TEACH-PD: Targeted Education ApproaCH to Improve Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes Trial

Sponsor
The University of Queensland (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03816111
Collaborator
The HOME Network (Other), Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (Other), New Zealand Peritoneal Dialysis Registry (Other)
1,500
48
2
69.3
31.3
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

For many patients peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the preferred form of dialysis to treat kidney disease as it provides greater flexibility and the ability to dialyse at home. However, PD use in Australia has been decreasing over the last 10 years. A big reason for this drop is the risk of infection. The best way to prevent PD related infections is to make sure that patients have good training in PD techniques. The researchers of this study have developed TEACH-PD, a new education package for training both PD nurses and PD patients.

The aim of this study is to find out whether TEACH-PD training reduces the number of PD related infections.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: TEACH-PD Training Curriculum
  • Behavioral: Current standard PD training
N/A

Detailed Description

End stage kidney disease is fatal unless treated with dialysis or transplant. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a core dialysis modality offering home-based care for patients. PD utilization is frequently threatened beyond 5 years for most patients due to PD-related infections. Patient training is a critical cornerstone of mitigating infection risk and maximizing PD durability (technique survival), but training practices are characterized by a lack of standardization and severe heterogeneity.

There is no high-level evidence to inform PD training. Accordingly, a structured program encompassing how and what to teach PD patients at the inception of PD treatment has the potential to reduce serious PD-related infections, extend the longevity of PD, support cost-effective home-based dialysis care, and reduce costs and health service utilization associated with hospitalization and transition to haemodialysis. TEACH-PD is a standardised modular curriculum for both PD nurse trainers and patients that has been collaboratively developed by renal nurses, doctors, educationalists and patients, aligned to current International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guidelines, utilizing modern adult learning principles. The TEACH-PD program is feasible and acceptable, as demonstrated in a successful pilot study.

The primary objective of TEACH-PD CRCT (Targeted Education ApproaCH to improve Peritoneal Dialysis outcomes - a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial) is to determine whether implementation of standardised training modules based on ISPD guidelines targeting both PD trainers and patients results in a longer time to the composite end-point of exit site infections, tunnel infections and peritonitis in incident PD patients compared to existing training practices.

TEACH-PD is a registry-based, pragmatic, multi-center, multinational trial, randomising PD units to implementing TEACH-PD training modules targeted at PD trainers and incident PD patients versus standard existing practices.

An estimated 1,500 patient new to PD will be recruited from at least approximately 42-44 PD units in Australia and New Zealand.The study is being coordinated by the University of Queensland (operating through the Australasian Kidney Trial Network).

The TEACH-PD training modules have been developed by a core group of renal nurses from the HOME Network in conjunction with senior medical clinicians from the Australasian Kidney Trials Network, eLearning curriculum developers, consumer representatives, and education experts, in line with the ISPD guidelines, utilizing modern adult learning principles and best practice eLearning techniques. The modules will be implemented at PD units in Australia and New Zealand to formally evaluate whether, compared with standard care, a standardised training curriculum will reduce the rate of PD-related infections and improve technique survival, resulting in better outcomes for patients receiving PD and significant cost-savings to the community.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
1500 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
A Pragmatic, Registry-based, International, Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Use of TEACH-PD Training Modules for Incident PD Patients Versus Existing Practices on the Rate of PD-related Infections
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 22, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 30, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 30, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: TEACH-PD Training Curriculum

All patients at sites randomized to this arm will receive the TEACH-PD Training Curriculum

Behavioral: TEACH-PD Training Curriculum
The TEACH-PD training modules have been developed by a core group of renal nurses from the HOME Network in conjunction with senior medical clinicians from the Australasian Kidney Trials Network, eLearning curriculum developers, consumer representatives, and education experts, in line with the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines, utilizing modern adult learning principles and best practice eLearning techniques.

Active Comparator: Current Standard PD Training

All patients at sites randomized to this arm will receive the unit's current PD training materials and plan

Behavioral: Current standard PD training
Current PD training materials and plan

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Time to the first occurrence of any PD-related infection [From the PD start date until first PD-related infection, assessed up to 4 years]

    Time to the first occurrence of any PD-related infection including exit site infection, tunnel infection or peritonitis

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Time to first exit site infection [From the PD start date until first exit site infection, assessed up to 4 years]

    Time to first exit site infection

  2. Time to first tunnel infection [From the PD start date until first tunnel infection, assessed up to 4 years]

    Time to first tunnel infection

  3. Time to first episode of peritonitis [From the PD start date until first peritonitis episode, assessed up to 4 years]

    Time to first episode of peritonitis

  4. Time to infection-associated catheter removal [From the PD start date until first infection-associated catheter removal, assessed up to 4 years]

