Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Relapsed Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
Fludarabine is currently approved for treatment of relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Studies have shown that drugs in combination with fludarabine have shown more effectiveness than fludarabine alone. The addition of ofatumumab to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combination offers potentially a more effective therapy, without additional toxicity.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ofatumumab added to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia who have responded previously to therapy but later develop progressive disease and require additional therapy.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Ofatumumab, Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles |
Drug: OFC Infusion
Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
|
Active Comparator: Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles |
Drug: FC infusion
Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) [From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug]
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Overall Survival (OS) [From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug]
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.
- Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC [From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug]
Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) >11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM.
- Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC [From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)]
DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
- Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC [From randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug]
Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
- Time to Next Therapy [From the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)]
Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population.
- Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status [Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months)]
The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no).
- Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time [Screening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months)]
Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months).
- Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC [From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug]
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
- Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator [From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug]
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR
- Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC [From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug]
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
- Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator [From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug]
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
- Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) [From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)]
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury.
- Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points [From start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medication]
Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive.
- Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) [From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)]
AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as "self" and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented.
- Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher [From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)]
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
- Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events [From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)]
Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
- Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study [From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug]
Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included.
- Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM [Baseline, 1M and 6M follow up]
Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period.
- Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ [Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up Period]
CD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
- Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ [Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up Period]
CD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
- Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response [From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug]
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (>98%, 97%-98% and <97%), beta 2 microglobulin (>3500 microgram per liter [µg/L] and <=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio <1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on >=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G).
- Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) [Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.]
The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects ([TSE], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale [DES], 4 items), and infection scale [IS] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities [Social Problems (SP) Scale] and future health worries[Future Health (FH) Scale].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization.
- Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit [Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.]
EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date.
- Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score [Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.]
EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if >20points.
- Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) [Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.]
The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions.
- Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab [Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6]
Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC[0-tau]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
- Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab [Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5]
Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
- Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab [Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4]
Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
-
confirmed and active CLL requiring treatment
-
at least one previous treatment for CLL and having achieved a complete or partial remission/response but after a period of 6 or more months, shows evidence of disease progression
-
fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours
-
age 18yrs or older
-
signed written informed consent
Key Exclusion Criteria:
-
diagnosis of refractory CLL (failure to achieve a complete or partial remission/response or disease progression within 6 months of last anti-CLL treatment
-
abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver and kidney function
-
certain heart problems, serious significant diseases, AIHA, other current cancers or within the last 5 years
-
active or chronic infections
-
use of drugs to suppress allergic or inflammatory responses (glucocorticoids)
-
CLL transformation
-
CLL central nervous system involvement
-
current participation in other clinical study
-
inability to comply with the protocol activities
-
lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Novartis Investigative Site | Boca Raton | Florida | United States | 33486 |
2 | Novartis Investigative Site | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60612-3833 |
3 | Novartis Investigative Site | Clinton | Maryland | United States | 20735 |
4 | Novartis Investigative Site | Kansas City | Missouri | United States | 64128 |
5 | Novartis Investigative Site | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | 63110 |
6 | Novartis Investigative Site | Memphis | Tennessee | United States | 38120 |
7 | Novartis Investigative Site | Brasilia | Goiás | Brazil | 70390-150 |
8 | Novartis Investigative Site | Porto Alegre | Rio Grande Do Sul | Brazil | 90610000 |
9 | Novartis Investigative Site | Sao Paulo | São Paulo | Brazil | 05403-000 |
10 | Novartis Investigational Site | Porto Alegre | Brazil | 91350 | |
11 | Novartis Investigative Site | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil | 20211-030 | |
12 | Novartis Investigation Site | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil | 20230-130 | |
13 | Novartis Investigative Site | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil | 21941-913 | |
14 | Novartis Investigational Site | Sao Paulo | Brazil | 03102-002 | |
