FISIO: Efficacy and Safety of Administration of High Levels of Protein to Critically Ill Patients.

Sponsor
Spanish Society of Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05918757
Collaborator
(none)
200
18
2
23
11.1
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Critically ill patients are known to develop serious nutritional deterioration during the course of their disease. They develop, from the beginning, a multifactorial protein malnutrition that relates to a poor clinical course and the development of weakness. Due to the increased protein catabolism in this type of patient, there is a rapid degradation of muscle mass and loss of functional proteins, and therefore nutritional support is mandatory. Indeed, achieving a high protein intake may promote a better evolution of the critically ill patient, i.e., maintenance of muscle protein, less deterioration of muscle strength, lower Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW), lower mortality, decrease in the number of infections, decrease in days on mechanical ventilation, and days of hospital stay and in ICU.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the appearance and degree of ICUAW in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation treated with two different doses of protein (1.5 g/kg/day vs.1.0 g/kg/day).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Protein dose 1.5 g/kg/day
  • Other: Protein dose 1.0 g/kg/day
N/A

Detailed Description

It is known that protein metabolism is altered in critically ill patients due to metabolic alterations derived from stress. This critical situation is manifested by a severe catabolic alteration, especially in the first week, which is fundamentally characterized by severe glucose intolerance and the use of the protein itself as a metabolic substrate.

Despite protein synthesis is increased, this is insufficient to compensate for the high protein degradation rate, which leads, among others, to muscle deterioration resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. This muscle destruction has been implicated in the early appearance of Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW). Although the pathophysiology of ICUAW is multifactorial, protein intake may play an key role in its treatment. However, protein intake cannot reduce muscle destruction, but it can stimulate protein synthesis.

Current evidence supports that the administration of early artificial nutritional support with a high protein intake can improve the clinical course of critically ill patients. However, there is still no consensus on the exact amount of protein needed to be administered to these patients in order to reduce adverse outcomes and prevent ICUAW.

Thus the aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a nutritional supplementation containing 1.5 g of protein/kg/day vs 1.0 g of protein /kg/day in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation on the development and degree of ICUAW.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Within 48 hours, intensive care patients on expected invasive mechanical ventilation of at least three days are allocated into two groups receiving enteral/parenteral nutrition with 1.5 g of protein/kg/day or 1.0 g of protein/kg/day as an active comparator.Within 48 hours, intensive care patients on expected invasive mechanical ventilation of at least three days are allocated into two groups receiving enteral/parenteral nutrition with 1.5 g of protein/kg/day or 1.0 g of protein/kg/day as an active comparator.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nutritional Administration of 1.5 g of Protein/kg/Day Versus 1.0 g of Protein/kg/Day in the Catabolic Phase of Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Protein dose 1.5 g/kg/day

Administration of 1.5 g of protein/kg/day in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation

Other: Protein dose 1.5 g/kg/day
Administration of 1.5 g of protein/kg/day via enteral/parenteral nutrition

Active Comparator: Protein dose 1.0 g/kg/day

Administration of 1.0 g of protein/kg/day in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation

Other: Protein dose 1.0 g/kg/day
Administration of 1.0 g of protein/kg/day via enteral/parenteral nutrition

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change of intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW). [Baseline, weekly in ICU up to 28 days after mechanical ventilation termination, throughout hospital stay, an expected average of 6 weeks, and 90 days after hospital discharge.]

    Determined by Medical Research Council sum score (MRC-SS). Diagnosis of ICUAW if MRC-SS < 48 (maximun score 60).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Muscle Strength. [Up to 6 months.]

    Dynamometry.

  2. Active mobility. [Up to 6 months.]

    Determined by Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale (ICUMS). Scored from 0 to 10 being 0 no activity, lying in bed, and 10 walking independently without a gait aid.

  3. Nosocomial infections. [Throughout hospital stay, an expected average of 6 weeks.]

    Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC).

  4. Mechanical ventilation. [Up to 1 month.]

    Number of days receiving mechanical ventilation.

  5. Gastrointestinal complications. [Throughout hospital stay, an expected average of 6 weeks.]

    Gastric residual volume, diarrhea, vomiting or regurgitation, abdominal distension, constipation.

  6. Metabolic complications. [Throughout hospital stay, an expected average of 6 weeks.]

    Glycemia, fluid intake, electrolytes/trace element determination, hypertriglyceridemia, liver disfunction, cholestasis, necrosis or mixed dysfunction, overfeeding.

  7. Mortality rate. [Up to 6 months.]

  8. Length of ICU and hospital stay. [Throughout hospital stay, an expected average of 6 weeks.]

    Number of days of hospitalization.

  9. Quality of life index. [Up to 6 months.]

    European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Scored from 0 to 100 being 0 the worst health imaginable and 100 the best health imaginable.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Critically ill patient

  • ICU admission during the previous 48h

  • Patients on expected invasive mechanical ventilation for three days

  • Patients with a minimum expected duration of clinical nutrition of at least seven days

  • Written informed consent signed by the patient or the patient's legally authorized representative.

  • Available central venous access for continuous infusion of the study drugs.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Denied informed consent

  • Acute renal failure (renal injury stage 3)

  • Liver failure (cirrhosis or Child-Pugh Scale > 5)

  • Severe liver failure with International Normalized Ratio (INR) > 1.7 (prothrombin time

50%) and encephalopathy

  • Patients with COVID-19-derived pneumonia

  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40 or < 18.5 (morbid obesity or previous caloric malnutrition)

  • Pregnant patients

  • Central Nervous System pathologies (Glasgow < 6)

  • Peripheral Nervous System pathologies interfering with study evaluations

  • Patients with cognitive dysfunction/dementia or unable to follow instructions regarding MRC tests

  • Severe muscular pathology

  • Already participating in another clinical trial

  • Impossibility to contact after ICU discharge to carry out the follow-up visit on day 90

  • Known hypersensitivity to milk protein or any of the components of the nutritional supplement

  • Inborn errors in the amino acid metabolism

  • Previous inclusion in the present study

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona Barcelona Spain 08916
2 Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge L'Hospitalet De Llobregat Barcelona Spain 08907
3 Hospital General Universitario de Castellón Castelló de la Plana Castelló Spain 12004
4 Hospital Universitario de Badajoz Badajoz Extremadura Spain 06080
5 Hospital de Barbastro Barbastro Huesca Spain 22300
6 Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada Fuenlabrada Madrid Spain 28942
7 Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina Parla MAdrid Spain 28981
8 Hospital de Manacor Manacor Mallorca Spain 07500
9 Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía Cartagena Murcia Spain 30202
10 Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca El Palmar Murcia Spain 30120
11 Hospital General Universitario Los Arcos del Mar Menor Pozo Aledo Murcia Spain 30739
12 Hospital Universitario Doctor Josep Trueta Girona Spain 17007
13 Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio Granada Spain 18016
14 Hospital Universitario San Jorge Huesca Spain 22004
15 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain 28041
16 Hospital Universitario La Paz Madrid Spain 28046
17 Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer Murcia Spain 30008
18 Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga Málaga Spain 29010

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Spanish Society of Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: María Carmen Sánchez Álvarez, PhD, Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICyUC)
  • Principal Investigator: Juan Francisco Fernández Ortega, PhD, Hospital Regional de Malaga

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Spanish Society of Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05918757
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ASF1
  • 2021-002329-56
First Posted:
Jun 26, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jun 26, 2023
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Spanish Society of Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 26, 2023