Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement

• Sponsor: Medical University of Vienna (Other)
• Overall Status: Completed
• CT.gov ID: NCT02391129
• Collaborator: (none)
• Enrollment: 102
• Duration (Months): 12

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical (range of motion, weight bearing, quality of life) and radiographic outcome (boney consolidation) between open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plates with revision prosthesis using a non-cemented long femoral stem in a group of patients with a Vancouver type-B2, B3 and C periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip replacement.

Condition or Disease	Intervention/Treatment	Phase
Periprosthetic Fractures	Procedure: Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening

Study Design

• Study Type: Observational
• Actual Enrollment: 102 participants
• Observational Model: Cohort
• Time Perspective: Retrospective
• Official Title: Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement
• Study Start Date: Jan 1, 2014
• Actual Primary Completion Date: Jan 1, 2015
• Actual Study Completion Date: Jan 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/Treatment
Hyperion Prosthesis Patients treated with the second generation long-stem revision prosthesis	Procedure: Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening
Helios Prosthesis Patients treated with the first generation long-stem revision prosthesis	Procedure: Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening
Locking compression plate Patients treated with LCP	Procedure: Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

1. Clinical Outcome (Range of Motion of the hip) [follow up of at least 1 year]

   Range of Motion of the hip

2. Radiographic Outcome (boney consolidation of the fracture) [follow up of at least 1 year]

   boney consolidation of the fracture after 3 month, 6 month and at least 1 year after the operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

1. Patient's Mobility (assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score) [follow up of at least 1 year]

   Patient's Mobility assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years and Older
• Sexes Eligible for Study: All
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with Vancouver type- BlI, BIII and C fractures and unstable femoral prosthesis stem.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with pathological fractures,

• Vancouver type-A, Bl, and

• stable femoral prosthesis stem,

• Patients with hemi - prosthesis and periprosthetic femoral fractures were excluded from final analysis.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

• Medical University of Vienna

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.

• Responsible Party: Julian Joestl, MD, Medical University of Vienna
• ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02391129
• Other Study ID Numbers: 1674/2014
• First Posted: Mar 18, 2015
• Last Update Posted: Mar 18, 2015
• Last Verified: Mar 1, 2015

• Additional relevant MeSH terms: Fractures, Bone; Femoral Fractures; Periprosthetic Fractures

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 18, 2015