LGL: Prospective, Multicentric, Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial on Two Parallel Groups Comparing the Efficacy of Two Immunosuppressive Drugs (Methotrexate, Cyclophosphamide) in Large Granular Lymphocytes Leukemia

Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT01976182
Collaborator
(none)
166
59
2
108
2.8
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

LGL leukemia represents a rare subtype of chronic T or NK lymphoproliferative disorders. It is an indolent disease, the main hematological or autoimmune complications lead to a treatment in more than 60% of patients.

Investigators set up at the University Hospital of Rennes, a database of more than 300 patients with LGL leukemia from major French services that support this disease, and published in 2010 the largest series of patients in the world (n = 229). However, the limited heterogeneity and retrospective data collected, as all previously released, makes it difficult the proposal of consensual treatment options. If first and second line treatments are based on the use of immunosuppression with methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, or cyclosporin A, no molecule has proven superiority over others. Methotrexate and cyclophosphamide are mainly used in the first line. Invetigators just have in the literature data on about 100 patients treated with either of these drugs. Combining the results of our series with those in the literature, invetigators estimate the respective overall response rate (RG) and complete response rate (CR) in 55% and 30% for methotrexate, and 60% and 50% for cyclophosphamide.

Thus, there are four objective in this study :
  1. to compare the respective efficacies of methotrexate and cyclophosphamide when administered as first-line therapies in patients suffering from T/NK LGL leukemia with severe neutropenia or neutropenia associated with infections, and/or anemia requiring transfusions, and/or auto-immune associated disease

  2. to evaluate the percentage of patients refractory to methotrexate or cyclophosphamide for which a second line treatment is efficacious

  3. to explore, in case of non-response to the first-line therapy, the efficacy of ciclosporine A, the comparison being performed with the treatment which was not administered in the first-line therapy

  4. to evaluate the response rate according to the phenotypic subtype of LGL leukemia.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Large Granular Lymphocyte (LGL) leukemia is a clonal disorder involving tissue invasion of marrow, spleen and liver. Clinical presentation is dominated by recurrent infections associated with neutropenia, anemia, splenomegaly, and auto-immune diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis. Both T cell and NK cell subtypes of LGL leukemia are indolent disease and considered as a chronic illness and lead to a treatment in more than 60% of patients.

LGL leukemia displays a chronic clinical course. Recommendations regarding therapy are similar for both subtypes. Indications for treatment include 1) severe neutropenia (ANC <500 mm3); 2) neutropenia (ANC <1500mm3) with symptomatic recurrent infections; 3) symptomatic or transfusion-dependent anemia and 4) associated autoimmune conditions requiring therapy, most often rheumatoid arthritis.

There is no standard treatment for patients with LGL leukemia. The numerous case reports published do not provide a consensus for a particular treatment. All the six largest series published in the literature so far (collecting data on more than 40 patients) are retrospective.

Immunosuppressive therapy remains the foundation of treatment including single three agents i.e. methotrexate, oral cyclophosphamide and ciclosporin A. However prospective trials involving large numbers of patients have not been performed and no molecule has proven superiority over others.

Invetigators set up at the University Hospital of Rennes, a database of more than 300 patients with LGL leukemia from major French services that support this disease, and published in 2010 the largest series of patients in the world (n = 229). However, the limited heterogeneity and retrospective data collected, as all previously released, makes it difficult the proposal of consensual treatment options. Combining the results of our series with those of the literature, invetigators estimate that overall response rate and complete response rate are 55% and 30% with methotrexate, 60% and 50% with cyclophosphamide, and 55% and less than 20% with ciclosporine A, respectively.

