Long-term Active Surveillance Study for Oral Contraceptives (LASS)

Sponsor
Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00676065
Collaborator
Bayer (Industry)
58,303
1
129.9
448.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to characterize and compare the risks of long-term use of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone and of other established oral contraceptives.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    The LASS Study is a large, multinational, prospective, controlled, non-interventional, long-term cohort study that follows a series of cohorts. The cohorts consist of new users (first-ever users, switchers and restarters) of three different groups of oral contraceptives (OCs): OCs containing drospirenone (DRSP), OCs containing levonorgestrel (LNG) and OCs containing other progestogens. A "non-interference" approach is used to provide standardized, comprehensive, reliable information on these groups of OCs under routine medical conditions.

    The main clinical outcomes of interest for the long-term follow-up are arterial and venous thromboembolism as well as breast cancer. Regular, active contacts with the cohort members (=active surveillance) provide all necessary information on health-related events or changes in health status.

    The study is based on the existing long-term EURAS cohorts who are still in follow-up. LASS succeeds EURAS and prolongs the follow-up period for another five years. Total follow-up time of members of the long-term cohorts will be between 6 and 10 years. By means of annual contacts almost all relevant clinical outcomes will be captured. This will be accomplished by contacting the relevant physicians and by reviewing relevant source documents in the case of relevant clinical outcomes.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    58303 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Long-term Active Surveillance Study for Oral Contraceptives (LASS)
    Study Start Date :
    Feb 1, 2001
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Mar 1, 2011
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Dec 1, 2011

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    1

    Women who take oral contraceptives containing drospirenone

    2

    Women who take oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel

    3

    Women who take oral contraceptives containing other progestogens

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Arterial Thromboembolism [Within 10 years]

      Arterial thromboembolism associated with the use of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel or other progestogens.

    2. Venous Thromboembolism [Within 10 years]

      Venous thromboembolism associated with the use of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel or other progestogens.

    3. Breast Cancer [Within 10 years]

      Breast cancer associated with the use of hormonal contraceptives either containing both drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinylestradiol (EE), levonorgestrel (LNG) or any other hormonal contraceptive without DRSP.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Women who are prescribed an oral contraceptive and who are new users (first-ever users, switchers or restarters) of the formulation
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Women who do not consent to participate in the study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Center for Epidemiology and Health Research Berlin Germany

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany
    • Bayer

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Juergen Dinger, MD, PhD, Center for Epidemiology and Health Research Berlin, Germany

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Juergen Dinger, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator, Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00676065
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • ZEG2006_03
    First Posted:
    May 12, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 19, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2014
    Keywords provided by Juergen Dinger, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator, Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details In the LASS study, 59,510 women were recruited overall. Of these, 836 participants were excluded due to protocol violation (e.g. patient did not start OC use). Furthermore, 371 patients started treatment with non-oral contraceptives. These patients were followed-up but were not part of the per protocol Population (58,303 patients).
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Yasmin OC-LNG OC-other
    Arm/Group Description Users of oral contraceptives containing 3 mg DRSP and 30 mcg ethinylestradiol Users of oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel Users of oral contraceptives containing other progestogens
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 16534 15428 26341
    COMPLETED 16534 15428 26341
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title DRSP/EE OC-LNG OC-other Total
    Arm/Group Description Users of oral contraceptives containing 3 mg DRSP and 30 mcg ethinylestradiol Users of oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel Users of oral contraceptives containing other progestogens Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 16534 15428 26341 58303
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    25.9
    (8.1)
    25.1
    (8.7)
    24.8
    (7.8)
    25.2
    (8.2)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    16534
    100%
    15428
    100%
    26341
    100%
    58303
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    Europe
    16534
    100%
    15428
    100%
    26341
    100%
    58303
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Arterial Thromboembolism
    Description Arterial thromboembolism associated with the use of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel or other progestogens.
    Time Frame Within 10 years