15 | Novartis Investigative Site | Pleven | Bulgaria | 5800 | |
16 | Novartis Investigative Site | Plovdiv | Bulgaria | 4000 | |
17 | Novartis Investigative Site | Sofia | Bulgaria | 1233 | |
18 | Novartis Investigational Site | Sofia | Bulgaria | 1407 | |
19 | Novartis Investigational Site | Sofia | Bulgaria | 1606 | |
20 | Novartis Investigative Site | Sofia | Bulgaria | ||
21 | Novartis Investigative Site | Varna | Bulgaria | 9010 | |
22 | Novartis Investigative Site | New Westminster | British Columbia | Canada | V3L 3W4 |
23 | Novartis Investigative Site | Kitchener | Ontario | Canada | N2G 1G3 |
24 | Novartis Investigative Site | Newmarket | Ontario | Canada | L3Y 2P9 |
25 | Novartis Investigative Site | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada | K1H 8L6 |
26 | Novartis Investigative Site | Greenfield Park | Quebec | Canada | J4V 2H1 |
27 | Novartis Investigative Site | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | H1T 2M4 |
28 | Novartis Investigative Site | Sherbrooke | Quebec | Canada | J1H 5N4 |
29 | Novartis Investigative Site | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | Canada | S7N 4H4 |
30 | Novartis Investigative Site | Karlsruhe | Baden-Wuerttemberg | Germany | 76137 |
31 | Novartis Investigative Site | Stuttgart | Baden-Wuerttemberg | Germany | 70190 |
32 | Novartis Investigative Site | Stuttgart | Baden-Wuerttemberg | Germany | 70376 |
33 | Novartis Investigative Site | Villingen-Schwenningen | Baden-Wuerttemberg | Germany | 78052 |
34 | Novartis Investigative Site | Muenchen | Bayern | Germany | 81241 |
35 | Novartis Investigative Site | Frankfurt | Hessen | Germany | 65929 |
36 | Novartis Investigative Site | Kassel | Hessen | Germany | 34119 |
37 | Novartis Investigative Site | Hannover | Niedersachsen | Germany | 30625 |
38 | Novartis Investigative Site | Lehrte | Niedersachsen | Germany | 31275 |
39 | Novartis Investigative Site | Essen | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 45122 |
40 | Novartis Investigative Site | Moenchengladbach-Rheydt | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 41239 |
41 | Novartis Investigative Site | Muenster | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 48149 |
42 | Novartis Investigative Site | Saarbruecken | Saarland | Germany | 66113 |
43 | Novartis Investigative Site | Dresden | Sachsen | Germany | 01307 |
44 | Novartis Investigational Site | Hamburg | Germany | 22767 | |
45 | Novartis Investigational Site | Lubeck | Germany | 23562 | |
46 | Novartis Investigative Site | Athens, | Greece | 11 527 | |
47 | Novartis Investigative Site | Athens | Greece | 11527 | |
48 | Novartis Investigative Site | Thessaloniki | Greece | 564 29 | |
49 | Novartis Investigative Site | Thessaloniki | Greece | 57010 | |
50 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bangalore | India | 560029 | |
51 | Novartis Investigative Site | Mumbai | India | 400012 | |
52 | Novartis Investigative Site | Mumbai | India | 400014 | |
53 | Novartis Investigative Site | New Delhi | India | 110029 | |
54 | Novartis Investigative Site | Pune | India | 411001 | |
55 | Novartis Investigative Site | Vadodara | India | 390007 | |
56 | Novartis Investigative Site | Potenza | Basilicata | Italy | 85100 |
57 | Novartis Investigative Site | Roma | Lazio | Italy | 00041 |
58 | Novartis Investigative Site | Roma | Lazio | Italy | 00161 |
59 | Novartis Investigative Site | Genova | Liguria | Italy | 16132 |
60 | Novartis Investigative Site | Pavia | Lombardia | Italy | 27100 |
61 | Novartis Investigative Site | Ascoli Piceno | Marche | Italy | 63100 |
62 | Novartis Investigative Site | Alessandria | Piemonte | Italy | 15100 |
63 | Novartis Investigative Site | Novara | Piemonte | Italy | 28100 |
64 | Novartis Investigative Site | Catania | Sicilia | Italy | 95124 |
65 | Novartis Investigative Site | Palermo | Sicilia | Italy | 90146 |
66 | Novartis Investigative Site | Guadalajara | Jalisco | Mexico | 44280 |
67 | Novartis Investigative Site | Monterrey | Nuevo León | Mexico | 64460 |
68 | Novartis Investigative Site | Monterrey | Nuevo León | Mexico | 64710 |
69 | Novartis Investigative Site | Mexico City | Mexico | CP 14080 | |
70 | Novartis Investigative Site | Amersfoort | Netherlands | 3818 ES | |
71 | Novartis Investigative Site | Den Haag | Netherlands | 2545 CH | |
72 | Novartis Investigative Site | Nijmegen | Netherlands | 6525 GA | |
73 | Novartis Investigative Site | Rotterdam | Netherlands | 3015 CE | |
74 | Novartis Investigative Site | Rotterdam | Netherlands | 3075 EA | |
75 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bialystok | Poland | 15-276 | |
76 | Novartis Investigative Site | Chorzow | Poland | 41-500 | |
77 | Novartis Investigative Site | Krakow | Poland | 31-501 | |
78 | Novartis Investigative Site | Lodz | Poland | 93-510 | |
79 | Novartis Investigative Site | Opole | Poland | 45-372 | |
80 | Novartis Investigative Site | Slupsk | Poland | 76-200 | |
81 | Novartis Investigative Site | Szczecin | Poland | 71-242 | |
82 | Novartis Investigative Site | Warszawa | Poland | 02-507 | |
83 | Novartis Investigative Site | Warszawa | Poland | 02-776 | |
84 | Novartis Investigative Site | Warszawa | Poland | 02-781 | |
85 | Novartis Investigative Site | Wroclaw | Poland | 50-367 | |
86 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bucharest | Romania | 022328 | |
87 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bucharest | Romania | 050098 | |
88 | Iasi | Romania | 300328 | ||
89 | Novartis Investigative Site | Iasi | Romania | 700483 | |
90 | Novartis Investigative Site | Kazan | Russian Federation | 420029 | |
91 | Novartis Investigative Site | Moscow | Russian Federation | 115478 | |
92 | Novartis Investigative Site | Moscow | Russian Federation | 125101 | |
93 | Novartis Investigative Site | Moscow | Russian Federation | 125167 | |
94 | Novartis Investigative Site | Novosibirsk | Russian Federation | 630087 | |
95 | Novartis Investigative Site | St'Petersburg | Russian Federation | 191024 | |
96 | Novartis Investigative Site | St. Petersburg | Russian Federation | 197 089 | |
97 | Novartis Investigative Site | Barcelona | Spain | 08003 | |
98 | Novartis Investigative Site | Barcelona | Spain | 08025 | |
99 | Novartis Investigative Site | Barcelona | Spain | 08916 | |
100 | Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | Spain | 28006 | |
101 | Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | Spain | 28040 | |
102 | Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | Spain | 28046 | |
103 | Novartis Investigative Site | Salamanca | Spain | 37007 | |
104 | Novartis Investigative Site | Sevilla | Spain | 41014 | |
105 | Novartis Investigative Site | Taichung | Taiwan | 404 | |
106 | Novartis Investigative Site | Taipei city | Taiwan | 100 | |
107 | Novartis Investigative Site | Taipei | Taiwan | 112 | |
108 | Novartis Investigational Site | Taipei | Taiwan | 404 | |
109 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bangkok | Thailand | 10330 | |
110 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bangkok | Thailand | 10400 | |
111 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bangkok | Thailand | 10700 | |
112 | Novartis Investigative Site | Cherkasy | Ukraine | 18009 | |
113 | Novartis Investigative Site | Dnipropetrovsk | Ukraine | 49102 | |
114 | Novartis Investigative Site | Kharkiv | Ukraine | 61070 | |
115 | Novartis Investigative Site | Khmelnytskyi | Ukraine | 29000 | |
116 | Novartis Investigative Site | Kyiv | Ukraine | 03022 | |
117 | Novartis Investigative Site | Kyiv | Ukraine | 04112 | |
118 | Novartis Investigative Site | Lviv | Ukraine | 79044 | |
119 | Novartis Investigative Site | Makiivka | Ukraine | 86132 | |
120 | Novartis Investigational Site | Simferopil | Ukraine | 95023 | |
121 | Novartis Investigative Site | Vinnitsa | Ukraine | 21018 | |
122 | Novartis Investigational Site | Zhytomyr | Ukraine | 10002 | |
123 | Novartis Investigative Site | Birmingham | United Kingdom | B9 5SS | |
124 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bradford | United Kingdom | BD96RJ | |
125 | Novartis Investigative Site | Burton on Trent | United Kingdom | DE13 0RB | |
126 | Novartis Investigative Site | Cottingham | United Kingdom | HU16 5JQ | |
127 | Novartis Investigative Site | Dudley | United Kingdom | DY1 2HQ | |
128 | Novartis Investigative Site | Glasgow | United Kingdom | G12 OYN | |
129 | Novartis Investigative Site | Leicester | United Kingdom | LE1 5WW | |
130 | Novartis Investigative Site | London | United Kingdom | SE5 9RS | |
131 | Novartis Investigative Site | Manchester | United Kingdom | M13 9WL | |
132 | Novartis Investigative Site | Sutton | United Kingdom | SM5 1AA | |
133 | Novartis Investigative Site | Swindon | United Kingdom | SN3 6BB | |
134 | Novartis Investigative Site | Truro | United Kingdom | TR1 3LJ | |
135 | Novartis Investigative Site | Uxbridge | United Kingdom | UB8 3NN |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Investigators
- Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 110913
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants (par) were screened within 14 days prior to the start of study drug administration to determine eligibility. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Eligible par were stratified by Stage (Binet A vs. B vs. C) and number of prior therapies (1-2 vs. ≥3). Par in each stratum were then centrally randomized in a 1:1 ratio to recive intravenous (IV) fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in combination with ofatumumab or IV fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Period Title: Treatment Phase | ||
STARTED | 183 | 182 |
COMPLETED | 119 | 102 |
NOT COMPLETED | 64 | 80 |
Period Title: Treatment Phase | ||
STARTED | 172 | 160 |
COMPLETED | 154 | 129 |
NOT COMPLETED | 18 | 31 |
Period Title: Treatment Phase | ||
STARTED | 96 | 89 |
COMPLETED | 87 | 73 |
NOT COMPLETED | 9 | 16 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 183 | 182 | 365 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
61.4
(8.82)
|
61.6
(10.21)
|
61.5
(9.53)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
79
43.2%
|
66
36.3%
|
145
39.7%
|
Male |
104
56.8%
|
116
63.7%
|
220
60.3%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
African American/African Heritage |
3
1.6%
|
5
2.7%
|
8
2.2%
|
American Indian or Alaska Native |
3
1.6%
|
1
0.5%
|
4
1.1%
|
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage |
13
7.1%
|
16
8.8%
|
29
7.9%
|
Asian - East Asian Heritage |
3
1.6%
|
3
1.6%
|
6
1.6%
|
Asian - South East Asian Heritage |
3
1.6%
|
3
1.6%
|
6
1.6%
|
White - Arabic/North African Heritage |
0
0%
|
1
0.5%
|
1
0.3%
|
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage |
158
86.3%
|
153
84.1%
|
311
85.2%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) |
---|---|
Description | PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants randomized and received study drug. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
28.94
|
18.83
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects, Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0032 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.67 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.51 to 0.88 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Overall Survival (OS) |
---|---|
Description | Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact. |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
62.65
|
46.23
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects, Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1427 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.80 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.59 to 1.09 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC |
---|---|
Description | Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) >11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM. |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Participants with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders. Only responders were included in the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 152 | 123 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
0.99
|
0.99
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects, Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.4490 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.08 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.85 to 1.37 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC |
---|---|
Description | DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. |
Time Frame | From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Par with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders, only responders were included in this analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 152 | 123 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
29.63
|
24.90
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects, Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0878 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.77 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.56 to 1.05 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC |
---|---|
Description | Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
42.12
|
26.78
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects, Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0036 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.63 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.45 to 0.87 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Time to Next Therapy |
---|---|
Description | Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population. |
Time Frame | From the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab+Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide_anti-CLL Therapies | Fludarabine+Cyclophosphamide_anti-CLL Therapies | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 74 | 67 | 183 | 182 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
29.68
|
21.03
|
52.96
|
40.08
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects, Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | Participants in the ITT population | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1143 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.77 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.55 to 1.08 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects, Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | Participants who took anti-cancer therapies | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0109 |
Comments | ||
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.67 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.48 to 0.94 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status |
---|---|
Description | The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no). |
Time Frame | Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Cycle 2 Day 1 |
15
8.2%
|
13
7.1%
|
Cycle 3 Day 1 |
16
8.7%
|
13
7.1%
|
Cycle 4 Day 1 |
19
10.4%
|
13
7.1%
|
Cycle 5 Day 1 |
20
10.9%
|
15
8.2%
|
Cycle 6 Day 1 |
26
14.2%
|
16
8.8%
|
1 M, FU |
31
16.9%
|
22
12.1%
|
3 M, FU |
31
16.9%
|
21
11.5%
|
6 M, FU |
30
16.4%
|
18
9.9%
|
9 M, FU |
31
16.9%
|
23
12.6%
|
12 M, FU |
30
16.4%
|
20
11%
|
15 M, FU |
23
12.6%
|
18
9.9%
|
18 M, FU |
23
12.6%
|
18
9.9%
|
21 M, FU |
22
12%
|
16
8.8%
|
24 M, FU |
20
10.9%
|
15
8.2%
|
27 M, FU |
15
8.2%
|
13
7.1%
|
30 M, FU |
14
7.7%
|
8
4.4%
|
33 M, FU |
15
8.2%
|
7
3.8%
|
36 M, FU |
12
6.6%
|
7
3.8%
|
39 M, FU |
12
6.6%
|
7
3.8%
|
42 M, FU |
11
6%
|
6
3.3%
|
45 M, FU |
8
4.4%
|
4
2.2%
|
48 M, FU |
8
4.4%
|
2
1.1%
|
51 M, FU |
7
3.8%
|
3
1.6%
|
54 M, FU |
7
3.8%
|
2
1.1%
|
57 M, FU |
3
1.6%
|
3
1.6%
|
60 M, FU |
3
1.6%
|
3
1.6%
|
Title | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time |
---|---|
Description | Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months). |
Time Frame | Screening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Screening, no B-sy |
63
34.4%
|
59
32.4%
|
Screening, one B-sy |
120
65.6%
|
121
66.5%
|
Cycle 1 Day 1, no B-sy |
64
35%
|
68
37.4%
|
Cycle 1 Day 1, one B-sy |
115
62.8%
|
111
61%
|
Cycle 2 Day 1,no B-sy |
116
63.4%
|
108
59.3%
|
Cycle 2 Day 1, one B-sy |
52
28.4%
|
62
34.1%
|
Cycle 3 Day 1, no B-sy |
131
71.6%
|
116
63.7%
|
Cycle 3 Day 1, one B-sy |
34
18.6%
|
40
22%
|
Cycle 4 Day 1, no B-sy |
129
70.5%
|
107
58.8%
|
Cycle 4 Day 1, one B-sy |
25
13.7%
|
25
13.7%
|
Cycle 5 Day 1, no B-sy |
120
65.6%
|
97
53.3%
|
Cycle 5 Day 1, one B-sy |
14
7.7%
|
21
11.5%
|
Cycle 6 Day 1, no B-sy |
111
60.7%
|
82
45.1%
|
Cycle 6 Day 1, one B-sy |
9
4.9%
|
13
7.1%
|
1 M, FU, no B-sy |
141
77%
|
116
63.7%
|
1 M, FU, one B-sy |
20
10.9%
|
29
15.9%
|
3 M, FU, no B-sy |
136
74.3%
|
105
57.7%
|
3 M, FU, one B-sy |
17
9.3%
|
14
7.7%
|
6 M, FU, no B-sy |
123
67.2%
|
96
52.7%
|
6 M, FU, one B-sy |
15
8.2%
|
11
6%
|
9 M, FU, no B-sy |
116
63.4%
|
87
47.8%
|
9 M, FU, one B-sy |
13
7.1%
|
9
4.9%
|
12 M, FU, no B-sy |
108
59%
|
74
40.7%
|
12 M, FU, one B-sy |
11
6%
|
13
7.1%
|
15 M, FU, no B-sy |
98
53.6%
|
63
34.6%
|
15 M, FU, one B-sy |
5
2.7%
|
8
4.4%
|
18 M, FU, no B-sy |
93
50.8%
|
58
31.9%
|
18 M, FU, one B-sy |
5
2.7%
|
6
3.3%
|
21 M, FU, no B-sy |
87
47.5%
|
55
30.2%
|
21 M, FU, one B-sy |
7
3.8%
|
5
2.7%
|
24 M, FU, no B-sy |
79
43.2%
|
48
26.4%
|
24 M, FU, one B-sy |
1
0.5%
|
4
2.2%
|
27 M, FU, no B-sy |
71
38.8%
|
41
22.5%
|
27 M, FU, one B-syn |
4
2.2%
|
3
1.6%
|
30 M, FU, no B-sy |
68
37.2%
|
33
18.1%
|
30 M, FU, one B-sy |
2
1.1%
|
2
1.1%
|
33 M, FU, no B-sy |
63
34.4%
|
27
14.8%
|
33 M, FU, one B-sy |
3
1.6%
|
2
1.1%
|
36 M, FU, no B-sy |
56
30.6%
|
23
12.6%
|
36 M, FU, one B-sy |
2
1.1%
|
0
0%
|
39 M, FU, no B-sy |
49
26.8%
|
18
9.9%
|
39 M, FU, one B-sy |
3
1.6%
|
0
0%
|
42 M, FU, no B-sy |
45
24.6%
|
16
8.8%
|
42 M, FU, one B-sy |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
45 M, FU, no B-sy |
41
22.4%
|
14
7.7%
|
45 M, FU, one B-sy |
0
0%
|
1
0.5%
|
48 M, FU, no B-sy |
36
19.7%
|
13
7.1%
|
48 M, FU, one B-sy |
1
0.5%
|
0
0%
|
51 M, FU, no B-sy |
32
17.5%
|
11
6%
|
