ALGOPLUS LE: International Validation Study Of The Algoplus Scale In Five Languages

Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02018614
Collaborator
Dr M Fisher Dr. Ulrike Bornschlegel (Other), Dr M Schuler (Other), Dr Pat Schofield (Other), Dr D Lussier (Other), Dr S Gibson (Other), Dr Joan ESPAULELLA PANICOT (Other), Dr Joan Manuel PEREZ CASTEJON (Other), Gambassi, Giovanni, M.D. (Other), Dr Patrizio ODETTI (Other), Dr Fiametta MONACELLI (Other), University Hospital, Grenoble (Other), Dr Hirondina GUARDA, Dr Sónia SANTOS (Other), Dr Gisèle PICKERING (Other), Dr Valérie LEGOUT (Other), Dr Patrice Rat (Other), Dr Bernard WARY (Other)
250
1
12
20.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Acute pain is responsible for unnecessary suffering. Among elderly patients, acute pain is frequent and underestimated, especially when these patients have cognitive disorders. The expression of pain is then modified and the conventional tools for evaluating pain cannot be used. Thus the existence of pain must be detected on the basis of a behavioural assessment.

It is nonetheless necessary to have the assistance of standardised and validated tools. In France, the Doloplus Group has proposed a scale called Doloplus, validated in January 1999, and is now proposing a new scale for acute pain, Algoplus that has been validated in French (4). Doloplus has been recently translated and validated in 5 languages and an identical methodology will be used in this protocol.

Internationally, although several teams are working on the development of scales that can be used for non-communicating elderly subjects, there is as yet no validated tool for acute pain assessment.

Considering 1- the lack of tools at an international level and 2- the frequent request from many practitioners worldwide, the Doloplus group has offered to validate the Algoplus® scale in 5 foreign languages, English, German, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese. A rigorous methodology with the help of a statistician will be used in this validation process.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: algoplus

Detailed Description

50 patients per language will be explored : t1 = time t Physician M Physician N t2 = time t+4 hours Physician M

The methodology of the validation of our translation procedure consists of studying the reliability of the scale in two major steps:

  • Data from a sample of 50 patients will be used to explore the test-retest reliability of the scale administered by the same trained clinician, on two occasions four hours apart, without any treatment in between. The ALGOPLUS® scores obtained from the patients at a time t will be compared with their (t + 4 hours) scores to assess test-retest reliability.

  • For a sample of at least 50 patients, two physicians trained for the use of ALGOPLUS, will assess pain independently. A statistical test will be used to compare the results for the inter-rater reliability.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
250 participants
Time Perspective:
Cross-Sectional
Official Title:
INTERNATIONAL VALIDATION STUDY OF THE ALGOPLUS SCALE IN FIVE LANGUAGES
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2014
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2014
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
testretest relaibility

Data from a sample of 50 patients will be used to explore the test-retest reliability of the scale administered by the same trained clinician, on two occasions four hours apart, without any treatment in between. The ALGOPLUS® scores obtained from the patients at a time t will be compared with their (t + 4 hours) scores to assess test-retest reliability

Other: algoplus

statistical test

For a sample of at least 50 patients, two physicians trained for the use of ALGOPLUS, will assess pain independently. A statistical test will be used to compare the results for the inter-rater reliability

Other: algoplus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Inter-rater scale and intra-rater comparisons of the filled Algoplus® scale. [at time 1 (Physician N and M), at time 2 (t+4 hours) by physician M.]

    The scale includes five items (facial expression, sight expression, complaints, bodily attitudes and finally the general behaviour).. The presence of one behaviour in each of the items is sufficient to score "yes" for the item under consideration. Each item marked "yes" is scored one point and the sum of the items provides a total score out of five

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
    • males or females aged 65 or above 65, with communication disorders
  • with or without suspected acute pain

Exclusion Criteria:
    • are too agitated,
  • have acute pain needing immediate pain management,

  • change of treatment between the two evaluations ( t and t+4 hours ),

  • refuse to participate

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU de Clermont-Ferrand Clermont-Ferrand France 63003

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
  • Dr M Fisher Dr. Ulrike Bornschlegel
  • Dr M Schuler
  • Dr Pat Schofield
  • Dr D Lussier
  • Dr S Gibson
  • Dr Joan ESPAULELLA PANICOT
  • Dr Joan Manuel PEREZ CASTEJON
  • Gambassi, Giovanni, M.D.
  • Dr Patrizio ODETTI
  • Dr Fiametta MONACELLI
  • University Hospital, Grenoble
  • Dr Hirondina GUARDA, Dr Sónia SANTOS
  • Dr Gisèle PICKERING
  • Dr Valérie LEGOUT
  • Dr Patrice Rat
  • Dr Bernard WARY

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gisèle PICKERING, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02018614
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CHU-0172
First Posted:
Dec 23, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Jul 8, 2014
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2014
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 8, 2014