GRECCAR14: Study Evaluating the Tailored Management of Locally-advanced Rectal Carcinoma

• Sponsor: Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle (Other)
• Overall Status: Recruiting
• CT.gov ID: NCT04749108
• Collaborator: (none)
• Enrollment: 430
• Locations: 19
• Arms: 2
• Anticipated Duration (Months): 68.1
• Patients Per Site: 22.6
• Patients Per Site Per Month: 0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Locally advanced rectal carcinoma raise the issue of both the oncological control, local and general, and the therapeutic morbidity. Surgery alone can cure only one out of two patients, radiochemotherapy improves the local control but the metastatic risk remains about 30% with enhanced postoperative morbidity and poor functional results. The tumor response to preoperative treatment is the major prognostic factor which revealed the aggressiveness of the tumor. To this day, there are no biologic predictive markers for tumor response.

The purpose of this trial is to tailor the management according to the early tumoral response after short and intensive induction chemotherapy. MRI volumetric tumor response will be used to distinguish between good responders and bad responders.

"Very good" responders will be randomized to either immediate surgery or radiochemotherapy followed by surgery (Standard arm: Cap 50).

Condition or Disease	Intervention/Treatment	Phase
Locally Advanced Malignant Neoplasm; Rectal Carcinoma	Drug: Induction chemotherapy - modified FOLFIRINOX regimen; Other: Early tumor response evaluation by MRI volumetry; Radiation: Radiochemotherapy Cap 50; Procedure: Radical proctectomy with total mesorectal excision	Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

Cancer of the rectum is a common disease. It affects nearly 15,000 new people each year, with more men (53%) than women (47%).

In more than 9 out of 10 cases, it occurs after 50 years. Three types of treatments are used to treat rectal cancer: surgery, radiotherapy and drug treatments.

The standard treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers (LARC) is multidisciplinary, combining chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. The usual treatment in this situation is called induction chemotherapy administrated before radiochemotherapy. This phase of treatment taking place before surgery is called neoadjuvant therapy.

However, treating all cancers of the locally advanced rectum with the same neoadjuvant treatment exposes patients who are good responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with possible toxicity to radiotherapy and patients who are poor responders to ineffectiveness of conventional radiotherapy with surgery and so to a mutilating ineffective treatment.

The short- and long-term toxicity of pelvic radiation may be the most compelling reason to reconsider reflexive neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NA-RCT) and to move toward a more individualized approach.

A large North American trial is currently evaluating the suppression of preoperative radiation therapy in patients selected as a good responder to induction chemotherapy.

A first trial called GRECCAR-4 (Surgical Research Group on Rectum CAncer) with induction chemotherapy by 5 Fluorouracil + Irinotecan + Oxaliplatin and personalized radiochemotherapy reported the following results:

• High-dose induction chemotherapy is well tolerated and reproducible

• Early assessment after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy makes it possible to discriminate between good and bad responders without a negative impact on surgery.

• Personalized management of LARC according to the early tumor response to chemotherapy is possible.

• In good responder patients, a resection rate of 100% was achieved (even in the arm without radiotherapy), but due to poor recruitment, it is not possible to draw a formal conclusion regarding these promising results.

• The oncological results at 5 years show a local recurrence rate of 0% for the good responders and 4.8% for the poor responders. The 5-year overall survival was 86.7% with a 5-year progression-free survival of 75.0%.

GRECCAR 14 is the only French trial to question the feasibility of appropriate management of non-metastatic LARC. Its main objective is to evaluate, in good responder patients, personalized management after preoperative CT treatment.

GRECCAR-14 will try to confirm this strategy taking into account the 1st results of GRECCAR 4.

The study will initially focus on 200 patients to assess the surgical quality of this therapeutic strategy and then on 230 additional patients to assess the effectiveness of this personalized treatment on survival without recurrence.

