Efficacy of Itraconazole as Secondary Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation or Chemotherapy With Prior Invasive Fungal Infection

Sponsor

Zhejiang University (Other)

Overall Status

Completed

CT.gov ID

NCT01198236

Collaborator

Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (Other), Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of TCM (Other), First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Other), Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Other)

150

Enrollment

Location

Duration (Months)

5.4

Patients Per Site Per Month

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) remain the major cause of death among neutropenic patients receiving chemotherapy for leukemia, or submitted to stem cell transplantation. Patients with a history of invasive fungal infection (IFI) are at high risk of developing relapse and fatal complications.

Prompt intensive antifungal therapy, have improved responses and survival, allowing an increase of antifungal treatments, including secondary antifungal prophylaxis.

Few studies have addressed the role of previous IFI in the feasibility of stem cell transplant, or the secondary prophylaxis with antifungal drugs in preventing recurrence of infection after transplantation. However, given the lack of prospective studies, the role of secondary antifungal prophylaxis remains unclear.

Itraconazole is a wide-spectrum triazole antifungal agent active against Candida albicans, non-albicans, Aspergillus spp., Blastomyces dermatitidis, Blastomyces coccidioides, Cryptococcus neoformans, Sporothrix schenkii, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Histoplasma spp. and various kinds of yeast fungi and mycetes.

The role of itraconazole IFI prophylaxis treatment has been proved by many interventional studies. In this prospective, multicentric study of secondary prophylaxis, itraconazole will be given at standard dose to patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation or chemotherapy with prior invasive fungal infection, to assess the efficacy and safety of itraconazole secondary prophylaxis.

Condition or Disease	Intervention/Treatment	Phase
Invasive Fungal Infection	Drug: Itraconazole	Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:

Interventional

Actual Enrollment :

150 participants

Allocation:

N/A

Intervention Model:

Single Group Assignment

Masking:

None (Open Label)

Primary Purpose:

Prevention

Official Title:

Efficacy of Itraconazole as Secondary Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation or Chemotherapy With Prior Invasive Fungal Infection

Study Start Date :

Jul 1, 2008

Actual Primary Completion Date :

Sep 1, 2010

Actual Study Completion Date :

Nov 1, 2010

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

successful prophylaxis rate [more than 7 days]
The rate of patients without documented relapse of the fungal infection and the absence of new proven, probable or possible IFI at the end of secondary prophylaxis treatment and 7 days later.

Secondary Outcome Measures

rate of patients who developed persistent fever or pulmonary infiltrates of unknown etiology [at least 7 days]
The rate of patients who developed persistent fever or pulmonary infiltrates of unknown etiology. For those neutropenic patients with persistent fever, antibiotics should be used according to the International anti-infection guideline in order to exclude the possibility of bacterial infection. If the fever persists after 5-6 days' combination use of itraconazole and antibiotics, this case would be regarded as "secondary prophylaxis failure" and the trial is terminated , while doctors should search for further clinical therapy to save the patient.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:

18 Years to 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study:

All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

Inclusion Criteria:

Man or woman between 18 and 65 years of age, inclusive.
Patients who affected by hematological malignancies, receiving chemotherapy, or submitted to stem cell transplantation.
Patients with previous proven or probable invasive fungal infections, with residual or absent lesions on CT scan or X-ray and the absence of clinical signs of fungal infection at the time of enrollment. Or, possible IFI patients without microbiological evidence but with effective anti-fungal therapy history.

(The diagnosis is according to the definitions of Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplant.)

Subjects (or their legally acceptable representatives) must have signed an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.
Lack of clinical symptoms of invasive fungal infection

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient has no response to the previous intravenous itraconazole antifungal therapy.
Currently taking the contra-indicated medications such as teldane, astemizol, cisapride and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor（e.g. Simvastatin, ovastatin, oral Midazolam and Triazolam）
History of allergy or intolerance to imidazole or azoles anti-fungal agents（e.g. Fluconazol, Itraconazole, Ketoconazole, Miconazole, Clotrimazole）
Pregnant women, lactating women or women of child bearing potential without applying valid contraceptive measures
Patients with current cardiac dysfunction (especially with congestive heart failure) or with the history of congestive heart failure
Patients with severe liver dysfunction (aminotransferase levels ≥5 times the upper limit of normal and total bilirubin level ≥3mg/dL(51.3 μmol/L); or the severity of liver dysfunction does not match this criteria but the patient is in bad condition and not suitable for this trial( doctors make the decision);
Patients with renal insufficiency having serum Ccr level <30ml/min, calculated from the following formula:

Male: Ccr (ml/min)=(140-age)×weight (kg) /(0.8136×Crea (μmol/L) ) Female:Ccr (ml/min)=(140-age)×weight (kg) ×0.85/(0.8136× Crea (μmol/L) )

Patients received any experimental drug within 10 days before the planned start of treatment.
Patients with bad whole body status and not suitable for the trial (doctors make the decision)