Identification of the Sensory Level Block to Cold During Epidural Analgesia for Labor: A Cohort Study to Determine the Influence of the Direction of Testing

Sponsor
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03572439
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
5.8
5.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Assessment of the upper sensory block level during neuraxial analgesia for labor and delivery is an essential component of clinical management and patient safety. A variety of methods have been used for testing the sensory block such as cold, light touch, sharp touch or prick and transcutaneous electrical stimulation. In addition to the diversity of methods, the endpoints used by investigators have also been variable, considering total or partial responses as endpoints. Not surprisingly, a variable sensory block level could be identified as a result of the different methods and types of question asked by the examiner. Another complicating factor is the lack of standardization of the direction of the testing as it relates to anesthetized and non-anesthetized areas. This lack of standardization may result in a difference of several dermatomes in the level that two different assessors might record for the same patient. Considering a clinical research scenario, it may be difficult to replicate results and implement clinical practices. The objective of this study is to determine the degree of agreement between two methods of assessing the sensory block level to cold in women receiving epidural analgesia for labor (anesthetized to non-anesthetized segments versus non-anesthetized to anesthetized segments).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Sensory block level check using ice
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Identification of the Sensory Level Block to Cold During Epidural Analgesia for Labor: A Cohort Study to Determine the Influence of the Direction of Testing (Anesthetized Area to Non-anesthetized Area Versus Non-anesthetized to Anesthetized Area)
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 17, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 10, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 10, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Cephalad to caudal

Sensory block level check using ice, moving from cephalad to caudal

Diagnostic Test: Sensory block level check using ice
Patients are asked to report when the ice feels as cold as it does on the forehead.

Active Comparator: Caudal to cephalad

Sensory block level check using ice, moving from caudal to cephalad

Diagnostic Test: Sensory block level check using ice
Patients are asked to report when the ice feels as cold as it does on the forehead.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The lower sensory block level to cold [1 hour]

    The sensory block level will be defined as: the dermatome at which and below which there is complete loss of sensation to cold

  2. The upper sensory block level to cold [1 hour]

    The sensory block level will be defined as: the dermatome at which and below which there is still partial sensation to cold

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Patient satisfaction [20 minutes]

    Patients will be asked to report satisfaction with the test done from 0-10 (0=very uncomfortable 10=most comfortable

  2. The lower sensory block level to cold [2 hours]

    The sensory block level will be defined as: the dermatome at which and below which there is complete loss of sensation to cold

  3. The upper sensory block level to cold [2 hours]

    The sensory block level will be defined as: the dermatome at which and below which there is still partial sensation to cold

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients who request and have no contraindications to receive epidural analgesia

  • capable of understanding and signing the written informed consent

  • have no language barrier to respond to the level of sensory block assessment

  • have no conditions that could compromise their sensitivity to cold.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • patients who refuse to sign consent

  • epidural analgesia is contraindicated

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada M5G1X5

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose CA Carvalho, MD, MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03572439
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 18-05
First Posted:
Jun 28, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Feb 22, 2019
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 22, 2019