Randomized Controlled Trial of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheaths Versus Conventional Sheaths for Treatment of Nephrolithiasis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two variations of the mini-PCNL procedure using either a vacuum-assisted sheath or standard sheath which are both used for the surgical treatment of kidney stones. Both procedure types are commonly used in the treatment of kidneys stones and they have been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of stones similar in size and location to your own.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
In this study we aim to compare two variations of the miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) procedure which are both used for the surgical treatment of kidney stones. This procedure involves accessing the kidney via a small temporary tract that is placed through the patient's back during surgery. Both procedure types are commonly used in the treatment of kidneys stones and they have been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of stones similar in size and location to your own.
Two procedure types will be investigated:
-
Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed using a 16 Fr (6 mm diameter) vacuum-assisted tube with suction capability to assess the kidney and extract the stone.
-
Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed using a 16 Fr (6 mm diameter) standard tube to assess the kidney and extract the stone.
Approximately 90 people will take part in this study at Cleveland Clinic. The duration of the study will include the day of the surgery and following hospital stay until postoperative follow-up appointment with the surgeon approximately 4-6 weeks after the procedure.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: vacuum-assisted sheath
|
Device: vacuum assisted sheath
allows for simultaneous suction with continuous irrigation throughout the case to enhance visibility and facilitate stone retrieval
|
Active Comparator: passive suction via conventional sheath
|
Device: passive suction via conventional sheath
conventional access sheath for stone retrieval using current technique via passive suction
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Aim 1: Stone free rate [6 weeks]
The primary outcome of SFR will be measured using conventional follow up of post-operative NCCT at 6 weeks. NCCT provides the most definitive assessment for post-operative stone burden and allows assessment of radiolucent stones when compared to ultrasound or abdominal x-ray
- Aim 2: Intraoperative variables [3-7 days]
Patients with positive cultures will be treated with appropriate pre-operative antibiotics between 3 to 7 days depending on symptoms. Antibiotics on day of surgery will be selected according to their last pre-operative urine culture which is our standard of care for patients undergoing PCNL
- Aim 3: Post-operative Outcomes and Complications [1 day]
Post-operative pain scores will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and on postoperative day 1. The questionnaire may be filled out on a paper survey or an electronic REDCap survey sent via email. An electronic VAS has shown to be reliable and interchangeable with a paper VAS
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with planned prone mini-PCNL and a preoperative NCCT
-
Primary stone size: 10-25 mm
-
Pre-existing indwelling nephrostomy tube or ureteral stent permitted
-
Age: ≥ 18 years old
-
Gender: all
-
Ethnicity: all
-
Capable of giving informed consent
-
Capable and willing to fulfill requirements of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Anticoagulated or history of coagulopathy
-
Congenital renal anomalies
-
Prior ipsilateral upper urinary tract reconstructive procedures
-
Conversion to open procedure
-
Multiple access tracts
-
Inability to give informed consent or unable to meet requirements of the study for any reason
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- The Cleveland Clinic
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 23-104