Thus, there are four objective in this study :
  1. to compare the respective efficacies of methotrexate and cyclophosphamide when administered as first-line therapies in patients suffering from T/NK LGL leukemia with severe neutropenia or neutropenia associated with infections, and/or anemia requiring transfusions, and/or auto-immune associated disease

  2. to evaluate the percentage of patients refractory to methotrexate or cyclophosphamide for which a second line treatment is efficacious

  3. to explore, in case of non-response to the first-line therapy, the efficacy of ciclosporine A, the comparison being performed with the treatment which was not administered in the first-line therapy

  4. to evaluate the response rate according to the phenotypic subtype of LGL leukemia.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
166 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prospective, Sequential Multiple Assignment, Multicentric, Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial on Two Parallel Groups Comparing the Efficacy of Two Immunosuppressive Drugs (Methotrexate, Cyclophosphamide) in Large Granular Lymphocytes Leukemia
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 26, 2013
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 26, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 26, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: METHOTREXATE

In step 1, 55 patients will receive methotrexate 10mg / m² orally once a week, (at split doses of 5 mg/m2 in the morning and 5 mg/m2 at night), that is to say 2 tablets of 2.5 mg at each take In step 2, responders at Month 4 (CR or PR) will be treated during 8 additional months with methotrexate at the same dosage. Non responders at Month 4 will be randomized and treated either by: Cyclophosphamide delivered at 100 mg orally once daily, that is to say 2 tablets of 50 mg at each take between Month 5 and Month 8, decreased to 50 mg orally once daily beyond Month 8 for responders at Month 8; Ciclosporine A delivered at 3 mg/kg per day (at split doses of 1.5 mg/kg in the morning and 1.5 mg/kg at night) orally administered.

Drug: Methotrexate
methotrexate 10mg / m² orally once a week, (at split doses of 5 mg/m2 in the morning and 5 mg/m2 at night), that is to say 2 tablets of 2.5 mg at each take, during 4 months.

Active Comparator: CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE

In step 1, 55 patients will receive cyclophosphamide 100 mg orally once daily, that is to say 2 tablets of 50 mg at each take. In step 2, responders at Month 4 (CR or PR) will be treated during 8 additional months with cyclophosphamide (at 50 mg orally once daily); Non responders at Month 4 will be randomized and treated either by: Methotrexate administered at 10 mg/m2 orally once a week (at split doses of 5 mg/m2 in the morning and 5 mg/m2 at night), that is to say 2 tablets of 2.5 mg at each take; Ciclosporine A delivered at 3 mg/kg per day (at split doses of 1.5 mg/kg in the morning and 1.5 mg/kg at night) orally administered.

Drug: Cyclophosphamide
cyclophosphamide 100 mg orally once daily, that is to say 2 tablets of 50 mg at each take, during 4 months.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Complete response (CR) [at Month 4]

    The main endpoint will be the hematological CR rate evaluated after 4 months of treatment (binary endpoint). Complete response (CR) is defined as a normalization of clinical examination (disappearance of splenomegaly) and a complete normalization of blood counts (i.e., hemoglobin >12g/dL, platelets >150x109/L, ANC >1.5x109/L), lymphocytosis <4x109/L and circulating LGL in the normal range (<0.3x109/L). The number of LGL will be quantitated on blood smears.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. overall response rate (ORR) [at Month 4, and at Month 8 and Month 12 in non-responders at Month 4]

    Hematological overall response rate (ORR) defined as the sum of complete responses and partial responses over the total number of patients.

  2. Complete response (CR) [at Month 8 and Month 12]

    Complete response (CR) is defined as a normalization of clinical examination (disappearance of splenomegaly) and a complete normalization of blood counts (i.e., hemoglobin >12g/dL, platelets >150x109/L, ANC >1.5x109/L), lymphocytosis <4x109/L and circulating LGL in the normal range (<0.3x109/L). The number of LGL will be quantitated on blood smears.

  3. Hematological partial response (PR) [at Month 4, Month 8 and Month 12]

    Hematological partial response (PR) defined as an improvement in blood counts which do not meet criteria for complete remission (e.g., ANC increasing more than 50% and reaching more than 0.5 but less than 1.5x109/L with non-recurrence of infections, or hemoglobin level increasing more than 2 g/dL from baseline and transfusion requirements stopping without normalization of the hemoglobin level defined as hemoglobin >12g/dL).

  4. Progressive disease [at Month 4, Month 8 and Month 12]

    Progressive disease defined as worsening of cytopenia or organomegaly or incidence of infections.

  5. Time-to-relapse [from Month 4 to endpoint (in first-line treatment responders)]

    Time-to-relapse (censored variable). Relapse is defined as re-occurrence of either neutropenia or anemia (ANC <1x109/L and/or hemoglobin <10g/dL) or clonal LGL >0.5x109/L in complete responders, or as a return to baseline values of either ANC or hemoglobin in partial responders, at two monthly consecutive blood tests.

