TeachIntub: Teach Intubation by Novices in Anaesthesiology

Sponsor
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05145556
Collaborator
(none)
10
1
2
12
0.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Comparision of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy to learn successful tracheal intubation by novices in anaesthesiology

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Videolarygoscopy
  • Device: conventional laryngoscopy
N/A

Detailed Description

Video laryngoscopy has been recommended as an alternative during difficult conventional direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh blade. However, successful visualisation of the larynx and tracheal intubation using some of the indirect laryngoscopes or video laryngoscopy requires hand-eye coordination. To best of our knowledge in the current literature there are no data how is the best educative way to learn successful tracheal intubation by novices in anaesthesiology.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Starting with 100 tracheal intubations with conventional tracheal intubation and videolaryngoscopy and after 100 intubations change the device for the next 100 intubationsStarting with 100 tracheal intubations with conventional tracheal intubation and videolaryngoscopy and after 100 intubations change the device for the next 100 intubations
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparision of Direct Laryngoscopy and Video Laryngoscopy to Learn Successful Tracheal Intubation by Novices in Anaesthesiology
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 2, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Videolaryngoscopy (McGrath Macintosh)

First pass success rate using the videolaryngoscopy

Device: Videolarygoscopy
In a randomised order we evaluate the first pass success rate of the tracheal tube into the trachea.

Experimental: conventional direct laryngoscopy

First pass success rate using the conventional direct laryngoscopy

Device: conventional laryngoscopy
In a randomized order we evaluate the first pass success rate of the tracheal tube into the trachea.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. First pass success rate [at intubation in 60 seconds]

    successful tracheal intubation at the first attempt, compared to more than one attempt

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Time to ventilation [at intubation in 120 seconds]

    From Insertion of the blase into the mouth until first ventilation

  2. Cormack and Lehane Classification [at intubation in 120 seconds]

    after insert the device the user describe the glottis visualisation

  3. Overall success rate [at intubation in 120 seconds]

    after two attempts using defined rescue techniques (e.g. rigid stylet, laryngeal mask)

  4. Subjective Training Process [at one month]

    after 25 intubation attempts

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age ≥ 18 Years

  • capacity to consent

  • Present written informed consent of the research participant

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Age <18 years

  • Lack of consent

  • inability to consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University Mainz Rhineland-Palatinate Germany D55131

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc MK Kriege, PD Dr, University JG, Mainz

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Marc Kriege, MD, PD Dr. med., Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05145556
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • JohannesGUIT
First Posted:
Dec 6, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Mar 29, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Marc Kriege, MD, PD Dr. med., Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 29, 2022