FOCUS: Effect of Oseltamivir on Cognitive Function in Subjects With Influenza
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study has been designed to determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in attention / working memory / processing speed / mood as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone. The cognitive tests employed are objective measures developed and administered online by HeadMinder Inc.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
Primary Objective:
To determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in attention as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone.
Secondary Objectives:
To determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in working memory and processing speed as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone.
Supportive Objectives:
-
To determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in self-rated alertness as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone.
-
To determine if subjects treated with oseltamivir in addition to standard of care treatment for influenza demonstrate a greater improvement in self-rated calmness and contentment as compared to subjects receiving standard of care alone.
-
To determine if there is a correlation between the rate of improvement in symptom scores and the rate of change in attention and working memory.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Oseltamivir Added to standard of care for influenza |
Drug: Oseltamivir
Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Standard of care alone Standard of care for influenza |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Attention Assessment [Change from baseline at Day 4]
Attention assessed using simple reaction time measured in milliseconds. Simple reaction time calculated as the mean of the following 2 sub-tests: Reaction Time Subtest Cued Reaction Time Subtest The lower the value, the better the attention.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in Working Memory Assessment [Change from baseline at Day 4]
Working memory assessed with the Dot Memory Test. The higher the value, the better the working memory.
- Change in Processing Speed Assessment [Change from baseline at Day 4]
Processing speed assessed with the animal number decoding subtest The lower the value, the better the processing speed
Other Outcome Measures
- Change in Mood Assessment [Change from baseline at Day 4]
Mood was assessed using the Bond-Lader 10 cm (100 mm) visual analogue scales for mood (16 scales in total); factored for alertness (mean of 9 scales), calmness (mean of 2 scales) and contentment (mean of 5 scales). The range in score for each scale and for each factor (alertness, calmness and contentment) was 0 - 100 mm. Each scale was anchored such that the lower the value, the better the mood.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adult men and women, 18 - 65 years of age (inclusive)
-
Indicative symptoms/signs of uncomplicated acute illness due to influenza infection (A or B strains) that started within a maximum of 2 days prior to Visit 1 as per the
TamifluĀ® Canadian product label. Signs and symptoms may include the following:
-
Fever
-
Respiratory symptoms (cough, coryza, sore throat, rhinitis)
-
Constitutional symptoms (headache, malaise, myalgia, sweats and/or chills, fatigue)
-
Positive rapid antigen test for influenza (A or B strains) at Visit 1
-
Negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 for women of childbearing potential; women of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use a suitable form of contraception during the study. Acceptable birth control measures include: hysterectomy, birth control pills, tubal ligation, intrauterine device, hormonal injections and implants, double barrier methods (such as a condom with a diaphragm or a condom with spermicide), and abstinence. Oral contraceptives must be in stable use for 2 or more cycles prior to screening. Intrauterine device (IUD) must be in use at least 30 days prior to study drug administration. Barrier methods must be in use at least 14 days prior to study drug administration.
-
Subjects must:
-
have daily access to a computer at home with: internet access (preferably high-speed for optimal performance but dial-up can be used as well); Microsoft operating system; Internet Explorer browser capability and an e-mail account. A Macintosh (Mac) computer cannot be used.
-
be capable of and willing to complete the required online assessments in English according to the protocol schedule
-
be willing to abstain from the use of an antiviral medication if they are randomised to the standard of care treatment arm
-
have provided written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
-
More than 2 days since the onset of influenza symptoms
-
Subjects who, in the Investigator's judgment, require treatment with an antiviral medication as per the Canadian "Clinical Recommendations for Patients Presenting with Respiratory Symptoms During the 2009 - 2010 Influenza Season" (see Appendix D)
-
Clinical suspicion of infection with a respiratory virus other than influenza
-
Any medical condition that is sufficiently severe or unstable such that the subject is considered to be at imminent risk of requiring hospitalisation
-
History of conditions that may potentially affect cognitive function during the study, such as underlying neurologic conditions, depression or depressive disorders (unless the condition and treatment have been stable for 3 months), seasonal affective disorder (SAD), or any other cognitive impairment or dementia
-
Intermittent use of sedative-hypnotics; subjects who have been taking a fixed dose of a sedative-hypnotic every day for a period of at least 30 days may be included provided that they continue the same regimen throughout the study.
