Effectiveness of the Compression Belt for Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Sponsor
Texas Woman's University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01559948
Collaborator
Texas Physical Therapy Association (Other)
30
1
2
25
1.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to examine the usefulness of the addition of a pelvic compression belt to a lumbopelvic stabilization program for patients with sacroiliac joint pain by comparing lumbopelvic stabilization exercises with a pelvic compression belt to lumbopelvic stabilization exercises alone. Outcome measures including the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (OSW), the percentage change of TrA and IO muscle thickness (i.e. muscle contraction from rest to contract) utilizing ultrasound imaging, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain, and a subjective rating of overall perceived improvement using the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale will be collected. Hypothesis: The OSW scores and NPRS scores will be lower for those who receive the compression belt in addition to the lumbopelvic stabilization program as compared to those who receive the lumbopelvic stabilization alone. The percent change of muscle thickness for the deep abdominals as well as the GROC scores will be higher for those who receive the compression belt in addition to the lumbopelvic stabilization program as compared to those who receive the lumbopelvic stabilization alone.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise
  • Device: Sacroiliac joint belt
N/A

Detailed Description

Background: The estimated prevalence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is approximately 13-30% in patients with non-specific low back pain. One common presentation for those with SIJ pain is unilateral pain over the SIJ region, which is described as a positive Fortin's sign. Common impairments for this population include pelvic asymmetry, lumbopelvic muscle imbalance, and decreased lumbopelvic proprioceptive awareness and stability. Two common physical therapy interventions for this population are lumbopelvic stabilization programs and pelvic compression belts. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to examine the usefulness of the addition of a pelvic compression belt to a lumbopelvic stabilization program for patients with sacroiliac joint pain by comparing lumbopelvic stabilization exercises with a pelvic compression belt to lumbopelvic stabilization exercises alone. Participants: Thirty participants with unilateral pain near the SIJ will be recruited for the study and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups (stabilization plus belt or stabilization alone). Both groups will receive a lumbopelvic stabilization program for 12 weeks. The stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt to be worn continuously for the first 4 weeks. Outcome measures including the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (OSW), the percentage change of TrA and IO muscle thickness (i.e. muscle contraction from rest to contract) utilizing ultrasound imaging, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain, and a subjective rating of overall perceived improvement using the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale will be collected. These outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-intervention. Hypothesis: The OSW scores and NPRS scores will be lower for those who receive the compression belt in addition to the lumbopelvic stabilization program as compared to those who receive the lumbopelvic stabilization alone. The percent change of muscle thickness for the deep abdominals as well as the GROC scores will be higher for those who receive the compression belt in addition to the lumbopelvic stabilization program as compared to those who receive the lumbopelvic stabilization alone. Data Analysis: Two separate ANOVAs (group x time) with repeated measures will be used to examine the effect of the interventions on disability and the percent change of muscle thickness. Whitney U-test will be used to analyze the NPRS data, and descriptive statistics will be used to report the GROC scores. Clinical Relevance: The results of the study may provide evidence in prescribing pelvic compression belt for those with SIJ pain. It will also offer guidance as to how and when pelvic compression belts should be used in this population. Finally, it will guide physical therapists in prescribing effective interventions for those with SIJ pain.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effectiveness of the Compression Belt for Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Pain
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Lumbopelvic stabilization exercises plus sacroiliac joint belt

The participants will be instructed in the lumbopelvic stabilization program. Additionally, during the initial session, these participants receive a sacroiliac compression belt and be instructed to wear the belt during all waking hours for the first four weeks of the study.

Behavioral: Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise
The objective of this exercise program is to recruit and train the primary stabilizing muscles of the spine in order for them to more appropriately support the spine. Participants will complete 4 different exercises daily: one in supine, one in standing, one in quadruped, and one in a side-bridge position. The dosage for each exercise is 20 reps with an 8 second hold. In supine, the first exercise is the abdominal drawing-in maneuver. In standing, the first exercise is the abdominal drawing-in maneuver. In quadruped, the first exercise is alternating arm lifts. The final exercise is the side-bridge hold. Participants will then be asked to attend supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 2 weeks and once a week for another 2 weeks. They will be instructed to perform the exercises at home daily for a total of 12 weeks as well as complete a compliance log. Progression of the stabilization program will be determined by the physical therapist based on pre-established criteria.

Device: Sacroiliac joint belt
The belt should be worn low around the pelvis just above the greater trochanter and instructed to wear the belt during all waking hours of the first four weeks of the study. The treating physical therapist will monitor the placement of belts during each exercise session. Belt usage logs will be given to each participant to assess compliance with wearing the belt.