Study Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Anticipated Enrollment: 430 participants
• Allocation: Randomized
• Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
• Intervention Model Description: Drug: Induction chemotherapy - modified FOLFIRINOX regimen Other: Early tumor response evaluation by MRI volumetry Radiation: Radiochemotherapy Cap 50 Procedure: Radical proctectomy with total mesorectal excisionDrug: Induction chemotherapy - modified FOLFIRINOX regimen Other: Early tumor response evaluation by MRI volumetry Radiation: Radiochemotherapy Cap 50 Procedure: Radical proctectomy with total mesorectal excision
• Masking: None (Open Label)
• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Official Title: Multicentric Phase II-III Study Evaluating the Tailored Management of Locally-advanced Rectal Carcinoma After a Favorable Response to Induction Chemotherapy
• Actual Study Start Date: Nov 26, 2021
• Anticipated Primary Completion Date: Aug 1, 2027
• Anticipated Study Completion Date: Aug 1, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Arm A: immediate rectal surgery "Very good" responder patients will be randomly assigned to proctectomy performed within 4 to 6 weeks from randomization.	Drug: Induction chemotherapy - modified FOLFIRINOX regimen; An induction chemotherapy (6 cycles) combining irinotecan 180 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, elvorin 200 mg/m2 followed by a 46-hour continuous infusion 2,400 mg/m2) will be delivered every 15 days (D1=D15).; Other: Early tumor response evaluation by MRI volumetry; Two weeks after the CT completion, the tumor volume will be measured by MRI with specific software which automatically borders the tumor so as to determine the early tumor response. A centralized reassessment of all MRI exams will be systematically performed by two radiologists of the coordinator center.; Procedure: Radical proctectomy with total mesorectal excision; The proctectomy can be performed by laparoscopic surgery or conventional laparotomy.
Active Comparator: RCT Cap 50 and then rectal surgery Very good" responder patients will be randomly assigned to receive chemoradiotherapy combining the administration of oral capecitabine (1600 mg/m2/day, BID) and radiotherapy at a total dose of 50 grays (2Gy/day, 5 days a week, 5 weeks, boost 6 Gy) followed after 7 weeks by a proctectomy.	Drug: Induction chemotherapy - modified FOLFIRINOX regimen; An induction chemotherapy (6 cycles) combining irinotecan 180 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, elvorin 200 mg/m2 followed by a 46-hour continuous infusion 2,400 mg/m2) will be delivered every 15 days (D1=D15).; Other: Early tumor response evaluation by MRI volumetry; Two weeks after the CT completion, the tumor volume will be measured by MRI with specific software which automatically borders the tumor so as to determine the early tumor response. A centralized reassessment of all MRI exams will be systematically performed by two radiologists of the coordinator center.; Radiation: Radiochemotherapy Cap 50; RCT Cap 50 will combine radiotherapy at a dose of 50 Gy by either conventional 3D or Intensity-Modulated RadioTherapy (IMRT) (2 Gy per fraction, 5 fractions per week during 5 weeks / 44 Gy in mini pelvis, and boost 6 Gy on reduced peritumoral volume) with concomitant oral capecitabine at 1600 mg/m2 per day delivered the days of radiotherapy treatment (2 daily intake).; Procedure: Radical proctectomy with total mesorectal excision; The proctectomy can be performed by laparoscopic surgery or conventional laparotomy.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

1. R0 resection rate (R0 is defined as Circumferential resection margin (CRM ≥ 1 mm) for Phase II [Within 15 days after surgery]

   The excision limits will be determined precisely on the part, after exhaustive sampling of the maximum tumor extension zones and containing the surface of the inked mesorectum.

2. 3-year Disease free survival (DFS) for Phase III [3 years]

   (DFS is defined as the time interval between randomisation and the occurrence of the first event, such as local or metastatic recurrence, the development of a second cancer or death from any cause).Locoregional failure include locally progressive disease leading to an unresectable tumour, local R2 resection, or local recurrence after an R0-R1 resection. Patients without events at the time of analysis will be censored on the date of the last informative follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

1. Compliance rate with neoadjuvant treatment schedule [Within 4.5 months after the start of treatment]

   To measure the compliance rate to the whole neoadjuvant schedule (induction CT + radiochemotherapy)

2. Pathological complete response rate [Within 15 days after surgery]

   To assess the pathological complete response rate (ypT0N0)

3. Sphincter-saving surgery rate [Up to 2 months after the end of the neoadjuvant treatment]

   To assess the impact of the therapeutic strategy on the rate of sphincter-saving surgery.

