Brain Imaging of Lidoderm for Chronic Back Pain

Sponsor
Northwestern University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01515540
Collaborator
Endo Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
38
1
2
77
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators tested whether pain decrease can be observed centrally with non-invasive brain imaging in CBP subjects receiving Lidoderm. The investigators first tested effects of 5% Lidoderm patched in an open labelled trial. Next the investigators compared the effects of Lidocaine versus Placebo patches. Three time points were evaluated: baseline (before treatment) and 6 hours and 2 weeks after treatment. The latter trial was a 2 arm, double blind, placebo controlled trial, where participants either received Lidoderm or placebo patches, without cross over.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Previous data showed that Lidoderm patches that contain 5% Lidocaine applied to the affected area for a period of 1-2 weeks decreased chronic pain. We conducted a preliminary open-label trial in chronic back pain patients and found that the patients reported reduction in pain intensity and associated brain activity (measured with fMRI). As a next step, we conducted a double blind clinical trial where the drug was tested against placebo to determine whether the effects on CBP were mediated by a pharmacological mechanism. For this we obtained psychophysical measurements of pain and measures of brain activity using fMRI. Two scans after treatment (6 hour and 2 weeks after treatment) were conducted to observe the effects of short term and long term use.

Brain activity was measured by the non-invasive method of functional imaging (fMRI), which enables examination of cortical blood flow during pain rating. These brain scans were acquired in chronic back pain patients while they rated their ongoing chronic pain using a finger span device. In a control task, each patient also rated the changes in the length of a bar n a screen (a visual control task). Anatomical scans were also acquired.

The general design of the study was that CBP subjects were assesses with fmri for brain responses for ongoing pain at three time points. The initial (baseline) scan occurred after a minimum of 48 hour period during which the patients refrained from taking analgesic medication. The patients were next scanned at 6 hours after treatment and again after 2 weeks of continuous treatment. Subjects were randomised to placebo or Lidoderm (both Lidoderm and placebo patches were supplied by Endo Pharmaceuticals).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
38 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Basic Science
Official Title:
Brain Imaging of Lidoderm for Chronic Back Pain
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2004
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: lidocaine

5% lidoderm patch

Drug: lidocaine
5% lidoderm patch
Other Names:
  • Lidoderm (Endo Pharmaceuticals)
  • 5% lidocaine patch
  • Placebo Comparator: control

    placebo patch

    Drug: placebo
    placebo
    Other Names:
  • sham patch
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Pain Intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Scale Had Values From 0-100, Where 0 Represents "no Pain" and 100 Was the "Worst Pain Imaginable". [2 weeks]

      the primary hypothesis was that the lidoderm 5% patch was expected to decrease pain intensity post treatment greater than placebo patch. A lower value on the 0-100 scale is considered to represent less pain. Higher values represent more pain. Greater than 20%-30% decrease in pain is considered clinically meaningful.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Male or Female 18 years or older of age

    2. Pain in the location of the lower back

    3. Pain duration for a minimum of 6 months on a continuous basis

    4. Pain intensity of at least 3 out of 10 on most days of the week over the past six months

    5. Manifestations of radicular element of pain: radiation below knee (examples towards thigh, buttocks).

    6. Right handedness

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Applying for or currently receiving workers' compensation or disability status.

    2. Back pain secondary to spinal cord injury

    3. Back pain secondary to any systemic condition (e.g ankylosing spondylitis0

    4. Diabetes mellitus

    5. Back pain secondary to tumors.

    6. Standard MRI criteria re: claustrophobia, metal objects etc.

    7. Subjects with cognitive deficits such as dementia, psychiatric illness including depression with a BDI score of more than 19 (moderate to severe depression), history of brain injury, history of chronic disease

    8. Pregnant and/or lactating women

    9. Left handedness

    10. Active cancer

    11. Other serious painful condition (e.g., arthritis)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Northwestern University Chicago Illinois United States 60611

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Northwestern University
    • Endo Pharmaceuticals

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Apkar V. Apkarian, PhD, Northwestern University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Apkar Apkarian, Professor, Northwestern University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01515540
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • STU00022968
    First Posted:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Keywords provided by Apkar Apkarian, Professor, Northwestern University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details 38 patients were recruited for the brain imaging and treatment study. Data from 7 subjects was not analyzed due to failure to attend the repeat sessions for non specific reasons and data from 1 subject was excluded from analysis due to technical faults. Thus, data from a total of 30 subjects was included in the brain imaging analysis.
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Lidocaine Control
    Arm/Group Description 5% lidoderm patch placebo patch
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 20 18
    COMPLETED 15 15
    NOT COMPLETED 5 3

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Lidocaine Control Total
    Arm/Group Description 5% lidoderm patch placebo patch Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 20 18 38
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    20
    100%
    18
    100%
    38
    100%
    >=65 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    53
    (7.7)
    49.73
    (10.27)
    51.36
    (9.1)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    8
    40%
    9
    50%
    17
    44.7%
    Male
    12
    60%
    9
    50%
    21
    55.3%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    20
    100%
    18
    100%
    38
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Pain Intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Scale Had Values From 0-100, Where 0 Represents "no Pain" and 100 Was the "Worst Pain Imaginable".
    Description the primary hypothesis was that the lidoderm 5% patch was expected to decrease pain intensity post treatment greater than placebo patch. A lower value on the 0-100 scale is considered to represent less pain. Higher values represent more pain. Greater than 20%-30% decrease in pain is considered clinically meaningful.
    Time Frame 2 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    based on a literature search.
    Arm/Group Title Lidocaine Control
    Arm/Group Description 5% lidoderm patch placebo patch
    Measure Participants 15 15
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [peak pain intensity]
    51.0
    (7.6)
    51.6
    (7.1)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 2 weeks
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Lidocaine Control
    Arm/Group Description 5% lidoderm patch placebo patch
    All Cause Mortality
    Lidocaine Control
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Lidocaine Control
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/20 (0%) 0/18 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Lidocaine Control
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/20 (0%) 0/18 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Javeria Ali Hashmi
    Organization Northwestern University
    Phone 3125037991
    Email j-hashmi@northwestern.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Apkar Apkarian, Professor, Northwestern University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01515540
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • STU00022968
    First Posted:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2013