Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy With Rigid Stylet vs Video Laryngoscopy With the TCI Articulating Introducer for Endotracheal Intubation in Simulated Difficult Airways

Sponsor
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06115694
Collaborator
(none)
240
2
8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Purpose:

To compare the efficacy and safety of TCI tube core and ordinary tube core assisted tracheal intubation in simulating difficult airway under visual laryngoscope, and to provide reference for clinical application

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: TCI Articulating Introducer
  • Device: GlideRite® Rigid Stylet
N/A

Detailed Description

Endotracheal intubation plays an important role in contemporary clinical anesthesia. Direct laryngoscope intubation is the traditional intubation method in anesthesia and emergency medical work. However, due to the constraints of the operator's technical level, the abnormal airway structure and the condition of patients, about 1.5% ~ 8.5% of the cases of intubation difficulties occur. It's even impossible to intubate. Failure of intubation can lead to major complications, including brain damage and death. When a tracheal intubation cannot be placed on the first two attempts, the intubation is classified as difficult, and repeated routine tracheal intubation may lead to morbidity in the patient, and the incidence of airway related complications increases significantly with the number of tracheal intubations. Difficult intubation accounted for 4% of operating room intubation and 10% of intubation outside the operating room. For patients with high glottis and short epiglottis, although the glottis can be seen, intubation is difficult to place. The effectiveness and safety of TCI tube assisted intubation under visual laryngoscope and ordinary tube tube assisted intubation in simulated difficult airway were compared to provide reference for clinical application.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
240 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy With Rigid Stylet vs Video Laryngoscopy With the TCI Articulating Introducer for Endotracheal Intubation in Simulated Difficult Airways:A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Experimental group:TCI Articulating Introducer

Tracheal intubation was performed using a TCI core under a visual laryngoscope

Device: TCI Articulating Introducer
use

Placebo Comparator: Control group:GlideRite® Rigid Stylet

Tracheal intubation was performed under a visual laryngoscope using a common tube core

Device: GlideRite® Rigid Stylet
use

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The success of intubation for the first time [1 day of surgery]

    To compare the success rate of first intubation in simulated difficult airway with TCI tube assisted by visual laryngoscope and ordinary tube.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall success rate of intubation [1 day of surgery]

    Overall success rate of tracheal intubation assisted by TCI and conventional tube cores under video laryngoscope in all included patients

  2. Whether it is necessary to rotate the tracheal tube through the glottis [1 day of surgery]

    Whether it is necessary to rotate during tracheal intubation to successfully enter the airway through the glottis

  3. Throat complications [24 hours after surgery]

    Whether the following conditions will occur after operation: oral mucosal injury: tracheal tube stained with blood or secretion with blood when extubation; Sore throat: patients complained of throat discomfort, manifested as slurred speech, foreign body sensation, cough, etc. Loose teeth; Difficulty speaking; Patients were followed up for 24 hours after surgery to see whether they still had dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and cough.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Men ≥18 years of age or non-pregnant women;

  2. For elective gynecological surgery or upper abdominal surgery under general anesthesia by oral tracheal intubation, the operation position was supine and the operation time was less than 3 hours;

  3. Subject's American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status is I-III

  4. Subjects who could understand the purpose of the trial, voluntarily participated and signed the informed consent form, and were willing to accept the designated follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. any cerebrovascular accident, such as stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), etc. occurred within 3 months;

  2. patients with unstable angina pectoris or myocardial infarction within 3 months;

  3. laryngeal mass, obstruction, maxillofacial fracture or deformity;

  4. Full stomach, high intra-abdominal pressure, habitual vomiting, gastroesophageal reflux disease;

  5. pharyngeal infection, hematoma, abscess, tonsil enlargement;

  6. Upper respiratory tract infection within one month, fever, cough, runny nose, nasal congestion, etc.;

  7. history of chronic airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness or asthma;

  8. diabetic patients with severe diabetic complications (diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar coma, various infections, macroangiopathy, diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, diabetic cardiomyopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic foot, etc.);

  9. severe complications of hypertension, such as arterial dissection, renal failure, cerebral hemorrhage, etc.;

  10. reoperation within 3 months;

  11. patients with contraindications or allergies to intraoperative drugs;

  12. patients enrolled in other studies within 30 days;

  13. poor adherence or the investigator's opinion that the patient was not suitable for the study.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Guolin Wang, Professor, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06115694
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • GWang025
First Posted:
Nov 3, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Nov 3, 2023
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Guolin Wang, Professor, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 3, 2023