51 M, FU, one B-sy |
0
0%
|
1
0.5%
|
54 M, FU, no B-sy |
30
16.4%
|
10
5.5%
|
54 M, FU, one B-sy |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
57 M, FU, no B-sy |
26
14.2%
|
9
4.9%
|
57 M, FU, one B-sy |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
60 M, FU, no B-sy |
24
13.1%
|
9
4.9%
|
60 M, FU, one B-sy |
1
0.5%
|
0
0%
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC |
---|---|
Description | OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
CR |
27
14.8%
|
7
3.8%
|
CRi |
2
1.1%
|
1
0.5%
|
nPR |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
PR |
55
30.1%
|
59
32.4%
|
Stable disease |
11
6%
|
28
15.4%
|
Progressive Disease |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Not Evaluable |
4
2.2%
|
2
1.1%
|
Missing |
1
0.5%
|
2
1.1%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects, Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0003 |
Comments | ||
Method | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |
Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator |
---|---|
Description | OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery [CRi], partial response [PR], and nodular PR [nPR]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) > 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils >1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) >100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) >11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) <4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, <30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: >=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL >100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb >11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
CR |
45
24.6%
|
24
13.2%
|
CRi |
12
6.6%
|
4
2.2%
|
nPR |
2
1.1%
|
8
4.4%
|
PR |
107
58.5%
|
113
62.1%
|
Stable disease |
9
4.9%
|
21
11.5%
|
Progressive Disease |
0
0%
|
3
1.6%
|
Missing |
8
4.4%
|
9
4.9%
|
Responder |
166
90.7%
|
149
81.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects, Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0166 |
Comments | ||
Method | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |
Comments |
Title | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC |
---|---|
Description | MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes. |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Screening |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 |
0
0%
|
|
3 M, FU |
21
11.5%
|
7
3.8%
|
6 M, FU |
25
13.7%
|
6
3.3%
|
9 M, FU |
20
10.9%
|
4
2.2%
|
12 M, FU |
16
8.7%
|
1
0.5%
|
15 M, FU |
14
7.7%
|
1
0.5%
|
18 M, FU |
12
6.6%
|
1
0.5%
|
21 M, FU |
9
4.9%
|
1
0.5%
|
24 M, FU |
8
4.4%
|
1
0.5%
|
27 M, FU |
8
4.4%
|
0
0%
|
30 M, FU |
8
4.4%
|
2
1.1%
|
33 M, FU |
3
1.6%
|
1
0.5%
|
36 M, FU |
5
2.7%
|
1
0.5%
|
39 M, FU |
2
1.1%
|
1
0.5%
|
42 M, FU |
2
1.1%
|
|
45 M, FU |
1
0.5%
|
1
0.5%
|
48 M, FU |
2
1.1%
|
1
0.5%
|
51 M, FU |
2
1.1%
|
1
0.5%
|
54 M, FU |
2
1.1%
|
1
0.5%
|
Title | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator |
---|---|
Description | MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes. |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Screening |
0
0%
|
1
0.5%
|
3 M, FU |
39
21.3%
|
15
8.2%
|
6 M, FU |
48
26.2%
|
11
6%
|
9 M, FU |
35
19.1%
|
6
3.3%
|
12 M, FU |
31
16.9%
|
3
1.6%
|
15 M, FU |
23
12.6%
|
2
1.1%
|
18 M, FU |
20
10.9%
|
2
1.1%
|
21 M, FU |
16
8.7%
|
3
1.6%
|
24 M, FU |
13
7.1%
|
2
1.1%
|
27 M, FU |
14
7.7%
|
1
0.5%
|
30 M, FU |
12
6.6%
|
3
1.6%
|
33 M, FU |
8
4.4%
|
2
1.1%
|
36 M, FU |
9
4.9%
|
2
1.1%
|
39 M, FU |
6
3.3%
|
2
1.1%
|
42 M, FU |
7
3.8%
|
1
0.5%
|
45 M, FU |
6
3.3%
|
2
1.1%
|
48 M, FU |
6
3.3%
|
2
1.1%
|
51 M, FU |
5
2.7%
|
1
0.5%
|
54 M, FU |
4
2.2%
|
2
1.1%
|
57 M, FU |
3
1.6%
|
2
1.1%
|
60 M, FU |
3
1.6%
|
2
1.1%
|
Title | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) |
---|---|
Description | An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. |
Time Frame | From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety Population: Participants who received at least one dose of a study drug. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 181 | 178 |
AE |
170
92.9%
|
153
84.1%
|
SAE |
108
59%
|
86
47.3%
|
Title | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points |
---|---|
Description | Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive. |
Time Frame | From start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medication |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles) |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 181 | 178 |
Screening Visit, n= 179,177 |
8
4.4%
|
1
0.5%
|
Cycle 4 Day 1, n= 151,130 |
0
0%
|
2
1.1%
|
1 M, FU, n= 148,132 |
0
0%
|
2
1.1%
|
3 M, FU, n= 0,1 |
0
0%
|
|
6 M, FU, n= 130, 99 |
2
1.1%
|
0
0%
|
9 M, FU, n= 0, 2 |
0
0%
|
|
30 M, FU, n= 2, 0 |
0
0%
|
Title | Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) |
---|---|
Description | AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as "self" and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented. |
Time Frame | From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety Population |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 181 | 178 |
Number [Participants] |
3
1.6%
|
2
1.1%
|
Title | Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher |
---|---|
Description | An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death). |
Time Frame | From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety Population |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 181 | 178 |
AE |
19
10.4%
|
11
6%
|
SAE |
25
13.7%
|
21
11.5%
|
Title | Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events |
---|---|
Description | Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death). |
Time Frame | From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety Population |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 181 | 178 |
Number [Participants] |
126
68.9%
|
118
64.8%
|
Title | Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study |
---|---|
Description | Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included. |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety Population |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 181 | 178 |
At least one transfusion |
125
68.3%
|
99
54.4%
|
No transfusions |
56
30.6%
|
79
43.4%
|
Title | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM |
---|---|
Description | Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 1M and 6M follow up |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 181 | 178 |
Cycle 1 Day 1, IgA |
1.0
(0.74)
|
0.9
(0.68)
|
Cycle 1 Day 1, IgG |
8.7
(5.22)
|
8.2
(3.86)
|
Cycle 1 Day 1, IgM |
0.6
(1.36)
|
0.8
(1.77)
|
1 M, FU, IgA |
1.0
(0.79)
|
1.0
(0.77)
|
1 M, FU, IgG |
7.9
(4.05)
|
7.9
(3.38)
|
1 M, FU, IgM |
0.5
(1.16)
|
0.8
(1.88)
|
6 M, FU, IgA |
1.0
(0.77)
|
1.0
(0.76)
|
6 M, FU, IgG |
7.8
(3.97)
|
8.9
(4.31)
|
6 M, FU, IgM |
0.4
(0.50)
|
1.1
(1.98)
|
9 M, FU, IgA |
0.9
(NA)
|
0.9
(0.21)
|
9 M, FU, IgG |
15.2
(NA)
|
8.8
(6.87)
|
9 M, FU, IgM |
0.8
(NA)
|
0.2
(0.04)
|
18 M, FU, IgA |
2.4
(NA)
|
|
18 M, FU, IgG |
9.1
(NA)
|
|
18 M, FU, IgM |
1.0
(NA)
|
|
30 M, FU, IgA |
1.3
(1.17)
|
|
30 M, FU, IgG |
4.7
(0.33)
|
|
30 M, FU, IgM |
0.4
(0.26)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ |
---|---|
Description | CD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. |
Time Frame | Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up Period |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Cycle 1 Day 1 |
43180.6
(48784.64)
|
53208.7
(70944.56)
|
Cycle 1 Day 15 |
2656.9
(6418.02)
|
9244.0
(19610.62)
|
Cycle 2 Day 1 |
2057.4
(5525.72)
|
10318.8
(21453.15)
|
Cycle 2 Day 15 |
513.7
(1717.65)
|
6874.4
(20632.64)
|
Cycle 3 Day 1 |
790.0
(2953.42)
|
6423.6
(19725.57)
|
Cycle 4 Day 1 |
402.1
(1768.74)
|
2643.2
(8092.22)
|
Cycle 5 Day 1 |
142.6
(472.24)
|
2838.6
(8314.08)
|
Cycle 6 Day 1 |
109.8
(398.77)
|
3862.7
(13312.14)
|
1 M, FU |
163.5
(685.41)
|
5514.3
(17369.97)
|
3 M, FU |
671.3
(2786.99)
|
2604.9
(9229.90)
|
6 M, FU |
1591.6
(8857.22)
|
2275.6
(5118.00)
|
9 M, FU |
910.5
(2495.85)
|
3408.4
(7438.45)
|
12 M, FU |
2303.2
(6675.70)
|
2876.5
(6252.53)
|
15 M, FU |
3325.8
(8006.48)
|
3072.7
(9038.23)
|
18 M, FU |
1607.5
(2935.82)
|
4549.8
(8839.23)
|
21 M, FU |
3830.8
(8989.02)
|
5236.9
(10537.31)
|
24 M, FU |
1244.6
(1300.01)
|
7843.3
(11897.55)
|
27 M, FU |
1877.4
(2117.84)
|
6128.0
(9161.38)
|
30 M, FU |
5029.7
(8266.90)
|
6515.5
(5916.36)
|
33 M, FU |
14166.8
(20166.09)
|
5208.0
(NA)
|
36 M, FU |
1187.0
(1407.79)
|
8184.0
(NA)
|
39 M, FU |
557.0
(NA)
|
|
42 M, FU |
1640.0
(NA)
|
|
45 M, FU |
4689.0
(1493.41)
|
|
48 M FU |
27755.0
(NA)
|
29155.0
(NA)
|
54 M FU |
189849.0
(NA)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ |
---|---|
Description | CD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. |
Time Frame | Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up Period |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety Population |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 181 | 178 |
