Is Isokinetic Testing an Indicator of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Sponsor
Bahçeşehir University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05668546
Collaborator
(none)
29
1
2
10.1
2.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this study, investigators analyzed whether the isokinetic knee muscle strength of patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a predictor for surgery.

Patients and Methods: In total, 29 unilateral TKA candidates (58 knees; mean age = 66.69 ± 7.42 years; mean symptom duration = 10 ± 5.40 years) were enrolled. The knees of patients with bilateral advanced knee osteoarthritis (stage 3 or 4), according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L scale), that were scheduled for unilateral TKA were divided into surgical and non-surgical groups. An isokinetic testing system was used to assess knee flexor and extensor muscle strength (peak torque) at angular velocities of 60°/s and 180°/s (five cycles per velocity). The radiological (X-ray-based K-L scale and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based quadriceps angle) and clinical findings (isokinetic test and visual analog scale pain scores) in both groups were compared. The isokinetic test results correlated with the radiological findings of the surgery group.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: isokinetic testing CSMI HUMAC NORM instrument
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
29 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Masking Description:
After the surgical decision was made, the patients were referred to the physiatrist by the orthopedist without informing which knee would be operated on. The physiatrist and the patient did not know which knee would be operated, so the tests were performed blindly.
Primary Purpose:
Screening
Official Title:
Is Isokinetic Knee Muscle Strength an Indicator of Total Knee Arthroplasty
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: surgical knee group

This study analyzed 58 knees of 29 unilateral TKA candidates, divided into the surgical and non-surgical knee groups

Device: isokinetic testing CSMI HUMAC NORM instrument
The strength (PT) of the bilateral knee flexors and extensors were tested with isokinetic test. Tests were performed under the guidance of a rehabilitation medicine specialist, and the system was calibrated prior to their commencement. The patients were seated in upright position and were fixed with pelvic and thigh belts. Concentric extension (PT_E) and concentric flexion (PT_F) were measured between the 0° and 90° knee ranges at angular velocities of 60°/s and 180°/s (60 PT_E, 60 PT_F, 180 PT_E, and 180 PT_F, respectively) The tests were repeated five times at each velocity, and the highest PTs were selected for statistical analysis. The participants performed repeated trials before sets, while a 20-second rest was provided between sets.

Experimental: non surgical knee group

This study analyzed 58 knees of 29 unilateral TKA candidates, divided into the surgical and non-surgical knee groups

Device: isokinetic testing CSMI HUMAC NORM instrument
The strength (PT) of the bilateral knee flexors and extensors were tested with isokinetic test. Tests were performed under the guidance of a rehabilitation medicine specialist, and the system was calibrated prior to their commencement. The patients were seated in upright position and were fixed with pelvic and thigh belts. Concentric extension (PT_E) and concentric flexion (PT_F) were measured between the 0° and 90° knee ranges at angular velocities of 60°/s and 180°/s (60 PT_E, 60 PT_F, 180 PT_E, and 180 PT_F, respectively) The tests were repeated five times at each velocity, and the highest PTs were selected for statistical analysis. The participants performed repeated trials before sets, while a 20-second rest was provided between sets.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Knee flexion and extension muscle strengths assessed by isokinetic dynamometer [cross-sectional study, baseline]

    In the isokinetic evaluation, both 60 PT_E (Peak Torque _Extension) and 60 PT_F (Peak Torque_Flexion) were evaluated.The tests were repeated five times at each velocity, and the highest PTs were selected for statistical analysis. The participants performed repeated trials before sets, while a 20-second rest was provided between sets.

  2. Osteoartritis gradings assessed by Kellgren-Lawrence grading system [cross sectional study, baseline]

    Kellgren-Lawrence grading system was used. Each radiograph was assigned a grade from 0 to 4, which correlated to increasing severity of OA, with Grade 0 signifying no presence of OA and Grade 4 signifying severe OA

  3. Pain assessed by Visual analog scale [cross sectional study, baseline]

    The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score of each individual was also recordedThe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be'). Investigators asked the patient to rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line.

  4. Quadriceps angle [cross sectional study, baseline]

    Q angle of knees were recorded. It is defined as the angle formed between the quadriceps muscles and the patella tendon.The Q angle measured in standing. Normal Q angle score for females is between 13-18° and in males is between 12-15°, with values greater than and lesser these are considered abnormal

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosis of advanced (Kellgren-Lawrence stage 3 or 4) bilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA).

  • Unilateral total knee replacement surgery recommended by orthopedics according to pain status

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Neurological diseases that could affect knee muscle strength

  • Rheumatological diseases

  • Diagnosis of osteoarthritis below 3 according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Memorial Sisli Hospital Istanbul Turkey

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Bahçeşehir University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ilknur saral, Ass Prof, Bahcesehir University, Department of Health Sciences

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Ilknur Saral, Ass. Prof., Bahçeşehir University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05668546
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 395
First Posted:
Dec 30, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Dec 30, 2022
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Ilknur Saral, Ass. Prof., Bahçeşehir University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 30, 2022