EVA: Epidural Analgesia (EDA) Versus Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) in Laparoscopic Colon Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a epidural analgesia versus patient controlled analgesia reduces the medical recovery in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colon surgery.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Allocation by individual random number generated by a computer program to either EDA or PCA for 48h after laparoscopic colonic surgery.
Short, both groups are treated according to a recent Fast track protocol. Group A will preoperatively receive a mid thoracic EDA (th 8-9; naropine 0,1%) while group B will receive a PCA (morphine) postoperatively. Both EDA and PCA are removed the afternoon at day 2. Patients with a non-functioning EDA within the first 24h will be crossed over to the PCA group.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: A Epidural Analgesia (EDA) An epidural catheter was inserted at thoracic level (Th8-Th10) before induction of anesthesia. A bolus of 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% was started as soon as the epidural catheter was in place, and a continuous perfusion of bupivacaine 0.5% at 5 mL/hr was initiated until the end of surgical procedure. |
Procedure: Epidural analgesia
Thoracic epidural analgesia until day 2
|
Other: B Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) was assured by fentanyl (morphine-based) as needed. |
Procedure: Patient controlled analgesia
Patient controlled analgesia (morphine-based)
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Medical Recovery (Defined as Pain Sufficient Controlled by Oral Analgesia, Fully Mobile Patients or at Least as Mobile as at Admission and Tolerance of the Patient of Oral Food Intake (More Than 2/3 of Daily Meal)) [30 days]
Medical recovery was chosen as primary end point and was defined as the fulfillment of all the 3 following criteria: (1) sufficient pain control by oral analgesics, (2) fully mobilized or at least comparable with preoperative status, and (3) tolerance of oral food that was defined as two thirds or more of normal meal (hospital portion).23 Medical recovery was considered as more specific outcome parameter than hospital stay because social and logistic factors were not interfering.24,25
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Complication Rate, Peridural Analgesia Failure Rate, Patient Comfort [30 days]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients admitted for elective laparoscopic colonic surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Age < 18y
-
No informed consent
-
Emergency situation
-
Contraindication for EDA (according to local Anesthesia guidelines)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne | Lausanne | Switzerland | 1011 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Lausanne Hospitals
Investigators
- Study Chair: Nicolas Demartines, MD, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- P166/07
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Epidural | Patient-controlled Analgesia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Epidural Analgesia (Th 8-9) Epidural analgesia: Thoracic epidural analgesia until day 2 | Patient controlled analgesia (morphine-based) Patient controlled analgesia: Patient controlled analgesia (morphine-based) |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 67 | 61 |
COMPLETED | 65 | 57 |
NOT COMPLETED | 2 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Epidural | Patient-controlled Analgesia | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | epidural catheter was inserted at thoracic level (Th8-Th10) before induction of anesthesia. A bolus of 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% was started as soon as the epidural catheter was in place, and a continuous perfusion of bupivacaine 0.5% at 5 mL/hr was initiated until the end of surgical procedure. | In the PCA group, intravenous PCA was inserted with 1 mg/h. A bolus of 1 mL was allowed at every 5 minutes up to a maximal dose of 40 mg/4h. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 65 | 57 | 122 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
63.1
(15.1)
|
61.2
(17.8)
|
62.5
(16.3)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
28
43.1%
|
23
40.4%
|
51
41.8%
|
Male |
37
56.9%
|
34
59.6%
|
71
58.2%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |||
Count of Participants [Participants] |
0
0%
|
||
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
Switzerland |
65
100%
|
57
100%
|
122
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Medical Recovery (Defined as Pain Sufficient Controlled by Oral Analgesia, Fully Mobile Patients or at Least as Mobile as at Admission and Tolerance of the Patient of Oral Food Intake (More Than 2/3 of Daily Meal)) |
---|---|
Description | Medical recovery was chosen as primary end point and was defined as the fulfillment of all the 3 following criteria: (1) sufficient pain control by oral analgesics, (2) fully mobilized or at least comparable with preoperative status, and (3) tolerance of oral food that was defined as two thirds or more of normal meal (hospital portion).23 Medical recovery was considered as more specific outcome parameter than hospital stay because social and logistic factors were not interfering.24,25 |
Time Frame | 30 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
accorindg to intention-to-treat principle |
Arm/Group Title | Epidural | Patient-controlled Analgesia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | epidural catheter was inserted at thoracic level (Th8-Th10) before induction of anesthesia. A bolus of 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% was started as soon as the epidural catheter was in place, and a continuous perfusion of bupivacaine 0.5% at 5 mL/hr was initiated until the end of surgical procedure. | In the PCA group, intravenous PCA was inserted with 1 mg/h. A bolus of 1 mL was allowed at every 5 minutes up to a maximal dose of 40 mg/4h. |
Measure Participants | 65 | 57 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [days] |
5
|
4
|
Title | Complication Rate, Peridural Analgesia Failure Rate, Patient Comfort |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 30 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse event data were collected until 30 days after surgery. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Epidural | Patient-controlled Analgesia | ||
Arm/Group Description | epidural catheter was inserted at thoracic level (Th8-Th10) before induction of anesthesia. A bolus of 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% was started as soon as the epidural catheter was in place, and a continuous perfusion of bupivacaine 0.5% at 5 mL/hr was initiated until the end of surgical procedure. | In the PCA group, intravenous PCA was inserted with 1 mg/h. A bolus of 1 mL was allowed at every 5 minutes up to a maximal dose of 40 mg/4h. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Epidural | Patient-controlled Analgesia | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/65 (3.1%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Epidural | Patient-controlled Analgesia | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 13/65 (20%) | 5/57 (8.8%) | ||
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||
major complications according to clavien: 3+4 | 13/65 (20%) | 13 | 5/57 (8.8%) | 5 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Epidural | Patient-controlled Analgesia | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/65 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | martin hübner |
---|---|
Organization | lausanne university hospital |
Phone | +41795561506 |
martin.hubner@chuv.ch |
- P166/07