DICAM: Renal Function Evaluation After Reduction of Cyclosporine A Dose in Renal Transplant Patients

Sponsor
University Hospital, Rouen (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00213590
Collaborator
(none)
208
2
79

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to show the efficacy of reduction of cyclosporine A exposure measured by the area under the curve by Bayesian estimator on the primary prevention of degradation of the renal function in renal transplant recipients

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: cyclosporine A
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Study population Eligible patients were 18 to 75 years of age and primary or secondary renal transplant recipients in their second year posttransplant with stable serum creatinine levels (i.e., < 20% variation for the previous 3 months). All patients must have received induction therapy, been corticosteroid-free for at least 3 months, and receiving combination maintenance therapy consisting of cyclosporine (trough level, 125 to 175 ng/mL) and mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, F. Hoffmann- La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland) 2 g daily.

Patients at either low or high risk of graft dysfunction were ineligible; a majority of the participating centers maintained low immunological risk patients on cyclosporine alone and those with a high risk of graft dysfunction were usually maintained on corticosteroids. For this study, low risk was defined as the presence of the following: zero or one acute rejection episode with a return of renal function to previous levels after corticosteroid treatment, panel-reactive antibody titer <25%, serum creatinine level <125 µmol/L, age >25 years, and donor age <40 years. High risk was defined as the presence of at least one of the following: a serum creatinine level >250 µmol/L, proteinuria >1 g/day, panel-reactive antibody titer >80%, >1 episode of T-cell-mediated rejection or at least one episode of antibody-mediated rejection posttransplant, or the presence of vasculitis or systemic lupus erythematosus which usually were treated with corticosteroids.

Other exclusion criteria were evidence of systemic infection or malignancy within the previous 5 years (except adequately treated nonmetastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin), leukocyte count <2.5x103/µL, hemoglobin <80 g/dL, platelet count <100x103/µL, severe intestinal disorders, pregnancy, breast feeding, current immunosuppressive treatment with drugs other than cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. Women of childbearing age were required to use adequate contraception during treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and for six weeks after its discontinuation.

Study Endpoints The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment failure (failure to prevent kidney dysfunction) at 24 months, which was a composite of graft loss, histologically confirmed acute rejection or cyclosporine toxicity, or a > 15% increase in the mean serum creatinine level from the baseline assessment. The mean of the current and two previous serum creatinine levels was used to determine the level at baseline, the level at the nadir (the time of the lowest serum creatinine measurement),and the level at 2 years.

The secondary endpoints included the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline calculated using the four-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study; blood pressure, urinary protein, and lipid levels; severe adverse events such as infection requiring hospitalization, neoplasia, or lymphoma; and graft and patient survival.

Study Follow-up and Procedures Weight, blood pressure after a 10-minute rest, serum creatinine and glucose levels, a complete blood cell count, and urinary protein levels were measured, and the use of immunosuppressive, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering drugs was recorded at baseline and every 2 months. Serum lipid levels were measured at baseline and every 6 months. Gynecologic and dermatologic examinations were performed at baseline and yearly. Adverse events were recorded.

Renal biopsies were performed when creatinine levels increased > 20% relative to the nadir or when proteinuria was >1 g/day. The nadir level was used as a reference point to obviate the risk of missing the diagnosis of rejection in the low-exposure arm; serum creatinine levels usually fell after the initiation of a low exposure regimen. Biopsies were classified using Banff 1997 criteria by four senior pathologists blinded to the clinical information. CNI-associated nephrotoxicity was graded mild, moderate, or severe according to the Banff 1997 chronicity rejection scores.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
208 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Multicentric, Randomized, Opened Study to Evaluate Efficacy on Renal Function of an Immunosuppressant Regimen Based on Cyclosporine A Dose Reduction in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil, From the Second Year of Renal Transplantation
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2000
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2006
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2006

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: 1

the usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L

Experimental: 2

the low-exposure group the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 50% usual target or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L

Drug: cyclosporine A
The usual-exposure level was based on the mean area-under-the-concentration-time curve (AUC0-12h). In the usual-exposure group, the cyclosporine AUC0-12h target was 4.3 (3.5 to 4.8, range) mg•h/L and in the low-exposure group the target was 50% or 2.2 (2.0 to 2.6, range) mg•h/L. Ranges were asymmetrical for safety reasons, i.e., to prevent the occurrence of rejection in the low-exposure arm and nephrotoxicity in the usual-exposure arm.The AUC 0-12h was estimated using a Bayesian estimator and a three-point limited sampling strategy (0, 1, and 3 hours). A computer program was used to calculate the dose adjustment required to reach the therapeutic target. Doses were adjusted in increments of 25% to reach the target within 2 months. Cyclosporine AUC0-12h was determined every 2 months.
Other Names:
  • cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral Novartis Basel Switzerland
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. renal function at two years [every two months]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. proteinuria [every two months]

    2. hypertension [every two months]

    3. hemodialysis [at any time during the study period]

    4. nephrotoxicity [at any time during the study period]

    5. chronic renal dysfunction [at two years]

    6. biopsy proven late acute rejection [at any time during the study period]

    7. dyslipidemia [every six months]

    8. patient survival [at two years]

    9. graft survival [at two years]

    10. severe infection with hospitalisation [at any time during the study period]

    11. post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder [at any time during the study period]

    12. cutaneous carcinoma [every year]

    13. area under the concentration-time of cyclosporine A [every two months]

    14. area under the concentration-time of mycophenolate mofetil [at month 0 6 12 and 24]

    15. biodisponibility of mycophenolate mofetil after reduction of cyclosporine A exposure [at month 6 12 and 24]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • first or second renal graft

    • cadaveric renal graft

    • second year of renal transplantation

    • stable renal function

    • moderate renal dysfunction risk

    • bitherapy with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil

    • corticosteroid withdrawal since 3 months at less

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • 2 or more acute rejection episodes

    • PRA> 80%

    • serum creatinine> 250µmol/L

    • 24-hour proteinuria > 1g

    • humoral rejection

    • vasculitis

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University Hospital, Rouen

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Isabelle ETIENNE, MD, University Hospital, Rouen

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University Hospital, Rouen
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00213590
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1998/081/HP
    First Posted:
    Sep 21, 2005
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2012
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 16, 2012