Evaluation of Efficacy and Comfort: A Trial on the Incrediwear Back Brace in Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain

Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06126887
Collaborator
(none)
100
1
4
2
50.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that the utilization of Incrediwear's Back Brace, compared to a sham brace and a standard-issue brace, will lead to better brace adherence, increased patient satisfaction, reduced pain medication usage, and improved functional disability among non-surgical chronic LBP patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Incrediwear Daytime Back Brace
  • Device: Incrediwear Sham Daytime Back Brace
  • Device: Control Daytime Back Brace
  • Device: Incrediwear 24 Hour Back Brace
N/A

Detailed Description

Problem: Chronic low back pain (LBP) affects a substantial portion of the population and often leads to decreased functional ability and increased pain medication usage. While back braces have been recommended as part of LBP management, their efficacy and impact on patient outcomes remain uncertain.

Research Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the utilization of Incrediwear's Back Brace, compared to a sham brace and a standard-issue brace, will lead to better brace adherence, increased patient satisfaction, reduced pain medication usage, and improved functional disability among non-surgical chronic LBP patients.

Importance of the Research: This randomized clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy of Incrediwear's Back Brace in improving patient outcomes for chronic LBP. The study will provide valuable insights into the utilization patterns and adherence of back braces, patient satisfaction with treatment protocols, and the impact of brace usage on pain medication consumption and functional disability. By evaluating these factors through a controlled trial, the investigators seek to enhance the understanding of effective LBP management strategies, potentially reducing the burden of chronic LBP on patients and healthcare systems.

The study will be conducted under the guidance of Dr. Akhil Chhatre, Principal Investigator at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. The research will involve 100 non-surgical chronic LBP patients meeting specific inclusion criteria. The patients will be randomly assigned to one of four study groups, and data will be collected through phone calls over a full 4-week duration.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Evaluation of Efficacy and Comfort: A Randomized Clinical Trial on the Incrediwear Back Brace in Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Incrediwear Daytime

Incrediwear back brace worn 7AM-7PM (against skin)

Device: Incrediwear Daytime Back Brace
Incrediwear Daytime Back Brace

Sham Comparator: Incrediwear Sham Daytime

Incrediwear sham back brace worn 7AM-7PM (against skin)

Device: Incrediwear Sham Daytime Back Brace
Incrediwear Sham Daytime Back Brace

Placebo Comparator: Control Daytime

Standard-issue brace (e.g. Horizon Lumbar Brace (Aspen Medical Products, LLC)) worn 7AM-7PM

Device: Control Daytime Back Brace
Control Daytime Back Brace

Active Comparator: Incrediwear 24 hour

Incrediwear back brace worn 7AM-7PM (against skin). Incrediwear waist sleeve worn 7PM-7AM (against skin)

Device: Incrediwear 24 Hour Back Brace
Incrediwear 24 Hour Back Brace

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. User Evaluation of Satisfaction as assessed by the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0) [1 month]

    Satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 [QUEST 2.0] score). The score ranges from 1-5 with 1 being not satisfied at all to 5 being very satisfied

  2. Brace and sleeve utilization [1 month]

    Self-reported hours worn

  3. Pain medication name [1 month]

    The investigators aim to explore the effects of brace utilization on pain medication use. The investigators will document the pain medication name

  4. Functional disability status as assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [1 month]

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). A total score of 0-4 (no disability), 5-14 (mild disability), 15-24 (moderate disability), 25-34 (severe disability), 35-50 (completely disabled)

  5. Pain as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) [1 month]

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and frequency (ordinal scale). 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as it could possibly be

  6. Pain medication dosage used [1 month]

    The investigators aim to explore the effects of brace utilization on pain medication use. The investigators will document the pain medication dosage used

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Male or female, age > 18

  • Has undergone treatment for an initial episode of nonspecific low back pain (LBP) lasting > 1 month, with one of the following causative "Principle Diagnoses":

  • Disc herniation

  • Facet arthropathy

  • Compression fracture

  • Spondylolisthesis

  • Sacroiliac joint dysfunction

  • Scoliosis

  • Mild to moderate central spinal stenosis

  • Lumbar spondylosis

  • Degenerative changes, not otherwise specified

  • Utilize pain medication (including Step I or II analgesics, NSAIDs, Benzodiazepines) at least weekly for their LBP

  • Subject report a VAS pain score at the time of consent greater than three (>3) out of ten (10)

  • Recommended a back brace for LBP management

  • Provide written consent for participation

  • Subject available for phone calls after 6PM

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Severe central spinal stenosis

  • Focal lower extremity weakness

  • LBP radiating beyond the knee and/or accompanied by neurological signs (including sciatica)

  • Spinal operation within 5 years preceding the study date

  • Secondary LBP due to a work accident (e.g. workers comp)

  • History of spinal arthrodesis

  • LBP with an inflammatory, tumor, or infectious cause

  • Contraindications to: Step I or II analgesics, NSAIDs, Benzodiazepines

  • Diagnosed peripheral arterial disease

  • Diabetes

  • Higher functions do not enable proper comprehension of protocol or reliable data recording

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Johns Hopkins Health Care & Surgery Center - Howard County Medical Center Columbia Maryland United States 21044

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Johns Hopkins University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Akhil Chhatre, MD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Johns Hopkins University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06126887
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB00391930
First Posted:
Nov 13, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Nov 13, 2023
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 13, 2023