Endo-epicardial vs Endocardial-only Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (EPIC-VT)

Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05888662
Collaborator
(none)
150
2
60

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) is the gold standard treatment of refractory VTs in patients with ischaemic heart disease. In this setting, ablation is usually performed endocardially. However, even after a procedural success there is a high risk of recurrence, particularly due to the inability to create transmural lesions. Indeed, only the endocardium of the LV has been ablated, while a significant part of the arrhythmia substrate may be located on the other side of the myocardial thickness, on the epicardial side of the LV.

First described in 1996, epicardial ablation, performed via a percutaneous subxyphoid approach, has since undergone considerable development. Electrophysiologists often use a double endo- and epicardial approach as first line therapy for the ablation of VTs complicating myocarditis or arrhythmogenic dysplasia of the right ventricle, where the substrate is most often epicardial.

For VT in ischaemic heart disease, electrophysiologists perform endocardial ablation, and often perform epicardial ablation only after several endocardial failures. Several observational studies suggest that a combined endo- and epicardial approach as first line therapy is associated with a reduced risk of VT recurrence. Since recurrent VT in patients with ischaemic heart disease as a prognostic impact in terms of morbidity and mortality, it appears essential to optimise rhythm management by ablation, by offering a combined approach from the as first approach to reduce the risk of recurrences.

The aim of our prospective, multicentre, controlled, randomized study is therefore to compare the rate of VT recurrence after ablation performed as first line therapy either by endocardial approach alone or by combined endo-epicardial approach.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Endo-epicardial ablation
  • Procedure: endocardial ablation only
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
150 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Endo-epicardial vs Endocardial-only Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients Withischemic Cardiomyopathy: a Randomized Controlled Study
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2028
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2028

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Endo-epicardial ablation

Procedure: Endo-epicardial ablation
Endo-epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia

Active Comparator: endocardial ablation only

Procedure: endocardial ablation only
endocardial-only catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Survival free from ventricular arrhythmia recurrence [up to 5 years]

    Survival free from ventricular arrhythmia recurrence, defined as the time interval between the date of ablation and the date of first ventricular arrhythmia recurrence. Recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia is defined as the occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy or the occurrence of sustained VT/VF > 30 seconds The occurrence of the event and the date of the event will be obtained from the ICD interrogation. Patients without recurrence will be censored at the date of last ICD interrogation

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of ventricular arrhythmias treated [up to 5 years]

    Number of ventricular arrhythmias treated by the defibrillator with shocks or bursts of antitachycardia pacing during follow-up or the occurrence of sustained VT/VF > 30 seconds.

  2. Percentage of patients with recurrent ventricular arrhythmia [up to 5 years]

    Percentage of patients with recurrent ventricular arrhythmia

  3. Percentage of patients with a electrical storm [up to 5 years]

    Electrical storm is defined as the occurrence of at least 3 appropriate therapies (antitachycardia pacing or shocks) delivered by the defibrillator within 24 hours.

  4. Number of serious complications [up to 5 years]

    Number of serious complications related to the procedure

  5. Number of patients hospitalized for cardiovascular reasons [up to 2 years]

    Number of patients hospitalized for cardiovascular reasons (i.e. heart failure, rhythm disorders) at 2 years

  6. Number of patients requiring a redo ablation for ventricular arrhythmia [Up to 5 years]

    Number of patients requiring a redo ablation for ventricular arrhythmia

  7. mortality rate [Up to 2 years]

    2-year mortality rate

  8. Number of patients in each group who are non-inducible at the end of the procedure [1 day]

    Number of patients in each group who are non-inducible at the end of the procedure (programmed ventricular stimulation negative)

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Procedure duration [1 day]

    Procedure time (from puncture to catheter removal, in minutes) and duration of radiofrequency delivery (in minutes)

  2. Percentage of patients with inappropriate therapies deliverd by the ICD [Up to 2 years]

    Percentage of patients with inappropriate therapies deliverd by the ICD at 2 years

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients over 18 years of age

  2. 1st radiofrequency ablation of VT complicating ischaemic heart disease

  3. Patients with an ICD and remote monitoring

  4. Having, for women of childbearing age, effective contraception until discharge from hospital

  5. Have given their free and informed consent in writing

  6. are affiliated to or have health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. History of cardiac surgery compromising the epicardial approach (coronary artery bypas s grafting, valve replacements, or other surgeries that may have caused pericardial adhesions)

  2. Anticoagulant therapy that cannot be temporarily discontinued

  3. Double antiplatelet therapy that cannot be temporarily replaced by single antiplatelet therapy

  4. History of pericarditis

  5. Previous thoracic radiotherapy

  6. Contraindication to general anaesthesia

  7. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman

  8. History of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type 2 (as injection is required during the procedure)

  9. Person under legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship), deprived of liberty, or unable to express consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Rennes University Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: RaphaĆ«l MARTINS, MD, PhD, Rennes University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Rennes University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05888662
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 35RC20_9765_EPIC-VT
First Posted:
Jun 5, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jun 5, 2023
Last Verified:
May 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Rennes University Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 5, 2023