Screening |
4817.8
(20948.17)
|
6959.1
(39980.14)
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 |
5996.7
(22331.29)
|
2041.3
(4418.63)
|
Cycle 1 Day 15 |
239.0
(1052.19)
|
351.7
(1377.56)
|
Cycle 2 Day 1 |
115.4
(403.09)
|
465.7
(1610.05)
|
Cycle 2 Day 15 |
35.6
(133.75)
|
331.3
(1177.18)
|
Cycle 3 Day 1 |
39.5
(144.64)
|
179.7
(520.63)
|
Cycle 4 Day 1 |
25.7
(92.88)
|
95.3
(369.19)
|
Cycle 5 Day 1 |
15.9
(77.11)
|
195.5
(945.34)
|
Cycle 6 Day 1 |
10.0
(29.85)
|
649.7
(3606.28)
|
1 M, FU |
7.5
(19.54)
|
863.8
(5001.84)
|
3 M, FU |
40.1
(238.18)
|
172.0
(681.28)
|
6 M, FU |
21.2
(58.16)
|
50.7
(49.13)
|
9 M, FU |
85.7
(359.01)
|
92.0
(101.16)
|
12 M, FU |
89.9
(226.06)
|
220.1
(698.57)
|
15 M, FU |
67.3
(59.52)
|
94.6
(70.17)
|
18 M, FU |
126.1
(188.25)
|
92.3
(69.14)
|
21 M, FU |
375.5
(1307.35)
|
108.3
(95.86)
|
24 M, FU |
74.0
(57.46)
|
104.5
(70.46)
|
27 M, FU |
73.9
(60.40)
|
187.5
(200.85)
|
30 M, FU |
74.2
(58.82)
|
129.5
(5303)
|
33 M, FU |
41.8
(40.13)
|
1003.0
(NA)
|
36 M, FU |
107.3
(86.75)
|
1506.0
(NA)
|
39 M, FU |
13.0
(NA)
|
|
42 M, FU |
13.0
(NA)
|
|
45 M, FU |
166.5
(222.74)
|
|
48 M, FU |
6528.0
(NA)
|
28.0
(NA)
|
54 M, FU |
690.0
(NA)
|
Title | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response |
---|---|
Description | Blood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (>98%, 97%-98% and <97%), beta 2 microglobulin (>3500 microgram per liter [µg/L] and <=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio <1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on >=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G). |
Time Frame | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
B2 Microglobulin G 1: > 3500 microgram/liter (μg/L |
79
43.2%
|
78
42.9%
|
B2 Microglobulin G 1: <= 3500 ug/L |
22
12%
|
26
14.3%
|
CY G 1: 11q- |
29
15.8%
|
19
10.4%
|
CY G 1: 17p- |
6
3.3%
|
9
4.9%
|
CY G 1: 6q- or +12q or 13q- |
38
20.8%
|
48
26.4%
|
CY G 1: no aberration |
27
14.8%
|
27
14.8%
|
VH3-21 Usage Flag: Yes |
6
3.3%
|
4
2.2%
|
VH3-21 Usage Flag: No |
93
50.8%
|
96
52.7%
|
IgVH Homology, <97% |
13
7.1%
|
15
8.2%
|
IgVH Homology, 97%-98% |
5
2.7%
|
7
3.8%
|
IgVH Homology, >98% |
80
43.7%
|
78
42.9%
|
ZAP70 G 1, Negative |
14
7.7%
|
13
7.1%
|
ZAP70 G 1, Intermediate |
27
14.8%
|
23
12.6%
|
ZAP70, G1 Positive |
60
32.8%
|
65
35.7%
|
Title | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) |
---|---|
Description | The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects ([TSE], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale [DES], 4 items), and infection scale [IS] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities [Social Problems (SP) Scale] and future health worries[Future Health (FH) Scale].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization. |
Time Frame | Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
DES, Cycle 4 Day 1 |
-8.5
(18.08)
|
-9.0
(17.16)
|
DES, 1 M, FU |
-9.7
(19.18)
|
-9.8
(19.89)
|
DES, 3 M, FU |
-8.2
(19.48)
|
-10.9
(19.07)
|
DES, 6 M, FU |
-9.8
(17.99)
|
-11.6
(18.05)
|
DES, 9 M, FU |
-8.2
(20.70)
|
-12.0
(17.04)
|
DES. 12 M, FU |
-10.1
(18.64)
|
-10.2
(16.09)
|
DES, 15 M, FU |
-8.6
(18.08)
|
-10.2
(16.91)
|
DES, 18 M, FU |
-8.5
(18.53)
|
-11.6
(18.79)
|
DES, 21 M, FU |
-8.2
(18.48)
|
-11.3
(17.60)
|
DES, 24 M, FU |
-7.1
(19.93)
|
-13.6
(16.18)
|
Fatigue Scale (FS), Cycle 4 Day 1 |
-7.0
(22.57)
|
-7.1
(24.16)
|
FS, 1 M, FU |
-5.4
(29.16)
|
-6.2
(28.74)
|
FS, 3 M, FU |
-4.4
(26.30)
|
-8.3
(30.14)
|
FS, 6 M, FU |
-7.1
(25.94)
|
-12.0
(25.98)
|
FS, 9 M, FU |
-6.2
(27.08)
|
-10.6
(26.95)
|
FS. 12 M, FU |
-7.3
(27.26)
|
-8.1
(25.75)
|
FS, 15 M, FU |
-7.6
(22.57)
|
-9.9
(24.04)
|
FS, 18 M, FU |
-7.0
(23.03)
|
-3.7
(33.34)
|
FS, 21 M, FU |
-10.3
(24.28)
|
-8.2
(27.27)
|
FS, 24 M, FU |
-8.7
(24.19)
|
-8.7
(25.48)
|
FH, Cycle 4 Day 1 |
-11.8
(32.89)
|
-10.6
(27.76)
|
FH, 1 M, FU |
-15.3
(35.04)
|
-11.9
(29.56)
|
FH, 3 M, FU |
-14.3
(33.96)
|
-14.0
(32.06)
|
FH, 6 M, FU |
-13.4
(33.98)
|
-17.7
(30.57)
|
FH, 9 M, FU |
-15.6
(33.65)
|
-13.2
(34.43)
|
FH. 12 M, FU |
-14.1
(32.80)
|
-14.9
(33.63)
|
FH, 15 M, FU |
-14.6
(29.14)
|
-14.2
(34.13)
|
FH, 18 M, FU |
-15.9
(31.69)
|
-18.4
(33.72)
|
FH, 21 M, FU |
-16.9
(28.70)
|
-15.4
(29.12)
|
FH, 24 M, FU |
-21.0
(29.58)
|
-17.7
(30.51)
|
IS, Cycle 4 Day 1 |
0.5
(17.65)
|
-1.4
(18.23)
|
IS, 1 M, FU |
2.9
(22.79)
|
2.7
(24.06)
|
IS, 3 M, FU |
0.8
(19.42)
|
0.8
(20.99)
|
IS, 6 M, FU |
-1.2
(18.46)
|
-0.9
(20.40)
|
IS, 9 M, FU |
-1.4
(18.81)
|
1.4
(22.45)
|
IS. 12 M, FU |
0.4
(19.22)
|
2.1
(20.92)
|
IS, 15 M, FU |
0.5
(17.56)
|
0.3
(18.79)
|
IS, 18 M, FU |
-2.0
(16.04)
|
0.9
(19.04)
|
IS, 21 M, FU |
-2.5
(18.13)
|
2.5
(22.09)
|
IS, 24 M, FU |
-0.5
(18.85)
|
0.5
(21.34)
|
SP Scale Cycle 4 Day 1 |
1.9
(25.44)
|
0.3
(26.94)
|
SP Scale, 1 M, FU |
3.2
(34.51)
|
0.0
(35.22)
|
SP Scale, 3 M, FU |
-1.9
(33.04)
|
-4.3
(35.75)
|
SP Scale, 6 M, FU |
-5.6
(31.73)
|
-10.9
(30.56)
|
SP Scale, 9 M, FU |
-5.0
(30.15)
|
-11.0
(31.45)
|
SP Scale. 12 M, FU |
-7.2
(31.06)
|
-7.6
(34.47)
|
SP Scale, 15 M, FU |
-6.7
(30.21)
|
-13.7
(30.05)
|
SP Scale, 18 M, FU |
-7.1
(31.57)
|
-8.5
(40.40)
|
SP Scale, 21 M, FU |
-8.1
(31.07)
|
-7.5
(37.92)
|
SP Scale, 24 M, FU |
-11.8
(24.27)
|
-8.7
(36.15)
|
TSE, Cycle 4 Day 1 |
-4.7
(16.15)
|
-4.0
(16.78)
|
TSE, 1 M, FU |
-5.0
(18.09)
|
-3.2
(19.08)
|
TSE, 3 M, FU |
-3.7
(19.41)
|
-4.3
(17.03)
|
TSE, 6 M, FU |
-6.0
(15.25)
|
-4.8
(16.96)
|
TSE, 9 M, FU |
-4.3
(17.22)
|
-5.1
(16.38)
|
TSE. 12 M, FU |
-5.2
(16.44)
|
-3.2
(13.94)
|
TSE, 15 M, FU |
-4.0
(14.92)
|
-4.2
(13.73)
|
TSE, 18 M, FU |
-4.4
(17.10)
|
-3.6
(19.18)
|
TSE, 21 M, FU |
-4.7
(16.63)
|
-4.0
(15.91)
|
TSE, 24 M, FU |
-5.4
(17.52)
|
-6.5
(14.12)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit |
---|---|
Description | EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date. |
Time Frame | Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
UT, Cycle 4 Day 1 |
0.0
(0.27)
|
0.0
(0.21)
|
UT, 1 M, FU |
0.1
(0.22)
|
0.0
(0.28)
|
UT, 3 M, FU |
0.0
(0.27)
|
0.1
(0.23)
|
UT, 6 M, FU |
0.1
(0.24)
|
0.1
(0.24)
|
UT, 9 M, FU |
0.1
(0.26)
|
0.1
(0.24)
|
UT. 12 M, FU |
0.1
(0.21)
|
0.1
(0.22)
|
UT, 15 M, FU |
0.0
(0.23)
|
0.1
(0.24)
|
UT, 18 M, FU |
0.1
(0.21)
|
0.0
(0.34)
|
UT, 21 M, FU |
0.1
(0.21)
|
0.1
(0.26)
|
UT, 24 M, FU |
0.1
(0.19)
|
0.1
(0.28)
|
VAS Cycle 4 Day 1 |
6.1
(17.68)
|
5.6
(17.64)
|
VAS, 1 M, FU |
5.6
(20.73)
|
5.9
(22.83)
|
VAS, 3 M, FU |
5.7
(19.92)
|
9.6
(20.88)
|
VAS, 6 M, FU |
8.2
(18.84)
|
11.1
(19.08)
|
VAS, 9 M, FU |
8.1
(18.33)
|
11.9
(20.59)
|
VAS. 12 M, FU |
7.0
(21.93)
|
10.3
(21.21)
|
VAS, 15 M, FU |
8.0
(17.52)
|
13.1
(21.06)
|
VAS, 18 M, FU |
9.4
(17.86)
|
11.1
(25.40)
|
VAS, 21 M, FU |
8.1
(16.42)
|
11.3
(24.16)
|
VAS, 24 M, FU |
8.8
(19.50)
|
15.2
(21.88)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score |
---|---|
Description | EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if >20points. |
Time Frame | Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Appetite Loss, Cycle 4 Day 1 |
0.5
(25.60)
|
-1.9
(26.65)
|
Appetite Loss, 1 M, FU |
-0.2
(26.14)
|
-3.9
(28.52)
|
Appetite Loss, 3 M, FU |
-0.7
(26.77)
|
-7.4
(28.22)
|
Appetite Loss, 6 M, FU |
-6.0
(23.00)
|
-12.4
(26.05)
|
Appetite Loss, 9 M, FU |
-3.9
(20.38)
|
-9.6
(25.25)
|
Appetite Loss. 12 M, FU |
-4.0
(22.76)
|
-6.0
(27.59)
|
Appetite Loss, 15 M, FU |
-3.8
(23.13)
|
-9.4
(28.19)
|
Appetite Loss, 18 M, FU |
-7.9
(20.11)
|
-9.4
(30.12)
|
Appetite Loss, 21 M, FU |
-3.4
(20.36)
|
-7.7
(27.70)
|
Appetite Loss, 24 M, FU |
-3.9
(22.53)
|
-12.5
(29.68)
|
Cognitive Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1 |
3.4
(18.25)
|
2.5
(18.39)
|
Cognitive Functioning, 1 M, FU |
-0.4
(18.40)
|
3.0
(19.87)
|
Cognitive Functioning, 3 M, FU |
0.0
(18.74)
|
2.3
(21.69)
|
Cognitive Functioning, 6 M, FU |
1.7
(18.95)
|
2.7
(20.99)
|
Cognitive Functioning, 9 M, FU |
-0.6
(20.58)
|
2.4
(19.61)
|
Cognitive Functioning. 12 M, FU |
-2.1
(19.17)
|
-1.8
(21.36)
|
Cognitive Functioning, 15 M, FU |
-1.0
(17.97)
|
0.3
(20.58)
|
Cognitive Functioning, 18 M, FU |
-0.9
(20.00)
|
-0.3
(22.67)
|
Cognitive Functioning, 21 M, FU |
-1.9
(21.65)
|
-1.9
(21.84)
|
Cognitive Functioning, 24 M, FU |
1.0
(20.83)
|
-1.3
(21.25)
|
Constipation, Cycle 4 Day 1 |
2.1
(21.46)
|
0.8
(18.60)
|
Constipation, 1 M, FU |
-0.7
(19.02)
|
0.3
(18.92)
|
Constipation, 3 M, FU |
-2.1
(19.33)
|
-0.9
(20.01)
|
Constipation, 6 M, FU |
-3.5
(19.32)
|
0.3
(18.22)
|
Constipation, 9 M, FU |
-1.2
(19.71)
|
0.4
(18.18)
|
Constipation. 12 M, FU |
-0.0
(23.13)
|
0.4
(19.24)
|
Constipation, 15 M, FU |
-1.7
(21.29)
|
-3.8
(20.11)
|
Constipation, 18 M, FU |
-0.4
(21.49)
|
-1.1
(24.32)
|
Constipation, 21 M, FU |
-1.9
(22.93)
|
-3.8
(23.26)
|
Constipation, 24 M, FU |
0.0
(21.23)
|
-3.3
(21.56)
|
Diarrhoea, Cycle 4 Day 1 |
0.2
(19.72)
|
-2.4
(17.54)
|
Diarrhoea, 1 M, FU |
-3.5
(20.87)
|
0.8
(21.28)
|
Diarrhoea, 3 M, FU |
1.6
(22.49)
|
1.5
(20.98)
|
Diarrhoea, 6 M, FU |
0.0
(20.38)
|
-3.1
(16.64)
|
Diarrhoea, 9 M, FU |
0.3
(20.56)
|
-2.7
(17.97)
|
Diarrhoea. 12 M, FU |
-3.4
(15.75)
|
-2.2
(19.12)
|
Diarrhoea, 15 M, FU |
-1.7
(19.57)
|
-4.4
(20.62)