4. Quality of life by using the quality of life questionnaire score (QLQ-C30) [For a 2-year follow-up]

   The EORTC QLQ-C30 uses for the questions 1 to 28 a 4-point scale. The scale scores from 1 to 4: 1 ("Not at all"), 2 ("A little"), 3 ("Quite a bit") and 4 ("Very much"). Half points are not allowed. The range is 3. For the raw score, less points are considered to have a better outcome. The EORTC QLQ-C30 uses for the questions 29 and 30 a 7-points scale. The scale scores from 1 to 7: 1 ("very poor") to 7 ("excellent"). Half points are not allowed. The range is 6. First of all, raw score has to be calculated with mean values. Afterwards linear transformation is performed to be comparable. More points are considered to have a better outcome.

5. Bowel function, Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) [6 and 12 months respectively after closure of stoma]

   Assessed using LARS questionnaire (score 0-42, a high score indicates poor bowel function)

6. Quality of life by using the quality of life questionnaire score (QLQ-CR29) [For a 2-year follow-up]

   Score 26-108, a high score indicates many symptoms of colorectal cancer.

7. 3-year local recurrence free survival rate (L-RFS) [3 years]

   The time interval from the date of inclusion to the date of local recurrence or death from any cause).Patients alive without local recurrence will be censored at the date of last follow-up.

8. 3-year metastasis recurrence free survival rate (M-RFS) [3 years]

   The time interval from the date of inclusion to the date of metastatic recurrence or death from any cause).Patients alive without metastasis will be censored at the date of last follow-up.

9. 3-year Overall survival (OS) [3 years]

   The time interval from the date of inclusion and randomization to the date of death from any cause.Patients alive will be censored at the date of last follow-up.

10. 5-year Overall survival (OS) [5 years]

    The time interval from the date of inclusion and randomization to the date of death from any cause.Patients alive will be censored at the date of last follow-up.

11. Local recurrence rate [For a 2-3-year follow-up]

    The time interval from the date of inclusion to the date of local recurrence.Patients without local recurrence will be censored at the date of last follow-up or death.

12. Clavien-Dindo grade [Within 1 month after surgery]

    Grade 1 (light) to Grade 5 = Death of patient . It is widely used throughout surgery for grading adverse events (i.e. complications) which occur as a result of surgical procedures.

13. Neoadjuvant rectal Score by Fokas [Within 15 days after surgery]

    The score uses the variables of clinical tumor stage, pathologic tumor stage, and pathologic nodal stage which are commonly available, furthering its utility in the clinical setting. The final scores range from 0 (good prognostic) to 100 (poor prognostic).

14. Rates of Total mesorectal excision (TME) grading according to Quirke [Within 15 days after surgery]

    This grade is given by the pathologist on the appearance of the mesorectum on fresh specimen (complete grade = good resection), incomplete and near incomplete grade (between good and poor resection), incomplete grade = poor resection)

15. Distal margin to the tumor [Within 15 days after surgery]

16. Definitive stoma rate [36 MONTHS]

17. Second surgery rate [36 MONTHS]

18. Rehospitalization rate [Within 1 month after surgery]

19. Dworak Classification [Approximately 6 weeks after randomization]

    Histopathologic analysis of tumor. Grade 0 to grade 4 with (Grade 4 = sterilized tumor to grade 0 = no regression of tumor)

20. Metastasis recurrence rate [For a 2-3-year follow-up]

    the time to metastasis defined as the time interval from the date of inclusion to the date of metastasis. Patients without metastasis will be censored at the date of last follow-up or death.

21. Disease Fee Survival rate (DFS) [For a 3-year follow-up]

    the time interval from the date of inclusion until the date of the first cancer-related event, or death from any cause). Patients alive without event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.

22. Assessment of adverse events by using the NCI-CTCAE version 5 scale [Approximately 72 months for all patients]

    From the signature of informed consent until 60 days after Surgery

23. Evaluation of urinary function by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire score [For a 6-month follow-up]

    Score 0-35, a high score indicates an impaired urinary function.

24. Evaluation of sexual function in men by International Index of Erectil Function (IIEFS) questionnaire score [For a 6-month follow-up]

    Score 1-25, a low score indicates an impaired sexual function in men.

