Usability, Safety and Efficacy of AspivixTM (Comparative Study)

Sponsor
Aspivix SA (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04441281
Collaborator
(none)
120
2
2
9.6
60
6.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Limited mobility of the uterine cervix and alignment with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). Currently, the available instruments are traumatic tenacula, which could cause pain and bleeding and therefore represent an obstacle for certain patients to pursue their medical follow-up.

AspivixTM is a new device, which enables atraumatic traction of the cervix while respecting its specific semi-circular anatomic shape through a system powered by a vacuum chamber.

The aim of our comparative study is to assess the patient's pain and bleeding using the AspivixTM device in comparison with a commonly used single-tooth tenaculum (Pozzi forceps). Additionally, the comparative study aims to assess and compare the safety of the AspivixTM device with the single-tooth tenaculum (Pozzi forceps).

Note: Study is made of 2 phases (pilot phase followed by a comparative phase). Details regarding pilot study is registered separately.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Traction of the cervix for IUD insertion
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
Single-blinded - Participants will be blinded towards the intervention used. Additionally, the type of device used will only be revealed to the practitioner after randomization, immediately prior IUD insertion.
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Usability, Safety and Efficacy of AspivixTM, an Atraumatic Innovative Uterine Cervical Traction Device: a Pilot Phase Followed by a Comparative Study (Comparative)
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 30, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 14, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 15, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Single-tooth tenaculum (Pozzi forceps)

In the control arm, a single-tooth tenaculum, Pozzi forceps, used during routine IUD insertion, is employed to hold and stabilize the cervix.

Procedure: Traction of the cervix for IUD insertion
Limited mobility of the uterine cervix and alignment with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD).

Experimental: AspivixTM cervical vacuum tenaculum

In the experimental arm, the investigational AspivixTM cervical vacuum tenaculum is employed to hold and stabilize the cervix.

Procedure: Traction of the cervix for IUD insertion
Limited mobility of the uterine cervix and alignment with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale [Before the procedure]

    Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.

  2. Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale [During speculum insertion]

    Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.

  3. Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale [During AspivixTM / standard tenaculum application]

    Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.

  4. Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale [During application of cervical traction]

    Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.

  5. Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale [During IUD insertion]

    Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.

  6. Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale [During AspivixTM / standard tenaculum release]

    Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.

  7. Patient-reported pain: Visual Analogic Scale [5 minutes after the end of the procedure]

    Patient-reported pain scores (VAS) at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure Minimal and maximal values range from 0 to 100, the higher being the better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. The number of placement attempts before traction can be applied [During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.]

    number of placement attempts before traction can be applied The number of placement attempts before traction of the cervix can be applied will be recorded

  2. The number of spontaneous releases [During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.]

    The number of spontaneous releases during traction of the cervix will be recorded

  3. Assessment of the efficacy of the investigational device and its comparator by the practitioner [During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.]

    5 point Likert 'Efficacy Questionnaire' will be used. Minimal to maximal values range from 1 to 5, 1 meaning "disagree" and 5 "agree".

  4. Assessment of bleeding [During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.]

    To assess bleeding, every buffer will be weighted, and the blank weight subtracted. Weight in mg will be reported in the case report form.

  5. Assessment of adverse events [During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.]

    Safety of the procedure will be assessed by documenting adverse events (description of the adverse events, number of participants)

  6. Assessment of device deficiencies [During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.]

    Safety of the procedure will be assessed by documenting device deficiencies (description)

  7. Identification of new risks [During the procedure to insert the IUD which should last less than 5 minutes.]

    Safety of the procedure will be assessed by identifying and documenting any new risk.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Participants older than 18 years

  • Participants presenting at the outpatient clinic IUD insertion of Mirena (BAYER), Kyleena (BAYER), Jaydess (BAYER), NOVAT 380 (BAYER), NT Cu380 mini (MONALISA), NT Cu380 (MONALISA), CuT 380A (MONALISA) or CuT 380A QL (MONALISA).

  • Participants able to provide informed consent as documented by signature with at least 24 hours of reflection time

  • Good understanding of written and oral speaking used at the centre where the study will be carried out.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Participants who are contraindicated for the insertion of the IUD Mirena (BAYER), Kyleena (BAYER), Jaydess (BAYER), NOVAT 380 (BAYER), NT Cu380 mini (MONALISA), NT Cu380 (MONALISA), CuT 380A (MONALISA) or CuT 380A QL (MONALISA).

  • Participants under use of excessive alcohol, narcotics or benzodiazepines prior to procedure

  • Participants who do not wish to be informed of a chance discovery

  • Participant receiving anaesthetics prior to IUD insertion procedure

  • Participants on anticoagulant medication

  • Participants under use of an analgesic (< 12 hours)

  • Previous cervical operation

  • Severe vaginal bleeding of unknown origin

  • Participant previously enrolled in this study

  • Cervix diameter smaller than 26 mm

  • Nabothian cyst

  • Cervical myomas

  • Cervical condylomas

  • Squamous intraepithelial lesion (Cervical dysplasia)

  • Cervical endometriosis

  • Cervical tears

  • A well exposed cervix and / or well aligned vaginal and cervical canals where no traction is required for IUD insertion

  • Other cervical abnormalities (cervical polyp, cervical lesion, or irregularity) which may contraindicate or complicate IUD insertion

  • Large ectopy, for which it is not possible to find a suitable location near the ectopy where native tissue is present

  • Large scar tissue, for which it is not possible to find a suitable location near the scar where native tissue is present

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 HUG - Department Women, Child & Adolescent Geneva Vaud Switzerland 1205
2 Department Women, Mother & Child, University Hospital Lausanne Vaud Switzerland 1011

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Aspivix SA

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrice Mathevet, Prof., DFME CHUV Lausanne

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Aspivix SA
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04441281
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Aspivix_IUD2019_Comparative
First Posted:
Jun 22, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Feb 15, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 15, 2022