Ket-RSI: Evaluating the Hemodynamic Effects of Ketamine Versus Etomidate During Rapid Sequence Intubation

Sponsor
South East Area Health Education Center, Wilmington, NC (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03545503
Collaborator
New Hanover Regional Medical Center (Other)
428
1
2
20
21.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the hemodynamic effects of ketamine v etomidate during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the pre-hospital and emergency department setting.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

This is a randomized prospective study evaluating the hemodynamic response in adult participants greater than or equal to 18 years of age undergoing RSI in the pre-hospital or emergency department setting. Hemodynamic response is the cardiology response of the circulatory system. The investigators will compare the drugs Ketamine and Etomidate in participants having RSI. Ketamine and Etomidate are immediately available for RSI in both settings as both are currently standards of care for RSI.

Research thus far demonstrates that both Etomidate and ketamine are safe and effective for RSI. Despite the reported safety of Ketamine, Etomidate usage continues to far surpass that of ketamine. Both Etomidate and Ketamine are FDA-approved for induction of anesthesia. They are both ideal drugs for intubation due to their pharmacokinetic properties including a quick onset of less than 60 seconds, a short duration of about 10 minutes, and the minimal effect they have on the cardiovascular system. The neutral effect on the cardiovascular system is particularly important in the acute and traumatic setting when patients are often hypotensive.

However, there are some differences and disadvantages in the two medications. Due to these factors and limited data to support Ketamine as an equal or superior alternative to Etomidate, it has been difficult to clearly recommend one agent over the other for RSI.

Data will be analyzed using SPSS with a p-value of less than 0.05 being considered significant. The PI will consider a 20% decrease in systolic BP from a participant baseline as significant, and will compare the incidence of post RSI hypotension between the two groups. Several a priori subgroups will be evaluated to include patients greater than 70 years of age, trauma participants requiring RSI, and those participants whose shock index is less than 0.9 versus those whose shock index is greater than 0.9.

To maintain 80% power with a probability of 0.05, 200 participants will be needed in each arm to detect at 25% difference in SBP (baseline to post drug administration effects)

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
428 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Hemodynamic Effects of Ketamine Versus Etomidate During Rapid Sequence Intubation
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Etomidate

Etomidate will be dosed once at a standard of 0.3 mg/kg via IV Push

Drug: Etomidate
Etomidate will be administered as the sedative for RSI on even days
Other Names:
  • Amidate
  • Active Comparator: Ketamine

    Ketamine will be dosed once at a standard 2 mg/kg via IV Push

    Drug: Ketamine
    Ketamine will be administered as the sedative for RSI on odd days
    Other Names:
  • Ketalar
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Hemodynamic Effect as Measured by Systolic Blood Pressure Before and After RSI [The hemodynamic response will be measured by assessing the change in vital signs between 15 minutes prior to administration and vitals up to 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug.]

      The primary outcome of this study is to determine the change in hemodynamic response comparing systolic blood pressure pre-versus post-administration of study drug. A significant hemodynamic response is defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 20% or greater between the pre versus post administered study drug.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Persons greater than 18yrs requiring rapid sequence intubation for any reason.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Pregnant patients

    • Children under the age of 18

    • Patients with a known hypersensitivity to etomidate or ketamine

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 New Hanover Regional Medical Center Wilmington North Carolina United States 28401

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • South East Area Health Education Center, Wilmington, NC
    • New Hanover Regional Medical Center

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: William F Powers IV, MD, New Hanover Regional Medical Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    William F Powers, IV, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, South East Area Health Education Center, Wilmington, NC
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03545503
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1712-4
    First Posted:
    Jun 4, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 26, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by William F Powers, IV, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, South East Area Health Education Center, Wilmington, NC
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Participants were recruited if they required rapid sequence intubation in the pre-hospital or 17th street campus emergency department setting between January 1, 2018 and July 30, 2019.
    Pre-assignment Detail 98 did not meet inclusion criteria, 48 had incomplete sedative data, and 71 were excluded for other reasons
    Arm/Group Title Etomidate Ketamine
    Arm/Group Description Etomidate will be dosed once at a standard of 0.3 mg/kg via IV Push Etomidate: Etomidate will be administered as the sedative for RSI on even days Ketamine will be dosed once at a standard 2 mg/kg via IV Push Ketamine: Ketamine will be administered as the sedative for RSI on odd days
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 208 220
    COMPLETED 194 204
    NOT COMPLETED 14 16

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Etomidate Ketamine Total
    Arm/Group Description Etomidate will be dosed once at a standard of 0.3 mg/kg via IV Push Etomidate: Etomidate will be administered as the sedative for RSI on even days Ketamine will be dosed once at a standard 2 mg/kg via IV Push Ketamine: Ketamine will be administered as the sedative for RSI on odd days Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 194 204 398
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    57.48
    (19.5)
    56.68
    (19.68)
    57.08
    (19.57)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    67
    34.5%
    74
    36.3%
    141
    35.4%
    Male
    127
    65.5%
    130
    63.7%
    257
    64.6%
    Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    0
    0%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Hemodynamic Effect as Measured by Systolic Blood Pressure Before and After RSI
    Description The primary outcome of this study is to determine the change in hemodynamic response comparing systolic blood pressure pre-versus post-administration of study drug. A significant hemodynamic response is defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 20% or greater between the pre versus post administered study drug.
    Time Frame The hemodynamic response will be measured by assessing the change in vital signs between 15 minutes prior to administration and vitals up to 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Etomidate Ketamine
    Arm/Group Description Participants randomized to receive etomidate Participants randomized to receive ketamine
    Measure Participants 194 204
    Pre-SBP
    138.04
    (38.63)
    132.39
    (39.54)
    Post SBP 0-7
    139.09
    (44.52)
    130.09
    (41.78)
    Post SBP 8-15
    130.42
    (42.19)
    120.80
    (37.37)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 24 hours
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Etomidate Ketamine
    Arm/Group Description Participants receiving etomidate Participants receiving ketamine
    All Cause Mortality
    Etomidate Ketamine
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/194 (0%) 0/204 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Etomidate Ketamine
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/194 (0%) 1/204 (0.5%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 0/194 (0%) 1/204 (0.5%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Etomidate Ketamine
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 117/194 (60.3%) 111/204 (54.4%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 117/194 (60.3%) 111/204 (54.4%)
    Hypotension 36/194 (18.6%) 53/204 (26%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Investigators nor clinicians were blinded to study drug. Resuscitation pre-RSI was not accounted for nor was the dosing for vascopressors. We could not control the slow administration of ketamine to decrease effects of hypotension due to rapid administration.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title William F. Powers, IV, MD, FACS
    Organization New Hanover Regional Medical Center
    Phone 910-667-9232
    Email william.powers@nhrmc.org
    Responsible Party:
    William F Powers, IV, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, South East Area Health Education Center, Wilmington, NC
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03545503
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1712-4
    First Posted:
    Jun 4, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 26, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021