Web Based Intervention to Reduce Weight Bias Among Dietitians

Sponsor
Texas Tech University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04177784
Collaborator
(none)
166
1
3
3.3
51

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Weight bias in dietitians is prevalent and may affect patient care. The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial to test if explicit and implicit bias could be influenced by a short, 20 minute educational video.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Online Educational Videos
N/A

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial studied the effect of three different videos on weight bias in a nationally representative sample of dietitians. The "intervention" group (I) watched a video about the etiology of obesity, reasons for weight regain, and how to talk to patients about weight. The first "control" group (C1) received information about the role of the environment and individual behavior in weight gain, and tools to help patients control their weight. The second control group (C2) received a weight neutral video about the role of dieticians in society. Bias measures were taken before and just after watching the video, and again one month later.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
166 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
Participants were told they would be participating in a study that aims to determine the effectiveness of online education in dietitians. They were unaware that determining the effect of the videos on weight bias was the objective of the study.
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Web Based Intervention to Reduce Weight Bias Among Dietitians
Actual Study Start Date :
May 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 8, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 8, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intervention (I)

This arm was randomized to a 20 min video that emphasized information about factors other than individual behaviors that influence weight, weight loss and ability to maintain weight. It also indirectly addressed weight bias by explaining how to have conversation about weight and health with a patient with obesity that is free of biases.

Other: Online Educational Videos
The videos were developed by the researchers based on a prior study to test if specific information about obesity and weight control influence weight bias.

Active Comparator: Weight Control (C1)

This arm was randomized to a 20 min video that emphasized the controllable aspects of weight and gave dietitians an overview of a tool to help plan and monitor weight loss.

Other: Online Educational Videos
The videos were developed by the researchers based on a prior study to test if specific information about obesity and weight control influence weight bias.

Placebo Comparator: Weight Neutral Control (C2)

The arm was randomized to a 20 min video about the role dietitians play in society, that made no mention of weight or obesity.

Other: Online Educational Videos
The videos were developed by the researchers based on a prior study to test if specific information about obesity and weight control influence weight bias.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in "Blame" explicit bias [Change from pre to immediately post intervention (1 hour)]

    "Blame" subscore of Anti-fat Attitudes Test, higher score means more bias

  2. Change in "Blame" explicit bias [Change from pre to 1 month post intervention]

    "Blame" subscore of Anti-fat Attitudes Test, higher score means more bias

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in "Social" explicit bias [Change from pre to immediately post intervention (1 hour)]

    "Social" subscore of Anti-fat Attitudes Test, higher score means more bias

  2. Change in "Social" explicit bias [Change from pre to 1 month post intervention]

    "Social" subscore of Anti-fat Attitudes Test, higher score means more bias

  3. Change in "Physical" explicit bias [Change from pre to immediately post intervention (1 hour)]

    "Physical" subscore of Anti-fat Attitudes Test, higher score means more bias

  4. Change in "Physical" explicit bias [Change from pre to 1 month post intervention]

    "Physical" subscore of Anti-fat Attitudes Test, higher score means more bias

  5. Change in Implicit Bias [Change from pre to immediately post intervention (1 hour)]

    Category of bias from Weight Implicit Association Test; Categories 1-4, higher category means more bias

  6. Change in Implicit Bias [Change from pre to 1 month post intervention]

    Category of bias from Weight Implicit Association Test; Categories 1-4, higher category means more bias

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Any dietitian in the Clinical Dietitian Registry Database.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • None

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Texas Tech University Lubbock Texas United States 79409

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Texas Tech University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Emily Dhurandhar, Assistant Professor, Texas Tech University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04177784
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB2019-321
First Posted:
Nov 26, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Jan 10, 2020
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 10, 2020