The WISE Trial - Walking Improvement for SCI With Exoskeleton
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
A randomized, controlled trial comparing exoskeleton gait training with standard gait training or no gait training in community-dwelling participants with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Community dwelling iSCI participants may improve clinical gait function by engaging in a gait training regimen, where robotic exoskeletons can readily deliver a precise dose and simultaneously reduce the physical stress imposed on therapists using conventional manually assisted stepping practice. Exoskeleton training is predicted to improve function in participants receiving usual care, but not superior to intensity-matched manual training. The rationale to implement exoskeleton robotics as preference in gait training is based on precision dosing, over-ground training, and reduced therapist burden for high repetition training.
The investigators aim to demonstrate that Ekso exoskeleton training can significantly improve gait speed in stable chronic, community-dwelling incomplete SCI (iSCI) participants. The objectives of this study are the following:
A. Primary Objective:
To demonstrate that a 12 week robotic gait training regimen can lead to a clinically meaningful improvement in independent gait speed on the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) in community dwelling participants with chronic iSCI.
B. Secondary Objectives:
-
To examine the economic factors such as number of physical therapists/staff required during training.
-
To analyze the physical burden on therapists assisting and supervising during training.
-
To study the influence of factors that may modify the gait recovery in the chronic incomplete SCI population (demographic, clinical, functional, psychological, balance, etc.).
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group 1: Ekso GT Rehabilitation Therapy Participants in this group receive Ekso GT (gait training) PT therapy intervention 3 times per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions). Intervention: Ekso GT Rehabilitation therapy |
Device: Ekso GT Rehabilitation Therapy
Walking Improvement for Spinal Cord Injuries with Exoskeleton
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Group 2: Active controls - BWSTT Therapy Participants in this group receive a matched number of sessions of standard gait training using body-weight supported treadmill training and overground training. Intervention: Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training |
Device: Body Weight Supported (BWS) Treadmill Training
Standard gait training using BWS PT and overground training
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Group 3: Passive controls Participants in this group continue with normal daily activities over 12 weeks. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) [Baseline and 12 Weeks]
The mean increase in gait speed demonstrated during the 10MWT after 12 weeks of training and compared between groups.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) [Baseline and evaluations week 6,12, 24]
10MWT: Number of participants who achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 0.15 m/s 21 during the 10MWT. Number of participants who transition from exercise or household ambulation (defined as a walking speed of < 0.44 meters/second) to limited community or full community ambulation (> 0.44 meter/second) during the 10MWT. Time point of recovery at which participants reach the MCID and/or community ambulation speeds of > 0.44 meters/second.
- International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) Exam - Full Exam for Classification [Baseline and week 12]
Number of participants who convert from American Spinal Cord Injury Association (AIS) C to AIS D.
- International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) Exam - Full Exam for Scoring [Baseline and week 12]
Motor and sensory scores
- Participant Quality of Life [Baseline and evaluations week 6, 12, 24]
International SCI Quality of Life Basic Data Set. Depression scores using the Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D 10).
- Numeric Pain Rating Scale [Weeks 1-12]
Numeric Pain Rating Scale for self-reported neuropathic pain upon resting and during gait training.
- Therapist Outcomes [Weeks 1-12]
Number of therapists/staff required for each active group as well as set-up/donning time for cost effectiveness of the two active therapies.
- 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12, and 24]
Measurement of endurance, level of assistance and assistive devices needed and distance walked
- Timed Up and Go (TUG) [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12, and 24]
Test of basic mobility skills. Balance during sit-to-stand, walking, turning, and stand-to-sit.
- Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12, and 24]
Measurement of the ability of an individual to complete a locomotor task in a standardized environment. Score for need of assistive devices.
- Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulatory Index (SCI-FAI) [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12, and 24]
Quality assessment of gait pattern
- Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III, Mobility subscale) [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12, and 24]
Mobility subscale for ability to perform transfers and walking different distances.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12, and 24]
General health measure.
