Learning Curves for Airtraq Versus King Vision Laryngoscopes

Sponsor
Fundación para la Investigación Biosanitaria del Principado de Asturias (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03464929
Collaborator
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (Other), Fundación Asturcor (Other)
64
1
13.3
4.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Several videolaryngoscopes have been developed but few have been compared in terms of their learning curves and efficacy. The aim of this study is to compare the learning curves of Airtraq versus King Vision in a group of residents trained in direct laryngoscopy. Four residents will perform, after a short training in manikin, 8 intubations with each device. The sequence of use of the devices will be randomized. Outcome measures will be duration of intubation attempt, glottic visualization and percentage of intubation success.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Airtraq indirect laryngoscopy
  • Device: King Vision indirect laryngoscopy

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
64 participants
Observational Model:
Other
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Learning Curves for Airtraq Versus King Vision Laryngoscopes
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 15, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 25, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 25, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Airtraq indirect laryngoscopy

Intubation attempts using Airtraq device.

Device: Airtraq indirect laryngoscopy
Attempt to intubation using the Airtraq device

King Vision indirect laryngoscopy

Intubation attempts using King Vision device

Device: King Vision indirect laryngoscopy
Attempt to intubation using the King Vision device

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Time for intubation [60 seconds]

    Time required from the insertion of the blade beyond the incisors until one complete wave pattern of capnography is monitored.

  2. Glottic visualization [60 seconds]

    Scale of glottic visualization achieved

  3. Intubation success [60 seconds]

    Percentage of intubation success

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-II.

  • Elective surgery.

  • General anesthesia required.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Bronchoaspiration risk.

  • Pharmacological allergies.

  • Craniofacial anomalies.

  • Body mass index > 30.

  • Prior history of airway management complications.

  • Presence of clinical signs predictive of difficult intubation.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA) Oviedo Principado De Asturias Spain 33011

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Fundación para la Investigación Biosanitaria del Principado de Asturias
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
  • Fundación Asturcor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Félix Ezequiel Fernández-Suárez, MD, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Fundación para la Investigación Biosanitaria del Principado de Asturias
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03464929
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ISPA_CritLab_2
First Posted:
Mar 14, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Feb 26, 2019
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 26, 2019