PET/MR-P: Development of a PET-MR Myocardial Perfusion Examination Using Regadenoson

Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01779869
Collaborator
Astellas Pharma US, Inc. (Industry)
16
1
1
28.9
0.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective for this pilot study is to develop an optimized, clinically usable myocardial PET-MR perfusion protocol and to determine which of all data potentially available should be acquired for a clinical myocardial perfusion examination. Hypothesis: The hypothesis is that high resolution, high sensitivity DCE MRI could replace the rest PET myocardial perfusion imaging, significantly decreasing examination time and patient radiation dose while maintaining the comprehensive reference-quality PET myocardial stress perfusion coverage.

The primary outcome will be comparison of diagnostic accuracy of each combination of imaging to detect clinically significant coronary artery stenosis (≥70% diameter stenosis).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Simultaneous acquisition PET-MRI is a new technology that has the potential to significantly impact diagnostic patient care. It combines high signal resolution MRI anatomic imaging and PET biological measurements, with the added benefit of radiation dose reduction in comparison to PET-CT. As the incidence of false positive SPECT-MPI studies secondary to attenuation artifact is relatively high and MRI coverage of the left ventricular myocardium is limited, it is likely that one of the immediate applications of PET-MRI technology is myocardial ischemia assessment.

PET has long been considered the noninvasive reference standard for myocardial perfusion. However, delayed contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is very sensitive for infarct detection. Indeed, both PET and MR imaging have the potential to provide comprehensive whole heart ischemia and infarct detection.

PET-MR technology, with its ability to obtain simultaneous perfusion information via both PET and MRI, has the potential to obtain multiple, possibly redundant, data sets. On the other hand, it also has the potential to combine the best of both techniques to provide a highly robust examination that is both shorter and of lower radiation dose than the standard myocardial PET perfusion examination. Optimization of a protocol is necessary to develop a comprehensive protocol without redundancy. Because of its single injection capability, regadenoson is ideally suited to a protocol that will assess and employ dual-modality myocardial perfusion data collection.

It is expected that the best candidates for PET-MR myocardial perfusion imaging will likely be a) patients whose body habitus suggests that their SPECT-MPI examination would be limited by attenuation artifact -- women with large breasts and patients (usually men) with abdominal obesity and/or b) patients who may have a smaller region of ischemia that might be missed on an MRI examinations with limited perfusion coverage.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
16 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Development of a PET-MR Myocardial Perfusion Examination Using Regadenoson
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Single group assignment - imaging

All patients will undergo PET-MR myocardial perfusion imaging during rapid intravenous administration of 0.4 mg regadenoson.

Drug: Regadenoson
Regadenoson 400 micrograms will be administered in a single IV bolus (<10 seconds) via an antecubital cannula and followed by 5 mL of saline flush. 10-20 seconds after the regadenoson is administered, 10 mCi of 13N-ammonia as a bolus, and 0.075 mmol/Kg of gadobenate dimeglumine MR contrast agent at a rate of 5 mL/sec followed by a 15 mL normal saline flush will be administered simultaneous, each into an antecubital vein, and a 15 min list-mode PET acquisition will be acquired simultaneously with the MR perfusion imaging.
Other Names:
  • Lexiscan
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac PET/MRI Examination [PET/MRI imaging was performed within 10 days after SPECT-MPI examination]

      The accuracy of the cardiac PET and cardiac MR examination components of the PET/MRI, and the accuracy of the combined PET/MR examination, for ischemic heart disease will be compared to the accuracy of cardiac SPECT in patients who have had ICA as "truth" or the reference standard. To assess the accuracy of an abbreviated PET/MR examination, an additional accuracy analysis was made using only the stress PET perfusion imaging and the MR LGE data sets. The accuracy of this combined data set was also determined with ICA as "truth" or the reference standard. Accuracy is calculated as % difference = (experimental - true) x 100%.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients who have had a clinically ordered rest/regadenoson single-isotope SPECT-MPI study within 10 days prior to cardiac PET-MRI examination

    • Reversible perfusion abnormalities on SPECT imaging in at least 2 contiguous myocardial segments

    • Patients for whom standard of care coronary ICA is planned

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • An clinical event (ie; worsening angina pectoris or myocardial infarction) occuring after the SPECT-MPI and before the cardiac MRI examination

    • Myocardial revascularization occuring after the SPECT-MPI and before the cardiac MRI examination

    • Contraindications to MR imaging (pacemaker, brain aneurysm clips, shrapnel, etc.)

    • Renal insufficiency (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2)

    • Allergy or other contraindication to gadolinium-based MR contrast agent

    • Second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block

    • Active asthma

    • Seizures

    • Current hypotension (<100/60)

    • Current hypertension (>160/90)

    • Pregnancy

    • Breast feeding

    • Use of caffeine, nicotine or over the counter cold medicines within 12 hours of the cardiac PET-MRI examination

    • Use of the medication dipyridamole within 48 hrs of the cardiac PET-MRI examination

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Center for Clinical Imaging Research at Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Washington University School of Medicine
    • Astellas Pharma US, Inc.