-
Intermittent or chronic use of psychiatric medications (with the exception of antidepressants that have been stable for 3 months) or anti-epileptic drugs
-
Nursing home residents
-
Known allergy to oseltamivir phosphate or any of the inactive ingredients of TamifluĀ®
-
Women who are pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, or who are lactating
-
Current alcohol or drug abuse or substance dependence
-
Participation in another clinical trial with an investigational drug within the last 30 days
-
Patients vaccinated for influenza within 6 months of study enrollment
-
In the Investigator's judgment, the subject will not be able to adhere to the protocol requirements or is not suitable for study participation for any reason
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dr. Collette | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada | |
2 | Dr. Lai | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada | |
3 | Topsail Road Medical Clinic | St. John's | Newfoundland and Labrador | Canada | |
4 | Moran Medical Centre | Collingwood | Ontario | Canada | |
5 | Dr. Kanani | Etobicoke | Ontario | Canada | |
6 | Dr. Herman | London | Ontario | Canada | |
7 | Milestone Research | London | Ontario | Canada | |
8 | SKDS Research Inc | Newmarket | Ontario | Canada | |
9 | Family First Medical Centre | Orleans | Ontario | Canada | |
10 | Steeple Hill Medical Centre | Pickering | Ontario | Canada | L1V 2A6 |
11 | Dr. Martyn Chilvers - London Road Diagnostic Clinic and Medical Centre | Sarnia | Ontario | Canada | |
12 | Dr. Michael O'Mahony - London Road Diagnostic Clinic and Medical Centre | Sarnia | Ontario | Canada | |
13 | DCTM Clinical Trials Group Ltd. | Strathroy | Ontario | Canada | |
14 | Dr. Gupta | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | |
15 | Devonshire Clinical Research Inc. | Woodstock | Ontario | Canada | |
16 | Regina Medical Centre | Regina | Saskatchewan | Canada | S4P 3X1 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Trial Management Group Inc.
- Hoffmann-La Roche
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dr. O'Mahony, M.D., London Road Diagnostic Clinic and Medical Centre
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CAI-001-10
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Added to standard of care for influenza Oseltamivir: Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days | Standard of care for influenza |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 59 | 63 |
COMPLETED | 59 | 62 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Added to standard of care for influenza Oseltamivir: Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days | Standard of care for influenza | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 59 | 63 | 122 |
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ] | |||
Median (Full Range) [years] |
37.0
|
32.0
|
34.0
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
29
49.2%
|
33
52.4%
|
62
50.8%
|
Male |
30
50.8%
|
30
47.6%
|
60
49.2%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
1
1.7%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.8%
|
Asian |
12
20.3%
|
12
19%
|
24
19.7%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
1
1.7%
|
2
3.2%
|
3
2.5%
|
White |
43
72.9%
|
49
77.8%
|
92
75.4%
|
More than one race |
1
1.7%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.8%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1
1.7%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.8%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
Canada |
59
100%
|
63
100%
|
122
100%
|
Highest Education Level (Count of Participants) | |||
Grade 5 - 11 |
7
11.9%
|
3
4.8%
|
10
8.2%
|
High School Graduate |
12
20.3%
|
19
30.2%
|
31
25.4%
|
1 - 3 Years College |
20
33.9%
|
24
38.1%
|
44
36.1%
|
Bachelor's Degree |
16
27.1%
|
13
20.6%
|
29
23.8%
|
Post-Graduate |
4
6.8%
|
4
6.3%
|
8
6.6%
|
Current Smoker (Count of Participants) | |||
Count of Participants [Participants] |
7
11.9%
|
14
22.2%
|
21
17.2%
|
Time from Symptom Onset (hours) [Median (Full Range) ] | |||
Median (Full Range) [hours] |
33.8
|
36.7
|
35.0
|
Baseline Symptom Score (symptom score) [Median (Full Range) ] | |||
Median (Full Range) [symptom score] |
13
|
14
|
14
|
Body Temperature (Degrees centigrade) [Median (Full Range) ] | |||
Median (Full Range) [Degrees centigrade] |
38.1
|
38.1
|
38.1
|
Health Assessment Question (Score) [Median (Full Range) ] | |||
Median (Full Range) [Score] |
3
|
3
|
3
|
Influenza Type (Count of Participants) | |||
Strain A |
53
89.8%
|
52
82.5%
|
105
86.1%
|
Strain B |
6
10.2%
|
11
17.5%
|
17
13.9%
|
Cognitive/Mood Conditions (Count of Participants) | |||
None |
53
89.8%
|
60
95.2%
|
113
92.6%
|
ADHD |
0
0%
|
1
1.6%
|
1
0.8%
|
Anxiety |
1
1.7%
|
1
1.6%
|
2
1.6%
|
Depression |
5
8.5%
|
1
1.6%
|
6
4.9%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change in Attention Assessment |
---|---|
