Long-Term Non-Interventional Study (NIS) To Investigate The Safety And Effectiveness Of MACUGEN In Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Conditions Of Routine Clinical Practice

Sponsor
Pfizer (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00787319
Collaborator
(none)
108
11
29
9.8
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To define what procedures were used for the diagnosis and monitoring of the treatment age-related macular degeneration (AMD). What is the effect of the Macugen, compliance with Macugen treatment, safety profile of Macugen, final physician assessment of treatment with Macugen.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: no intervention

Detailed Description

no sampling

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
108 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Cross-Sectional
Official Title:
Long-Term Non-Interventional Study (NIS) To Investigate The Safety And Effectiveness Of MACUGEN In Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Conditions Of Routine Clinical Practice
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
AMD

Other: no intervention
Outpatients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
Other Names:
  • observation only
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Final Visit [Baseline, Final Visit (Week 104 or early termination [ET])]

      Visual acuity (VA) measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Each Visit [Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102]

      VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as logMAR, logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.

    2. Number of Participants With Change in Visual Acuity (VA) as Compared to Previous Examination [Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102]

      VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss,negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts(85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results based on study eye for which medication was given. Number of participants with VA improved, unchanged or worsened as compared to previous examination reported.

    3. Physician's Assessment of Efficacy [Week 104 or End of study (EOS)]

      Efficacy was based on the study eye for which pegaptanib treatment was given. Number of participants with each grade of efficacy of treatment, as assessed by the physician was reported on the 5 point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Number of Participants With Procedures for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Diagnosis and Monitoring [Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102]

      Procedures used for diagnosis of AMD and monitoring of the course of treatment included fluorescein angiography (FA), optical coherent tomography (OCT), or other (Ot) procedure apart from FA and OCT. OCT, FA, and other are not mutually exclusive, hence same participant may be included in more than 1 procedure for AMD diagnosis and monitoring at a particular time point.

    2. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events (AEs) [Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)]

      An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

    3. Duration of Treatment [Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)]

      Duration of treatment (in weeks) was calculated as: (date of the last injection of study medication minus date of the first injection of study medication plus 1) divided by 7.

    4. Mean Number of Doses of Study Medication Received [Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)]

    5. Physician's Assessment of Tolerability [Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)]

      Number of participants with each grade of tolerability of treatment as assessed by physician was evaluated on the five point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • age over 18 years old

    • patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

    • enrollment to study is fully on physician decision in compliance with current SPC

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patient who did not meet indication according to SPC Macugen.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Pfizer Investigational Site Brno Czechia 625 00
    2 Pfizer Investigational Site Brno Czechia 62500
    3 Pfizer Investigational Site Olomouc Czechia 775 20
    4 Pfizer Investigational Site Olomouc Czechia 77520
    5 Pfizer Investigational Site Ostrava - Poruba Czechia 70852
    6 Pfizer Investigational Site Plzen Czechia 304 60
    7 Pfizer Investigational Site Praha 2 Czechia 128 08
    8 Pfizer Investigational Site Praha 2 Czechia 12808
    9 Pfizer Investigational Site Praha 6 Czechia 169 00
    10 Pfizer Investigational Site Praha 6 Czechia 169 02
    11 Pfizer Investigational Site Usti nad Labem Czechia 40113

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Pfizer

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Pfizer
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00787319
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • A5751032
    First Posted:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 6, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2018
    Keywords provided by Pfizer
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 108
    COMPLETED 45
    NOT COMPLETED 63

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Overall Participants 108
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    75.8
    (8.3)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    65
    60.2%
    Male
    43
    39.8%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Final Visit
    Description Visual acuity (VA) measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.
    Time Frame Baseline, Final Visit (Week 104 or early termination [ET])

