A Pre-market Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of a Skin Preparation Device for Removal of Dry Crusty Skin

Sponsor
Mirka Ltd (Industry)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05356572
Collaborator
Clinius Ltd (Industry)
27
1
2
6
4.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this clinical one-site investigation the performance and safety of a skin preparation device will be evaluated for removing hyperkeratotic skin prior to further medical treatment. Comfort and pain during skin preparation, as well as performance and safety of device, will be compared to comparators on separate skin areas for every subject.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Investigational Skin Preparation Device
  • Device: GMDN 47102 / Electrode Skin Abrasive Pad
  • Device: UMDNS 13-230 / Biopsy punch (Dermal Curette)
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
27 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Single-center, Open, Randomized, Non-controlled, Comparative Pre-market Investigation to Evaluate the Performance of a Skin Preparation Device for Removal of Hyperkeratotic Skin
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Investigational Skin Preparation Device versus Disposable Dermal Curette

Device: Investigational Skin Preparation Device
Removal of hyperkeratotic skin with Investigational Skin Preparation Device

Device: UMDNS 13-230 / Biopsy punch (Dermal Curette)
Removal of hyperkeratotic skin with Disposable Dermal Curette

Active Comparator: Investigational Skin Preparation Device versus Abrasive Pad for Skin Preparation

Device: Investigational Skin Preparation Device
Removal of hyperkeratotic skin with Investigational Skin Preparation Device

Device: GMDN 47102 / Electrode Skin Abrasive Pad
Removal of hyperkeratotic skin with Abrasive Pad for Skin Preparation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Grade of hyperkeratotic skin removal [Day 0]

    Sufficient hyperkeratotic skin removal in comparison to comparative methods. The removal of hyperkeratotic skin is assessed visually and by palpation. Removal of hyperkeratotic skin measurement grades: All hyperkeratotic skin removed, Partial hyperkeratotic skin removed, None hyperkeratotic skin removed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Grade of injury to skin / grade of skin irritation / grade of allergic skin reaction [Day 0]

    Investigator assessment of adverse effects on skin in comparison to the comparative methods. Grade of injury to skin: none, mild, moderate, severe. Grade of skin irritation: none, mild, moderate, severe. Grade of allergic skin reaction: none, mild, moderate, severe.

  2. Grade of skin irritation / grade of allergic skin reaction [14 day follow-up]

    Investigator assessment of adverse effects on skin in comparison to the comparative methods. Grade of skin irritation: none, mild, moderate, severe. Grade of allergic skin reaction: none, mild, moderate, severe.

  3. Duration of operation time per treated skin area [Day 0]

    Operation time assessed by the mean difference in time per treated skin area to remove the hyperkeratotic skin in comparison to comparative methods.

  4. Presence of actinic keratosis [Day 0]

    Presence of actinic keratosis (AK) is measured by number of different grades of AK lesions. Number of different grades of AK lesions: None, Grade I AK lesions, Grade II AK lesions, Grade III AK lesions.

  5. Clearance of actinic keratosis [6th month follow-up]

    Number of different grades of actinic keratosis (AK) lesions are measured: None, Grade I AK lesions, Grade II AK lesions, Grade III AK lesions. Actinic keratosis clearance is assessed as the number of cleared actinic keratosis lesions at 6th month follow-up divided by the actinic keratosis lesion number at Day 0. Clearance will be reported in %. A high %-value means a high number of cleared lesions.

  6. Physician comfort during skin preparation using an investigator questionnaire [Day 0]

    Rate of physician comfort when comparing the investigational product versus comparative methods. The endpoint will utilize a questionnaire for the investigator/nurse to fill in.

  7. Subject comfort during skin preparation using a subject questionnaire [Day 0]

    Rate of subject comfort (including skin sensation and heating of skin) when comparing the investigational product with comparative methods. The endpoint will utilize a questionnaire for the subject to fill in. Skin sensation during skin preparation: Very pleasant, Pleasant, Neutral, Unpleasant, Very unpleasant. Heating of skin during skin preparation: None, Mild temperature rise, Moderate temperature rise, High temperature rise, Burning.

  8. Subject pain sensation during skin preparation [Day 0]

    Rate of pain using visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS: 0 - 10 (0= No pain and 10 = worst possible pain)

  9. Subject pain sensation during daylight photodynamic treatment [Day 0]

    Rate of pain using visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS: 0 - 10 (0= No pain and 10 = worst possible pain)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Attending the clinic for treatment of actinic keratosis using daylight photodynamic therapy

  • Age: 18 - 100 years.

  • Available for two follow-up visits: two weeks after treatment and 6 months after treatment

  • Provision of informed consent i.e., subject must be able to understand and sign the patient Information and Consent Form

  • Subject have been informed on the nature, the scope and the relevance of the study

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Known or suspected allergy/hypersensitivity to phenol formaldehyde

  • Wound at the skin site to be treated

  • Documented skin disease at the time of enrollment, as judged by the investigator

  • Previously enrolled in the present investigation

  • Inclusion in other ongoing investigations simultaneously that would preclude the subject from participating in this investigation as judged by the investigator

  • Actinic keratosis treatment obtained within last 6 months

  • Involvement in the planning and conduct of the clinical investigation (applies to all investigation site staff and third party vendor)

  • Any subject that according to Medical Research Act, paragraphs 7-10, is deemed unsuitable for study enrolment.

  • Complications that would increase wound risks if investigational product would be used.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Vaasa Central Hospital Vaasa Finland 65130

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Mirka Ltd
  • Clinius Ltd

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Johanna H Hagman, M.D, PhD, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Mirka Ltd
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05356572
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AMCIREP2204
First Posted:
May 2, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jun 9, 2022
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 9, 2022