The Impact of LBBAP vs RVP on the Incidence of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrioventricular Block

Sponsor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06023784
Collaborator
(none)
530
1
2
87
6.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a single-center, randomized controlled study. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of left bundle branch area pacing versus traditional right ventricular pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrioventricular block.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: left bundle branch area pacing
  • Procedure: right ventricular pacing
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
530 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Impact of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing on the Incidence of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrioventricular Block: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 30, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2028
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2030

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: left bundle branch area pacing

Procedure: left bundle branch area pacing
Left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) is a novel physiological pacing form for ventricular pacing. In patients received LBBAP, the pacing lead will be placed at left bundle branch area to achieve narrow paced QRS duration.

Active Comparator: right ventricular pacing

Procedure: right ventricular pacing
Right ventricular pacing is the traditional pacing modality for ventricular pacing. The pacing lead was placed in the apex or septum of right ventricle.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation [within two years after device implantation]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. all-cause mortality [within two years after device implantation]

  2. hospitalization for heart failure [within two years after device implantation]

  3. an device upgrade for heart failure [within two years after device implantation]

  4. alteration of quality of life score [within two years after device implantation]

  5. Improvement of left ventricular, right ventricular and left atrial function measured by echocardiography [within two years after device implantation]

  6. pacemaker-associated cardiomyopathy [within two years after device implantation]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult patients aged 18-85;

  • AV block patients with ventricular pacing indications and the expected rate of ventricular pacing(VP)> 40%, including (a) third-degree AV block; (b) second degree AV block (type II); (c) intermittent advanced AV block with expected VP>40%; (d) symptomatic first degree AV block and PR interval on ECG > 300ms;

  • Signed informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Baseline echocardiographic assessment of patients with impaired LV function (LVEF<50%);

  • Patients with the history of atrial fibrillation;

  • Having difficulties in follow-up: Those who cannot accept 2-year follow-up on time due to physical condition or other reasons;

  • Pacemaker replacement without new implanted ventricular electrodes;

  • Surgery is required within 1 year due to severe structural heart disease;

  • Patients with tricuspid mechanical valve replacement, or congenital heart disease (including transposition of the great arteries, or permanent left superior vena cava, etc);

  • AV block resulting from: (a) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM), (b) ventricular septal defect repair, and those who are unlikely to achieve successful LBBAP procedure.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Beijing Beijing China 100730

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Taibo Chen, PhD., Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06023784
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • the July study
First Posted:
Sep 5, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Sep 5, 2023
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 5, 2023