|
Diarrhoea, 18 M, FU |
-1.9
(17.67)
|
-1.1
(17.18)
|
Diarrhoea, 21 M, FU |
-2.3
(18.88)
|
0.6
(21.17)
|
Diarrhoea, 24 M, FU |
-2.9
(17.02)
|
-0.7
(20.75)
|
Dyspnoea Cycle 4 Day 1 |
-4.6
(22.85)
|
-4.6
(23.41)
|
Dyspnoea, 1 M, FU |
-1.0
(26.60)
|
-2.8
(25.67)
|
Dyspnoea, 3 M, FU |
-3.1
(26.40)
|
-1.5
(25.53)
|
Dyspnoea, 6 M, FU |
-2.7
(21.92)
|
-7.2
(24.17)
|
Dyspnoea, 9 M, FU |
-2.7
(26.03)
|
-6.4
(23.55)
|
Dyspnoea. 12 M, FU |
-3.4
(24.52)
|
-4.1
(22.87)
|
Dyspnoea, 15 M, FU |
-2.5
(20.77)
|
-2.2
(26.66)
|
Dyspnoea, 18 M, FU |
-3.0
(24.81)
|
-2.8
(29.22)
|
Dyspnoea, 21 M, FU |
-3.4
(24.92)
|
-1.9
(21.30)
|
Dyspnoea, 24 M, FU |
-2.4
(26.39)
|
-4.8
(24.53)
|
Emotional Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 |
4.4
(17.91)
|
5.4
(19.59)
|
Emotional Functioning, 1 M, FU |
5.4
(20.26)
|
7.2
(24.08)
|
Emotional Functioning, 3 M, FU |
5.7
(20.93)
|
7.8
(20.90)
|
Emotional Functioning, 6 M, FU |
4.8
(22.57)
|
8.9
(22.34)
|
Emotional Functioning, 9 M |
3.4
(22.95)
|
6.7
(18.52)
|
Emotional Functioning. 12 M, FU |
3.9
(22.11)
|
8.0
(21.92)
|
Emotional Functioning, 15 M, FU |
5.1
(21.54)
|
6.5
(21.15)
|
Emotional Functioning, 18 M, FU |
5.1
(22.94)
|
6.5
(26.35)
|
Emotional Functioning, 21 M, FU |
5.3
(22.43)
|
7.7
(23.56)
|
Emotional Functioning, 24 M, FU |
7.1
(23.02)
|
7.1
(26.16)
|
Fatigue Cycle 4 Day 1 |
-4.3
(21.37)
|
-6.3
(22.66)
|
Fatigue, 1 M, FU |
-7.4
(25.16)
|
-4.5
(28.64)
|
Fatigue, 3 M, FU |
-5.4
(24.01)
|
-9.3
(27.83)
|
Fatigue, 6 M, FU |
-8.2
(23.64)
|
-12.2
(22.43)
|
Fatigue, 9 M, FU |
-8.8
(23.80)
|
-9.8
(24.56)
|
Fatigue. 12 M, FU |
-6.8
(25.28)
|
-10.3
(23.44)
|
Fatigue, 15 M, FU |
-7.6
(19.83)
|
-8.9
(27.61)
|
Fatigue, 18 M, FU |
-7.0
(22.25)
|
-6.1
(30.15)
|
Fatigue, 21 M, FU |
-9.6
(20.44)
|
-9.1
(25.34)
|
Fatigue, 24 M, FU |
-9.1
(23.01)
|
-11.7
(25.30)
|
Financial Difficulties Cycle 4 Day 1 |
-4.5
(23.98)
|
-6.1
(29.93)
|
Financial Difficulties, 1 M, FU |
-5.9
(26.57)
|
-5.2
(26.07)
|
Financial Difficulties, 3 M, FU |
-4.1
(28.30)
|
-9.0
(29.40)
|
Financial Difficulties, 6 M, FU |
-5.8
(24.61)
|
-8.8
(26.89)
|
Financial Difficulties, 9 M, FU |
-6.1
(27.54)
|
-8.7
(27.44)
|
Financial Difficulties. 12 M, FU |
-6.4
(24.93)
|
-9.6
(28.71)
|
Financial Difficulties, 15 M, FU |
-8.3
(23.69)
|
-9.7
(27.91)
|
Financial Difficulties, 18 M, FU |
-4.1
(24.39)
|
-12.2
(30.04)
|
Financial Difficulties, 21 M, FU, |
-10.6
(22.34)
|
-11.1
(28.02)
|
Financial Difficulties, 24 M, FU |
-6.2
(24.93)
|
-12.0
(27.57)
|
Nausea and Vomiting Cycle 4 Day 1 |
2.0
(16.06)
|
3.7
(18.37)
|
Nausea and Vomiting, 1 M, FU |
1.0
(14.85)
|
0.1
(19.22)
|
Nausea and Vomiting, 3 M, FU |
0.1
(15.90)
|
-2.9
(14.49)
|
Nausea and Vomiting, 6 M, FU |
-2.8
(13.12)
|
-2.5
(14.36)
|
Nausea and Vomiting, 9 M, FU |
-1.3
(13.81)
|
-1.2
(15.08)
|
Nausea and Vomiting. 12 M, FU |
-2.9
(13.52)
|
-1.8
(12.35)
|
Nausea and Vomiting, 15 M, FU |
-3.3
(11.45)
|
-2.7
(11.76)
|
Nausea and Vomiting, 18 M, FU |
-3.3
(12.03)
|
-2.5
(10.02)
|
Nausea and Vomiting, 21 M, FU |
-4.0
(13.37)
|
1.3
(11.72)
|
Nausea and Vomiting, 24 M, FU |
-2.4
(13.69)
|
-0.3
(11.90)
|
Pain Cycle 4 Day 1 |
-3.6
(20.64)
|
-4.2
(20.43)
|
Pain, 1 M, FU |
-2.8
(23.02)
|
-5.5
(22.31)
|
Pain, 3 M, FU |
-3.8
(25.13)
|
-2.1
(24.44)
|
Pain, 6 M, FU |
-5.3
(23.54)
|
-6.6
(20.59)
|
Pain, 9 M, FU |
-4.2
(23.86)
|
-4.8
(22.12)
|
Pain. 12 M, FU |
-3.5
(24.43)
|
-3.7
(21.01)
|
Pain, 15 M, FU |
-2.9
(23.08)
|
-3.5
(22.00)
|
Pain, 18 M, FU |
-3.3
(19.39)
|
0.5
(28.05)
|
Pain, 21 M, FU |
-5.9
(19.74)
|
-0.9
(25.82)
|
Pain, 24 M, FU |
-1.7
(23.25)
|
-3.0
(24.67)
|
Physical Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 |
1.2
(14.50)
|
0.6
(16.81)
|
Physical Functioning, 1 M, FU |
0.4
(19.52)
|
-0.7
(21.15)
|
Physical Functioning, 3 M, FU |
0.9
(18.66)
|
0.9
(19.68)
|
Physical Functioning, 6 M, FU |
3.2
(16.41)
|
5.7
(17.01)
|
Physical Functioning, 9 M, FU |
3.9
(17.30)
|
6.2
(17.25)
|
Physical Functioning. 12 M, FU |
2.4
(17.98)
|
3.5
(17.52)
|
Physical Functioning, 15 M, FU |
3.8
(14.65)
|
2.7
(18.46)
|
Physical Functioning, 18 M, FU |
4.1
(16.65)
|
0.1
(22.09)
|
Physical Functioning, 21 M, FU |
4.7
(17.14)
|
2.1
(18.88)
|
Physical Functioning, 24 M, FU |
5.3
(17.44)
|
3.7
(20.57)
|
Global Health Status Cycle 4 Day 1 |
6.4
(23.46)
|
6.8
(17.54)
|
Global Health Status, 1 M, FU |
6.5
(24.23)
|
6.9
(26.32)
|
Global Health Status, 3 M, FU |
5.0
(21.45)
|
12.3
(21.15)
|
Global Health Status, 6 M, FU |
7.5
(21.57)
|
13.7
(23.01)
|
Global Health Status, 9 M, FU |
7.6
(23.24)
|
11.7
(22.35)
|
Global Health Status. 12 M, FU |
7.6
(23.64)
|
12.2
(21.77)
|
Global Health Status, 15 M, FU |
7.6
(20.40)
|
12.7
(22.29)
|
Global Health Status, 18 M, FU |
9.2
(23.03)
|
10.4
(27.00)
|
Global Health Status, 21 M, FU |
10.8
(20.26)
|
12.7
(21.53)
|
Global Health Status, 24 M, FU |
12.1
(24.28)
|
12.3
(24.31)
|
Role Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 |
1.4
(23.27)
|
0.1
(24.83)
|
Role Functioning, 1 M, FU |
-0.1
(25.83)
|
-0.7
(27.53)
|
Role Functioning, 3 M, FU |
0.5
(25.19)
|
0.9
(28.94)
|
Role Functioning, 6 M, FU |
4.3
(25.49)
|
5.5
(26.54)
|
Role Functioning, 9 M, FU |
4.1
(26.21)
|
6.2
(25.60)
|
Role Functioning. 12 M, FU |
2.1
(26.46)
|
3.9
(24.78)
|
Role Functioning, 15 M, FU |
3.8
(24.84)
|
1.9
(25.13)
|
Role Functioning, 18 M, FU |
7.0
(24.09)
|
-0.0
(28.95)
|
Role Functioning, 21 M, FU |
5.3
(22.82)
|
2.6
(26.74)
|
Role Functioning, 24 M, FU |
5.8
(25.54)
|
3.7
(30.10)
|
Social Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 |
3.1
(20.30)
|
-0.9
(23.50)
|
Social Functioning, 1 M, FU |
0.4
(25.98)
|
0.8
(27.93)
|
Social Functioning, 3 M, FU |
0.8
(23.76)
|
4.3
(26.29)
|
Social Functioning, 6 M, FU |
3.4
(22.04)
|
6.1
(26.24)
|
Social Functioning, 9 M, FU |
2.3
(21.84)
|
4.2
(25.46)
|
Social Functioning. 12 M, FU |
3.0
(23.04)
|
3.3
(21.95)
|
Social Functioning, 15 M, FU |
6.2
(18.30)
|
1.6
(27.61)
|
Social Functioning, 18 M, FU |
6.5
(19.78)
|
2.7
(29.69)
|
Social Functioning, 21 M, FU |
6.6
(18.83)
|
4.5
(24.72)
|
Social Functioning, 24 M, FU |
7.9
(19.60)
|
7.7
(24.56)
|
Insomnia Cycle 4 Day 1 |
-3.1
(26.07)
|
-8.7
(26.94)
|
Insomnia, 1 M, FU |
-5.9
(29.04)
|
-11.1
(27.78)
|
Insomnia, 3 M, FU |
-6.2
(29.64)
|
-13.3
(28.07)
|
Insomnia, 6 M, FU |
-5.2
(26.18)
|
-17.0
(25.88)
|
Insomnia, 9 M, FU |
-3.0
(30.53)
|
-13.2
(31.04)
|
Insomnia. 12 M, FU |
-6.9
(25.91)
|
-10.5
(29.33)
|
Insomnia, 15 M, FU |
-5.9
(29.02)
|
-17.5
(26.52)
|
Insomnia, 18 M, FU |
-7.5
(28.32)
|
-15.3
(28.58)
|
Insomnia, 21 M, FU |
-8.5
(25.15)
|
-10.3
(34.64)
|
Insomnia, 24 M, FU |
-1.5
(33.30)
|
-13.6
(35.95)
|
Title | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) |
---|---|
Description | The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions. |
Time Frame | Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 | 182 |
Cycle 4 Day 1 |
2.6
(1.62)
|
2.8
(1.59)
|
1 M, FU |
3.0
(2.05)
|
3.2
(2.30)
|
3 M, FU |
3.0
(2.11)
|
2.8
(1.86)
|
6 M, FU |
2.6
(1.76)
|
2.6
(1.82)
|
9 M, FU |
2.5
(1.78)
|
2.4
(1.57)
|
12 M, FU |
2.5
(1.80)
|
2.5
(1.78)
|
15 M, FU |
2.2
(1.57)
|
2.3
(1.68)
|
18 M, FU |
2.4
(1.67)
|
2.7
(2.01)
|
21 M, FU |
2.3
(1.50)
|
2.3
(1.52)
|
24 M, FU |
2.3
(1.76)
|
2.6
(1.89)
|
Title | Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab |
---|---|
Description | Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC[0-tau]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141). |
Time Frame | Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PK Population: Participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained were analyzed, only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed(represented by n=X in the category titles) |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 |
cycle 1, week 1 |
3554.910
|
cycle 1, week 2 |
34109.67
|
cycle 2 |
67069.79
|
cycle 3 |
84620.05
|
cycle 4 |
89091.35
|
cycle 5 |
96829.23
|
cycle 6 |
104798.0
|
Title | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab |
---|---|
Description | Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141). |
Time Frame | Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PK Population: Participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained were analyzed, only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed(represented by n=X in the category titles) |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 |
Cmax cycle 1, week 1 |
61.355
|
Cmax cycle 1, week 2 |
241.192
|
Cmax cycle 4 |
312.745
|
Ctrough cycle 1, week 1 |
3.551
|
Ctrough cycle 1, week 2 |
9.496
|
Ctrough cycle 2 |
24.281
|
Ctrough cycle 3 |
25.632
|
Ctrough cycle 4 |
58.640
|
Ctrough cycle 5 |
70.398
|
Title | Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab |
---|---|
Description | Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4. |
Time Frame | Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PK Population: Participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained were analyzed, only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed(represented by n=X in the category titles) |
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. |
Measure Participants | 183 |