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The number of participants refers to the ITT study population. During the course od the study, women could for example stop use of oral contraception at any point of time. Therefore, the woman-years of exposure for each group are provided in addition.
    Arm/Group Title DRSP/EE OC-LNG OC-other
    Arm/Group Description Users of oral contraceptives containing 3 mg DRSP and 30 mcg ethinylestradiol Users of oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel Users of oral contraceptives containing other progestogens
    Measure Participants 16534 15428 26341
    Measure Woman-years, AT-population 52278 57539 106221
    Number [participants]
    7
    0%
    22
    0.1%
    34
    0.1%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection DRSP/EE, OC-LNG
    Comments Tested null hypotheses: the ATE hazard ratio for DRSP/E2 vs. OCs containing LNG is higher or equal to 2.
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments The LASS study was designed to analyse rare events (incidence rate <1 per 1,000 woman-years and ≥ 1 per 10,000 WY). 300,000 WY of observation would be sufficient to exclude a two-fold risk of rare events in users of DRSP compared to other oral contraceptives with a power (1-β) of 0.80 and an one-sided α of 0.05.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.2 to 0.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Hazard ratio was adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, hypertension and family history
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection DRSP/EE, OC-other
    Comments Tested null hypotheses: the ATE hazard ratio for DRSP/E2 vs. OCs containing other progestogens is higher or equal to 2.
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments The LASS study was designed to analyse rare events (incidence rate <1 per 1,000 woman-years and ≥ 1 per 10,000 WY). 300,000 WY of observation would be sufficient to exclude a two-fold risk of rare events in users of DRSP compared to other oral contraceptives with a power (1-β) of 0.80 and an one-sided α of 0.05.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.2 to 0.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Hazard ratio was adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, hypertension and family history
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Venous Thromboembolism
    Description Venous thromboembolism associated with the use of oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel or other progestogens.
    Time Frame Within 10 years

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The number of participants refers to the ITT study population. During the course od the study, women could for example stop use of oral contraception at any point of time. Therefore, the woman-years of exposure for each group are provided in addition.
    Arm/Group Title DRSP/EE OC-LNG OC-other
    Arm/Group Description Users of oral contraceptives containing 3 mg DRSP and 30 mcg ethinylestradiol Users of oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel Users of oral contraceptives containing other progestogens
    Measure Participants 16534 15428 26341
    Measure Woman-years, AT population 52278 57539 106221
    Number [participants]
    56
    0.3%
    53
    0.3%
    144
    0.5%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection DRSP/EE, OC-LNG
    Comments Tested null hypotheses: the VTE hazard ratio for DRSP/E2 vs. OCs containing LNG is higher or equal to 2.
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments The LASS study was designed to analyse rare events (incidence rate <1 per 1,000 woman-years and ≥ 1 per 10,000 WY). 300,000 WY of observation would be sufficient to exclude a two-fold risk of rare events in users of DRSP compared to other oral contraceptives with a power (1-β) of 0.80 and an one-sided α of 0.05.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.8 to 1.7
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Hazard ratio was adjusted for age, BMI, current duration of use, and family history of VTE.
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection DRSP/EE, OC-other
    Comments Tested null hypotheses: the VTE hazard ratio for DRSP/E2 vs. OCs containing other progestogens is higher or equal to 2.
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments The LASS study was designed to analyse rare events (incidence rate <1 per 1,000 woman-years and ≥ 1 per 10,000 WY). 300,000 WY of observation would be sufficient to exclude a two-fold risk of rare events in users of DRSP compared to other oral contraceptives with a power (1-β) of 0.80 and an one-sided α of 0.05.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.7
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.5 to 1.0
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Hazard ratio was adjusted for age, BMI, current duration of use, and family history of VTE.
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title Breast Cancer
    Description Breast cancer associated with the use of hormonal contraceptives either containing both drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinylestradiol (EE), levonorgestrel (LNG) or any other hormonal contraceptive without DRSP.
    Time Frame Within 10 years