  6. Time-to-relapse [from Month 8 to endpoint (in second-line treatment responders)]

    Time-to-relapse (censored variable). Relapse is defined as re-occurrence of either neutropenia or anemia (ANC <1x109/L and/or hemoglobin <10g/dL) or clonal LGL >0.5x109/L in complete responders, or as a return to baseline values of either ANC or hemoglobin in partial responders, at two monthly consecutive blood tests.

  7. Molecular remission [at Month 4 and Month 12 for hematological complete responders]

    Molecular remission defined as the disappearance of the clonal pattern of TCR gamma multiplex rearrangement and Phenotypic remission is defined as : For the T subtype: disappearance of the excess of CD3+/CD8+ cells (or disappearance of the LGL clone according to the specific subtype observed at inclusion); For the NK subtype: disappearance of the excess of CD3-/CD56+ cells (or disappearance of the LGL clone according to the specific subtype observed at inclusion)

  8. Adverse events rate [Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 8, Month 10, Month 12]

    Adverse events rate

  9. Compliance [Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 8, Month 10, Month 12]

    Compliance

  10. relationship between the response to treatment and the phenotypic subtype [Day 1]

    Identification of a relationship between the response to treatment and the phenotypic subtype characterized by the panel of monoclonal antibodies defined in the ancillary study subsection.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Common criteria of LGL leukemia: the diagnosis is based on a chronic LGL peripheral blood expansion (>0.5x109/L), usually lasting more than 6 months

  • Specific criteria for T-LGL leukemia or NK-LGL lymphocytosis or chronic NK-LGL leukemia:

  • Specific criteria for T-LGL leukemia:

  • Expression of LGL surface markers compatible with an activated T-cell (commonly alpha-beta+/CD3+/CD8+/CD57+ and/or CD16+) phenotype or gamma-delta+ T cells;

  • Clonal rearrangement of TCRγ gene using PCR or specific and clonal Vβ expression using FCM.

  • Specific criteria for NK-LGL lymphocytosis or chronic NK LGL leukemia:

  • Expression of LGL surface markers compatible with a NK cell (commonly CD3-/CD8+/CD16+ and/or CD16+/CD56+) phenotype;

  • CD56+ or CD16+ NK cells greater than 0.75x109/L;

  • The term of chronic NK-LGL lymphocytosis is used for patients with chronic illness (NB: patients with massive tissue LGL infiltration of the spleen, liver and bone marrow and presenting aggressive clinical behavior are considered as having aggressive NK-LGL leukemia and should not be included).

  • Age above 18 years

  • ECOG performance status of 0-2

  • Life expectancy of at least 1 year

  • Lack of previous treatment (except with G-CSF or transfusions)

  • At least one indication of treatment:

  • Isolated severe neutropenia (ANC <0.5x109/L) or neutropenia (ANC <1.5x109/L) with two or more infections requiring antibiotics;

  • Anemia (whatever the underlying mechanism: pure red cell aplasia or marrow infiltration) requiring transfusions greater than 2 units for two months prior to inclusion, or symptomatic anemia (hemoglobin <10g/dl) with impairment of the quality of life;

  • Associated complications such as systemic diseases or auto-immune diseases (i.e. recurrent uveitis, cutaneous vasculitis, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis resistant to steroids and/or immunomodulator agents (colchicin, disulone, hydrochloroquine)) and justifying a treatment with methotrexate or cyclophosphamide

  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Inability to understand or to follow study procedures

  • Prior or concurrent malignancy within the past 5 years except inactive nonmelanomatous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix

  • Other serious medical illnesses, such as hepatic, renal, cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, or metabolic disease that would preclude the patient's ability to tolerate methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, or ciclosporine A

  • Reactive LGL lymphocytosis (i.e. after viral infection)

