LIBREAST: Long-term Outcomes After Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis Surgery: an European, Retrospective, Snapshot Study

Sponsor
Hospital Miguel Servet (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04817813
Collaborator
Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) (Other)
300
1
4.5
66.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Breast cancer ranks as the top leading malignant tumors among females, and also accounts for the most common cause of tumor related mortality in females worldwide. Approximately, 20-30% of breast cancer cases develop metastasis, while 50% of patients will suffer from breast cancer liver metastasis. The proper indication for surgical treatment of breast cancer liver metastasis is still a matter of discussion. Surgery is becoming more practical and effective than conservative treatment in improving the outcomes of patients with breast cancer liver metastasis and liver metastasis surgery is included in an onco- surgical strategy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Breast cancer ranks as the top leading malignant tumors among females, and also accounts for the most common cause of tumor related mortality in female's worldwide . Approximately, 20-30% of breast cancer (BC) cases develop metastasis, while 50% of patients will suffer from breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) . The presence of liver metastasis has markedly worsened the prognosis of patients, and the median survival was reported to be 3.8-29 months.

    Metastatic breast cancer is considered to be a disseminated disease and many oncologists remain reluctant to include surgery within the multimodal treatment strategy of these patients . Although systemic treatments can achieve approximately 60% of responses in breast cancer recurrence, long-term survival is exceptional only with medical treatment . Without liver resection, the average survival reported after the first onset of liver metastases is distributed over a range from 1 to 15 months. Surgery is becoming more functional and effective than conservative treatment in improving the poor outcomes of patients with BCLM . However, there is no generally acknowledged set of standards for identifying candidates who will benefit from surgery. The proper indication for surgical treatment is still a matter of discussion; surgical resection should be assessed when the following premises are met: low surgical risk, low metastasis number, complete macroscopic liver removal, absence of proven extrahepatic disease by positron emission tomography and computed tomography, objective response to chemotherapy before surgery, and long disease-free interval. Breast cancer liver metastasis surgery (BCLMS) is included in an onco-surgical strategy.

    Most of the published series of patients with liver metastases of breast cancer who have undergone surgery come from a single center or few centers and there are hardly any long-term results, so we consider necessary to carry out a multicenter review of patients who underwent surgery in high volume centers across Europe belonging to the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) to asses survival and disease-free survival and to determine which patients may benefit from surgery.

    This retrospective multicenter cohort study in centers performing BCLMS aims to provide an assessment of the outcomes across E-AHPBA centers.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    300 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Retrospective
    Official Title:
    LIBREAST STUDY: Long-term Outcomes After Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis Surgery: an European, Retrospective, Snapshot Study
    Anticipated Study Start Date :
    Mar 15, 2021
    Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
    Jun 15, 2021
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Jul 31, 2021

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Survival and disease-free survival at 1st year. [1 year.]

      Disease-free time and survival at 1st year.

    2. Survival and disease-free survival at 3th year. [3 years.]

      Disease-free time and survival at 3th year.

    3. Survival and disease-free survival at 5th year. [5 years.]

      Disease-free time and survival at 5th year.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Preoperative details-Tumor TNM [5 years.]

      Stage

    2. Preoperative details- Dysplasia grade [5 years.]

      Low-Moderate- High

    3. Preoperative details- Tumor subtypes [5 years.]

      Yes/No of Luminal A/Luminal B/ HER2+/Triple negative-basal like

    4. Preoperative details- Location of breast cancer [5 years.]

      Breast Quadrant

    5. Preoperative details- Segment location [5 years.]

      Segment 1 to 8

    6. Preoperative details- Number of liver metastasis [5 years.]

      Number

    7. Intra-operative events [Surgery date.]

      Satava's Classification

    8. Nº metastasis intraoperatively [Surgery date.]

      Number

    9. Post-operative curse- Re-hospitalization cause [30 days.]

      Cause of re-hospitalization

    10. Post-operative curse- Complications [30 days.]

      Clavien- Dindo Classification

    11. Post-operative curse- ICU admission length of stay [30 days.]

      Days

    12. Histopathological details- Ki67 [30 days.]

      Percent

    13. Histopathological details- Resection status [30 days.]

      R0-R1-R2

    14. Histopathological details- Nº of lesions [30 days.]

      Number

    15. Follow up- Adjuvant systemic treatment [5 years.]

      Yes/No of Chemotherapy, Hormonetherapy, AntiHER2Therapy, Antiangiogenics

    16. Follow up- Liver metastasis relapse [5 years.]

      Location of relapse

    17. Follow up- Date of death [5 years.]

      Date

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 100 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients ≥ 18 year old.

    • Scheduled surgery for breast cancer liver metastases between January 1st 2010 and December 31st 2015

    • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I-III.

    • They have signed the informed consent.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients under 18 year old.

    • ASA ≥ IV.

    • Urgent surgery.

    • Patients who have not signed the informed consent.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Mario Serradilla Martín Zaragoza Spain 50008

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Hospital Miguel Servet
    • Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Mario Serradilla Martín, MD FACS, Zaragoza, Spain. Miguel Servet University Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Mario Serradilla, MD, FACS, Principal Investigator, Hospital Miguel Servet
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04817813
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • PI20/596
    First Posted:
    Mar 26, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 26, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Mario Serradilla, MD, FACS, Principal Investigator, Hospital Miguel Servet
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 26, 2021