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The number of participants refers to the ITT study population. During the course od the study, women could for example stop use of oral contraception at any point of time. Therefore, the woman-years of exposure for each group are provided in addition.
    Arm/Group Title DRSP/EE OC-LNG OC-other
    Arm/Group Description Users of oral contraceptives containing 3 mg DRSP and 30 mcg ethinylestradiol Users of oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel Users of oral contraceptives containing other progestogens
    Measure Participants 16534 15428 26341
    Measure Woman-years 52278 57539 106221
    Number [participants]
    27
    0.2%
    31
    0.2%
    45
    0.2%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection DRSP/EE, OC-LNG
    Comments Tested null hypotheses: the breast cancer hazard ratio for DRSP/E2 vs. OCs containing LNG is higher or equal to 2.
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments The LASS study was designed to analyse rare events (incidence rate <1 per 1,000 woman-years and ≥ 1 per 10,000 WY). 300,000 WY of observation would be sufficient to exclude a two-fold risk of rare events in users of DRSP compared to other oral contraceptives with a power (1-β) of 0.80 and an one-sided α of 0.05.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.5 to 1.4
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Hazard ratio was adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, educational level and age at menarche.
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection DRSP/EE, OC-other
    Comments Tested null hypotheses: the breast cancer hazard ratio for DRSP/E2 vs. OCs containing other progestogens is higher or equal to 2.
    Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
    Comments The LASS study was designed to analyse rare events (incidence rate <1 per 1,000 woman-years and ≥ 1 per 10,000 WY). 300,000 WY of observation would be sufficient to exclude a two-fold risk of rare events in users of DRSP compared to other oral contraceptives with a power (1-β) of 0.80 and an one-sided α of 0.05.
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.6 to 1.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments Hazard ratio was adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, educational level and age at menarche.

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Information on adverse events was collected over a time period of 10 years.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description ITT population. All study participants were asked for adverse events at each follow-up.
    Arm/Group Title DRSP/EE OC-LNG OC-other
    Arm/Group Description Users of oral contraceptives containing 3 mg DRSP and 30 mcg ethinylestradiol Users of oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel Users of oral contraceptives containing other progestogens
    All Cause Mortality
    DRSP/EE OC-LNG OC-other
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    DRSP/EE OC-LNG OC-other
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 1912/16534 (11.6%) 2121/15428 (13.7%) 3936/26341 (14.9%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Diseases of the blood and the bloodforming organs 7/16534 (0%) 9/15428 (0.1%) 18/26341 (0.1%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Cardiovascular system 198/16534 (1.2%) 226/15428 (1.5%) 425/26341 (1.6%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Ear 24/16534 (0.1%) 28/15428 (0.2%) 53/26341 (0.2%)
    Endocrine disorders
    Endocrine diseases 50/16534 (0.3%) 74/15428 (0.5%) 96/26341 (0.4%)
    Eye disorders
    Eye 19/16534 (0.1%) 24/15428 (0.2%) 40/26341 (0.2%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Digestive system 248/16534 (1.5%) 265/15428 (1.7%) 503/26341 (1.9%)
    Infections and infestations
    Infectious diseases 86/16534 (0.5%) 86/15428 (0.6%) 171/26341 (0.6%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Injury, poisoning, accidents, etc. 337/16534 (2%) 358/15428 (2.3%) 651/26341 (2.5%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Muscoskeletal system & connective tissue 206/16534 (1.2%) 233/15428 (1.5%) 403/26341 (1.5%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Neoplasms, malignant 59/16534 (0.4%) 72/15428 (0.5%) 124/26341 (0.5%)
    Neoplasms, benign 96/16534 (0.6%) 97/15428 (0.6%) 179/26341 (0.7%)
    Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
    Pregnancy, delivery & puerperium 51/16534 (0.3%) 62/15428 (0.4%) 99/26341 (0.4%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Psychiatric & neurological disorders 114/16534 (0.7%) 136/15428 (0.9%) 274/26341 (1%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Genitourinary system 279/16534 (1.7%) 290/15428 (1.9%) 572/26341 (2.2%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Respiratory system 56/16534 (0.3%) 64/15428 (0.4%) 128/26341 (0.5%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Skin 82/16534 (0.5%) 97/15428 (0.6%) 200/26341 (0.8%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    DRSP/EE OC-LNG OC-other
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/16534 (0%) 0/15428 (0%) 0/26341 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    In non-experimental studies the possibility of bias and residual confounding can never be entirely eliminated. The findings may exclude large, but not small relative risks.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Juergen Dinger, MD, PhD
    Organization Center for Epidemiology and Health Research Germany
    Phone +49 30 945 101 20
    Email dinger@zeg-berlin.de
    Responsible Party:
    Juergen Dinger, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator, Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00676065
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • ZEG2006_03
    First Posted:
    May 12, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 19, 2014
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2014