25. Evaluation of sexual function in women by Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire score [For a 6-month follow-up]

    Score 4-95, a low score indicates an impaired sexual function in women.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years and Older
• Sexes Eligible for Study: All
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Written consent for study,

2. Patients aged over 18 years old,

3. WHO performance status 0-1,

4. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum,

5. Distal part of the tumor from 2 to 12 cm from the anal verge,

6. No unequivocal evidence on CT-Scan of established metastatic disease,

7. MRI evaluation of the locally advanced tumor:

8. Predictive CRM < 2mm

9. T3c-d (extending ≥ 5mm beyond the muscularis propria) with EMVI (extra mural venous invasion)

10. T4a - b (except bone and sphincteric invasion),

11. General condition considered suitable for radical pelvic surgery and a systemic therapy with FOLFIRINOX,

12. Adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal and ionogram function assessed within 7 days prior to study treatment

13. Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm3; Hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 9 g/dL; Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/ mm3

14. Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, Alkaline phosphatases ≤ 3 x ULN and AST and ALT

≤ 3 x ULN

1. Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN or calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min according to MDRD,

2. Kalemia, Calcemia and Magnesemia within normal limits,

3. For women of reproductive potential, negative serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) pregnancy test obtained within 7 days before the start of study treatment. Women not of reproductive potential are female patients who are postmenopausal or permanently sterilized (e.g., tubal occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy),

4. For women of childbearing potential and men, agreement to use an adequate contraception for the duration of study participation and up to 6 months following completion of therapy. Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active with a non-sterilized male partner must use 2 methods of effective contraception. The investigator or a designated associate is requested to advise the patient on how to achieve an adequate birth control.

Adequate contraception is defined in the study as any medically recommended method (or combination of methods) as per standard of care,

1. No evidence of chronic or acute ischemic heart disease,

2. Willing to participate to the study, and able to give informed consent and to comply with the treatment and follow-up schedules,

3. Affiliation to the French Social Security System.

After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patient must also meet the following criteria

• Patient with tumoral regression ≥ 60% and CRM ≥ 1mm

Non-Inclusion criteria

1. Non measurable rectal tumor or not assessed by MRI before inclusion

2. Ultra-low rectal tumor at diagnosis which imposes radiotherapy administration (inferior tumor pole less than 1 cm from the upper part of the levator ani)

3. Patient with a history of chemotherapy or pelvic radiotherapy

4. Contraindication to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy

5. Complete or partial Dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase (DPD) deficiency (uracilemia ≥ 16 ng/mL)

6. Peripheral neuropathy ≥ 2

7. ECG with a cQT interval higher than 450 ms for men and higher than 470 ms for women

8. Active cardiac disease including any of the following:

9. Congestive heart failure ≥ New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2 (appendix 4),

10. Unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest), new-onset angina (begun within the last 3 months),

11. Myocardial infarction less than 6 months before first dose of treatment,

12. Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy (beta blockers or digoxin are permitted).

13. Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from colorectal cancer within 5 years prior to study inclusion, except for curatively treated cervical cancer in situ, non-melanoma skin cancer and superficial bladder tumors [Ta (non invasive tumor), Tis (carcinoma in situ) and T1 (lamina propria invasion)].

14. Arterial or venous thrombotic or embolic events such as cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 6 months before start of treatment,

15. Any infection that could jeopardize treatment administration

16. Any other serious concomitant disease or disorder that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study and safety during the study (e.g., severe liver, heart, kidney, lung, metabolic, or psychiatric disorders).

17. History of inflammatory bowel disease

18. Patients with a history of pulmonary fibrosis or interstitial pneumonia

19. Patients using antivitamin K (Coumadin, etc.), it's possible to substitute the antivitamin K treatment with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) before starting chemotherapy.

20. Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs, study drug classes, or any constituent of the products.

21. Patient who received live attenuated vaccine within 10 days of inclusion

22. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman. If a patient is of childbearing age, she must have a negative pregnancy test (serum β-hCG) documented 72 hours prior to inclusion.

