AXEBEAM: Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Radiation Therapy With or Without Oxaliplatin Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Phase II clinical trial, open-label, randomized, two arms, multicentre (possibly multinational). Academic, investigator initiated.
To assess the activity of bevacizumab (AvastinTM) in combination with capecitabine (XelodaTM) and radiation therapy with or without oxaliplatin (EloxatinTM) in the pre-operative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, followed by TME (total mesorectal excision).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
See Synopsis
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: AXE (ARM 1) Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. |
Drug: Oxaliplatin
Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2
Other Names:
Drug: Bevacizumab
Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg
Other Names:
Drug: Capecitabine
825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy
Other Names:
Radiation: radiotherapy
Total dose 45Gy
|
Active Comparator: AX (ARM 2) Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy |
Drug: Bevacizumab
Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg
Other Names:
Drug: Capecitabine
825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy
Other Names:
Radiation: radiotherapy
Total dose 45Gy
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery. [4 months]
Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection [4 months]
Histopathologic R0 resection rate was defined as margins histologically negative for tumour involvement after resection. The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is considered to be involved if microscopic tumour is present <1mm from or at the inked circumferential or radial resection margin. Data on quality of mesorectal excision were expected but not collected consistently.
- Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery. [4 months]
Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100.
- Clinical Response Rate [3 months]
Baseline tumour measurements were performed within 4 weeks prior to treatment start (RECIST). The same methods of assessment (CT and/or MRI) were used for each measurable lesion at baseline and during follow-up. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumour (both target and non-target lesions). Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of tumour longest diameters (LD). Stable Disease (SD) is steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. Appearance of new lesions constitutes PD. In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions was considered evidence of PD.
- Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview [continuous up to 1 year]
Adverse events graded as per NCI CTCAE (US National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 3.0. All Serious Adverse Events occurrences are reported and counts are summarized here; all Adverse Events (all grades) related and not related to study treatment are reported and summarized here; all severe laboratory events (hematology and biochemistry Gr 3 and higher) are reported and summarized here; all severe postoperative complications (Gr 3 and higher) occurred within the first month post surgery are reported and summarized here. See section Adverse events for details.
- Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival [up to 5 years]
Counts and proportions of patients experiencing recurrence of disease (local and distant).
- Death Rates and Overall Survival [up to 5 years]
Counts and proportions of patients deceased (post-study).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adenocarcinoma of rectum measurable (RECIST), locally advanced (defined by MRI - Tumour beyond mesorectal fascia (T4) or Tumour ≤ 2 mm from mesorectal fascia or T3 tumour < 5 cm from anal verge
-
Patient is at least 18 years of age
-
Good organ function
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Evidence of distant metastases
-
Contraindication for bevacizumab
-
Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis | Aalst | Belgium | 9300 | |
2 | ZNA Middelheim | Antwerp | Belgium | ZNA Middelheim | |
3 | AZ St- Lucas | Brugge | Belgium | 8310 | |
4 | Erasme Hospital | Brussels | Belgium | 1070 | |
5 | Cliniques Universitaires St Luc | Brussels | Belgium | 1200 | |
6 | AZ Groeninge | Kortrijk | Belgium | 8500 | |
7 | C.H.U. Sart-Tilman | Liege | Belgium | 4000 | |
8 | Clinique Sainte Elisabeth | Namur | Belgium | 5000 | |
9 | H. Hartziekenhuis | Roeselare | Belgium | 8800 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eric Van Cutsem, Prof. Dr., UZ Leuven
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- s51104 - ML5194
- 2007-007177-23
- MO19051
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Eighty-four patients were included. First patient enrolled: 22-Jun-2009. Last patient enrolled: 29-Sep-2013. Participating sites: UZ Leuven, Erasme Hospital Bruxelles, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc Bruxelles, AZ St. Lucas Brugge, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, CHU Sart-Tilman Liege, OLVZ Aalst, H. Hart Ziekenhuis Roeselare, Cl. Saint Elisabeth Namur |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Target population was represented by patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (tumour beyond mesorectal fascia (T4) or tumour ≤ 2 mm from mesorectal fascia or T3 tumour < 5 cm from anal verge by MRI), histologically confirmed. Pts were screened as per incl and excl criteria per protocol. Screening failures were not recorded in the eCRF. |
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy |
Period Title: Pre-treatment (Baseline) | ||
STARTED | 43 | 41 |
COMPLETED | 43 | 41 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Pre-treatment (Baseline) | ||
STARTED | 43 | 41 |
COMPLETED | 41 | 39 |
NOT COMPLETED | 2 | 2 |
Period Title: Pre-treatment (Baseline) | ||
STARTED | 41 | 39 |
COMPLETED | 41 | 38 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 1 |
Period Title: Pre-treatment (Baseline) | ||
STARTED | 42 | 41 |
