Local Anesthetic Response in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) and Healthy Volunteers

Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Enrolling by invitation
CT.gov ID
NCT04036305
Collaborator
University of Calgary (Other)
230
1
77.2
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Local anesthetic resistance is commonly reported by patients with EDS. However, there are no objective data on the occurrence of local anesthetic resistance in EDS patients and in healthy volunteers. We propose to collect such objective data on the frequency of drug resistance and whether any problems with local anesthesia are due to initial ineffectiveness or due to its effects dissipating too soon.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection
  • Drug: Lidocaine Injection 2%
  • Drug: Bupivacaine Injection 0.5%

Detailed Description

There was a prior large online questionnaire to better understand the issues around local anesthetic resistance. By November 2018, 933 EDS patients (total 1059 respondents) completed the survey, 99.2% of which had previously received local anesthetics. Among these patients, 88% reported that they have "had a problem with local anesthetic injection not working adequately or properly," while only 54% of respondents without EDS reported a similar problem. These data suggests that local anesthetic resistance might be more prevalent in patients with EDS than in the general population. If these findings are true, then this might have significant implications for the appropriate management of these patients during minor surgery and dental procedures.

This study aims to assess the frequency and related issues around local anesthetic resistance in EDS patients, including whether the problem is a lack of analgesia or a timing effect (short duration of action or delayed onset of action), and whether the problem relates only to some local anesthetics or whether there is a problem with the whole class of local anesthetics.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
230 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Local Anesthetic Response in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) and Healthy Volunteers
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 26, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
EDS Patients

Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria (2017) for Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Drug: 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection
All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
Other Names:
  • Saline
  • Drug: Lidocaine Injection 2%
    All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
    Other Names:
  • Xylocaine
  • lignocaine
  • Drug: Bupivacaine Injection 0.5%
    All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
    Other Names:
  • marcaine
  • Healthy Volunteers

    Healthy control volunteers who do not meet the criteria for Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

    Drug: 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection
    All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
    Other Names:
  • Saline
  • Drug: Lidocaine Injection 2%
    All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
    Other Names:
  • Xylocaine
  • lignocaine
  • Drug: Bupivacaine Injection 0.5%
    All participants will be injected subcutaneously with a single 0.5ml dose
    Other Names:
  • marcaine
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Delta Pain Scores Lidocaine at 5 min [5 minutes post-injection]

      Difference between the pain score at the Lidocaine injection locations (compared to a control location) and the saline injection location (compared to a control location). The pain scale is .a 4 level scale from 0 ("absent sensation"), to 1 ("dull pressure"), to 2 ("sharp but less than a control [non-injected] region) to 3 (same or worse than the control region).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Delta Pain Scores Lidocaine at 30 min [30 min]

      Difference between the pain score at the Lidocaine injection locations (compared to a control location) and the saline injection location (compared to a control location). The pain scale is .a 4 level scale from 0 ("absent sensation"), to 1 ("dull pressure"), to 2 ("sharp but less than a control [non-injected] region) to 3 (same or worse than the control region).

    2. Delta Pain Scores Bupivacaine at 5 min [5 min]

      Difference between the pain score at the bupivacaine injection locations (compared to a control location) and the saline injection location (compared to a control location). The pain scale is .a 4 level scale from 0 ("absent sensation"), to 1 ("dull pressure"), to 2 ("sharp but less than a control [non-injected] region) to 3 (same or worse than the control region).

    3. Delta Pain Scores Bupivacaine at 30 min [30 min]

      Difference between the pain score at the bupivacaine injection locations (compared to a control location) and the saline injection location (compared to a control location). The pain scale is .a 4 level scale from 0 ("absent sensation"), to 1 ("dull pressure"), to 2 ("sharp but less than a control [non-injected] region) to 3 (same or worse than the control region).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • EDS patients, clinically diagnosed hypermobile EDS based on 2017 criteria

    • EDS patients with genetically proven non-hypermobile EDS

    • Healthy participants, no EDS

    • Able and willing to provide informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Known allergy to Lidocaine or Bupivacaine

    • Unable to provide informed consent

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee United States 37232

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • University of Calgary

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Satish R Raj, MD MSCI, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Satish R. Raj, Adjunct Associate Professor of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04036305
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 190957
    First Posted:
    Jul 29, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 8, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Satish R. Raj, Adjunct Associate Professor of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 8, 2021