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full analysis set (FAS) included all enrolled participants who received study medication. Missing values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Measure Participants 108
    Baseline
    0.61
    (0.27)
    Change at Final visit
    0.15
    (0.37)
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (VA) at Each Visit
    Description VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. Decimal VA data presented as logMAR, logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss, while negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts (85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results were based on study eye for which medication was given.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS included all enrolled participants who received study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies participants evaluated at each time point, respectively.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Measure Participants 93
    Change at Week 6 (n=93)
    -0.03
    (0.13)
    Change at Week 12 (n=88)
    0.03
    (0.23)
    Change at Week 18 (n=76)
    0.03
    (0.27)
    Change at Week 24 (n=75)
    0.01
    (0.27)
    Change at Week 30 (n=74)
    0.03
    (0.26)
    Change at Week 36 (n=68)
    0.02
    (0.29)
    Change at Week 42 (n=59)
    0.06
    (0.28)
    Change at Week 48 (n=68)
    0.10
    (0.35)
    Change at Week 54 (n=50)
    0.09
    (0.35)
    Change at Week 60 (n=46)
    0.10
    (0.35)
    Change at Week 66 (n=25)
    0.10
    (0.41)
    Change at Week 72 (n=19)
    0.14
    (0.51)
    Change at Week 78 (n=20)
    0.19
    (0.37)
    Change at Week 84 (n=13)
    0.05
    (0.35)
    Change at Week 90 (n=16)
    -0.05
    (0.24)
    Change at Week 96 (n=11)
    -0.10
    (0.28)
    Change at Week 102 (n=20)
    0.16
    (0.37)
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Change in Visual Acuity (VA) as Compared to Previous Examination
    Description VA measured as viewing distance (distance for participant/distance for normal vision). Viewing distance considered as fraction to calculate decimal VA. logMAR= -log10 (decimal VA). It measures VA loss; positive values indicated vision loss,negative values denote normal/better VA and allowed comparison of data using different viewing distances and/or different charts(85 or 100 letters, 85 letter equivalents to decimal VA of 1.0). Results based on study eye for which medication was given. Number of participants with VA improved, unchanged or worsened as compared to previous examination reported.
    Time Frame Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS included all enrolled participants who received study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies participants evaluated at each time point, respectively.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Measure Participants 90
    Week 6: Improved (n=90)
    20
    18.5%
    Week 6: Unchanged (n=90)
    64
    59.3%
    Week 6: Worsened (n=90)
    6
    5.6%
    Week 12: Improved (n=88)
    12
    11.1%
    Week 12: Unchanged (n=88)
    58
    53.7%
    Week 12: Worsened (n=88)
    18
    16.7%
    Week 18: Improved (n=72)
    12
    11.1%
    Week 18: Unchanged (n=72)
    49
    45.4%
