Influence of Co-diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Patients With Fibromyalgia.

Sponsor
University of Extremadura (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05323838
Collaborator
(none)
140
1
29.2
4.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences in neuroimmunoendocrine response and quality of live in patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia, with or without a co-diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Subjective quality of live
  • Procedure: Blood extraction
  • Behavioral: Accelerometry

Detailed Description

The limited literature published in concordant relation affects the chronic fatigue syndrome comorbidity in the daily life of fibromyalgia patients leads us to design this study with the main objective of evaluating differences in the quality of life associated with pain and stress, mainly in relation to levels of physical activity, sedentary lifestyle and sleep in patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia, with or without a parallel co-diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
140 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Cross-Sectional
Official Title:
Influence of Co-diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Patients With Fibromyalgia on Physical Activity, Quality of Life and Immunoneuroendocrine Response.
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 9, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 22, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 16, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Control Healthy Women

Aged-matched control group of healthy women.

Behavioral: Subjective quality of live
The groups fill out scientifically validated questionnaires to know the differences in perceived stress, anxiety, quality of life, depression, quality of sleep, pain, fatigue, and impact of the disease on daily life.

Procedure: Blood extraction
Blood collection by qualified personnel.

Behavioral: Accelerometry
To know the objective differences between physical activity/sedentary lifestyle, caloric expenditure and quality of sleep, we used the accelerometry technique

Only Fibromyalgia

Patients diagnosed only with fibromyalgia.

Behavioral: Subjective quality of live
The groups fill out scientifically validated questionnaires to know the differences in perceived stress, anxiety, quality of life, depression, quality of sleep, pain, fatigue, and impact of the disease on daily life.

Procedure: Blood extraction
Blood collection by qualified personnel.

Behavioral: Accelerometry
To know the objective differences between physical activity/sedentary lifestyle, caloric expenditure and quality of sleep, we used the accelerometry technique

Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Behavioral: Subjective quality of live
The groups fill out scientifically validated questionnaires to know the differences in perceived stress, anxiety, quality of life, depression, quality of sleep, pain, fatigue, and impact of the disease on daily life.

Procedure: Blood extraction
Blood collection by qualified personnel.

Behavioral: Accelerometry
To know the objective differences between physical activity/sedentary lifestyle, caloric expenditure and quality of sleep, we used the accelerometry technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Differences in perceived anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) [During the intervention, at day 1.]

    State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived anxiety. The STAI has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. State anxiety items include: "I am tense; I am worried" and "I feel calm; I feel secure." Trait anxiety items include: "I worry too much over something that really doesn't matter" and "I am content; I am a steady person." All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

  2. Differences in perceived stress using The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) [During the intervention, at day 1.]

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived stress. This scale is a self- report instrument that evaluates the level of perceived stress during the last month, and consists of 14 items with a 5-point response scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = once in a while, 3 = often, 4 = very often). The total score of the PSS is obtained by reversing the scores of items 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 13 (in the following manner: 0 = 4, 1 = 3, 2 = 2, 3 = 1, and 4 = 0) and subsequently adding the 14 item scores. A higher score indicates a higher level of perceived stress.

  3. Differences in perceived depression using the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) [During the intervention, at day 1.]

    Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived depression. Each of the 21 items on the BDI measures the presence and severity of a symptom of depression by requiring a self-rating from 0 to 3. Mild (low) scores are less than 4; moderate (medium) is between 14 and 20, and severe 21 and above. Unless otherwise indicated, the use of "mild," "moderate," and "severe" levels of depression throughout the remainder of this chapter will refer to the aforementioned ranges.

  4. Differences in perceived pain using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) [During the intervention, at day 1.]

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a self-reported, scientifically validated questionnaire that measures perceived pain. The BPI starts with a screening question, asking about the presence of pain and a body chart is used to indicate painful regions as well as the worst region. These items aren´t evaluated. This is followed by the core BPI items: the rating scales for pain severity and interference. Numerical rating scales from 0 to 10 are used for all items. The anchors for pain severity scales are 0 = 'no pain' and 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine', whilst the interference anchors are 0 = 'no interference' and 10 = 'interferes completely'.

  5. Differences in perceived pain using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) [During the intervention, at day 1.]

    The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) has nine items, with the items measured on 0-10 numeric rating scales. Three items ask patients to rate the severity of their fatigue at its "worst," "usual," and"now" during normal waking hours, with 0 being "no fatigue" and 10 being "fatigue as bad as you can imagine." Six items assess the amount that fatigue has interfered with different aspects of the patient's life during the past 24 hours. The interference items include general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. The interference items are measured on a 0 -10 scale, with 0 beings "does not interfere" and 10 being "completely interferes."

  6. Differences in subjective quality of sleep using The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [During the intervention, at day 1.]

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality lndex (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if one is available). Only self-rated questions are included in the scoring. The 19 self-rated items are combined to form seven "component" scores, each of which has a range of 0-3 points. In all cases, a score of "0" indicates no difficulty, while a score of "3" indicates severe difficulty. The seven component scores are then added to yield one "global" score, with a range of 0-21 points, "0" indicating no difficulty and "21 " indicating severe difficulties in all areas.

  7. Differences in subjective quality of life using The Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control Questionnaire (HLPCQ) [During the intervention, at day 1.]

    The Healthy Lifestyle and Personal Control Questionnaire (HLPCQ) This is a 26-item tool in which the respondent is asked to indicate the frequency of adopting 26 positively stated lifestyle habits using a Likert-type scale (1=Never or rarely, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, and 4 = Always).

  8. Differences in perceived anxiety related to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) using the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) [During the intervention, at day 1.]

    The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale is a brief mental health screener that can be used to identify cases of dysfunctional anxiety related to COVID-19. The items measure physiologically-based symptoms that are aroused with coronavirus-related information and thoughts using a 5-point time anchored scale (0=not at all to 4=nearly every day over the last 2 weeks).

  9. Differences in fear of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) using the Fear COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) [During the intervention, at day 1.]

    The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) is used to identify and intervene early, psychologically, in people with high values of fear of COVID-19. This one-dimensional scale is made up of seven items with a 5-point Likert response ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) and the total tables can range between 7 and 35 points. The higher the score, the greater the fear of COVID-19 infection.

  10. Objective differences in physical activity, sedentary lifestyle and sleep using the accelerometer technique (ActiGraph) [Up to 1 week]

    An accelerometer is a small device, like a wristwatch, used to measure physical activity level, patterns of activity, sedentary levels, sleep patterns, and the expenditure of calories consumed, basal and total Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METs) used as an assessment of the metabolism of the person wearing it.

  11. Determination of immuno-neuroendocrine parameters (cytokines, catecholamines, and stress hormones) [Through study completion, an average of 2 year]

    Cytokines (IL-8, IL-10), catecholamines (such as epinephrine, and norepinephrine) as well as stress hormones (serotonin and cortisol), were analyzed by competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassays (ELISA)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
40 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Fibromyalgia and/or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome diagnosis by rheumatologists or internal medicine professionals.

  • Age not less than 40 years old and not more than 65 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Suffering from diagnosed "major depression".

  • Suffer diagnosed multiple chemical sensitivity.

  • Corticosteroid treatment or anti-cytokine therapies.

  • Periodically carry out programmed therapeutic physical activity in the two months prior to the accelerometry tests.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Extremadura Badajoz Spain 06006

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Extremadura

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Eduardo Otero Calderón, Staff Scientist, Research, University of Extremadura
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05323838
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • TesisEDUFM
First Posted:
Apr 12, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Apr 12, 2022
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 12, 2022