EVA: Epidural Analgesia (EDA) Versus Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) in Laparoscopic Colon Surgery

Sponsor
University of Lausanne Hospitals (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00508300
Collaborator
(none)
128
1
2
45
2.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a epidural analgesia versus patient controlled analgesia reduces the medical recovery in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colon surgery.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Epidural analgesia
  • Procedure: Patient controlled analgesia
N/A

Detailed Description

Allocation by individual random number generated by a computer program to either EDA or PCA for 48h after laparoscopic colonic surgery.

Short, both groups are treated according to a recent Fast track protocol. Group A will preoperatively receive a mid thoracic EDA (th 8-9; naropine 0,1%) while group B will receive a PCA (morphine) postoperatively. Both EDA and PCA are removed the afternoon at day 2. Patients with a non-functioning EDA within the first 24h will be crossed over to the PCA group.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
128 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Epidural Analgesia (EDA) Versus Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) in Laparoscopic Colon Surgery: A Monocentric Controlled Non-blinded Randomized Superiority Trial
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: A

Epidural Analgesia (EDA) An epidural catheter was inserted at thoracic level (Th8-Th10) before induction of anesthesia. A bolus of 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% was started as soon as the epidural catheter was in place, and a continuous perfusion of bupivacaine 0.5% at 5 mL/hr was initiated until the end of surgical procedure.

Procedure: Epidural analgesia
Thoracic epidural analgesia until day 2

Other: B

Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) was assured by fentanyl (morphine-based) as needed.

Procedure: Patient controlled analgesia
Patient controlled analgesia (morphine-based)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Medical Recovery (Defined as Pain Sufficient Controlled by Oral Analgesia, Fully Mobile Patients or at Least as Mobile as at Admission and Tolerance of the Patient of Oral Food Intake (More Than 2/3 of Daily Meal)) [30 days]

    Medical recovery was chosen as primary end point and was defined as the fulfillment of all the 3 following criteria: (1) sufficient pain control by oral analgesics, (2) fully mobilized or at least comparable with preoperative status, and (3) tolerance of oral food that was defined as two thirds or more of normal meal (hospital portion).23 Medical recovery was considered as more specific outcome parameter than hospital stay because social and logistic factors were not interfering.24,25

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Complication Rate, Peridural Analgesia Failure Rate, Patient Comfort [30 days]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • All patients admitted for elective laparoscopic colonic surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Age < 18y

  • No informed consent

  • Emergency situation

  • Contraindication for EDA (according to local Anesthesia guidelines)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland 1011

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Lausanne Hospitals

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nicolas Demartines, MD, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Center, Lausanne, Switzerland

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Nicolas DEMARTINES, professor of surgery, University of Lausanne Hospitals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00508300
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • P166/07
First Posted:
Jul 27, 2007
Last Update Posted:
Aug 11, 2020
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2020
Keywords provided by Nicolas DEMARTINES, professor of surgery, University of Lausanne Hospitals

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia
Arm/Group Description Epidural Analgesia (Th 8-9) Epidural analgesia: Thoracic epidural analgesia until day 2 Patient controlled analgesia (morphine-based) Patient controlled analgesia: Patient controlled analgesia (morphine-based)
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 67 61
COMPLETED 65 57
NOT COMPLETED 2 4

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia Total
Arm/Group Description epidural catheter was inserted at thoracic level (Th8-Th10) before induction of anesthesia. A bolus of 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% was started as soon as the epidural catheter was in place, and a continuous perfusion of bupivacaine 0.5% at 5 mL/hr was initiated until the end of surgical procedure. In the PCA group, intravenous PCA was inserted with 1 mg/h. A bolus of 1 mL was allowed at every 5 minutes up to a maximal dose of 40 mg/4h. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 65 57 122
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
63.1
(15.1)
61.2
(17.8)
62.5
(16.3)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
28
43.1%
23
40.4%
51
41.8%
Male
37
56.9%
34
59.6%
71
58.2%
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)
Count of Participants [Participants]
0
0%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
Switzerland
65
100%
57
100%
122
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Medical Recovery (Defined as Pain Sufficient Controlled by Oral Analgesia, Fully Mobile Patients or at Least as Mobile as at Admission and Tolerance of the Patient of Oral Food Intake (More Than 2/3 of Daily Meal))
Description Medical recovery was chosen as primary end point and was defined as the fulfillment of all the 3 following criteria: (1) sufficient pain control by oral analgesics, (2) fully mobilized or at least comparable with preoperative status, and (3) tolerance of oral food that was defined as two thirds or more of normal meal (hospital portion).23 Medical recovery was considered as more specific outcome parameter than hospital stay because social and logistic factors were not interfering.24,25
Time Frame 30 days

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
accorindg to intention-to-treat principle
Arm/Group Title Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia
Arm/Group Description epidural catheter was inserted at thoracic level (Th8-Th10) before induction of anesthesia. A bolus of 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% was started as soon as the epidural catheter was in place, and a continuous perfusion of bupivacaine 0.5% at 5 mL/hr was initiated until the end of surgical procedure. In the PCA group, intravenous PCA was inserted with 1 mg/h. A bolus of 1 mL was allowed at every 5 minutes up to a maximal dose of 40 mg/4h.
Measure Participants 65 57
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [days]
5
4
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Complication Rate, Peridural Analgesia Failure Rate, Patient Comfort
Description
Time Frame 30 days

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title
Arm/Group Description

Adverse Events

Time Frame Adverse event data were collected until 30 days after surgery.
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia
Arm/Group Description epidural catheter was inserted at thoracic level (Th8-Th10) before induction of anesthesia. A bolus of 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% was started as soon as the epidural catheter was in place, and a continuous perfusion of bupivacaine 0.5% at 5 mL/hr was initiated until the end of surgical procedure. In the PCA group, intravenous PCA was inserted with 1 mg/h. A bolus of 1 mL was allowed at every 5 minutes up to a maximal dose of 40 mg/4h.
All Cause Mortality
Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 2/65 (3.1%) 0/57 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 13/65 (20%) 5/57 (8.8%)
Surgical and medical procedures
major complications according to clavien: 3+4 13/65 (20%) 13 5/57 (8.8%) 5
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Epidural Patient-controlled Analgesia
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/65 (0%) 0/57 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title martin hübner
Organization lausanne university hospital
Phone +41795561506
Email martin.hubner@chuv.ch
Responsible Party:
Nicolas DEMARTINES, professor of surgery, University of Lausanne Hospitals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00508300
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • P166/07
First Posted:
Jul 27, 2007
Last Update Posted:
Aug 11, 2020
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2020