    Week 18: Worsened (n=72)
    11
    10.2%
    Week 24: Improved (n=73)
    16
    14.8%
    Week 24: Unchanged (n=73)
    46
    42.6%
    Week 24: Worsened (n=73)
    11
    10.2%
    Week 30: Improved (n=74)
    9
    8.3%
    Week 30: Unchanged (n=74)
    51
    47.2%
    Week 30: Worsened (n=74)
    14
    13%
    Week 36: Improved (n=68)
    11
    10.2%
    Week 36: Unchanged (n=68)
    47
    43.5%
    Week 36: Worsened (n=68)
    10
    9.3%
    Week 42: Improved (n=59)
    8
    7.4%
    Week 42: Unchanged (n=59)
    42
    38.9%
    Week 42: Worsened (n=59)
    9
    8.3%
    Week 48: Improved (n=68)
    12
    11.1%
    Week 48: Unchanged (n=68)
    44
    40.7%
    Week 48: Worsened (n=68)
    12
    11.1%
    Week 54: Improved (n=50)
    8
    7.4%
    Week 54: Unchanged (n=50)
    33
    30.6%
    Week 54: Worsened (n=50)
    9
    8.3%
    Week 60: Improved (n=46)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 60: Unchanged (n=46)
    38
    35.2%
    Week 60: Worsened (n=46)
    7
    6.5%
    Week 66: Improved (n=25)
    3
    2.8%
    Week 66: Unchanged (n=25)
    11
    10.2%
    Week 66: Worsened (n=25)
    11
    10.2%
    Week 72: Improved (n=18)
    4
    3.7%
    Week 72: Unchanged (n=18)
    12
    11.1%
    Week 72: Worsened (n=18)
    2
    1.9%
    Week 78: Improved (n=20)
    2
    1.9%
    Week 78: Unchanged (n=20)
    14
    13%
    Week 78: Worsened (n=20)
    4
    3.7%
    Week 84: Improved (n=13)
    2
    1.9%
    Week 84: Unchanged (n=13)
    8
    7.4%
    Week 84: Worsened (n=13)
    3
    2.8%
    Week 90: Improved (n=16)
    4
    3.7%
    Week 90: Unchanged (n=16)
    10
    9.3%
    Week 90: Worsened (n=16)
    2
    1.9%
    Week 96: Improved (n=11)
    5
    4.6%
    Week 96: Unchanged (n=11)
    4
    3.7%
    Week 96: Worsened (n=11)
    2
    1.9%
    Week 102: Improved (n=20)
    3
    2.8%
    Week 102: Unchanged (n=20)
    8
    7.4%
    Week 102: Worsened (n=20)
    9
    8.3%
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Physician's Assessment of Efficacy
    Description Efficacy was based on the study eye for which pegaptanib treatment was given. Number of participants with each grade of efficacy of treatment, as assessed by the physician was reported on the 5 point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor.
    Time Frame Week 104 or End of study (EOS)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FAS included all enrolled participants who received study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Measure Participants 108
    Excellent
    20
    18.5%
    Very Good
    16
    14.8%
    Good
    24
    22.2%
    Fair
    12
    11.1%
    Poor
    36
    33.3%
    5. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Procedures for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Diagnosis and Monitoring
    Description Procedures used for diagnosis of AMD and monitoring of the course of treatment included fluorescein angiography (FA), optical coherent tomography (OCT), or other (Ot) procedure apart from FA and OCT. OCT, FA, and other are not mutually exclusive, hence same participant may be included in more than 1 procedure for AMD diagnosis and monitoring at a particular time point.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, 84, 90, 96, 102