Active Comparator: Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise

The participants will be instructed in the lumbopelvic stabilization program.

Behavioral: Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise
The objective of this exercise program is to recruit and train the primary stabilizing muscles of the spine in order for them to more appropriately support the spine. Participants will complete 4 different exercises daily: one in supine, one in standing, one in quadruped, and one in a side-bridge position. The dosage for each exercise is 20 reps with an 8 second hold. In supine, the first exercise is the abdominal drawing-in maneuver. In standing, the first exercise is the abdominal drawing-in maneuver. In quadruped, the first exercise is alternating arm lifts. The final exercise is the side-bridge hold. Participants will then be asked to attend supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 2 weeks and once a week for another 2 weeks. They will be instructed to perform the exercises at home daily for a total of 12 weeks as well as complete a compliance log. Progression of the stabilization program will be determined by the physical therapist based on pre-established criteria.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire [Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks]

    The Modified Oswestry Back Pain Questionnaire(OSW) will be used to determine Low back pain-related disability. The OSW consists of 10 items assessing different aspects of pain and function related to LBP. Each item is scored 0-5. The item scores are summed and multiplied by 2 to get the total disability score. The total score reported can range from 0-100 with 0 representing no disability and higher scores representing greater disability.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks]

    The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is an 11-point scale with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst imaginable pain." This scale will be used to assess pain intensity.

  2. Percent Change of Muscle Thickness for the Transverse Abdominis (TrA) [Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks]

    The percent change of muscle thickness of the TrA will be assessed using ultrasound imaging. The deep abdominal muscles will be imaged in brightness mode (b-mode) using the SonoSite M-Turbo Ultrasound System. A 2-5 MHz broad spectrum curvilinear transducer will be used to obtain the images. Images were saved for offline analysis using ImageJ software. The muscle thickness for each muscle was determined by the linear distance between the upper and lower fascial lines at the midpoint of the muscle as measured by ImageJ Software. The percent change of muscle thickness was calculated using the following formula: (contracted thickness - resting thickness)/ resting thickness x 100%.

  3. Change in Global Rating of Change (GROC) Scale [4 weeks, 12 weeks]

    The GROC scale will be used to assess the participants' overall perception of improvement since the beginning the interventions. This is a scale ranging from -7 ("a very great deal worse") to 0 ("about the same") to +7 ("a very great deal better").

  4. Percent Change of Muscle Thickness for Internal Oblique [Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks]

    The percent change of muscle thickness of the Internal Oblique will be assessed using ultrasound imaging. The deep abdominal muscles will be imaged in brightness mode (b-mode) using the SonoSite M-Turbo Ultrasound System. A 2-5 MHz broad spectrum curvilinear transducer will be used to obtain the images. Images were saved for offline analysis using ImageJ software. The muscle thickness for was determined by the linear distance between the upper and lower fascial lines at the midpoint of the muscle as measured by ImageJ Software. The percent change of muscle thickness was calculated using the following formula: (contracted thickness - resting thickness)/ resting thickness x 100%.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • unilateral pain near the sacroiliac joint that does not extend pass the knee

  • positive result on 2 of 6 sacroiliac joint provocation tests:

  • compression test

  • distraction test

  • posterior shear test

  • Gaenslens' test (left and right)

  • sacral thrust test

Exclusion Criteria:
  • current pregnancy or pregnancy in the last 6 months

  • history of surgery to lumbar spine, pelvis, chest, abdomen

  • history of congenital lumbar or pelvic anomalies

  • any neurological signs in the lower extremity

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Texas Woman's University Dallas Texas United States 75235

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Texas Woman's University
  • Texas Physical Therapy Association

