Impact of Covid-19 Aerosol Box On Intubation Success Rate

Sponsor
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT06042829
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
12
5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The safety of novel medical device must be assessed before being implemented into clinical practice. In the case of aerosol box, one of the safety features concerned includes its impact on intubation and how it affect the probability of efficient intubation in order to avoid risk of hypoxia to patient. As the barrier box is newly invented, there have been limited studies published.

This study aims to compare intubation success rate between intubation with and without aerosol box in real patients, which will determine the chances of efficient intubation and reflect the safety features of the aerosol box.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Intubation using aerosol box
  • Device: Intubation without aerosol box
N/A

Detailed Description

General Objective To determine whether intubation performed using aerosol box will have a lower chance of success as compared to intubation without using the box.

Specific Objectives

  1. To determine whether intubation with aerosol box will require more time for successful intubation as compared to intubation without the box.

  2. To compare the ease of intubation and determine whether intubation using aerosol box will require additional airway manipulation as compared to intubation without using the box.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Impact of Covid-19 Aerosol Box On Intubation Success Rate and Intubation Time
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 23, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 22, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 22, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intubation with aerosol box

Aerosol box group where patient will be intubated using aerosol box

Device: Intubation using aerosol box
Intubation time and ease of intubation using aerosol box

Active Comparator: Intubation without Aerosol box

Without aerosol box group whereby patients will be intubated without aerosol box.

Device: Intubation without aerosol box
Intubation time and ease of intubation without aerosol box

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Tracheal intubation time [1 year]

    Time taken from the laryngoscope blade passes through front incisors, followed by endotracheal intubation being inserted into trachea, and until the first upstroke of the capnograph trace visible as proof of successful tracheal intubation (the measurement is measured in seconds)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Ease of tracheal intubation [1 year]

    Based on scale of tracheal intubation difficulty. The scale is called Intubation Difficulty Scale. Intubation difficulty scale is a numerical score of total intubation difficulty and is based on seven parameters known to be associated with difficult intubation. The seven parameters are number of attempts, number of intubators, number of alternative techniques, Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopy grades, requirement of lifting force of laryngoscopy, application of laryngeal pressure, and mobility of vocal cords. The score will be summed. The degree of difficulty will be categorized into easy (IDS score of 0), slight difficulty (IDS of 1-4) and moderate to major difficulty (IDS of 5 and more) according to the total score. The higher score is associated with a higher prevalence of difficult intubation.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age > 18 years old

  2. American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) I or II patients

  3. Tested negative for COVID-19 prior to surgery

  4. Patient scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Claustrophobia

  2. Difficult airway features

  3. Body mass index (BMI) of more than 35 kg/m2

  4. Body habitus not physically fit into the aerosol box.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Cheras Kuala Lumpur Malaysia 56000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nurul Najwa Mohd Noor Dr, National University of Malaysia

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06042829
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HTM-2020-006
First Posted:
Sep 21, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Sep 21, 2023
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 21, 2023