Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Sponsor
Riverside Haematology Group (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT00003602
Collaborator
(none)
400
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two different combination chemotherapy regimens in treating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:
  • Compare the efficacy of oral idarubicin and etoposide vs intravenous mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine as consolidation therapy in patients over 55 years old with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

  • Compare the toxicity of these 2 regimens in these patients.

  • Assess the quality of life of these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to number of courses of induction therapy required to achieve complete remission.

All patients receive induction chemotherapy consisting of idarubicin IV on days 1-3 and cytarabine IV over 12 hours on days 1-7. Patients receive 1-2 courses of induction chemotherapy to achieve complete remission.

Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms for consolidation therapy after achieving complete remission.

  • Arm I: Patients receive 2 courses of mitoxantrone IV on days 1 and 2, etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5, and cytarabine IV over 12 hours on days 1-5.

  • Arm II: Patients receive 2 courses of oral idarubicin and etoposide on days 1-3.

Quality of life is assessed before each course of consolidation chemotherapy and 6-8 weeks after completion of therapy.

Patients are followed until death.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 400 patients will be accrued for this study.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
400 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomised Study Comparing an Oral Regimen (Idarubicin and Etoposide) With an Intravenous Regimen (MAE) for Consolidation in Patients Over 55 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia in First Complete Remission
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 1998

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    55 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
    • Histologically confirmed de novo or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

    • Prior myelodysplasia allowed

    • Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) OR

    • RAEB in transformation

    • No relapsed AML

    • No chronic granulocytic leukemia in transformation

    • No CNS disease

    PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
    Age:
    • Over 55
    Performance status:
    • Not specified
    Life expectancy:
    • Not specified
    Hematopoietic:
    • Not specified
    Hepatic:
    • Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)

    • Transaminases no greater than 2.5 times ULN

    Renal:
    • Creatinine no greater than 2.5 times ULN
    Cardiovascular:
    • No severe or uncontrolled cardiac failure
    Other:
    • No serious medical, social, or psychological condition

    • Not HIV 1 or 2 seropositive

    PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
    Biologic therapy:
    • No plan for future autograft
    Chemotherapy:
    • No prior chemotherapy for myelodysplastic syndrome or AML
    Endocrine therapy:
    • Not specifed
    Radiotherapy:
    • Not specified
    Surgery:
    • Not specified
    Other:
    • No concurrent aluminum or magnesium-based antacids

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust Newcastle-Upon-Tyne England United Kingdom NE7 7DN

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Riverside Haematology Group

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Graham Jackson, MD, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00003602
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CDR0000066675
    • RHG-AML97
    • EU-98031
    First Posted:
    Jan 27, 2003
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 20, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2001

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 20, 2013