  • ALAT/ASAT or alkalin phosphatases >3 times normal values

  • Creatinine clairance <50 ml/min

  • Serologic evidence of HIV, hepatitis C or hepatitis B infection

  • Non effective contraception

  • Positive pregnancy test

  • Nursing woman

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU Sud Amiens France 80054
2 CHU Angers Angers France 49033
3 Intern medecine Service - CH Antibes-Juan-les-Pins Antibes France
4 Hematology Service - CH Avignon Avignon France 84902
5 Hematology Service - CH de la cote basque Bayonne France
6 hematology service - CH Beauvais Beauvais France 60021
7 Hematology Service - CH Jean Minjoz Besançon France 25030
8 Hematology Service - CH Beziers Beziers France 34500
9 Hematology Unit - HOpital Avicienne Bobigny France 93009
10 Hematology Service - CH Docteur Duchenne Boulogne sur Mer France 62321
11 Hematology Service - CH de Brest Brest France 29609
12 Hematology Service - CH François Baclesse Caen France 14076
13 hematology Service - CH Louis Pasteur Chartres France 28018
14 Centre Hospitalier de Cholet Cholet France 49300
15 Hopital Inter-Armées Percy Clamart France 92141
16 hematology Service - CHU Estaing Clermont-Ferrand France 63003
17 Hematology Service - Civils hospital Colmar France 68024
18 Hematology Service CHSF Corbeil Essonnes France 91110
19 CHU Henri Mondor Lymphoid Hemopathy Unit Creteil France 94000
20 CHU Dijon Hematology Unit Dijon France 21000
21 Hematology Unit CH Michalon Grenoble France 38043
22 Hematology Unit CHD Vendée La Roche sur Yon France 85925
23 Hematology Unit CH LE MANS Le Mans France 72000
24 CH Robert Boulin Libourne France 33500
25 Hematology Unit CHRU Lille Lille France 59037
26 Hematology Unit CHU Dupuytren Limoges France 87042
27 CH de Bretagne Sud Lorient France 56322
28 Hematology Unit CHU La Conception Marseille France 13005
29 Hematology Unit - Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille France 13009
30 Hematology Unit CH Meaux Meaux France 77100
31 Hematology Unit CH Notre Dame Bon Secours Metz France 57000
32 Hematogy Unit CHU ST ELOI Montpellier France 34295
33 Hematology Unit CH E.MULLER Mulhouse France 68070
34 Internal Medicine - CHU Hotel Dieu Nantes France
35 Oncology Unit CH Antoine Lacassagne Nice France
36 hematology Unit CHU Caremeau Nimes France 30029
37 Hematology Unit - CHR Orleans Orleans France 45067
38 Hematology Service - Hopital La Pitié Salpetrière Paris France 75013
39 Hematology Unit - Hopital Hotel Dieu Paris France 75181
40 Hematology Unit - Hopital Saint Antoine Paris France 75571
41 AP-HP Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades Paris France 75743
42 Hematology Unit - Hopital Saint Louis Paris France
43 Hematology Unit Hopital Saint Jean Perpignan France 66000
44 Hematology Service- CH Haut Leveque Pessac France 33604
45 Hematology Unit CH LYON SUD Pierre Benite France 69310
46 Hematology Unit CHU La Miletrie Poitiers France 86000
47 Hematology Unit CH René DUBOS Pontoise France 95000
48 CH Annecy - Hematology Service Pringy France 74374
49 Hematology Unit- Hopital Robert Debré Reims France 51092
50 Hematology Service - CHU of Rennes Rennes France 35000
51 Hematology Unit - CH Becquerel Rouen France 76038
52 Oncology Unit - Institut de cancérologie de la Loire Saint Priest en Jarez France 60008
53 CH Saint Quentin Oncohematology Saint Quentin France 21000
54 CH Yves Lefoll Saint-Brieuc France 22027
55 Hematology Unit CHU Toulouse Toulouse France 31000
56 Hematology Unit CHU Bretonneau Tours France 37044
57 Hematology Unit Hopitaux de Brabois Vandoeuvre les Nancy France 54511
58 Intern Medecine Unit CHBA Vannes France 56017
59 Hôpital André Mignot Centre Hospitalier de Versailles Versailles France 78157

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Rennes University Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Rennes University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01976182
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • LGL
First Posted:
Nov 5, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Aug 30, 2021
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Rennes University Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 30, 2021