SBRT for HCC: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01910909
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
1
62
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

  1. Background 1.1. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) HCC is the third most common cause of cancer death globally. It is also the second cause of cancer mortality in Korea, despite the incidence of HCC was fifth. The most important cause of this discrepancy is connected with the fact that the significant portion of the HCC is detected as unresectable status.

1.2. Standard treatment of the HCC At the point of HCC diagnosis, only 30% of the patients could receive standard curative treatment, like resection, liver transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown in randomized trials to improve survival compared with symptomatic therapy alone, in the patients without macrovascular involvement, extrahepatic disease and tumor related symptoms. However, in the recent review of TACE, TACE might be contraindicate or not recommended in the patients who showed vascular tumor invasion, more than 10 cm size, poor portal blood flow and/or repeated poor response.

Recently, Sorafenib, which is one of the target agents, showed survival advantage on unresectable HCC patients in two randomized study. In those study, sorafenib improved approximately three month overall survival increment, however, the median survival duration was only 10.7 months in experiment group (received sorafenib), and even 6.5 months in Asian-Pacific trial. Additionally, the possibility that sorafenib effect could be reduced in the patients had hepatitis B virus (HBV) was suggested in the subgroup analysis.

1.3 Radiation therapy (RT) for the HCC The use of RT in HCC is increased with the radiation technological advances. In the unresectable patients, RT showed 50 to 60% response rate with the dose response relationship. Recently, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) showed excellent local control and comparable survival rate in thoracic tumor. In the HCC, SBRT also showed 75 to 100% local control rate without significant elevation of the toxicities. One study reported that 24 to 54 Gy SBRT achieved 87% 1year local control and 17 months overall survival. The standard treatment of unresectable HCC is sorafenib, but Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (KLCSG) recommend RT as an option in localized unresectable HCC. Furthermore, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) started randomized trial to confirm the effect of SBRT in unresectable HCC (RTOG 1112).

Investigators previously reported the retrospective result that the higher dose SBRT achieved 2 year overall survival 87.9% and local control 85% in the patient who showed less than 5 cm solitary HCC without portal vein involvement.

Based on those studies, we start this prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse event of SBRT in the patients who had solitary 3 cm or less size HCC without extrahepatic lesion and vascular involvement.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: Stereotactic body radiotherapy
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effectiveness and Safety of the Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prospective Phase II Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2013
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2018
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Stereotactic body radiotherapy

Stereotactic body radiotherapy 60 Gy/3 fraction standard dose The highest allowable dose with maintain normal tissue constraints

Radiation: Stereotactic body radiotherapy
Respiration training will be done on the day that patient decided participate this study with wearing video goggle and headphone assisted respiration by visual and voice. Four dimensional CT simulation with wearing video goggle and headphone assisted respiration by visual and voice and real time position management system (PRM) signal will be adopted. Planning MRI with diffusion image also be acquired in same condition with CT simulation. SBRT will be delivered daily 20 Gy for 3 fractions.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. To evaluate the SBRT effect on local progression free survival rate [Radiologic response will be evaluated at 3 month.]

    Radiologic response will be evaluated at 1, 3 month after SBRT, and then every 3 month imaging follow up will be continued. Local progression will be defined by modified Modified response evaluation criteria for solid tumor (mRECIST). Local progression was defined as 20% or more size increase of contrast enhanced primary lesion or new contrast enhanced lesion in planning target volume.

  2. To evaluate the SBRT effect on adverse events [Adverse events will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT.]

    Adverse events will be evaluated at 1 and 3 month after SBRT, and then every 3 month follow up will be continued.. Adverse event will be evaluated with common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE version 4.0) during follow up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. To determine the SBRT objective response rate [Response will be evaluated at 3 month]

  2. To measure the time to local tumor progression [Response will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT.]

    Response will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT, then every 3 month follow up with imaging will be continued. mRECIST will be used to define local tumor progression.

  3. To measure the overall survival [Survival will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT.]

    Survival will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT, then every 3 month follow up will be continued. Overall survival will be measured from the data of SBRT start to the date of death or to the date of last follow up visit.

  4. To measure the progression free survival [Response will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT.]

    Response will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT, then every 3 month follow up with imaging will be continued. mRECIST will be used to define response. Progression free survival will be measured from the date of SBRT to the date of progression recognition or to the date of lat follow up visit.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of life(QOL)change before and after RT [QoL will be assessed before, and 1, 3, 6 months after SBRT.]

    To measure the quality of life(QOL) before and after RT, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) will be used. Before simulation of RT, baseline QOL assessment will be obtained, then QOL will be assessed at 1, 3, 6 months after RT, before physician interview.

  2. RT response prediction probability evaluation by diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI and PET [At 1 month after RT]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients must have a diagnosis of HCC by at least one criterion listed below (KLCSG guideline 2009) 1.1 Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of HCC 1.2 Liver nodule in high risk group 1.2.1 If alpha feto protein (AFP)≥200 ng/mL , ≥ 1 typical HCC enhancing pattern on dynamic contrast enhanced CT or MRI 1.2.2 If AFP<200 ng/mL, ≥2 typical HCC enhancing pattern on dynamic contrast enhanced CT, MRI, and angiography 1.3 ≥ 2 cm nodule in liver cirrhosis (LC), ≥ 1 typical HCC enhancing pattern on dynamic contrast enhanced CT or MRI

  2. Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status 0 or 1

  3. Size of the HCC ≤ 3 cm or less

  4. Age ≥ 20

  5. Unsuitable for resection or transplant or RFA

  6. Unsuitable for or refractory to TACE or drug eluting beads (DEB)

  7. Agreement of study-specific informed consent

  8. Assessment by radiation oncologist and medical oncologist or hepatologist within 28 days prior to study entry?

  9. Child-Pugh score A within 14 days prior to study entry

  10. normal liver (Liver minus gross tumor volume) ≥ 700 cc

  11. Target is only one viable hepatocellular carcinoma

  12. Blood work requirements

  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500 /mm3, Platelet ≥ 70,000/mm3, Hgb ≥ 8 g/dl

  • Liver function test (LFT): T. bilirubin<3.0 mg/dL, International normalized ratio (INR) < 1.7, Albumin ≥ 2.8g/dL, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)< 6 X normal

  • Serum creatinine < 1.5 X normal, or Creatinine clearance rate ≥ 60 mL/min

  1. Male, consent contraception at least 6 months Childbearing potential woman, consent contraception at least 6 months

  2. Life expectancy more than 12 weeks

  3. Stable breathing more than 10 minutes

  4. Consent to fiducial marker insertion ( if needed )

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Extrahepatic metastasis or malignant nodes

  2. Pregnant and/or breastfeeding woman

  3. Macroscopic vascular tumor involvement

  4. Previous upper abdominal RT history

  5. Uncontrolled active co-morbidity

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Samsung Medical Center Seoul Korea, Republic of 135-710

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Samsung Medical Center

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hee Chul Park, M.D., Ph.D., Samsung Medical Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Samsung Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01910909
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2013-06-005-001
First Posted:
Jul 30, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Apr 20, 2018
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2018
Keywords provided by Samsung Medical Center
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 20, 2018