- Upper and Lower Extremity Muscle Strength [Baseline, Evaluations week 6 and 24]
As measured by physical therapist for muscle strength.
- Spinal Cord Assessment Tool for Spastic Reflexes (SCATS) Modified Ashworth Scale [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12, and 24]
Spasticity measurement.
- Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity Evaluation Tool (SCI-SET) [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12, 24]
Participant reported spasticity measurement.
- Numeric Rating of Spasticity [Baseline and weekly assessments for 12 weeks]
Participant reported spasticity measurement.
- Heart Rate [Baseline, Weekly training sessions 1 - 12, Evaluations week 6, 12 and 24]
Physiological outcomes: heart rate
- Participant Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (Borg) [Baseline and weekly assessments for 12 weeks, Evaluations week 6, 12 and 24]
Self-reported perceived exertion.
- Modified International SCI Bowel Function Basic Data Set [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12 and 24]
Participant assessment of bowel function
- Modified International SCI Lower Urinary Tract Basic Data Set [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12 and 24]
Participant lower urinary tract assessment and incidence of urinary track infections.
- Incidence of Pressure Ulcers [Baseline, each training session 1 through 36.]
Skin integrity check.
- Incidence of Falls [Each training session 1 through 36, Evaluations week 6, 12 and 24]
Assessed at each visit via participant report.
- Incidence of Hospitalization and/or Unexpected Physician Visits [Each training session 1 through 36, Evaluations week 6, 12 and 24]
Assessed at each visit via participant report.
- Therapist Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (Borg) [Weeks 1 through 12]
Self-reported perceived exertion.
- Therapist National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Task Load Index [Weeks 1 through 12]
Self-reported work load assessment.
- Participant National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Task Load Index [Weeks 1 through 12]
Self-reported work load assessment.
- Video Assessment of Physical Therapist Posture [Week 1 and Week 12]
Independent assessment of shoulder, neck, and trunk posture.
- Therapist Report of Pain and/or Injury [Up to Week 12]
Therapist self-reported questionnaire.
- Blood Pressure [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12 and 24]
Physiological outcomes: blood pressure
- Gait Quality [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12 and 24]
GAITRite for temporospatial gait parameters and symmetry
- Berg Balance Scale [Baseline, Evaluations week 6, 12 and 24]
Measurement of static and dynamic sitting and standing balance
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Motor incomplete paraplegia or tetraplegia
-
Neurological level of injury (NLI) C1- approximately T10 (inclusive, for upper motor neuron injuries only), as determined by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
-
Sufficient diaphragmatic strength such that respiration is not compromised with exercise.
-
Sufficient upper extremity strength to use a front wheeled walker either by manual muscle testing (minimum triceps strength bilaterally of 3/5, shoulder abduction/adduction and flexion/extension 4/5)
-
AIS-C SCI & AIS-D SCI, as determined by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
-
Ambulates at <0.44 meters/second with or without physical assistance and assistance device
-
WISCI ≥ 1
-
18 - 75 yrs, inclusive
-
No current or history of other neurological conditions
-
Screened and cleared by a physician
-
Involved in standing program or must be able to tolerate at least 15 min upright
-
Weigh 220 pounds (100kg) or less
-
Be able to fit into the Ekso device
-
Approximately between 5'0" and 6'4" tall
-
Standing hip width of approximately 18" or less
-
Have near normal range of motion in hips, knees and ankles
Exclusion Criteria:
-
AIS-A SCI or AIS-B SCI
-
Lower motor neuron injuries, as shown by absent reflexes during bilateral quadriceps and Achilles tendon taps
-
< 3 months since previous intensive gait training regimen
-
Already walking at self-selected ambulation speeds of at least 0.44 meter/second with or without assistance
-
Currently involved in another intervention study
-
Concurrent neurological disease
-
Hip flexion contracture greater than ~17°
-
Knee flexion contracture greater than 12°
-
Unable to achieve neutral ankle dorsiflexion with passive stretch (neutral with max 12° knee flexion)
-
Leg length discrepancy
-
Greater than 0.5" for upper leg
-
Greater than 0.75" for lower leg
-
Spinal instability
-
Unresolved deep vein thrombosis
-
Uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia
-
Severe muscular or skeletal pain
-
Spasticity that prevents joint motion (severe stiffness or rigidity,) where both legs have a Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) score of 3 or higher for half or more of their proximal lower extremity muscles; proximal muscles include hip flexors/extensors/adductors and knee flexors/extensors.