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kelli J Brizzolara, MS, Texas Woman's University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Kelli Brizzolara, Graduate student, Texas Woman's University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01559948
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 16931
First Posted:
Mar 21, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Oct 7, 2019
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by Kelli Brizzolara, Graduate student, Texas Woman's University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details This study was a single blinded, mixed-design randomized clinical trial that was conducted in Dallas, Texas from January 2012 to December 2013. Thirty participants with SIJ pain who were not seeking medical care were recruited for this study via flyers and word of mouth marketing.
Pre-assignment Detail Exclusion criteria were current pregnancy or pregnancy in the last six months, history of surgery to the lumbar spine, pelvis, chest, or abdomen, history of congenital lumbar or pelvic anomalies, any neurological signs in the lower extremity, systemic arthritis, and history of pelvic fracture.
Arm/Group Title Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exc + Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise
Arm/Group Description The participants will be instructed in the same lumbopelvic stabilization program. Additionally, during the initial session, those participants randomly assigned to the lumbopelvic stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt. Sacroiliac joint belt: Those participants randomly assigned to the lumbopelvic stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt. They will be taught how to don/doff the belt and instructed to wear the belt during all waking hours for the first 4 weeks of the study. The belt should be worn low around the pelvis just above the greater trochanter. The treating physical therapist will monitor the placement of belts during each exercise session. Belt usage logs will be given to each participant to assess compliance with wearing the belt. The participants will be instructed in a lumbopelvic stabilization program. Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise: The objective of this exercise program is to recruit and train the primary stabilizing muscles of the spine in order for them to more appropriately support the spine. Participants will then be asked to attend supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 2 weeks and once a week for another 2 weeks. They will be instructed to perform the exercises at home daily for a total of 12 weeks as well as complete a compliance log. Progression of the stabilization program will be determined by the physical therapist based on pre-established criteria.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 15 15
COMPLETED 15 15
NOT COMPLETED 0 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exc + Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exc Total
Arm/Group Description These participants received a lumbopelvic exercise program plus a pelvic compression belt to wear for the the first four weeks of the study. The participants received a lumbopelvic exercise program. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 15 15 30
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
28.5
(10.6)
35.5
(12.2)
31.8
(11.8)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
13
86.7%
12
80%
25
83.3%
Male
2
13.3%
3
20%
5
16.7%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
15
100%
15
100%
30
100%
Pain Intensity (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
3.00
(1.96)
2.73
(1.34)
2.9
(1.7)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire
Description The Modified Oswestry Back Pain Questionnaire(OSW) will be used to determine Low back pain-related disability. The OSW consists of 10 items assessing different aspects of pain and function related to LBP. Each item is scored 0-5. The item scores are summed and multiplied by 2 to get the total disability score. The total score reported can range from 0-100 with 0 representing no disability and higher scores representing greater disability.
Time Frame Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise Plus Sacroiliac Joint Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise
Arm/Group Description The participants will be instructed in the same lumbopelvic stabilization program. Additionally, during the initial session, those participants randomly assigned to the lumbopelvic stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt. Sacroiliac joint belt: Those participants randomly assigned to the lumbopelvic stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt. They will be taught how to don/doff the belt and instructed to wear the belt during all waking hours for the first 4 weeks of the study. The belt should be worn low around the pelvis just above the greater trochanter. The treating physical therapist will monitor the placement of belts during each exercise session. Belt usage logs will be given to each participant to assess compliance with wearing the belt. The participants will be instructed in a lumbopelvic stabilization program. Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise: The objective of this exercise program is to recruit and train the primary stabilizing muscles of the spine in order for them to more appropriately support the spine. Participants will then be asked to attend supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 2 weeks and once a week for another 2 weeks. They will be instructed to perform the exercises at home daily for a total of 12 weeks as well as complete a compliance log. Progression of the stabilization program will be determined by the physical therapist based on pre-established criteria.
Measure Participants 15 15
Baseline
26.00
(10.42)
24.40
(9.86)
4 weeks
17.20
(10.41)
14.67
(6.49)
12 weeks
14.27
(10.08)
10.00
(8.32)
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Description The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is an 11-point scale with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst imaginable pain." This scale will be used to assess pain intensity.
Time Frame Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exc + Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise
Arm/Group Description The participants will be instructed in the same lumbopelvic stabilization program. Additionally, during the initial session, those participants randomly assigned to the lumbopelvic stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt. Sacroiliac joint belt: Those participants randomly assigned to the lumbopelvic stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt. They will be taught how to don/doff the belt and instructed to wear the belt during all waking hours for the first 4 weeks of the study. The belt should be worn low around the pelvis just above the greater trochanter. The treating physical therapist will monitor the placement of belts during each exercise session. Belt usage logs will be given to each participant to assess compliance with wearing the belt. The participants will be instructed in a lumbopelvic stabilization program. Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise: The objective of this exercise program is to recruit and train the primary stabilizing muscles of the spine in order for them to more appropriately support the spine. Participants will then be asked to attend supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 2 weeks and once a week for another 2 weeks. They will be instructed to perform the exercises at home daily for a total of 12 weeks as well as complete a compliance log. Progression of the stabilization program will be determined by the physical therapist based on pre-established criteria.
Measure Participants 15 15
Baseline
3.00
(1.96)
2.73
(1.34)
4 weeks
1.20
(1.70)
1.60
(1.88)
12 weeks
1.07
(1.53)
1.07
(1.58)
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Percent Change of Muscle Thickness for the Transverse Abdominis (TrA)
Description The percent change of muscle thickness of the TrA will be assessed using ultrasound imaging. The deep abdominal muscles will be imaged in brightness mode (b-mode) using the SonoSite M-Turbo Ultrasound System. A 2-5 MHz broad spectrum curvilinear transducer will be used to obtain the images. Images were saved for offline analysis using ImageJ software. The muscle thickness for each muscle was determined by the linear distance between the upper and lower fascial lines at the midpoint of the muscle as measured by ImageJ Software. The percent change of muscle thickness was calculated using the following formula: (contracted thickness - resting thickness)/ resting thickness x 100%.
Time Frame Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise Plus Sacroiliac Joint Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Excercise
Arm/Group Description These participants received a lumbopelvic exercise program plus a pelvic compression belt to wear for the the first four weeks of the study. The participants received a lumbopelvic exercise program.
Measure Participants 15 15
Baseline
66.52
(21.40)
81.00
(39.53)
4 weeks
141.93
(39.39)
170.24
(63.95)
12 weeks
96.48
(60.44)
77.02
(40.81)
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Global Rating of Change (GROC) Scale
Description The GROC scale will be used to assess the participants' overall perception of improvement since the beginning the interventions. This is a scale ranging from -7 ("a very great deal worse") to 0 ("about the same") to +7 ("a very great deal better").
Time Frame 4 weeks, 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Lumbopelvic Stabilization Excercise Plus Sacroiliac Joint Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Excercise
Arm/Group Description These participants received a lumbopelvic exercise program plus a pelvic compression belt to wear for the the first four weeks of the study. The participants received a lumbopelvic exercise program.
Measure Participants 15 15
4 weeks
3.13
(2.10)
3.13
(2.39)
12 weeks
4.40
(2.29)
4.20
(2.21)
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Percent Change of Muscle Thickness for Internal Oblique
Description The percent change of muscle thickness of the Internal Oblique will be assessed using ultrasound imaging. The deep abdominal muscles will be imaged in brightness mode (b-mode) using the SonoSite M-Turbo Ultrasound System. A 2-5 MHz broad spectrum curvilinear transducer will be used to obtain the images. Images were saved for offline analysis using ImageJ software. The muscle thickness for was determined by the linear distance between the upper and lower fascial lines at the midpoint of the muscle as measured by ImageJ Software. The percent change of muscle thickness was calculated using the following formula: (contracted thickness - resting thickness)/ resting thickness x 100%.
Time Frame Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise Plus Sacroiliac Joint Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Excercise
Arm/Group Description These participants received a lumbopelvic exercise program plus a pelvic compression belt to wear for the the first four weeks of the study. The participants received a lumbopelvic exercise program.
Measure Participants 15 15
Baseline
8.23
(11.59)
5.90
(14.49)
4 weeks
-21.58
(6.89)
-18.68
(9.59)
12 weeks
6.37
(12.34)
7.65
(14.55)