COMPLETED | 42 | 41 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 43 | 41 | 84 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
29
67.4%
|
29
70.7%
|
58
69%
|
>=65 years |
14
32.6%
|
12
29.3%
|
26
31%
|
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ] | |||
Median (Full Range) [years] |
61
|
59
|
60
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
14
32.6%
|
12
29.3%
|
26
31%
|
Male |
29
67.4%
|
29
70.7%
|
58
69%
|
ECOG PS (Performance Status) (Count of Participants) | |||
ECOG PS=0 |
36
83.7%
|
37
90.2%
|
73
86.9%
|
ECOG PS=1 |
7
16.3%
|
4
9.8%
|
11
13.1%
|
Distance from tumour to anal verge (Count of Participants) | |||
<5cm |
18
41.9%
|
15
36.6%
|
33
39.3%
|
>=5cm |
13
30.2%
|
15
36.6%
|
28
33.3%
|
NA |
12
27.9%
|
11
26.8%
|
23
27.4%
|
Distance to CRM (Count of Participants) | |||
0mm |
21
48.8%
|
24
58.5%
|
45
53.6%
|
<2mm |
6
14%
|
2
4.9%
|
8
9.5%
|
>=2mm |
9
20.9%
|
10
24.4%
|
19
22.6%
|
NA |
7
16.3%
|
5
12.2%
|
12
14.3%
|
Tumour stage (Count of Participants) | |||
T2 (Tumor invades muscularis propria) |
2
4.7%
|
2
4.9%
|
4
4.8%
|
T3 (tumor invades into pericolorectal tissues) |
34
79.1%
|
31
75.6%
|
65
77.4%
|
T4 (tumor invades through peritoneum/other organs) |
7
16.3%
|
8
19.5%
|
15
17.9%
|
Nodal stage (Count of Participants) | |||
N0 (no regional lymph node metastase) |
7
16.3%
|
5
12.2%
|
12
14.3%
|
N1 (metastasis in 1-3 regional lymp nodes) |
15
34.9%
|
18
43.9%
|
33
39.3%
|
N2 (metastasis in 4 or more regional lymph nodes) |
20
46.5%
|
17
41.5%
|
37
44%
|
Nx (regional nodes cannot be assessed) |
1
2.3%
|
1
2.4%
|
2
2.4%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery. |
---|---|
Description | Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100. |
Time Frame | 4 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Patients who had undertaken surgery and had pathology materials available for central review (centrally reviewed subset) |
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy |
Measure Participants | 41 | 38 |
Pathological complete response (Dworak TRG=4) % |
34
|
11
|
Good tumour regression (Dworak TRG=3-4) % |
41
|
24
|
Little tumour regression (Dworak TRG=0-1-2) % |
59
|
76
|
Title | Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection |
---|---|
Description | Histopathologic R0 resection rate was defined as margins histologically negative for tumour involvement after resection. The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is considered to be involved if microscopic tumour is present <1mm from or at the inked circumferential or radial resection margin. Data on quality of mesorectal excision were expected but not collected consistently. |
Time Frame | 4 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Patient in Arm 2 that discontinued chemoradiotherapy due to major toxicity and had surgery off protocol is counted here as well |
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy |
Measure Participants | 41 | 39 |
Negative resection margins |
40
93%
|
37
90.2%
|
Positive resection margins |
1
2.3%
|
2
4.9%
|
Title | Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery. |
---|---|
Description | Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100. |
Time Frame | 4 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Centrally reviewed subset |
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy |
Measure Participants | 41 | 38 |
Complete response, no tumour left Dworak TRG=4 |
14
32.6%
|
4
9.8%
|
Good tumour regression TRG=3-4 |
17
39.5%
|
9
22%
|
No or little tumour regression Dworak TRG=0-1-2 |
24
55.8%
|
29
70.7%
|
Title | Clinical Response Rate |
---|---|
Description | Baseline tumour measurements were performed within 4 weeks prior to treatment start (RECIST). The same methods of assessment (CT and/or MRI) were used for each measurable lesion at baseline and during follow-up. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumour (both target and non-target lesions). Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of tumour longest diameters (LD). Stable Disease (SD) is steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. Appearance of new lesions constitutes PD. In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions was considered evidence of PD. |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intent to treat, all registered patients |
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy |
Measure Participants | 43 | 41 |
CR |
3
7%
|
5
12.2%
|
PR |
24
55.8%
|
17
41.5%
|
SD |
9
20.9%
|
13
31.7%
|
PD |
0
0%
|
1
2.4%
|
NA |
7
16.3%
|
5
12.2%
|
Title | Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview |
---|---|
Description | Adverse events graded as per NCI CTCAE (US National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 3.0. All Serious Adverse Events occurrences are reported and counts are summarized here; all Adverse Events (all grades) related and not related to study treatment are reported and summarized here; all severe laboratory events (hematology and biochemistry Gr 3 and higher) are reported and summarized here; all severe postoperative complications (Gr 3 and higher) occurred within the first month post surgery are reported and summarized here. See section Adverse events for details. |
Time Frame | continuous up to 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intent to treat |
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy |
Measure Participants | 43 | 41 |
Serious adverse events |
22
|
12
|
All adverse events |
564
|
426
|
Severe lab events |
27
|
16
|
Post operative complications at 1 month |
14
|
9
|
Title | Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival |
---|---|
Description | Counts and proportions of patients experiencing recurrence of disease (local and distant). |
Time Frame | up to 5 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intent to treat (one patient lost to follow-up) |
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy |
Measure Participants | 43 | 41 |
Recurred Dec 2017 |
9
20.9%
|
9
22%
|
Not recurred Dec 2017 |
33
76.7%
|
32
78%
|
Lost to FU |
1
2.3%
|
0
0%
|
Title | Death Rates and Overall Survival |
---|---|
