Evaluation of Acute Endovascular Treatment in Symptomatic Isolated Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Within 24 Hours of Last Seen Well (ETICA)

Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05832762
Collaborator
(none)
200
1
2
31
6.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Our main hypothesis is that acute EVT associated with best medical treatment is superior to best medical treatment alone, for improving clinical outcomes at 90 days, in patient with mild or severe AIS and diffusion-perfusion or clinical-imaging mismatch, secondary to CICAO.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Endovascular treatment (EVT) + Best medical treatment (BMT)
  • Procedure: Best medical treatment (BMT)
N/A

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of endovascular therapy (EVT) associated with best medical therapy (BMT) compared to BMT alone to increase the functional independence at 3 months in patients with acute cervical isolated internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO), mild to severe stroke (NIHSS score > 5), and core-perfusion or clinical-imaging mismatch.

Secondary objectives are,(i) to compare the safety of EVT + BMT vs. BMT alone; (ii) to demonstrate the superiority of EVT + BMT vs BMT alone on : the rate of excellent outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale, mRS, score = 0-1), the rate of recanalization at 24 hours and at day 90 post-randomization, the cerebral infarct size at 24 hours post-randomization, the early neurological deterioration rate at 24 hours and at day 7 post-randomization, the ischemic recurrences rate at day 90 post-randomization, the cognitive impairment rate at day 90 post-randomization.

One of the secondary objective is also to describe in the experimental group (EVT + BMT), the procedure-related adverse events.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
The protocol is a national, multi-center, prospectively randomized into two parallel (1:1) arms, open to treatment with blinded endpoint trial (PROBE)The protocol is a national, multi-center, prospectively randomized into two parallel (1:1) arms, open to treatment with blinded endpoint trial (PROBE)
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
As the therapeutic arm is interventional in the experimental arm, the physicians in charge of the patient and the patients cannot be blinded. The mRS score will be evaluated by qualified assessors blinded to the initial treatment
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of Acute Endovascular Treatment in Symptomatic Isolated Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Within 24 Hours of Last Seen Well
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Endovascular treatment + best medical treatment

Endovascular treatment associated with the best medical treatment.

Procedure: Endovascular treatment (EVT) + Best medical treatment (BMT)
Endovascular treatment (EVT) in the experimental arm can be performed with any recanalization strategy based on the operator's choice, and anatomical and radiological situation: MT using aspiration or stent retriever, with or without stenting (CE-labelled) or angioplasty. In case of acute stenting, the use of antiplatelet drugs will be based on the operator's preference, anatomical situation, and risk of hemorrhage.

Active Comparator: best medical treatment

Best medical treatment alone

Procedure: Best medical treatment (BMT)
Administration of drugs is at the treating physician's discretion (for example, intravenous fibrinolysis, anticoagulants, or antiplatelet agents) according to the local standards of care, but not intra-arterial therapies.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of patients with favorable functional outcome, defined by a mRS score ≤2 [Day 90 (± 14 days) post-randomization]

    The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability.The scale runs from "0" to "6", running from perfect health without symptoms to death. The mRS score will be evaluated by qualified assessors blinded to the initial treatment.The blinded evaluator must be familiar with mRS scoring (dedicated training and certification). If a participant is unable to attend in-person the follow-up visit at day 90 (±14), mRS scoring can be done by telephone by a qualified investigator.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of patients with excellent outcome (mRS score = 0-1) [Day 90 (± 14 days) post-randomization]

    The mRS score will be evaluated by qualified assessors blinded to the initial treatment.The blinded evaluator must be familiar with mRS scoring (dedicated training and certification). If a participant is unable to attend in-person the follow-up visit at day 90 (±14), mRS scoring can be done by telephone by a qualified investigator.

  2. Change in NIHSS score at 24 (-6/+12) hours post-randomization. [24h (-6/+12) post-randomization]

    NIHSS score is "the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale". The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function, while higher scores are indicative of some level of impairment. The individual scores for each item are summed to calculate the patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, and the minimum score is 0.

  3. Quality of life assessed with the EuroQol 5D-5L scale [Day 90 (± 14 days) post-randomization]

    Assessed with the EuroQol 5D-5L scale. It comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems

  4. Cognitive function at day 90 (±14), evaluated with the MoCA test. [Day 90 (±14 days) post randomization]

    The MoCA test is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment mesuring the neurocognitive function. There are 30 questions covering orientation, short-term memory, focus and spatial awareness, language, concentration and clock drawing test.

  5. Ischemic recurrence rate [Day 5-7 post randomization]

    Ischemic recurrence rate

  6. Ischemic recurrence rate [day 30 (±5) post randomization]

    Ischemic recurrence rate

  7. Ischemic recurrence rate [day 90 (±14) post randomization]

    Ischemic recurrence rate

  8. Carotid artery revascularization rate [randomization]

    Assessed by angiography in the treatment arm, defined by complete recanalization or residual carotid artery stenosis <50%

  9. Carotid artery recanalization rate [24 (-6/+12) hours post randomization]

    Assessed by MRA with gadolinium or CTA, defined as complete recanalization or residual carotid artery stenosis <50%

  10. Carotid artery recanalization rate [Day 90 (± 14 days) post-randomization]

    Assessed by MRA with gadolinium or CTA, defined as complete recanalization or residual carotid artery stenosis <50%

  11. Infarct volume [24 (-6/+12) hours post randomization]

    Mesured by magnetic resonance angiography (MRI, FLAIR) or computed tomography (CT).

