Factors Influencing the Results of Treatment in Patients With Hernias of Various Localizations

Sponsor
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05920200
Collaborator
(none)
4,000
1
71.7
55.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study attempts to quantify the relative risks for acute postoperative pain, complications rate, chronic postoperative pain (CPIP) and recurrence rate after different methods of repair of groin, umbilical and incisional hernia depending on surgical technique, mesh type and fixation suture material.

For this purpose the investigators will analyze data from the Kalinigrad Hernia Registry (KHR).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: open non-mesh hernia repair
  • Procedure: open mesh hernia repair
  • Procedure: MIS hernia repair

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
4000 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Factors Affecting the Results of Treatment of Patients With Hernias of Various Localization: Evaluation of Treatment Results Using an Automated Hernia Register
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 9, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Patients with groin and femoral hernia/IG

Procedure: open non-mesh hernia repair
A groin and femoral hernia non-mesh repair. An umbilical hernia non-mesh repair. A ventral and incisional hernia non-mesh repair.

Procedure: open mesh hernia repair
A groin and femoral hernia repair, reinforced by synthetic mesh. The mesh is affixed with sutures for Lichtenstein. Self-fixating mesh is also possible. An umbilical, ventral, incisional hernia repair, reinforced by synthetic mesh. The mesh is affixed with sutures.

Procedure: MIS hernia repair
A groin and femoral minimal invasive hernia repair (TAPP, eTEP). The mesh is affixed with tack/no-fixation. Self-fixation mesh is also possible. An umbilical, ventral, incisional minimal invasive hernia repair (eTEP, IPOM,). The mesh is affixed with tack and no-fixation .

Patients with umbilical hernia/IG

Procedure: open non-mesh hernia repair
A groin and femoral hernia non-mesh repair. An umbilical hernia non-mesh repair. A ventral and incisional hernia non-mesh repair.

Procedure: open mesh hernia repair
A groin and femoral hernia repair, reinforced by synthetic mesh. The mesh is affixed with sutures for Lichtenstein. Self-fixating mesh is also possible. An umbilical, ventral, incisional hernia repair, reinforced by synthetic mesh. The mesh is affixed with sutures.

Procedure: MIS hernia repair
A groin and femoral minimal invasive hernia repair (TAPP, eTEP). The mesh is affixed with tack/no-fixation. Self-fixation mesh is also possible. An umbilical, ventral, incisional minimal invasive hernia repair (eTEP, IPOM,). The mesh is affixed with tack and no-fixation .

Patients with ventral and incisional hernia/InG

Procedure: open non-mesh hernia repair
A groin and femoral hernia non-mesh repair. An umbilical hernia non-mesh repair. A ventral and incisional hernia non-mesh repair.

Procedure: open mesh hernia repair
A groin and femoral hernia repair, reinforced by synthetic mesh. The mesh is affixed with sutures for Lichtenstein. Self-fixating mesh is also possible. An umbilical, ventral, incisional hernia repair, reinforced by synthetic mesh. The mesh is affixed with sutures.

Procedure: MIS hernia repair
A groin and femoral minimal invasive hernia repair (TAPP, eTEP). The mesh is affixed with tack/no-fixation. Self-fixation mesh is also possible. An umbilical, ventral, incisional minimal invasive hernia repair (eTEP, IPOM,). The mesh is affixed with tack and no-fixation .

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Chronic postoperative pain rate and severity [1 year]

    The painDETECT questionnaire will be used to identify chronic postoperative pain. Final painDETECT Score: 20, indicating that a neuropathic pain component is likely (>90%).

  2. Recurrence rate [3 year]

    the overall frequency of recurrent hernias

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Treatment satisfaction rate [3 year]

    To assess the quality of life will be used Eura HS Quality of Life Scale-EuraHS QoL. EuraHS Qol - total (min - 0, max - 90) EuraHS Qol - pain (min - 0, max - 30) EuraHS Qol - restriction of activities (min - 0, max - 40) EuraHS Qol - cosmetic discomfort (min -0, max - 20) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • All mesh and non-mesh repairs that have been registered in the KHR from January 9, 2020, until December 31, 2023.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients not having a 11-digit state-assigned Personal insurance policy number.

  • Parastomal hernia;

  • infected hernias;

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Baltic Federal University Kaliningrad Kaliningrad Region Russian Federation 236041

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05920200
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HR202339
First Posted:
Jun 27, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jun 27, 2023
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 27, 2023