Description | Attention assessed using simple reaction time measured in milliseconds. Simple reaction time calculated as the mean of the following 2 sub-tests: Reaction Time Subtest Cued Reaction Time Subtest The lower the value, the better the attention. |
Time Frame | Change from baseline at Day 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomised subjects for whom data was collected at both baseline and Day 4. Oseltamivir group: baseline data available for 58 of 59 randomised subjects and Day 4 data for 53 subjects (53 subjects analysed). Standard of Care Alone group: baseline data available for 61 of 63 subjects and Day 4 data for 55 subjects (55 subjects analysed). |
Arm/Group Title | Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Added to standard of care for influenza Oseltamivir: Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days | Standard of care for influenza |
Measure Participants | 53 | 55 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [milliseconds] |
-70.0
(10.9)
|
-39.7
(10.9)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Oseltamivir, Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .0492 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Means Difference |
Estimated Value | -30.4 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -60.7 to -0.1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The LS means for Standard of Care Alone was subtracted from that of Oseltamivir. |
Title | Change in Working Memory Assessment |
---|---|
Description | Working memory assessed with the Dot Memory Test. The higher the value, the better the working memory. |
Time Frame | Change from baseline at Day 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomised subjects with data collected at both Baseline and Day 4. Oseltamivir Group: Baseline values collected for all randomized subjects (59); Day 4 data available for 54 subjects (54 analysed). Standard of Care Alone Group: Baseline values collected for all randomized subjects (63); Day 4 data available for 58 subjects (58 analysed) |
Arm/Group Title | Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Added to standard of care for influenza Oseltamivir: Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days | Standard of care for influenza |
Measure Participants | 54 | 58 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Number of correct answers] |
8.2
(0.95)
|
4.4
(0.94)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Oseltamivir, Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0054 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Means Difference |
Estimated Value | 3.8 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.14 to 6.42 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The LS means for Standard of Care Alone was subtracted from that of Oseltamivir. |
Title | Change in Processing Speed Assessment |
---|---|
Description | Processing speed assessed with the animal number decoding subtest The lower the value, the better the processing speed |
Time Frame | Change from baseline at Day 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized subjects for whom data was collected at both Baseline and Day 4. Oseltamivr Group: Baseline data available for all randomized subjects (59); Day 4 data available for 54 subjects (54 analysed). Standard of Care Alone Group: Baseline data available for all randomized subjects (63); Day 4 data available for 58 subjects (58 analysed). |
Arm/Group Title | Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Added to standard of care for influenza Oseltamivir: Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days | Standard of care for influenza |
Measure Participants | 54 | 58 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Millliseconds] |
-551.9
(77.6)
|
-555.8
(78.2)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Oseltamivir, Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .9685 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Means Difference |
Estimated Value | 3.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -190.1 to 197.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The LS means for Standard of Care Alone was subtracted from that of Oseltamivir. |
Title | Change in Mood Assessment |
---|---|
Description | Mood was assessed using the Bond-Lader 10 cm (100 mm) visual analogue scales for mood (16 scales in total); factored for alertness (mean of 9 scales), calmness (mean of 2 scales) and contentment (mean of 5 scales). The range in score for each scale and for each factor (alertness, calmness and contentment) was 0 - 100 mm. Each scale was anchored such that the lower the value, the better the mood. |
Time Frame | Change from baseline at Day 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomised subjects with data collected at both Baseline and Day 4. Baseline data was available for all randomized subjects in both groups; Day 4 data was available for 54 of 59 randomized subjects in the Oseltamivir Group (54 analysed) and for 58 of 63 randomized subjects in the Standard of Care Alone Group (58 analysed). |
