MIRO: Long-Term Effectiveness of the Motiva Implants® Round and Round Ergonomix
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Post-marketing surveillance study to demonstrate the silent rupture rate and satisfaction of patients who underwent a primary and revision breast augmentation surgery with Motiva Implants®, 3 to 10 years before enrollment.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Single-arm, multicenter study with a minimum of 120 subjects who underwent Breast Implant surgery from 3-10 years postoperatively.
Following IRB / EC approval - and if applicable Competent Authority approval - Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) with the validated BREAST-Q will be collected at a single time point for all enrolled subjects.
MRI data will be used for the analysis of silent rupture, and BREAST-Q Postoperative Augmentation module scales to record patients for satisfaction.
Two styles of Motiva Implants® will be used for this study:
-
Motiva Implants® Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants, SmoothSilk® Round (referred to as "Motiva Implants® Round ProgressiveGel® Plus", or "Round")
-
Motiva Implants® Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants, SmoothSilk® Round Ergonomix® (referred to as "Motiva Implants® Ergonomix® Round ProgressiveGel® Ultima®", or "Round Ergonomix").
Henceforth, these devices will generally be referenced as "Motiva Implants®."
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Primary /Revision Augmentation Cohort Patients that underwent primary and/or revision augmentation from 3-10 years postoperatively. |
Other: MRI and PRO
MRI as a standard of care for the analysis of silent rupture. BREAST-Q Postoperative Augmentation module scales to record patients for satisfaction: Satisfaction with breasts; Satisfaction with outcome; Psychosocial well-being; Physical well-being
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- To describe the rate of silent rupture in women who have undergone primary and revision breast augmentation with Motiva Implants® 3 to 10 years after surgery. [1 year to complete after study start.]
Percentage of participants with silent implant rupture identified on MRI evaluation.
- To describe Patient-Reported Outcomes in women who have undergone primary and revision breast augmentation with Motiva Implants® 3 to 10 years after surgery. [1 year to complete after study start]
Mean scores of the BBREAST-QTM - AUGMENTATION MODULE (POSTOPERATIVE) VERSION 2.0, scales: PSYCHOSOCIAL WELL-BEING. Values 1-5. A higher score means a better outcome. SATISFACTION WITH BREASTS. Values 1-4. A higher score means a better outcome. PHYSICAL WELL-BEING: CHEST. Values 1-3. A higher score means a worse outcome. SATISFACTION WITH OUTCOME. Values 1-3. A higher score means a better outcome.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Genetic women.
-
The subject has undergone primary augmentation or revision augmentation surgery with Motiva Implants Round or Round Ergonomix®.
-
The subject underwent breast implant surgery 3-10 years before enrolling in the study.
-
The subject has undergone an MRI to evaluate implant rupture in the last 2-3 years before enrolling in the study or is willing to undergo an MRI evaluation.
-
The subject is willing to follow all study requirements (pre-screening, baseline visit, signing the ICF, and completing the BREAST-Q questionnaires).
Exclusion Criteria:
-
The subject had undergone fat grafting, needle biopsy, or any procedures that might have caused an iatrogenic rupture.
-
The Subject or Investigator is aware of a possible ruptured device that has not been removed.
-
The subject is pregnant or nursing.
-
The subject has any condition that impedes the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), including implanted metal devices, claustrophobia, or other conditions that would make MRI scan prohibited.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dr. Moradi´s Office | Surry Hills | Sydney | Australia | NSW 2010 |
2 | Clinica de Cirugia Plastica Peralta Mantilla | Pavas | San Jose | Costa Rica | 10109 |
3 | Centro Europeo de Cirugia | San Jose | Costa Rica | 10108 | |
4 | Villa Bella Clinic | Salò | BS | Italy | 25087 |
5 | Instituto de Cirugía Plástica y Estética | Madrid | Spain | 28006 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Motiva USA LLC
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Zeidler KR, Pittman TA, Cohen R, Stevens WG. Long-Term Safety of Textured and Smooth Breast Implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Dec 13;38(1):38-48. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx157. Review.
- Meadows KA. Patient-reported outcome measures: an overview. Br J Community Nurs. 2011 Mar;16(3):146-51. Review.
- Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Bharatha A, Montanera WJ, Park AL. Association Between MRI Exposure During Pregnancy and Fetal and Childhood Outcomes. JAMA. 2016 Sep 6;316(9):952-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12126.
- Wong T, Lo LW, Fung PY, Lai HY, She HL, Ng WK, Kwok KM, Lee CM. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast augmentation: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2016 Jun;7(3):399-410. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0482-9. Epub 2016 Mar 9. Review.
- Zingaretti, Nicola & Fasano, Daniele & Preis, Franz & Moreschi, Carlo & Ricci, Silvia & Massarut, Samuele & De Francesco, Francesco & Parodi, Pier. (2020). Suspected breast implant rupture: our experience, recommendations on its management, and a proposal for a model of informed consent. European Journal of Plastic Surgery. 43. 10.1007/s00238-019-01610-1.
- CLINP- 001010