Adverse Events

Time Frame 1 year
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exc + Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise
Arm/Group Description The participants will be instructed in the same lumbopelvic stabilization program. Additionally, during the initial session, those participants randomly assigned to the lumbopelvic stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt. Sacroiliac joint belt: Those participants randomly assigned to the lumbopelvic stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt. They will be taught how to don/doff the belt and instructed to wear the belt during all waking hours for the first 4 weeks of the study. The belt should be worn low around the pelvis just above the greater trochanter. The treating physical therapist will monitor the placement of belts during each exercise session. Belt usage logs will be given to each participant to assess compliance with wearing the belt. The participants will be instructed in a lumbopelvic stabilization program. Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise: The objective of this exercise program is to recruit and train the primary stabilizing muscles of the spine in order for them to more appropriately support the spine. Participants will then be asked to attend supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 2 weeks and once a week for another 2 weeks. They will be instructed to perform the exercises at home daily for a total of 12 weeks as well as complete a compliance log. Progression of the stabilization program will be determined by the physical therapist based on pre-established criteria.
All Cause Mortality
Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exc + Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exc + Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exc + Belt Lumbopelvic Stabilization Exercise
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/15 (0%) 0/15 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Dr. Kelli Brizzolara
Organization Texas Woman's University
Phone 214-689-7722
Email kbrizzolara@twu.edu
Responsible Party:
Kelli Brizzolara, Graduate student, Texas Woman's University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01559948
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 16931
First Posted:
Mar 21, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Oct 7, 2019
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2019