cycle 1, week 1 |
6.106
|
cycle 1, week 2 |
5.004
|
cycle 4 |
4.878
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse Events (AEs) are collected from First Patient First Visit (FPFV) until Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV). All AEs reported in this record are from date of First Patient First Treatment until Last Patient Last Visit) up to approximately 5 years. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Analysis was done in the safety Population included subjects who received at least one dose of a study drug. This population was used for all safety measurements. In the analyses, subjects were grouped based on the treatment they receive regardless of how they are randomized. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | ||
Arm/Group Description | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared [m^2] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 40/181 (22.1%) | 42/178 (23.6%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 108/181 (59.7%) | 86/178 (48.3%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Agranulocytosis | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Anaemia | 11/181 (6.1%) | 12/178 (6.7%) | ||
Aplasia pure red cell | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia | 2/181 (1.1%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Febrile neutropenia | 18/181 (9.9%) | 15/178 (8.4%) | ||
Granulocytopenia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Haemolysis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Haemolytic anaemia | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Leukopenia | 2/181 (1.1%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Lymphadenopathy | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Neutropenia | 17/181 (9.4%) | 14/178 (7.9%) | ||
Pancytopenia | 5/181 (2.8%) | 5/178 (2.8%) | ||
Thrombocytopenia | 7/181 (3.9%) | 10/178 (5.6%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Acute myocardial infarction | 2/181 (1.1%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Angina pectoris | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Atrial fibrillation | 2/181 (1.1%) | 3/178 (1.7%) | ||
Bradycardia | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Cardiac arrest | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Cardiac failure | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Cardiac failure acute | 0/181 (0%) | 4/178 (2.2%) | ||
Cardiac failure congestive | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Cardiopulmonary failure | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Coronary artery disease | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Extrasystoles | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Myocardial infarction | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Myocardial ischaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pericardial effusion | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Tachycardia paroxysmal | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | ||||
Epidermolysis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal pain | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Abdominal pain upper | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Anal fistula | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Ascites | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Colitis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Constipation | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Diarrhoea | 3/181 (1.7%) | 3/178 (1.7%) | ||
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | 3/181 (1.7%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Ileus | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Ileus paralytic | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Inguinal hernia | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Mouth ulceration | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Nausea | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Oesophagitis | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Proctalgia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Salivary hypersecretion | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Stomatitis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Vomiting | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Asthenia | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Chills | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Death | 3/181 (1.7%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Fatigue | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
General physical health deterioration | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Hyperthermia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Malaise | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Oedema peripheral | 1/181 (0.6%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Pyrexia | 9/181 (5%) | 5/178 (2.8%) | ||
Sudden death | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Cholecystitis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hepatic failure | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hepatic function abnormal | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Hepatitis | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hyperbilirubinaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Immune system disorders | ||||
Anaphylactic reaction | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Graft versus host disease | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Acinetobacter bacteraemia | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Acinetobacter infection | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Anal abscess | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Appendicitis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Atypical mycobacterial infection | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Atypical pneumonia | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Bacteraemia | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Bacterial infection | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Bacterial sepsis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Bronchitis | 3/181 (1.7%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Campylobacter gastroenteritis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Campylobacter infection | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Cellulitis | 2/181 (1.1%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Clostridium difficile colitis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Cytomegalovirus infection | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Device related infection | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Diarrhoea infectious | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Diverticulitis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Endocarditis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Enterococcal sepsis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Epididymitis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Erysipelas | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Escherichia infection | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Escherichia urinary tract infection | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Febrile infection | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Gastroenteritis | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Gastroenteritis salmonella | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal candidiasis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
H1N1 influenza | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Hepatitis B | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Hepatitis B reactivation | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Herpes zoster | 1/181 (0.6%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Infected skin ulcer | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Infection | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Infective exacerbation of bronchiectasis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Intervertebral discitis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Lower respiratory tract infection | 6/181 (3.3%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Neutropenic infection | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Neutropenic sepsis | 4/181 (2.2%) | 5/178 (2.8%) | ||
Oral candidiasis | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Oropharyngeal candidiasis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pharyngitis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pneumococcal sepsis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pneumocystis jirovecii infection | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia | 0/181 (0%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Pneumonia | 28/181 (15.5%) | 29/178 (16.3%) | ||
