SFERA: Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
In patients with suspected acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion with indication for endovascular treatment, radial access is just as safe, fast, and effective as femoral access, and it improves the entire stroke treatment process.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Investigators will compare the procedure times, angiographic results as well as the clinical evolution and the patient's experience during their hospital stay and after discharge, depending on the arterial access practiced for mechanical thrombectomy.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Radial access The ischemic stroke treatment will be performed through the radial artery (as first option) |
Procedure: thrombectomy
Extraction of intracranial thrombus in an acute large vessel occlusion
|
Active Comparator: Femoral access The ischemic stroke treatment will be performed through the femoral artery (as first option) |
Procedure: thrombectomy
Extraction of intracranial thrombus in an acute large vessel occlusion
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- No inferiority of radial access in the recanalization rate [Immediate after treatment]
To demonstrate the non-inferiority of radial access with respect to femoral access in the recanalization rate (% mTICI 2b-3 in 3 or fewer passes) obtained in patients with large vessel occlusion treated by mechanical thrombectomy.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- No differences in complications in vascular access [24 hours]
Comparison in frequency of access vessel occlusion, bleeding or presence of pseudoaneurysm
- Grades of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [24 hours]
Grade of recanalization after first pass, third pass and at the end of the procedure
- Change of artery access [24 hours]
Rate of need to change from radial to femoral access and from femoral to radial access
- Patient Reported Outcomes [5 days]
PROMS Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
- Patient experience [5 days]
PREMS Patient Reported Experience Measures
- Degree of disability/dependence after a stroke [24 hours and at 90 days]
modified rankin scale (from 0 to 6, being 0 best and 6 worst)
- Times during hospitalization [At 24 hours and during first 5 days]
Beginning of sitting, ambulation, rehabilitation and total time of hospital admission, need for urinary catheter
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with high suspicion of ischemic stroke due to large cerebral vessel occlusion defined by NIHSS> 10.
-
Immediate availability of the entire team responsible for endovascular treatment (Neurologist, Neurointerventional physician, Anesthetist, Nursing, Technicians ...)
-
Radial artery diameter ≥2.5 mm
-
Presence of femoral pulse or patency by ultrasonography in its defect.
-
Previous functional independence (mRS 0-2).
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Life expectancy of less than 6 months.
-
Intracranial hemorrhage
-
Patients with pre-existing neurological or psychiatric pathology that may confuse future evaluations.
-
No availability for follow-up after 90 days.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona | Barcelona | Spain | 08035 | |
2 | Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron | Barcelona | Spain | 08035 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: ALEJANDRO TOMASELLO, MD, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Amoroso G, Sarti M, Bellucci R, Puma FL, D'Alessandro S, Limbruno U, Canova A, Petronio AS. Clinical and procedural predictors of nurse workload during and after invasive coronary procedures: the potential benefit of a systematic radial access. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005 Sep;4(3):234-41.
- Bertrand OF, Bélisle P, Joyal D, Costerousse O, Rao SV, Jolly SS, Meerkin D, Joseph L. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2012 Apr;163(4):632-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.015. Review.
- Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, Klinke WP, Carere RG, Pi D, Berry B, Hilton JD. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart. 2008 Aug;94(8):1019-25. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.136390. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
- Chen SH, Snelling BM, Sur S, Shah SS, McCarthy DJ, Luther E, Yavagal DR, Peterson EC, Starke RM. Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: comparison of technical and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Sep;11(9):874-878. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014485. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
- Crockett MT, Selkirk GD, Chiu AHY, Singh TP, McAuliffe W, Phillips TJ. First line transradial access for posterior circulation stroke intervention; initial 12-month experience at a high volume thrombectomy center. J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Aug;78:194-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.069. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
- Ghani MR, Busa V, Dardeir A, Marudhai S, Patel M, Abdelmoneim YM, Jan A, Eskander N. Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Cerebral Angiography. Cureus. 2020 Oct 12;12(10):e10919. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10919. Review.
- Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Dávalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA, Donnan GA, Roos YB, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Diener HC, van den Berg LA, Levy EI, Berkhemer OA, Pereira VM, Rempel J, Millán M, Davis SM, Roy D, Thornton J, Román LS, Ribó M, Beumer D, Stouch B, Brown S, Campbell BC, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Saver JL, Hill MD, Jovin TG; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
- Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009 Jan;157(1):132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023. Epub 2008 Nov 1. Review.
- Khanna O, Mouchtouris N, Sweid A, Chalouhi N, Ghosh R, Al Saiegh F, Gooch MR, Tjoumakaris S, Rosenwasser RH, Romo V, Jabbour P. Transradial approach for acute stroke intervention: technical procedure and clinical outcomes. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2019 Nov 27;5(1):103-106. doi: 10.1136/svn-2019-000263. eCollection 2020.
- Khanna O, Sweid A, Mouchtouris N, Shivashankar K, Xu V, Velagapudi L, Stricsek G, Amllay A, Texakalidis P, Gooch MR, Tjoumakaris S, Rosenwasser RH, Jabbour PM. Radial Artery Catheterization for Neuroendovascular Procedures. Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2587-2590. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025811. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
- Kolkailah AA, Alreshq RS, Muhammed AM, Zahran ME, Anas El-Wegoud M, Nabhan AF. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4:CD012318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012318.pub2. Review.
- Maud A, Khatri R, Chaudhry MRA, Vellipuram A, Cruz-Flores S, Rodriguez GJ. Transradial Access Results in Faster Skin Puncture to Reperfusion Time than Transfemoral Access in Posterior Circulation Mechanical Thrombectomy. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2019 May;10(3):53-57.
- Mazighi M, Chaudhry SA, Ribo M, Khatri P, Skoloudik D, Mokin M, Labreuche J, Meseguer E, Yeatts SD, Siddiqui AH, Broderick J, Molina CA, Qureshi AI, Amarenco P. Impact of onset-to-reperfusion time on stroke mortality: a collaborative pooled analysis. Circulation. 2013 May 14;127(19):1980-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000311.
- Phillips TJ, Crockett MT, Selkirk GD, Kabra R, Chiu AHY, Singh T, Phatouros C, McAuliffe W. Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: analysis of 375 consecutive cases. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Jun;6(2):207-213. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000624. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
- Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, Campbell BC, Nogueira RG, Demchuk AM, Tomasello A, Cardona P, Devlin TG, Frei DF, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Berkhemer OA, Jovin TG, Siddiqui AH, van Zwam WH, Davis SM, Castaño C, Sapkota BL, Fransen PS, Molina C, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Chamorro Á, Lingsma H, Silver FL, Donnan GA, Shuaib A, Brown S, Stouch B, Mitchell PJ, Davalos A, Roos YB, Hill MD; HERMES Collaborators. Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647.
- Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, Rubartelli P, Briguori C, Andò G, Repetto A, Limbruno U, Cortese B, Sganzerla P, Lupi A, Galli M, Colangelo S, Ierna S, Ausiello A, Presbitero P, Sardella G, Varbella F, Esposito G, Santarelli A, Tresoldi S, Nazzaro M, Zingarelli A, de Cesare N, Rigattieri S, Tosi P, Palmieri C, Brugaletta S, Rao SV, Heg D, Rothenbühler M, Vranckx P, Jüni P; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
- PR(AG)209/2021