Arm/Group Title | Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Added to standard of care for influenza Oseltamivir: Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days | Standard of care for influenza |
Measure Participants | 54 | 58 |
Change in Alertness Assessment |
19.1
(1.4)
|
17.2
(1.4)
|
Change in Calmness Assessment |
3.0
(1.3)
|
3.6
(1.2)
|
Change in Contentedness Assessment |
16.3
(1.5)
|
13.0
(1.5)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Oseltamivir, Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Comments | Alertness: the higher the value, the greater the alertness. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .3195 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Means Difference |
Estimated Value | 1.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.9 to 5.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The LS means for Standard of Care Alone was subtracted from that of Oseltamivir. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Oseltamivir, Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Comments | Calmness: the higher the value, the greater the calmness. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .7219 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Means Difference |
Estimated Value | -.6 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -4.1 to 2.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The LS means for Standard of Care AL one was subtracted from that of Oseltamivir. |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Oseltamivir, Standard of Care Alone |
---|---|---|
Comments | Contentedness: the higher the value, the greater the contentedness. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .1162 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Means Difference |
Estimated Value | 3.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -.8 to 7.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The LS means of Standard of Care Alone was subtracted from that of Oseltamivir. |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 14 days | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone | ||
Arm/Group Description | Added to standard of care for influenza Oseltamivir: Oseltamivir 75mg BID for 5 days | Standard of care for influenza | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/59 (0%) | 0/63 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Oseltamivir | Standard of Care Alone | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 8/59 (13.6%) | 8/63 (12.7%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Nausea | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/63 (0%) | 0 |
Diarrhoea | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 1/63 (1.6%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Bronchitis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/63 (0%) | 0 |
Pharyngitis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/63 (0%) | 0 |
Gastroenteritis viral | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/63 (0%) | 0 |
Pneumonia | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 2/63 (3.2%) | 2 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Fracture | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/63 (0%) | 0 |
Contusion | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 1/63 (1.6%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Headache | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 1/63 (1.6%) | 1 |
Dizziness | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/63 (0%) | 0 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Anxiety Disorder | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 1/63 (1.6%) | 1 |
Anger | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 1/63 (1.6%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Epistaxis | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 1/63 (1.6%) | 1 |
Oropharyngeal Pain | 0/59 (0%) | 0 | 1/63 (1.6%) | 1 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Rash | 2/59 (3.4%) | 4 | 1/63 (1.6%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
If Sponsor has not submitted a manuscript for publication for this multi-center study within 12 months of study completion/termination, the PI will be free to publish separately. Sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications for up to 90 days if the proposed publication contains information relating to patentable items. If Sponsor believes proposed communications contain any confidential information, Sponsor has the right to remove it.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Joanne Morris, Clinical Research Quality Manager |
---|---|
Organization | Trial Management Group Inc. |
Phone | 4169297717 |
joanne@tmginvestigators.com |
- CAI-001-10