Effects of Manipulative Therapy and Pain Education in Individuals With CLBP

Sponsor
Santa Catarina Federal University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02982382
Collaborator
(none)
128
1
2
24
5.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The burden of low back pain more than doubled in the last 20 years, probably caused by biopsychosocial factors. Some noninvasive treatments have been applied in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain as spinal manipulation and pain education. However, it is not already clear the neurophysiological effects of these treatments.The purpose of this research is to verify the effects of the technique of spinal manipulation and pain education in individuals with chronic low back pain

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Manipulative Therapy
  • Other: Pain Education
  • Other: Sham
N/A

Detailed Description

The outcomes will be subjective pain (measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale), pressure pain threshold (measured by Algometer), disability (measured by Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), fear and avoidance beliefs (measured by Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire), risk of poor prognosis (measured by STarT Back Screening Tool), quality of life (measured by Short Form-12v2) and blood biomarkers (measured by ELISA). The data will be collected by a blinded assessor.

Individuals eligibility is going to be assessed by blinded assessor to determine if they are or not eligible for this research. Then, they will be informed about the objectives of this study and asked to sign the consent form. Afterward, the sociodemographic data will be recorded. The data related to the research outcomes will be collected by the blinded assessor at baseline assessment, after six weeks and three months.

Random Allocation Before the treatment begins, one of the researchers not involved in the recruiting and assessment will allocate the individuals in one of the groups. Block randomization will be used; it is going to generate by randomization.com, this site will create a list with the randomization sequence, which will be only seen by the physical therapists that will treat the individuals.

Statistical Methods

Sample size calculation The sample size calculation was calculated with the A-priori test with the following specifications: Statistical test ANCOVA, the effect size of 0.25, the statistical power of 80%, and an alpha level of 5%. As a result, the study requires a sample size of 64 per group or 128 individuals in total.

Analysis of effects of treatment Our research will use the intention-to-treat principles. The descriptive data and the scores of RMDQ, SBST, FABQ, SF-12v2 and NPRS as well as the pressure pain threshold means and the values of inflammatory biomarkers, before and after interventions, will be tabbed on Microsoft Excel 2010. To see the effect of treatment is going to be used statistical based on intention-to-treat principles, statistical analyses will be used to analyses data of individuals socio-demographics and clinics characteristics, and they will be presented by mean and standard deviation. To compare the groups, Shapiro-Wilk test will be applied to test the normality distribution of data, depending on this distribution will be used ANOVA one-way for parametric data or Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric data. To compare groups on the pre-intervention period another ANOVA-one way or another Kruskal-Wallis will be applied.

Covariance analysis (ANCOVA) will be conducted to assess the effect of treatment on the following outcomes: Scores obtained on RMDQ, FABQ, SF-12v2, SBST and NPRS, pressure pain threshold and the blood biomarkers concentrations, utilizing the post-treatment means as dependent variables, the pre-treatment means as co-variables and the group as fixed factor.

To the relationships among the variables must be applied the Pearson correlation coefficient to parametric data and Spearman correlation coefficient to nonparametric data. To classify the relationships will be used the Munro's classification, where values between 0.26 and 0.49 will be low, values between 0.50 and 0.69 will be moderate, between 0.70 and 0.89 will be high values, and between 0.90 and 1.0 will be considered very high. For all of these analyses will be used the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS version 20.0, IBM Corp, Armonk, New York).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
128 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Neurophysiological and Functional Effects of Manipulative Therapy and Pain Education in Individuals With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Manipulative Treatment

Subjects will receive Manipulative Therapy

Other: Manipulative Therapy
Subjects will receive techniques of High Velocity and Low Amplitude (HVLA) or grade V manipulation to the lumbar region (lumbar roll), and pain education based on the biopsychosocial approach.
Other Names:
  • Manual Therapy
  • Grade V Manipulation
  • Spinal Manipulation
  • Other: Pain Education
    Individuals will receive pain education based in a biopsychosocial approach
    Other Names:
  • Neuroscience Pain Education
  • Sham Comparator: Pain Education

    Subjects will receive Pain Education and manual contact over lumbar region

    Other: Pain Education
    Individuals will receive pain education based in a biopsychosocial approach
    Other Names:
  • Neuroscience Pain Education
  • Other: Sham
    The individuals will receive a simulation of spinal manipulation (sham) involving manual contact over lumbar region totaling 5 minutes.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Pain Intensity [6 weeks after randomization]

      Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Pain Intensity [Baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    2. Disabilty [baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)

    3. Pressure Pain Threshold [Baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      The pressure pain threshold will be assessed by algometer. It will be realized three times in each point (Five centimeters of the right and left side of the spinal process of L1, L3 and L5, and on the muscle belly of tibialis anterior).

    4. Fear and Beliefs about pain [Baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ)

    5. Risk of poor prognosis [Baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST)

    6. Quality of Life [Baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months]

      Short-Form Health Survey 12 version 2 (SF-12v2)

    7. Serum Level of Cytokines [Baseline, 6 weeks]

      Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) to TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-10, IL-15, MIP-4, CCL18, MCP-3 / CCL7, MCP-2 / CCL8, IGP - 10 / CXCL10, Stromal Lymphopoietin Receptor (TSLR), Interferon Gamma and CRP.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 65 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Chronic episodes of nonspecific LBP for at least six months

    • Pain on movement for at least one direction (flexion, extension, side bending or rotation of the trunk)

    • At least score 3 in NPRS.

    Exclusion Criteria:
      1. Previous history of lumbar myelopathy, rheumatic disease, tumors, peripheral or central neurological disorders
      1. Historical of trauma, fracture or surgery in lumbar region;
      1. Nerve root compression signs: important muscle weakness affecting lower limb, decrease or abolish of patellar and calcaneus reflex and decrease of dermatomes sensibility of lower limbs.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Santa Catarina Federal University Florianopolis Santa Catarina Brazil 88040-900

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Santa Catarina Federal University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Clécio Vier, PhD Student, Santa Catarina Federal University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Clecio Vier, Principal Investigator, Santa Catarina Federal University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02982382
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Cvier
    • U1111-1190-4899
    First Posted:
    Dec 5, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 25, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2019
    Keywords provided by Clecio Vier, Principal Investigator, Santa Catarina Federal University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 25, 2019