A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) in Low Back Pain Patients
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Objectives:
Determine the efficacy of the SNAG technique (Mulligan) applied to a subgroup of people with non-specific low back pain (LBP) on two new kinematic-algorythms, on pain, functional disability and kinesiophobia.
Design:
A randomized double blinded placebo controlled trial with double arms in accordance with the CONSORT statement.
Subjects:
Patients with non-specific low back pain will be recruting from Saint-Luc hospital, only a subgroup of them will be included according to specific inclusion criteria tailored for indication of application of SNAG's therapy (Mulligan technique applied on the lumbar spine).
Method:
Subjects will be randomized in 2 groups; real-SNAG and sham-SNAG groups. All patients will be treated during a single session, and real/sham SNAG will be applied from a sitting position with the belt, and in a flexion direction. Two kinematic-algorythms (ROM and Speed) from a validated kinematic spine model will be used and recorded with an opto-electronic device (BTS-Elite). Pain at rest and during flexion, as well as functional disability and kinesiophobia will be recorded by self-reported measures. These outcomes will be blindly evaluated before and after treatment to compare both groups with " Two-Way-ANOVA " statistic with for factors; time and groups.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Real SNAG A real sustained natural apophyseal glide (SNAG / Mulligan technique) applied on the lumbar spine from a sitting position, and in a trunk flexion direction with the use of the belt. |
Device: SNAG
sustained natural apophyseal glide: SNAG / Mulligan technique
|
| Placebo Comparator: Sham SNAG A sham (placebo) sustained natural apophyseal glide (SNAG / Mulligan technique) applied on the lumbar spine from a sitting position, and in a trunk flexion direction with the use of the belt. |
Device: Sham
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Kinematic spine model (Hidalgo et al 2012 Journal of rehabilitation medicine) [Change from baseline until discharge of treatment (same day, single session)]
Use of quantitative variables for ROM and SPEED kinematic (Logit scores index)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Oswestry Disability questionnaire [change from baseline until 2 weeks after treatment]
- present pain with visual analog scale (VAS) [change from baseline and after treatment the same day (single session)]
- Tampa scale for kinesiophobia [change from baseline until two weeks after treatment]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- non-specific LBP, mechanical LBP with a pain in flexion direction, the pain in flexion is reduce with the application of SNAG therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- specific LBP, non-mechanical LBP, the pain is not release in a flexion direction when SNAG is appllied
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | READ LAB / Tour Pasteur / Saint-Luc Hospital | Brussels | Belgium | 1200 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Université Catholique de Louvain
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Hidalgo B, Gilliaux M, Poncin W, Detrembleur C. Reliability and validity of a kinematic spine model during active trunk movement in healthy subjects and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):756-63. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1015.
- Hidalgo B, Gobert F, Bragard D, Detrembleur C. Effects of proprioceptive disruption on lumbar spine repositioning error in a trunk forward bending task. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(4):381-7. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130396.
- Hidalgo B, Hall T, Nielens H, Detrembleur C. Intertester agreement and validity of identifying lumbar pain provocative movement patterns using active and passive accessory movement tests. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Feb;37(2):105-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.09.006. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
- Moutzouri M, Billis E, Strimpakos N, Kottika P, Oldham JA. The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Oct 1;9:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-131.
- IoNS-UCL-Hidalgo-02