Long-Term Non-Interventional Study (NIS) To Investigate The Safety And Effectiveness Of MACUGEN In Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Conditions Of Routine Clinical Practice
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To define what procedures were used for the diagnosis and monitoring of the treatment age-related macular degeneration (AMD). What is the effect of the Macugen, compliance with Macugen treatment, safety profile of Macugen, final physician assessment of treatment with Macugen.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
no sampling
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
AMD
|
Other: no intervention
Outpatients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Final Visit [Baseline, Final Visit (Week 104 or early termination [ET])]
Visual acuity (VA) measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Each Visit [Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102]
VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as logMAR, logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.
- Number of Participants With Change in Visual Acuity (VA) as Compared to Previous Examination [Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102]
VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss,negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts(85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results based on study eye for which medication was given. Number of participants with VA improved, unchanged or worsened as compared to previous examination reported.
- Physician's Assessment of Efficacy [Week 104 or End of study (EOS)]
Efficacy was based on the study eye for which pegaptanib treatment was given. Number of participants with each grade of efficacy of treatment, as assessed by the physician was reported on the 5 point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor.
Other Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Procedures for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Diagnosis and Monitoring [Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102]
Procedures used for diagnosis of AMD and monitoring of the course of treatment included fluorescein angiography (FA), optical coherent tomography (OCT), or other (Ot) procedure apart from FA and OCT. OCT, FA, and other are not mutually exclusive, hence same participant may be included in more than 1 procedure for AMD diagnosis and monitoring at a particular time point.
- Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events (AEs) [Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)]
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
- Duration of Treatment [Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)]
Duration of treatment (in weeks) was calculated as: (date of the last injection of study medication minus date of the first injection of study medication plus 1) divided by 7.
- Mean Number of Doses of Study Medication Received [Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)]
- Physician's Assessment of Tolerability [Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)]
Number of participants with each grade of tolerability of treatment as assessed by physician was evaluated on the five point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
age over 18 years old
-
patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration
-
enrollment to study is fully on physician decision in compliance with current SPC
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient who did not meet indication according to SPC Macugen.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Brno | Czechia | 625 00 | |
2 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Brno | Czechia | 62500 | |
3 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Olomouc | Czechia | 775 20 | |
4 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Olomouc | Czechia | 77520 | |
5 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Ostrava - Poruba | Czechia | 70852 | |
6 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Plzen | Czechia | 304 60 | |
7 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Praha 2 | Czechia | 128 08 | |
8 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Praha 2 | Czechia | 12808 | |
9 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Praha 6 | Czechia | 169 00 | |
10 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Praha 6 | Czechia | 169 02 | |
11 | Pfizer Investigational Site | Usti nad Labem | Czechia | 40113 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Pfizer
Investigators
- Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- A5751032
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 108 |
COMPLETED | 45 |
NOT COMPLETED | 63 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Overall Participants | 108 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
75.8
(8.3)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
65
60.2%
|
Male |
43
39.8%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Final Visit |
---|---|
Description | Visual acuity (VA) measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Final Visit (Week 104 or early termination [ET]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set (FAS) included all enrolled participants who received study medication. Missing values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Measure Participants | 108 |
Baseline |
0.61
(0.27)
|
Change at Final visit |
0.15
(0.37)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Each Visit |
