Phase 1/2a Study on Allogeneic Osteoblastic Cells Implantation in Delayed-Union Fractures
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Fracture healing is a complex physiological process caused by interaction of cellular elements, cytokines and signaling proteins, which results in the formation of new bone. There is for now no universally accepted approach to evaluate the progression of fracture healing. Typically, a fracture is considered as a delayed-union when the bone has not united within a period of time that would be considered adequate for bone healing. Delayed-union suggests that union is slow but will eventually occur without additional surgical or non-surgical intervention, whereas non-union is defined as the cessation of all reparative process of healing.
The incidence of impaired healing is estimated to range from 5 to 10% of all long bone fractures, depending on the fracture site, the type and degree of injury, among other factors. Currently the treatment of choice remains bone allograft or autograft. This procedure shows in general good results but requires an invasive surgery of several hours under general anesthesia, followed by a few days of hospitalization. Because of this, major complications have been reported in up to 20-30% of patients.
The present Phase 1/2a study aims at demonstrating the safety and efficacy of ALLOB®, a proprietary population of allogeneic osteoblastic cells, in the treatment of delayed-union fractures of long bones. In this study, delayed-union is defined at the time of screening as an absence of healing of minimum 3 months and maximum 7 months (+/- 2 weeks) after the onset of the fracture.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: ALLOB® Implantation One arm: ALLOB® Implantation |
Drug: ALLOB® implantation
Each patient will undergo a single administration of ALLOB® into the delayed-union site under anesthesia.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Responders at 6 Months (Efficacy of ALLOB) [6 months]
The success of the study will be based on the percentage of treated patients (ALLOB®) not failing under treatment. A patient will be considered as failed under treatment if, at Month 6: - He/she had a rescue surgery Or - The Global Disease Evaluation score (VAS) as perceived by the patient has not improved by at least 25% and the Tomographic Union Score (TUS) as assessed by CT scan has not increased by at least two points (versus baseline).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patient (or patient's legally acceptable representative) capable to provide a written, dated, and signed informed consent prior to any study related procedure
-
Non-infected delayed-union fracture of a long bone of minimum 3 months and maximum 7 months (+/- 2 weeks)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Fracture interline larger than 2.5 cm
-
Insufficient fracture stability
-
Multifocal fracture
-
Positive serology for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
-
Current or past medical disease that could interfere with the evaluation of the safety and efficacy, as judged by the investigator
-
Severe renal or hepatic impairment
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Bone Therapeutics S.A
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- ALLOB-DU1
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Of the 25 patients enrolled in the study (ICF signature), 22 patients were treated: 2 patients were considered as non eligible before treatment 1 patient withdrew consent before prior to Day 0 |
Arm/Group Title | ALLOB® Implantation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | One arm: ALLOB® Implantation ALLOB® implantation: Each patient will undergo a single administration of ALLOB® into the delayed-union site under anesthesia. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 22 |
COMPLETED | 22 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | ALLOB® Implantation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | One arm: ALLOB® Implantation ALLOB® implantation: Each patient will undergo a single administration of ALLOB® into the delayed-union site under anesthesia. |
Overall Participants | 22 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
47.3
(13.96)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
9
40.9%
|
Male |
13
59.1%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |
Caucasian/White |
22
100%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
Belgium |
13
59.1%
|
Germany |
9
40.9%
|
BMI (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2] |
26.73
(4.676)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Responders at 6 Months (Efficacy of ALLOB) |
---|---|
Description | The success of the study will be based on the percentage of treated patients (ALLOB®) not failing under treatment. A patient will be considered as failed under treatment if, at Month 6: - He/she had a rescue surgery Or - The Global Disease Evaluation score (VAS) as perceived by the patient has not improved by at least 25% and the Tomographic Union Score (TUS) as assessed by CT scan has not increased by at least two points (versus baseline). |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The efficacy analysis was conducted on the Per Protocol population (21 treated patients; one patient being excluded from the analysis due on a major protocol deviation) |
Arm/Group Title | ALLOB® Implantation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | One arm: ALLOB® Implantation ALLOB® implantation: Each patient will undergo a single administration of ALLOB® into the delayed-union site under anesthesia. |
Measure Participants | 21 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percent of patients] |
100
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | ALLOB® Implantation |
---|---|---|
Comments | The success of ALLOB® treatment was based on the percentage of responders. A treated patient was considered as responding if, at the end of the study (6 months): He/she had not required rescue surgery and The GDE score as perceived by the patient had improved by at least 25% or the TUS (tomographic union score) as assessed by CT scan had increased by at least 2 points. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Other Statistical Analysis | The response rate at Month 6 for the 21 patients in the PP population was 100 % (CI: 86.71 - 100.0%). None of the treated patients required rescue surgery. An improvement of GDE score of at least 25% was reported for 16 (76.2%) patients. An increase in TUS of at least 2 points was reported for 16 (76.2%) patients; all patients met at least one of these two criteria. |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 6 months | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Emergence was defined from the date of ALLOB® implantation up to end of study visit (Month-6 visit) | |
Arm/Group Title | ALLOB® Implantation | |
Arm/Group Description | One arm: ALLOB® Implantation ALLOB® implantation: Each patient will undergo a single administration of ALLOB® into the delayed-union site under anesthesia. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
ALLOB® Implantation | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/22 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
ALLOB® Implantation | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/22 (9.1%) | |
Infections and infestations | ||
implant site infection | 1/22 (4.5%) | 1 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||
angioedema | 1/22 (4.5%) | 1 |
Urticaria | 1/22 (4.5%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
ALLOB® Implantation | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 9/22 (40.9%) | |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Fall | 2/22 (9.1%) | 2 |
Procedural pain | 5/22 (22.7%) | 5 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||
Vitamin D Deficiency | 2/22 (9.1%) | 2 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Chief Medical Officer |
---|---|
Organization | Bone Therapeutics |
Phone | +32 71 12 10 00 |
regulatory@bonetherapeutics.com |
- ALLOB-DU1