Efficiency and Safety Study of Pamidronate in Inflammatory Back Pain Due to Degenerative Disk Disease

Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01799616
Collaborator
INSERM CIC 501 (Other)
48
1
2
25.9
1.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether pamidronate is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of painful degenerative disk disease, also known as Modic type 1 changes

Detailed Description

Erosive degenerative disk disease, also known as Modic type 1 changes, is usually characterized by low back pain, with an inflammatory pain pattern, as seen in spondylarthropathies. Intravenous pamidronate has proven effective in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, and in painful bone diseases in general. We therefore hypothesized that pamidronate would be effective in treating back pain associated with Modic type 1 changes.

This study aimed to determine pamidronate's efficiency in reducing pain, with the primary outcome being a between-group difference of 30 points on a 100mm VAS at 3 months. Secondary outcomes are the improvement in functional status and the drug's tolerance. Primary and secondary outcome criteria will be assessed at each visit (inclusion, at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months). If the primary goal is not attained, a rigid or semi-rigid back brace will be proposed to the patient, regardless of the treatment group.

In total, 48 patients will need to be recruited. These patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, with each group comprising 24 patients: one group will be given pamidronate and the other placebo. Pamidronate will be administered at a dose of 90mg per day, 2 days in a row, and every patient, regardless of the treatment group, will be given paracetamol, in order to maintain blinding by preventing drug-induced fever.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
48 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Pamidronate

In total, 48 patients will need to be recruited. These patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, with each group comprising 24 patients: one group will be given pamidronate and the other placebo

Drug: Pamidronate

Other: Placebo

In total, 48 patients will need to be recruited. These patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, with each group comprising 24 patients: one group will be given pamidronate and the other placebo

Other: Placebo

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. back pain assessed on a100mm VAS [at 3 months]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. - Functional status using EIFEL, Dallas, FABQ, MacTar, and MCII/PASS questionnaires [at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months]

  2. Back stiffness assessed by Schober's test and finger-to-floor distance [at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months]

  3. Inflammatory pain pattern [at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months]

    Inflammatory pain pattern: number of nightly awakenings, as well as duration and intensity of morning stiffness on a 100mm VAS

  4. assess the efficacy of a rigid back brace in treating back pain [at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months]

    In case of failure to reduce the pain with pamidronate at 3 months: assess the efficacy of a rigid back brace in treating back pain

  5. Tolerance based on the number and types of side-effects [at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age from 18 to 60 years old
  • Low back pain

  • Daily pain since at least 3 months

  • VAS for pain > 40/100 during the last 48 hours

  • Inefficiency, intolerance, or contraindication to NSAIDS

  • Inefficiency of a rigid or half-rigid back brace

  • Modic 1 discopathy (diagnosed on MRI and confirmed by trained radiologist)

  • Dental check-up within the last 6 months

  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
    • Static disorders of the spine
  • Contraindication to pamidronate (hypocalcemia, severe kidney failure, or allergy)

  • Underage patients, patients under the protection of the law

  • Previous treatment with bisphosphonates

  • Pregnancy

  • Local or general infection

  • Previous discal surgery

  • Systemic corticosteroid therapy in the last month

  • Epidural or facet joint corticosteroid injection in the last month

  • History of septic spondylodiscitis

  • Ankylosing spondylitis

  • Low back pain associated with radiculalgia

  • Active psychiatric disorder

  • Inability to read or understand French

  • Body temperature above 38°C (fever) or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate above 20mm/hour

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU Clermont-Ferrand Clermont-Ferrand France 63003

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
  • INSERM CIC 501

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin SOUBRIER, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01799616
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CHU-0148
  • 2012-003569-16
First Posted:
Feb 27, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Feb 27, 2013
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2013

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 27, 2013