23. Patient treated with an investigational drug within the last 30 days.

24. Patient under curatorship or guardianship or safeguard justice

25. Inability to submit to medical monitoring of the trial for geographical, social or psychological reasons.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

	Site	City	State	Country	Postal Code
1	CHU Besançon	Besançon	Doubs	France	25030
2	CHU de Bordeaux	Bordeaux	Gironde	France	33600
3	Insitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier	Montpellier	Hérault	France	34298
4	CHU Rennes	Rennes	Ile Et Vilaine	France	35200
5	CHU de Nancy	Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy	Lorraine	France	54511
6	Centre Alexis Vautrin	Nancy	Meurthe Et Moselle	France	54519
7	Centre Oscart Lambret	Lille	Nord	France	59000
8	CHU Amiens	Amiens	Picardie	France	80054
9	CHU Clermont-Ferrand	Clermont-Ferrand	Puy De Dôme	France	63000
10	CHU de Lyon	Lyon	Rhône	France	69310
11	CHU Rouen	Rouen	Seine-Maritime	France	76031
12	Hôpital Bicêtre	Le Kremlin-Bicêtre	Val De Marne	France	94270
13	Institut Gustave Roussy	Villejuif	Val De Marne	France	94800
14	Chu Grenoble	Grenoble		France
15	CAC Léon Bérard	Lyon		France
16	Hopital Saint Eloi	Montpellier		France
17	Centre Antoine Lacassagne	Nice		France
18	Hôpital Saint-Antoine	Paris		France	75012
19	Hôpital Diaconesses	Paris		France	75020

Sponsors and Collaborators

• Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle

Investigators

• Study Chair: Philippe Rouanet, MD, [e-mail]

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

• Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lous J, Laurberg S. Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Sep;15(9):1130-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12244.
• Chen TY, Wiltink LM, Nout RA, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Laurberg S, Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ. Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short-course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015 Jun;14(2):106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
• Fokas E, Glynne-Jones R, Appelt A, Beets-Tan R, Beets G, Haustermans K, Marijnen C, Minsky BD, Ludmir E, Quirke P, Sebag-Montefiore D, Garcia-Aguilar J, Gambacorta MA, Valentini V, Buyse M, Rödel C. Outcome measures in multimodal rectal cancer trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):e252-e264. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30024-3. Review.
• Kang JH, Kim YC, Kim H, Kim YW, Hur H, Kim JS, Min BS, Kim H, Lim JS, Seong J, Keum KC, Kim NK. Tumor volume changes assessed by three-dimensional magnetic resonance volumetry in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation: the impact of the volume reduction ratio on the prediction of pathologic complete response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 15;76(4):1018-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.066. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
• Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):918-28. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8702. Epub 2012 Feb 23. Review.
• Nougaret S, Castan F, de Forges H, Vargas HA, Gallix B, Gourgou S, Rouanet P; GRECCAR Study Group. Early MRI predictors of disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer from the GRECCAR 4 trial. Br J Surg. 2019 Oct;106(11):1530-1541. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11233. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
• Rödel C, Graeven U, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Arnold D, Hofheinz RD, Ghadimi M, Wolff HA, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Wittekind C, Ströbel P, Staib L, Wilhelm M, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R, Liersch T; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):979-89. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00159-X. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
• Rouanet P, Rullier E, Lelong B, Maingon P, Tuech JJ, Pezet D, Castan F, Nougaret S; and the GRECCAR Study Group. Tailored Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma Based on the Tumor Response to Induction Chemotherapy: Preliminary Results of the French Phase II Multicenter GRECCAR4 Trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jul;60(7):653-663. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000849.
• Rouanet P. Which Trial to Demonstrate the Truthfulness of a Tailored Strategy in Rectal Carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jan;61(1):e1-e2. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000977.
• Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hess C, Becker H, Raab HR, Villanueva MT, Witzigmann H, Wittekind C, Beissbarth T, Rödel C. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
• Schrag D, Weiser MR, Goodman KA, Gonen M, Hollywood E, Cercek A, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Gollub MJ, Shia J, Guillem JG, Temple LK, Paty PB, Saltz LB. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without routine use of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a pilot trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 20;32(6):513-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7904. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
• Weiser MR, Fichera A, Schrag D, Boughey JC, You YN. Progress in the PROSPECT trial: precision treatment for rectal cancer? Bull Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;100(4):51-2.

• Responsible Party: Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04749108
• Other Study ID Numbers: PROICM 2021-01 GRE; 2021-000414-41
• First Posted: Feb 11, 2021
• Last Update Posted: Jan 4, 2022
• Last Verified: Jan 1, 2022

• Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: No
• Plan to Share IPD: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
• Additional relevant MeSH terms: Carcinoma; Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Folfirinox

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 4, 2022