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies participants evaluated at each time point, respectively.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Measure Participants 87
    Baseline: Diagnosis,OCT (n=87)
    85
    78.7%
    Baseline: Diagnosis,FA (n=87)
    61
    56.5%
    Baseline: Diagnosis,Ot (n=87)
    12
    11.1%
    Baseline: Monitoring,OCT (n=25)
    25
    23.1%
    Baseline: Monitoring,FA (n=25)
    6
    5.6%
    Baseline: Monitoring,Ot (n=25)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 6: Monitoring,OCT (n=21)
    21
    19.4%
    Week 12: Monitoring,OCT (n=32)
    32
    29.6%
    Week 18: Monitoring,OCT (n=20)
    20
    18.5%
    Week 18: Monitoring,Ot (n=20)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 24: Monitoring,OCT (n=23)
    23
    21.3%
    Week 24: Monitoring,FA (n=23)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 24: Monitoring,Ot (n=23)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 30: Monitoring,OCT (n=20)
    20
    18.5%
    Week 30: Monitoring,Ot (n=20)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 36: Monitoring,OCT (n=21)
    20
    18.5%
    Week 36: Monitoring,Ot (n=21)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 42: Monitoring,OCT (n=14)
    14
    13%
    Week 48: Monitoring,OCT (n=19)
    19
    17.6%
    Week 54: Diagnosis,OCT (n=2)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 54: Diagnosis,FA (n=2)
    2
    1.9%
    Week 54: Monitoring,OCT (n=18)
    18
    16.7%
    Week 54: Monitoring,FA (n=18)
    2
    1.9%
    Week 60: Monitoring,OCT (n=13)
    13
    12%
    Week 60: Monitoring,FA (n=13)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 60: Monitoring,Ot (n=13)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 66: Monitoring,OCT (n=3)
    3
    2.8%
    Week 72: Monitoring,OCT (n=6)
    6
    5.6%
    Week 72: Monitoring,Ot (n=6)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 78: Monitoring,OCT (n=10)
    10
    9.3%
    Week 78: Monitoring,Ot (n=10)
    2
    1.9%
    Week 84: Monitoring,OCT (n=11)
    10
    9.3%
    Week 84: Monitoring,FA (n=11)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 84: Monitoring,Ot (n=11)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 90: Diagnosis,OCT (n=1)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 90: Diagnosis,Ot (n=1)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 90: Monitoring,OCT (n=10)
    10
    9.3%
    Week 90: Monitoring,Ot (n=10)
    5
    4.6%
    Week 96: Monitoring,OCT (n=8)
    8
    7.4%
    Week 96: Monitoring,Ot (n=8)
    2
    1.9%
    Week 102: Diagnosis,OCT (n=1)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 102: Diagnosis,FA (n=1)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 102: Monitoring,OCT (n=17)
    12
    11.1%
    Week 102: Monitoring,FA (n=17)
    1
    0.9%
    Week 102: Monitoring,Ot (n=17)
    11
    10.2%
    6. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
    Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Measure Participants 108
    Number [participants]
    3
    2.8%
    7. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title Duration of Treatment
    Description Duration of treatment (in weeks) was calculated as: (date of the last injection of study medication minus date of the first injection of study medication plus 1) divided by 7.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Measure Participants 108
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [weeks]
    50.33
    (29.40)
    8. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title Mean Number of Doses of Study Medication Received
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Measure Participants 108
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [doses]
    7.48
    (3.77)
    9. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title Physician's Assessment of Tolerability
    Description Number of participants with each grade of tolerability of treatment as assessed by physician was evaluated on the five point categorical scale: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 104 (EOS)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    Measure Participants 108
    Excellent
    64
    59.3%
    Very Good
    34
    31.5%
    Good
    8
    7.4%
    Fair
    2
    1.9%
    Poor
    0
    0%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
    Arm/Group Title Pegaptanib
    Arm/Group Description Participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) received pegaptanib intravitreal injection in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and observed for a period of up to 24 months or early discontinuation.
    All Cause Mortality
    Pegaptanib
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Pegaptanib
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 2/108 (1.9%)
    Eye disorders
    Choroidal neovascularisation 1/108 (0.9%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Femur fracture 1/108 (0.9%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Pegaptanib
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 22/108 (20.4%)
    Eye disorders
    Age-related macular degeneration 4/108 (3.7%)
    Choroidal neovascularisation 3/108 (2.8%)
    Conjunctivitis 4/108 (3.7%)
    Corneal erosion 1/108 (0.9%)
    Glaucoma 1/108 (0.9%)
    Macular oedema 1/108 (0.9%)
    Retinal haemorrhage 2/108 (1.9%)
    Subretinal fibrosis 1/108 (0.9%)
    General disorders
    Drug ineffective 1/108 (0.9%)
    Granuloma 1/108 (0.9%)
    Infections and infestations
    Conjunctivitis bacterial 1/108 (0.9%)
    Keratitis herpetic 1/108 (0.9%)
    Oral herpes 1/108 (0.9%)
    Viral infection 1/108 (0.9%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Lower limb fracture 1/108 (0.9%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 1/108 (0.9%)
    Surgical and medical procedures
    Therapeutic embolisation 1/108 (0.9%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
    Organization Pfizer, Inc.
    Phone 1-800-718-1021
    Email ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
    Responsible Party:
    Pfizer
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00787319
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • A5751032
    First Posted:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 6, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2018