    Time to infection-associated catheter removal

  5. Incidence of technique failure - 30 days [Assessed at 30 days after transfer to HD or if death occurs within this period]

    Incidence of technique failure defined as transfer to haemodialysis for greater than 30-days and/or death within this time

  6. Incidence of technique failure - 180 days [Assessed at 180 days after transfer to HD or if death occurs within this period]

    Incidence of technique failure defined as transfer to haemodialysis for greater than 180-days and/or death within this time

  7. Incidence of all-cause hospitalization [Assessed from the PD start date, over up to 4 years]

    Incidence of all-cause hospitalization collected via health department hospitalization data linkage

  8. Incidence of all-cause mortality [Assessed from the PD start date, over up to 4 years]

    Incidence of all-cause mortality

  9. Participant Quality of Life questionnaire [Completed at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months]

    Participant-reported Quality of Life measured using EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol-5 dimensions questionnaire). EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life using 2 methods - a descriptive scale and a Visual Analogue Scale. The descriptive scale comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/ depression). Each dimension has 5 measurement levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Numbers associated with levels can be used to report an index score. The VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine' (100) and 'the worst health you can imagine' (0).

  10. Health-care cost-effectiveness analysis [Assessed from the PD start date, over up to 4 years]

    Difference in the incremental cost per Quality Adjusted Life Years gained between treatment arms

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Life participation questionnaire [Completed at baseline and 24 months]

    Life participation measured using PROMIS (patient-reported outcomes measurement information system) Short Form - Ability to participate in social roles and activities 6a. PROMIS will measure 6 dimensions (trouble with leisure activities, trouble doing family activities, trouble doing work, trouble doing activities with friends, limiting fun with others and limiting activities with friends). Each dimension has 5 measurement levels: Always (1), Usually, (2), Sometimes (3), Rarely (4) and Never (5).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients new to PD;

  • Patients > 18 years of age,

  • Need to undergo PD training;

  • Are able to provide informed consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Canberra Hospital Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
2 St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia 2010
3 Gosford Hospital Gosford New South Wales Australia
4 Lismore Hospital Lismore New South Wales Australia
5 Orange Hospital Orange New South Wales Australia
6 Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards New South Wales Australia
7 Liverpool Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
8 Nepean/Blacktown Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
9 Prince of Wales Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
10 Royal Prince Alfred/Concord Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
11 St George Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
12 Tamworth Hospital Tamworth New South Wales Australia
13 The Tweed Hospital Tweed Heads New South Wales Australia 2485
14 Royal Darwin Hospital Darwin Northern Territory Australia 0810
15 Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
16 Cairns Hospital Cairns Queensland Australia
17 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Herston Queensland Australia 4029
18 Mackay Base Hospital Mackay Queensland Australia 4740
19 Logan Hospital Meadowbrook Queensland Australia
20 Sunshine Coast University Hospital Nambour Queensland Australia
21 Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia
22 Toowoomba Hospital Toowoomba Queensland Australia
23 Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
24 Royal Hobart Hospital Hobart Tasmania Australia 7000
25 Launceston General Hospital Launceston Tasmania Australia 7250
26 Monash Health Dandenong Victoria Australia
27 St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Fitzroy Victoria Australia 3065
28 Barwon Health Geelong Victoria Australia 3220
29 Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia
30 Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia
31 Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch Western Australia Australia 6150
32 Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia 6009
33 Royal Perth Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia 6000
34 Waitakere Hospital Auckland New Zealand 0610
35 North Shore Hospital Auckland New Zealand 0620
36 Auckland Hospital Auckland New Zealand
37 Middlemore Hospital Auckland New Zealand
38 Wairau Hospital Blenheim New Zealand 7201
39 Christchurch Hospital Christchurch New Zealand
40 Dunedin Hospital Dunedin New Zealand
41 Gisborne Hospital Gisborne New Zealand 4010
42 Waikato Hospital Hamilton New Zealand 3204
43 Hawke's Bay Hospital Hastings New Zealand
44 Nelson Hospital Nelson New Zealand 7010
45 Taranaki Hospital New Plymouth New Zealand
46 Palmerston North/Whanganui Hospital Palmerston North New Zealand
47 Wellington Hospital Wellington New Zealand 6021
48 Whangarei Hospital Whangarei New Zealand

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • The University of Queensland
  • The HOME Network
  • Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry
  • New Zealand Peritoneal Dialysis Registry

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Neil C Boudville, Prof, University of Western Australia & Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
  • Study Chair: Josephine S Chow, Prof, South Western Sydney Local Health District
  • Study Director: Yeoungjee Cho, PhD, Queensland Health/Princess Alexandra Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
The University of Queensland
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03816111
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AKTN 17.03
First Posted:
Jan 25, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Aug 5, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by The University of Queensland
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 5, 2022