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Pamela K Woodard, MD, BA, Washington University School of Medicine

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Pamela Woodard, MD, Director of Center for Clinical Imaging Research (CCIR), Washington University School of Medicine
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01779869
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • PET/MR-Perfusion
    First Posted:
    Jan 30, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 15, 2018
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2018
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Pamela Woodard, MD, Director of Center for Clinical Imaging Research (CCIR), Washington University School of Medicine
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Single Group Assignment - Imaging
    Arm/Group Description All patients will undergo PET-MR myocardial perfusion imaging during rapid intravenous administration of 0.4 mg regadenoson. Regadenoson: Regadenoson 400 micrograms will be administered in a single IV bolus (<10 seconds) via an antecubital cannula and followed by 5 mL of saline flush. 10-20 seconds after the regadenoson is administered, 10 mCi of 13N-ammonia as a bolus, and 0.075 mmol/Kg of gadobenate dimeglumine MR contrast agent at a rate of 5 mL/sec followed by a 15 mL normal saline flush will be administered simultaneous, each into an antecubital vein, and a 15 min list-mode PET acquisition will be acquired simultaneously with the MR perfusion imaging.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 16
    COMPLETED 14
    NOT COMPLETED 2

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Single Group Assignment - Imaging
    Arm/Group Description All patients will undergo PET-MR myocardial perfusion imaging during rapid intravenous administration of 0.4 mg regadenoson. Regadenoson: Regadenoson 400 micrograms will be administered in a single IV bolus (<10 seconds) via an antecubital cannula and followed by 5 mL of saline flush. 10-20 seconds after the regadenoson is administered, 10 mCi of 13N-ammonia as a bolus, and 0.075 mmol/Kg of gadobenate dimeglumine MR contrast agent at a rate of 5 mL/sec followed by a 15 mL normal saline flush will be administered simultaneous, each into an antecubital vein, and a 15 min list-mode PET acquisition will be acquired simultaneously with the MR perfusion imaging.
    Overall Participants 16
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    55
    (12.4)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    9
    56.3%
    Male
    7
    43.8%
    Positive cardiac SPECT stress test (2 contiguous segments) (Count of Participants)
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    16
    100%
    Scheduled to undergo ICA (Count of Participants)
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    16
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac PET/MRI Examination
    Description The accuracy of the cardiac PET and cardiac MR examination components of the PET/MRI, and the accuracy of the combined PET/MR examination, for ischemic heart disease will be compared to the accuracy of cardiac SPECT in patients who have had ICA as "truth" or the reference standard. To assess the accuracy of an abbreviated PET/MR examination, an additional accuracy analysis was made using only the stress PET perfusion imaging and the MR LGE data sets. The accuracy of this combined data set was also determined with ICA as "truth" or the reference standard. Accuracy is calculated as % difference = (experimental - true) x 100%.
    Time Frame PET/MRI imaging was performed within 10 days after SPECT-MPI examination

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Patients who completed the full PET-MR myocardial perfusion examination
    Arm/Group Title Single Group Assignment - Imaging
    Arm/Group Description All patients will undergo PET-MR myocardial perfusion imaging during rapid intravenous administration of 0.4 mg regadenoson. Regadenoson: Regadenoson 400 micrograms will be administered in a single IV bolus (<10 seconds) via an antecubital cannula and followed by 5 mL of saline flush. 10-20 seconds after the regadenoson is administered, 10 mCi of 13N-ammonia as a bolus, and 0.075 mmol/Kg of gadobenate dimeglumine MR contrast agent at a rate of 5 mL/sec followed by a 15 mL normal saline flush will be administered simultaneous, each into an antecubital vein, and a 15 min list-mode PET acquisition will be acquired simultaneously with the MR perfusion imaging.
    Measure Participants 16
    SPECT Accuracy
    50
    MR Accuracy
    64
    PET Accuracy
    61
    Combined PET/MR Accuracy
    64
    Abbreviated PET/MR
    64
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Single Group Assignment - Imaging
    Comments Significance testing between the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT and PET, and SPECT and MR, and SPECT and PET/MR was performed by using chi square test. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments Accuracy was assessed compared to an imaging reference standard.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.35
    Comments
    Method Chi-squared
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 24 hours after imaging
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Single Group Assignment - Imaging
    Arm/Group Description All patients will undergo PET-MR myocardial perfusion imaging during rapid intravenous administration of 0.4 mg regadenoson. Regadenoson: Regadenoson 400 micrograms will be administered in a single IV bolus (<10 seconds) via an antecubital cannula and followed by 5 mL of saline flush. 10-20 seconds after the regadenoson is administered, 10 mCi of 13N-ammonia as a bolus, and 0.075 mmol/Kg of gadobenate dimeglumine MR contrast agent at a rate of 5 mL/sec followed by a 15 mL normal saline flush will be administered simultaneous, each into an antecubital vein, and a 15 min list-mode PET acquisition will be acquired simultaneously with the MR perfusion imaging.
    All Cause Mortality
    Single Group Assignment - Imaging
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/16 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Single Group Assignment - Imaging
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/16 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Single Group Assignment - Imaging
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/16 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Pamela K. Woodard, M.D.
    Organization Washington University School of Medicine
    Phone 314-362-7130
    Email woodardp@wustl.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Pamela Woodard, MD, Director of Center for Clinical Imaging Research (CCIR), Washington University School of Medicine
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01779869
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • PET/MR-Perfusion
    First Posted:
    Jan 30, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 15, 2018
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2018