Pneumonia fungal | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pneumonia haemophilus | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pneumonia respiratory syncytial viral | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Pneumonia viral | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Postoperative wound infection | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pseudomembranous colitis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Pulmonary tuberculosis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Respiratory tract infection | 1/181 (0.6%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Salmonella sepsis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Sepsis | 4/181 (2.2%) | 8/178 (4.5%) | ||
Septic shock | 1/181 (0.6%) | 3/178 (1.7%) | ||
Skin infection | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Soft tissue infection | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Systemic mycosis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Tonsillitis | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 4/181 (2.2%) | 5/178 (2.8%) | ||
Urinary tract infection | 6/181 (3.3%) | 6/178 (3.4%) | ||
Urinary tract infection bacterial | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Hip fracture | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Procedural pneumothorax | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Radius fracture | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Spinal compression fracture | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Thoracic vertebral fracture | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Haemoglobin decreased | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Neutrophil count decreased | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Platelet count decreased | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Weight decreased | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Dehydration | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Diabetes mellitus | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Gout | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hypercalcaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hyperglycaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hyperkalaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hyperuricaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hypocalcaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hyponatraemia | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Starvation | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Tumour lysis syndrome | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Back pain | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Muscle spasms | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal pain | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Myositis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Pain in extremity | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Acute myeloid leukaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Adenocarcinoma of colon | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Bladder papilloma | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Chronic myeloid leukaemia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Colon cancer metastatic | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Hypopharyngeal cancer | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Lung neoplasm malignant | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Melanoma recurrent | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Myelodysplastic syndrome | 3/181 (1.7%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Non-small cell lung cancer | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Plasma cell myeloma | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Tumour associated fever | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Carotid arteriosclerosis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Carpal tunnel syndrome | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Cerebral haemorrhage | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Cerebrovascular accident | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Dementia | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Demyelinating polyneuropathy | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Epilepsy | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Headache | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hepatic encephalopathy | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Nervous system disorder | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Peripheral sensory neuropathy | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Post herpetic neuralgia | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Seizure | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Syncope | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Transient ischaemic attack | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Vascular encephalopathy | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Acute kidney injury | 5/181 (2.8%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Calculus urinary | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Renal colic | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Renal failure | 1/181 (0.6%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Acute pulmonary oedema | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Acute respiratory distress syndrome | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Acute respiratory failure | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Bronchial haemorrhage | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Bronchospasm | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Cough | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 3/181 (1.7%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Interstitial lung disease | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Pleural effusion | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pneumonitis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pulmonary embolism | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Pulmonary fibrosis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Pulmonary oedema | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Respiratory failure | 3/181 (1.7%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Respiratory tract haemorrhage | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Pruritus | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Skin ulcer | 1/181 (0.6%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Arteriosclerosis | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Circulatory collapse | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Essential hypertension | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Haemorrhagic vasculitis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Hypertension | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Hypotension | 2/181 (1.1%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Hypovolaemic shock | 1/181 (0.6%) | 0/178 (0%) | ||
Peripheral ischaemia | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Shock | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Thrombophlebitis | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Venous thrombosis limb | 0/181 (0%) | 1/178 (0.6%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 149/181 (82.3%) | 123/178 (69.1%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anaemia | 24/181 (13.3%) | 38/178 (21.3%) | ||
Leukopenia | 27/181 (14.9%) | 10/178 (5.6%) | ||
Neutropenia | 93/181 (51.4%) | 62/178 (34.8%) | ||
Thrombocytopenia | 38/181 (21%) | 55/178 (30.9%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Constipation | 8/181 (4.4%) | 11/178 (6.2%) | ||
Diarrhoea | 14/181 (7.7%) | 19/178 (10.7%) | ||
Nausea | 45/181 (24.9%) | 36/178 (20.2%) | ||
Vomiting | 19/181 (10.5%) | 22/178 (12.4%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Asthenia | 13/181 (7.2%) | 16/178 (9%) | ||
Chills | 14/181 (7.7%) | 3/178 (1.7%) | ||
Fatigue | 15/181 (8.3%) | 11/178 (6.2%) | ||
Pyrexia | 26/181 (14.4%) | 15/178 (8.4%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 13/181 (7.2%) | 8/178 (4.5%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Platelet count decreased | 12/181 (6.6%) | 5/178 (2.8%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 13/181 (7.2%) | 8/178 (4.5%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Headache | 15/181 (8.3%) | 6/178 (3.4%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Cough | 15/181 (8.3%) | 10/178 (5.6%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 15/181 (8.3%) | 3/178 (1.7%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Pruritus | 19/181 (10.5%) | 2/178 (1.1%) | ||
Rash | 23/181 (12.7%) | 8/178 (4.5%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypotension | 11/181 (6.1%) | 4/178 (2.2%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Clinical Disclosure Office |
---|---|
Organization | Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
Phone | 862-778-8300 |
Novartis.email@novartis.com |
- 110913