ABPBCAETRA: Application of Brachial Plexus Block in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Aneurysm Embolization Via Transradial Approach

Sponsor
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06035692
Collaborator
Xuzhou Central Hospital (Other), Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital (Other), The First People's Hospital of Changzhou (Other), Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital (Other)
120
1
2
13
9.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and mechanism of brachial plexus block(BPB) preconditioning in preventing upper limb vascular injury in patients undergoing interventional surgery for intracranial aneurysms via transradial access(TRA). A multicenter prospective clinical trial was designed. The study subjects were patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm embolization with TRA. BPB was given in the experimental group patients and no BPB in the control group. To evaluate the short and long-term protective effects of brachial plexus block on the upper limb blood vessels injury after operation, the upper limb vasospasm and hemodynamic changes during operation, upper limb vascular thrombosis and radial artery occlusion after operation were observed in the two groups.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and mechanism of BPB preconditioning in preventing upper limb vascular injury in patients undergoing interventional surgery for intracranial aneurysms viaTRA. A multicenter prospective clinical trial was designed, and the study subjects were patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm embolization with TRA. The experimental group was givenBPB, and the control group was not given BPB.Firstly, the minimum effective concentration (MEC50 and MEC95) of BPB for preventing radial artery spasm was determined by sequential method. Then the experimental group patients was treated with MEC95.The hemodynamic changes and spasm of the upper limb vessels during the operation, and the complications such as thrombosis of the upper limb vessels and radial artery occlusion after the operation were compared between the two groups, to evaluate the short-term and long-term protective effects of BPB on upper limb vascular injury in those patients.The content of IL-2,IL-4,IL-6,IL-10,IL-17,IL-12p70,IFN-γ,TNF-α in plasma was determined by flow immunofluorescence before and after operation, to compare the changes of inflammatory cytokines between the two groups.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This is a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study.Patients were assigned to the two groups with the use of central randomization and competitive enrollment. The experimental group was given brachial plexus block 30 minutes before surgery, and the control group was given routine treatment.This is a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study.Patients were assigned to the two groups with the use of central randomization and competitive enrollment. The experimental group was given brachial plexus block 30 minutes before surgery, and the control group was given routine treatment.
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
In this study, participants, data recorders(investigators), and outcome assessor were unaware of group assignments
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
The Protective Effect of Brachial Plexus Block on Upper Limb Vascular Injury in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Aneurysm Embolization Via Transradial Approach
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Brachial plexus block group(Group T)

All patients received brachial plexus block 30min before surgery

Drug: Ropivacaine
The MEC50 and MEC95 of ropivacaine for brachial plexus block was measured by sequential method, and then the patients in the experimental group were treated with MEC95.
Other Names:
  • brachial plexus block
  • No Intervention: Control group (Group C)

    All patients were not pretreated with brachial plexus block before operation

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Assess the degree of vasospasm in the upper extremity artery by angiography [During the operation]

      The degree of vasospasm in the upper extremity artery was assessed by angiography during surgery.

    2. Assessed thrombosis in the upper extremity artery by ultrasound [Day 1 after surgery]

      Upper extremity artery thrombosis was assessed by ultrasonography after surgery

    3. Assessed stenosis in the upper extremity artery by ultrasound [Day 1 after surgery]

      Upper extremity artery stenosis was assessed by ultrasonography after surgery

    4. Assessed occlusion in the upper extremity artery by ultrasound [Day 1 after surgery]

      Upper extremity artery occlusion was assessed by ultrasonography after surgery

    5. Assess occlusion in the upper extremity artery by angiography or ultrasonography [Month 1 after surgery]

      Upper extremity artery occlusion was assessed by angiography or ultrasonography after surgery

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Evaluate the hemodynamic changes of upper limb artery by ultrasound [Before the operation]

      The hemodynamic changes of upper limb artery were evaluated by ultrasound after BPB , such as the decrease of vessel cross-sectional area (area),Blood flow (Q), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), mean velocity (TAMAX ), pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), etc. The change of these parameters will be combined to report in percent(%).

    2. Evaluate the hemodynamic changes of upper limb vessels by ultrasound [Day 1 after surgery]

      The hemodynamic changes of upper limb vessels were evaluated by ultrasound after BPB. , such as the decrease of vessel cross-sectional area (area),Blood flow (Q), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), mean velocity (TAMAX ), pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), etc. The change of these parameters will be combined to report in percent (%).

    3. Recorded the changes of inflammatory cytokine IL-6 in plasma before and after operation. [Day 1 after surgery]

      The changes of inflammatory cytokine IL-6 in plasma were recorded beforeand after operation by Flow immunofluorescence assay.

    4. Recorded the changes of inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in plasma before and after operation. [Day 1 after surgery]

      The changes of inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in plasma were recorded beforeand after operation by Flow immunofluorescence assay.

    5. Evaluated the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction by magnetic resonance imagingoperation(MRI) [Day 1 after surgery]

      The incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction was evaluated by MRI,Including lacunar cerebral infarction.

    6. Evaluate the hemodynamic changes of upper limb vessels by ultrasound [Month 1 after the surgery]

      The hemodynamic changes of upper limb vessels were evaluated by ultrasound after BPB. , such as the decrease of vessel cross-sectional area (area),Blood flow (Q), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), mean velocity (TAMAX ), pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), etc. The change of these parameters will be combined to report in percent (%).

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Calculate MEC50 and MEC95 of ropivacaine in brachial plexus block by sequential method [During the operation]

      The minimum effective concentration(MEC50 and MEC95) of ropivacaine for brachial plexus block to prevent radial artery spasm during operation was determined by sequential method.

    2. Record VAS score by questionnaire after the surgery [Day 0 after the surgery]

      VAS score was record by questionnaire.The VAS was scored from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe and unbearable pain. The pain scores of patients were recorded after awakening.

    3. Record VAS score by questionnaire 24h after the surgery [Day 1 after the surgery]

      VAS score was record by questionnaire.The VAS was scored from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe and unbearable pain. The pain scores of patients were recorded 1 day after operation

    4. Record physician satisfaction by questionnaire [Day 0 after the surgery]

      Physician satisfaction was scored on a scale of 1-5, with a score of 1 indicating very poor and dissatisfied experience and a score of 5 indicating very satisfied. The surgeons were asked to fill in the satisfaction questionnaire according to the operation situation after operation and recorded.

    5. Record complications of brachial plexus block [Day 1 after the surgery]

      The complications of brachial plexus block such as hematoma, infection, nerve injury were recorded after the surgery.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • 18-75 years old, BMI<28kg/m2

    • ASA physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ

    • Elective interventional surgery for intracranial aneurysms via TRA

    • willing to sign informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • patients allergic to local anesthetics

    • neck infection on the surgical side

    • Preoperative upper extremity ultrasound or DSA showed radial artery occlusion and arteriovenous fistula

    • The diameter of radial artery was still less than 2mm after brachial plexus block

    • Axillary artery occlusion and other vascular anatomical abnormalities may affect the operation

    • Radial artery patency: Barbeau type D

    • The history of hand trauma may affect the establishment of radial artery; access, or the use of radial artery as a bypass or dialysis vessel

    • patients with incomplete block effect after nerve block were detected;

    • The patient refused to participate in the study or cooperate with the follow-up

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University Nanjing Jiangsu China 210029

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
    • Xuzhou Central Hospital
    • Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital
    • The First People's Hospital of Changzhou
    • Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Jingjin Li, MD, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT06035692
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • BPB
    First Posted:
    Sep 13, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 13, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 13, 2023