Comparison of Intubation With Nerve Block and With Sedation in Awake Patients

Sponsor
Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01768377
Collaborator
(none)
70
1
2
3
23.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare intubation with nerve block with intubation with sedation in awake patients in terms of efficacy, ease, and the rate of complications and physician satisfaction

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
70 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of in Intubation With Nerve Block and Intubation With Sedation in Awake Patients in Terms of Efficacy, Complications and Physician's Satisfaction
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2012
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2013
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Intubation with sedation

Sedation with midazolam and analgesia with fentanyl

Drug: Fentanyl
Fentanyl 2 microgram/Kg BW IV

Drug: Midazolam
Midazolam 0.05 mg/kg BW IV infusion

Experimental: Intubation with Nerve block

Laryngeal plus supraglottic plus intratracheal nerve block plus sedation with midazolam

Drug: Nerve block with Lidocain
Lidocain 2% topical injection, 0.5 - 1 cc Lidocain 4% topical injection, 3 cc Lidocain 10% topical spray , total dose 50 mg

Drug: Midazolam
Midazolam 0.05 mg/kg BW IV infusion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Time required for intubation in seconds [From start of the intubation attempt for an average of one minutes]

    The interval is measured from the time that the healthcare provider attempts intubation until a successful intubation is achieved.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. physicians' perception of the difficulty of the procedure [Within an average of 30 minutes after completion of the procedure]

    Physicians' perception about the difficulty of the procedure is assessed using a 5-point Likert type scale (ranging from very easy to very difficult)verbally administered to the healthcare provider immediately (within 30 minutes) after completion of the intubation

  2. Number of Participants with Adverse Events [From the start of the procedure until 30 minutes after the procedure is completed]

    Number of patients developing any of the following complications (cough, esophageal intubation) from the start of the procedure until 30 minutes after completion of the procedure. This will represent the rate of complications

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Candidate for intubation with methods other than RSI

  • Age>= 18 years

  • Patient or patient's guardian's consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Need for RSI or crash intubation

  • Allergy to Lidocain in block group

  • Allergy to opioid drugs in sedation group

  • Allergy to midazolam in either group

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Imam Khomeini Hospital Tehran Iran, Islamic Republic of 1417613151

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohammad Jalili, MD, TUMS
  • Principal Investigator: Amir Nejati, MD, TUMS

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01768377
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 130-1928
First Posted:
Jan 15, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Jan 15, 2013
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2013
Keywords provided by Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 15, 2013