  12. Infarct volume [Day 90 (± 14 days) post randomization]

    Mesured by magnetic resonance angiography (MRI, FLAIR) or computed tomography (CT).

  13. Early neurological improvement [Day 0 - 24 hours post randomization]

    Early neurological improvement is defined by an NIHSS score of 0-2 at 24 hours or a ≥8-point decrease of the NIHSS score at 24 hours compared with baseline.

  14. Incidence of all-cause mortality at day 90 [Day 90 (± 14 days) post randomization]

    Incidence of all-cause mortality at day 90

  15. Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage [24 (-6/+12) hours post-randomization]

    According to the Heidelberg Bleeding classification by brain imaging

  16. Incidence of procedure/device-related adverse events [Day 30 (±5 days) post randomization]

    In the experimental group (EVT + BMT)

  17. Early neurological deterioration rate [24 hours post-randomization]

    NIHSS score increase by ≥4 points

  18. Neurological deterioration rate [Day 5-7 post randomization]

    NIHSS score increase by ≥4 points

  19. Rapid NIHSS worsening [Admission - day 5/day 7/discharge (if earlier)]

    NIHSS score increase by ≥10 points

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • ≥18-year-old patients (no upper age limit)

  • Clinical signs consistent with AIS (Acute ischemic stroke), and time from last seen well to randomization ≤23h

  • NIHSS score >5 at randomization time

  • Ischemic stroke confirmed by cerebral imaging (CT: Computed Tomography or MRI:Magnetic Resonance Imaging) or normal imaging with suspected ischemic stroke

  • Existence of a mismatch:

If perfusion data are available (PWI/CTP), existence of a core-perfusion mismatch, suggestive of carotid hemodynamic mechanism, according to the DEFUSE-3 criteria: mismatch volume ≥15 mL, core volume ≤70 mL, and mismatch ratio ≥1.8 If perfusion data are not available, existence of a clinical-imaging mismatch, defined by an ASPECTS >5 (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score)

  • CICAO (Cervical isolated Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion) on CTA (Computed Tomography Angiography) or MRA with gadolinium, without associated visible ipsilateral large intracranial occlusion (T or L, M1, M2, A1, A2, P1, P2), <1 h after randomization

  • Anticipated possibility to start the EVT procedure (arterial access) within 60 minutes after randomization

  • Pre-stroke mRS score ≤2

  • Patient or patient's representative has received information about the study and has signed and dated the appropriate Informed Consent or met the criteria for emergency consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • CICAO after recent (<1 month) endarterectomy

  • Patient with severe or fatal co-morbidities or life expectancy <6 months that will likely interfere with improvement or follow-up or that will render the procedure unlikely to benefit the patient

  • Patient unable to come or unavailable for follow-up

  • Pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological or functional evaluations

  • Seizures at stroke onset if they make the diagnosis of stroke doubtful and preclude obtaining an accurate baseline NIHSS assessment

  • Suspected cerebral vascular disease (e.g., vasculitis) based on the medical history and CTA/MRA

  • Pregnancy in progress or planned during the study period, woman who is known to be pregnant or lactating at admission time

  • Adult protected by law or patient under guardianship or curatorship

  • Current participation in another investigational drug study

  • Not affiliated to the French social security system or not beneficiary of such system

  • Known contrast or endovascular product life-threatening allergy

  • Associated stenosis (≥50%) of the middle cerebral artery ipsilateral to the CICAO

  • Chronic CICAO, defined as a known carotid occlusion (on a previous imaging exam) ≥30 days before randomization

  • Tandem occlusion, defined by cervical ICA occlusion associated with intracranial large vessel occlusion (T- or L-shaped, M1 or M2 portions of the middle cerebral artery, A1 or A2 portions of the anterior cerebral artery, P1 or P2 portions of the posterior cerebral artery)

  • Associated ipsilateral large intracranial arterial occlusion

  • Prior stenting of the target ICA

  • Intracranial stent implanted in the same vascular territory as the CICAO

  • Sub-occlusive cervical ICA stenosis on CTA or MRA

  • Suspicion of ICA occlusion starting at the petrous, cavernous or intracranial segment with normal cervical portion on non-invasive imaging (MRA or/and CTA)

  • Known absence of vascular access

  • Suspicion of aortic dissection based on medical history, clinical evaluation or/and imaging

  • Sub-occlusive cervical ICA stenosis on CTA or MRA

  • Common carotid artery occlusion without ICA occlusion on non-invasive imaging (MRA or/and CTA)

  • Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on CT/MRI.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Neurology/ Stroke Unit, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac Montpellier France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Montpellier

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Montpellier
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05832762
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RECHMPL21_0527
First Posted:
Apr 27, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Apr 27, 2023
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Montpellier
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 27, 2023