---|---|
Description | VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as logMAR, logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
FAS included all enrolled participants who received study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies participants evaluated at each time point, respectively. |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Measure Participants | 93 |
Change at Week 6 (n=93) |
-0.03
(0.13)
|
Change at Week 12 (n=88) |
0.03
(0.23)
|
Change at Week 18 (n=76) |
0.03
(0.27)
|
Change at Week 24 (n=75) |
0.01
(0.27)
|
Change at Week 30 (n=74) |
0.03
(0.26)
|
Change at Week 36 (n=68) |
0.02
(0.29)
|
Change at Week 42 (n=59) |
0.06
(0.28)
|
Change at Week 48 (n=68) |
0.10
(0.35)
|
Change at Week 54 (n=50) |
0.09
(0.35)
|
Change at Week 60 (n=46) |
0.10
(0.35)
|
Change at Week 66 (n=25) |
0.10
(0.41)
|
Change at Week 72 (n=19) |
0.14
(0.51)
|
Change at Week 78 (n=20) |
0.19
(0.37)
|
Change at Week 84 (n=13) |
0.05
(0.35)
|
Change at Week 90 (n=16) |
-0.05
(0.24)
|
Change at Week 96 (n=11) |
-0.10
(0.28)
|
Change at Week 102 (n=20) |
0.16
(0.37)
|
Title | Number of Participants With Change in Visual Acuity (VA) as Compared to Previous Examination |
---|---|
Description | VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss,negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts(85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results based on study eye for which medication was given. Number of participants with VA improved, unchanged or worsened as compared to previous examination reported. |
Time Frame | Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
FAS included all enrolled participants who received study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies participants evaluated at each time point, respectively. |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Measure Participants | 90 |
Week 6: Improved (n=90) |
20
18.5%
|
Week 6: Unchanged (n=90) |
64
59.3%
|
Week 6: Worsened (n=90) |
6
5.6%
|
Week 12: Improved (n=88) |
12
11.1%
|
Week 12: Unchanged (n=88) |
58
53.7%
|
Week 12: Worsened (n=88) |
18
16.7%
|
Week 18: Improved (n=72) |
12
11.1%
|
Week 18: Unchanged (n=72) |
49
45.4%
|
Week 18: Worsened (n=72) |
11
10.2%
|
Week 24: Improved (n=73) |
16
14.8%
|
Week 24: Unchanged (n=73) |
46
42.6%
|
Week 24: Worsened (n=73) |
11
10.2%
|
Week 30: Improved (n=74) |
9
8.3%
|
Week 30: Unchanged (n=74) |
51
47.2%
|
Week 30: Worsened (n=74) |
14
13%
|
Week 36: Improved (n=68) |
11
10.2%
|
Week 36: Unchanged (n=68) |
47
43.5%
|
Week 36: Worsened (n=68) |
10
9.3%
|
Week 42: Improved (n=59) |
8
7.4%
|
Week 42: Unchanged (n=59) |
42
38.9%
|
Week 42: Worsened (n=59) |
9
8.3%
|
Week 48: Improved (n=68) |
12
11.1%
|
Week 48: Unchanged (n=68) |
44
40.7%
|
Week 48: Worsened (n=68) |
12
11.1%
|
Week 54: Improved (n=50) |
8
7.4%
|
Week 54: Unchanged (n=50) |
33
30.6%
|
Week 54: Worsened (n=50) |
9
8.3%
|
Week 60: Improved (n=46) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 60: Unchanged (n=46) |
38
35.2%
|
Week 60: Worsened (n=46) |
7
6.5%
|
Week 66: Improved (n=25) |
3
2.8%
|
Week 66: Unchanged (n=25) |
11
10.2%
|
Week 66: Worsened (n=25) |
11
10.2%
|
Week 72: Improved (n=18) |
4
3.7%
|
Week 72: Unchanged (n=18) |
12
11.1%
|
Week 72: Worsened (n=18) |
2
1.9%
|
Week 78: Improved (n=20) |
2
1.9%
|
Week 78: Unchanged (n=20) |
14
13%
|
Week 78: Worsened (n=20) |
4
3.7%
|
Week 84: Improved (n=13) |
2
1.9%
|
Week 84: Unchanged (n=13) |
8
7.4%
|
Week 84: Worsened (n=13) |
3
2.8%
|
Week 90: Improved (n=16) |
4
3.7%
|
Week 90: Unchanged (n=16) |
10
9.3%
|
Week 90: Worsened (n=16) |
2
1.9%
|
Week 96: Improved (n=11) |
5
4.6%
|
Week 96: Unchanged (n=11) |
4
3.7%
|
Week 96: Worsened (n=11) |
2
1.9%
|
Week 102: Improved (n=20) |
3
2.8%
|
Week 102: Unchanged (n=20) |
8
7.4%
|
Week 102: Worsened (n=20) |
9
8.3%
|
Title | Physician's Assessment of Efficacy |
---|---|
Description | Efficacy was based on the study eye for which pegaptanib treatment was given. Number of participants with each grade of efficacy of treatment, as assessed by the physician was reported on the 5 point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor. |
Time Frame | Week 104 or End of study (EOS) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
FAS included all enrolled participants who received study medication. |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Measure Participants | 108 |
Excellent |
20
18.5%
|
Very Good |
16
14.8%
|
Good |
24
22.2%
|
Fair |
12
11.1%
|
Poor |
36
33.3%
|
Title | Number of Participants With Procedures for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Diagnosis and Monitoring |
---|---|
Description | Procedures used for diagnosis of AMD and monitoring of the course of treatment included fluorescein angiography (FA), optical coherent tomography (OCT), or other (Ot) procedure apart from FA and OCT. OCT, FA, and other are not mutually exclusive, hence same participant may be included in more than 1 procedure for AMD diagnosis and monitoring at a particular time point. |
Time Frame | Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies participants evaluated at each time point, respectively. |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Measure Participants | 87 |
Baseline: Diagnosis,OCT (n=87) |
85
78.7%
|
Baseline: Diagnosis,FA (n=87) |
61
56.5%
|
Baseline: Diagnosis,Ot (n=87) |
12
11.1%
|
Baseline: Monitoring,OCT (n=25) |
25
23.1%
|
Baseline: Monitoring,FA (n=25) |
6
5.6%
|
Baseline: Monitoring,Ot (n=25) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 6: Monitoring,OCT (n=21) |