-
Open skin ulcerations on buttocks or other body surfaces in contact with exoskeleton or harness
-
Pregnancy
-
Cognitive impairments - unable to follow 2 steps commands and communicate for pain or to stop session
-
Shoulder extension Range of Motion (ROM) < 50° excludes crutches during sit to stand or vice versa. (Walking with crutches permitted.)
-
Participant requires the assistance of more than one therapist to transfer safely.
-
Uncontrolled or severe orthostatic hypotension that limits standing tolerance; defined as sustained, symptomatic drops in systolic and diastolic blood pressure when moving from sitting to standing
-
Active heterotrophic ossification (HO), hip dysplasia or hip/knee axis abnormalities
-
Colostomy
-
History of long bone fractures since the SCI, secondary to osteoporosis
-
Unable to sustain current medication regimen
-
Any reason the physician may deem as harmful to the participant to enroll or continue in the study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Barrow Neurological Institute at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | 85013 |
2 | Gaylord Hospital | Wallingford | Connecticut | United States | 06492 |
3 | Shirley Ryan AbilityLab | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60611 |
4 | Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital | Wheaton | Illinois | United States | 60187 |
5 | Kennedy Kruger Institute | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21211 |
6 | Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan | Detroit | Michigan | United States | 48201 |
7 | Courage Kenny Research Center | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | 55407 |
8 | Kessler Foundation | West Orange | New Jersey | United States | 07052 |
9 | Burke Medical Research Institute | White Plains | New York | United States | 10605 |
10 | TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ekso Bionics
- Burke Medical Research Institute
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dylan Edwards, PhD, Burke Medical Research Institute
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Forrest GF, Hutchinson K, Lorenz DJ, Buehner JJ, Vanhiel LR, Sisto SA, Basso DM. Are the 10 meter and 6 minute walk tests redundant in patients with spinal cord injury? PLoS One. 2014 May 1;9(5):e94108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094108. eCollection 2014.
- Gad PN, Gerasimenko YP, Zdunowski S, Sayenko D, Haakana P, Turner A, Lu D, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Iron 'ElectriRx' man: Overground stepping in an exoskeleton combined with noninvasive spinal cord stimulation after paralysis. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:1124-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318563.
- Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Crew J, Moran S, Shah A. Safety and feasibility of using the EksoTM bionic exoskeleton to aid ambulation after spinal cord injury. Spine. 2013 doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.S4-003
- Kozlowski AJ, Bryce TN, Dijkers MP. Time and Effort Required by Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Learn to Use a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Spring;21(2):110-21. doi: 10.1310/sci2102-110. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
- Kressler J, Thomas CK, Field-Fote EC, Sanchez J, Widerström-Noga E, Cilien DC, Gant K, Ginnety K, Gonzalez H, Martinez A, Anderson KD, Nash MS. Understanding therapeutic benefits of overground bionic ambulation: exploratory case series in persons with chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Oct;95(10):1878-1887.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.026. Epub 2014 May 17.
- Sale P, Russo EF, Russo M, Masiero S, Piccione F, Calabrò RS, Filoni S. Effects on mobility training and de-adaptations in subjects with Spinal Cord Injury due to a Wearable Robot: a preliminary report. BMC Neurol. 2016 Jan 28;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0536-0.
- Stampacchia G, Rustici A, Bigazzi S, Gerini A, Tombini T, Mazzoleni S. Walking with a powered robotic exoskeleton: Subjective experience, spasticity and pain in spinal cord injured persons. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 27;39(2):277-83. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161358.
- 105333