Description | Counts and proportions of patients deceased (post-study). |
Time Frame | up to 5 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intent to treat in follow up (one patient in Arm 1 lost to follow up). |
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy |
Measure Participants | 43 | 41 |
Deceased (Dec 2017) |
6
14%
|
7
17.1%
|
Alive (Dec 2017) |
36
83.7%
|
34
82.9%
|
Lost to FU |
1
2.3%
|
0
0%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From signature of ICF to 30 days post surgery with follow-up for residual toxicity after this period if applicable | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | All SAE occurences are reported and displayed below. Only Gr 3-4-5 adverse events (serious and non serious) are reported in this report. | |||
Arm/Group Title | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) | ||
Arm/Group Description | Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/43 (0%) | 1/41 (2.4%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 21/43 (48.8%) | 12/41 (29.3%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Rectal haemorrhage | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Diarrhea | 3/43 (7%) | 3 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Fistula | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Leak | 2/43 (4.7%) | 2 | 3/41 (7.3%) | 3 |
Obstruction | 2/43 (4.7%) | 2 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Presacral hematoma | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
General disorders | ||||
Fever | 3/43 (7%) | 4 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Febrile neutropenia | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Septic shock | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary tract infection | 2/43 (4.7%) | 2 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Catheter site infection | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Wound infection | 5/43 (11.6%) | 5 | 2/41 (4.9%) | 2 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Neuropathy motor | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Seizure | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Depression | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Lung embolism | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 18/43 (41.9%) | 15/41 (36.6%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Platelet count decreased | 1/43 (2.3%) | 2 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Haemorrhage | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Dissiminated Intravascular Coagulation | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Hematoma postoperative | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Hematoma | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Hypertension b | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Hypertension | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 2/41 (4.9%) | 2 |
Cardiopulmonary arrest | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Meniere's disease | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Anorexia | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Diarrhea | 4/43 (9.3%) | 4 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Anal pain | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Leak Gi | 2/43 (4.7%) | 2 | 3/41 (7.3%) | 3 |
Obstruction Gi | 2/43 (4.7%) | 2 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Pain GI | 2/43 (4.7%) | 2 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Discharge from the anus | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Ascites | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Dysphagia | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
General disorders | ||||
Fatigue | 2/43 (4.7%) | 2 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Sweating | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Febrile neutropenia | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Catheter site infection | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Sepsis | 2/43 (4.7%) | 2 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Wound infection | 5/43 (11.6%) | 5 | 2/41 (4.9%) | 2 |
Peritonitis | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Infection due to leak of anastomosis | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Hypocalcemia | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Hyponatremia | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Pain musculoskeletal | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Pain muskuloskeletal Gr 3 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Hypokalemia | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Neuropathy sensory | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Syncope | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 0/41 (0%) | 0 |
Neuropathy - cranial | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Depression | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Leak GU | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Pain pumonary/respiratory | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 2 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Dermatitis | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 | 3/41 (7.3%) | 3 |
Rash | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Deep venous thrombosis | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 1/41 (2.4%) | 1 |
Embolism | 0/43 (0%) | 0 | 2/41 (4.9%) | 2 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The Sponsor is an academic institution and not the drug market authorization holder. Participating PIs were selected from other academic institutions. Participating PIs cannot publish full or partial study results before final publication by Sponsor, but they will be nominated as co-authors based on patient accrual at each participating site. Own results can be published afterwards by participant PIs, with the agreement of the Sponsor.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Prof. Dr. Eric Van Cutsem |
---|---|
Organization | UZ Leuven |
Phone | +32 16 34 42 18 |
Eric.VanCutsem@uzleuven.be |
- s51104 - ML5194
- 2007-007177-23
- MO19051