21
19.4%
|
Week 12: Monitoring,OCT (n=32) |
32
29.6%
|
Week 18: Monitoring,OCT (n=20) |
20
18.5%
|
Week 18: Monitoring,Ot (n=20) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 24: Monitoring,OCT (n=23) |
23
21.3%
|
Week 24: Monitoring,FA (n=23) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 24: Monitoring,Ot (n=23) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 30: Monitoring,OCT (n=20) |
20
18.5%
|
Week 30: Monitoring,Ot (n=20) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 36: Monitoring,OCT (n=21) |
20
18.5%
|
Week 36: Monitoring,Ot (n=21) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 42: Monitoring,OCT (n=14) |
14
13%
|
Week 48: Monitoring,OCT (n=19) |
19
17.6%
|
Week 54: Diagnosis,OCT (n=2) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 54: Diagnosis,FA (n=2) |
2
1.9%
|
Week 54: Monitoring,OCT (n=18) |
18
16.7%
|
Week 54: Monitoring,FA (n=18) |
2
1.9%
|
Week 60: Monitoring,OCT (n=13) |
13
12%
|
Week 60: Monitoring,FA (n=13) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 60: Monitoring,Ot (n=13) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 66: Monitoring,OCT (n=3) |
3
2.8%
|
Week 72: Monitoring,OCT (n=6) |
6
5.6%
|
Week 72: Monitoring,Ot (n=6) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 78: Monitoring,OCT (n=10) |
10
9.3%
|
Week 78: Monitoring,Ot (n=10) |
2
1.9%
|
Week 84: Monitoring,OCT (n=11) |
10
9.3%
|
Week 84: Monitoring,FA (n=11) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 84: Monitoring,Ot (n=11) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 90: Diagnosis,OCT (n=1) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 90: Diagnosis,Ot (n=1) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 90: Monitoring,OCT (n=10) |
10
9.3%
|
Week 90: Monitoring,Ot (n=10) |
5
4.6%
|
Week 96: Monitoring,OCT (n=8) |
8
7.4%
|
Week 96: Monitoring,Ot (n=8) |
2
1.9%
|
Week 102: Diagnosis,OCT (n=1) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 102: Diagnosis,FA (n=1) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 102: Monitoring,OCT (n=17) |
12
11.1%
|
Week 102: Monitoring,FA (n=17) |
1
0.9%
|
Week 102: Monitoring,Ot (n=17) |
11
10.2%
|
Title | Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events (AEs) |
---|---|
Description | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication. |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Measure Participants | 108 |
Number [participants] |
3
2.8%
|
Title | Duration of Treatment |
---|---|
Description | Duration of treatment (in weeks) was calculated as: (date of the last injection of study medication minus date of the first injection of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication. |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Measure Participants | 108 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [weeks] |
50.33
(29.40)
|
Title | Mean Number of Doses of Study Medication Received |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication. |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Measure Participants | 108 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [doses] |
7.48
(3.77)
|
Title | Physician's Assessment of Tolerability |
---|---|
Description | Number of participants with each grade of tolerability of treatment as assessed by physician was evaluated on the five point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication. |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. |
Measure Participants | 108 |
Excellent |
64
59.3%
|
Very Good |
34
31.5%
|
Good |
8
7.4%
|
Fair |
2
1.9%
|
Poor |
0
0%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study. | |
Arm/Group Title | Pegaptanib | |
Arm/Group Description | Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Pegaptanib | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Pegaptanib | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/108 (1.9%) | |
Eye disorders | ||
Choroidal neovascularisation | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Femur fracture | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Pegaptanib | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 22/108 (20.4%) | |
Eye disorders | ||
Age-related macular degeneration | 4/108 (3.7%) | |
Choroidal neovascularisation | 3/108 (2.8%) | |
Conjunctivitis | 4/108 (3.7%) | |
Corneal erosion | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Glaucoma | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Macular oedema | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Retinal haemorrhage | 2/108 (1.9%) | |
Subretinal fibrosis | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
General disorders | ||
Drug ineffective | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Granuloma | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Infections and infestations | ||
Conjunctivitis bacterial | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Keratitis herpetic | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Oral herpes | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Viral infection | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Lower limb fracture | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Nervous system disorders | ||
Dizziness | 1/108 (0.9%) | |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||
Therapeutic embolisation | 1/108 (0.9%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center |
---|---|
Organization | Pfizer, Inc. |
Phone | 1-800-718-1021 |
ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com |
- A5751032