Combined Treatment of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise in Patients With Low Back Pain

Sponsor
University of Alcala (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04384185
Collaborator
(none)
42
1
2
7.4
5.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

MAIN OBJECTIVE: to assess whether an exercise protocol on the lumbar musculature by adding manual therapy techniques on the diaphragm muscle has the same or greater effect on chronic non-specific lumbar pain than an isolated exercise protocol.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the effectiveness of a lumbar exercise protocol in chronic non-specific low back pain in isolation; To evaluate the effectiveness of both therapies in improving joint range in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain and, finally, to assess catastrophism and the avoidance of lumbar mobility when carrying out loaded movements.

HYPOTHESIS: that a lumbar exercise protocol combined with manual therapy treatment on the diaphragm is equal or more effective on pain in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain than treatment with the same lumbar exercise protocol in isolation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Exercise protocol
  • Other: Manual therapy
N/A

Detailed Description

METHODOLOGY: A prospective randomized clinical trial with two types of intervention (lumbar exercise protocol and manual diaphragm therapy) will be carried out. The variables to be measured are pain, disability, mobility and kinesiophobia. It will be performed in two groups of 21 people who are of legal age, who have low back pain of more than 3 months duration and which is of non-specific origin.

The patients will be randomized and divided into two groups A (control) and B (experimental).

Group A will undergo an exercise protocol.

Group B will undergo the same protocol plus manual therapy techniques on diaphragm muscle. Study participants will have treatment twice a week for 8 weeks, the first information session and the second measurement-evaluation session in the first week of treatment. In the following 3 weeks the session will last 40 minutes for both groups. In the 4th week the established measurements will be carried out again.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
42 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomized clinical trialRandomized clinical trial
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effectiveness of a Therapeutic Exercise Protocol Combined With Manual Therapy Techniques on the Diaphragm Muscle in Patients With Low Back Pain
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 30, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 15, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Group A: Exercise therapy

Group A: will perform an exercise protocol to improve the stability of the spine muscle of low-back

Other: Exercise protocol
Exercises: Pelvic tilt. brinding. cuadruped arm/leg raise. Abdominal strengthening exercises. Low-back muscles stretching. The side bridge. Side leg separation

Experimental: Group B. Manual therapy and exercises

Group B: Will be treated with manual therapy in the diaphragm muscle and the same protocol of therapeutic exercise applied in group A

Other: Exercise protocol
Exercises: Pelvic tilt. brinding. cuadruped arm/leg raise. Abdominal strengthening exercises. Low-back muscles stretching. The side bridge. Side leg separation

Other: Manual therapy
Functional diaphragm balancing technique: gentle vertical pressure was applied for 5 minutes at the diaphragm level. Muscle fiber stretching technique: a cranial traction was performed from the lower edge of the costal arches during the inspiratory breathing phase, for more than 10 respiratory cycles. Phrenic-center inhibition technique (Figure 3C): the soft tissue was pumped during the expiratory phase by gently and simultaneously using both hands to create pressure in cranial and caudal direction, for more than 10 respiratory cycles.
Other Names:
  • Myofascial manipulation
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Low-back pain [Change from Baseline disability at 3 months]

      The investigators use a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to determine the intensity of the patient with lowback pain.The VAS is a 100-mm line, oriented horizontally, with one end representing "no pain" and ten the other end representing "worst pain." Subjects will be asked to rate their current pain with a mark on the scale.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Disability with Oswestry Disability Index [Change from Baseline disability at 3 months]

      The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a questionnaire used by clinicians and researchers to quantify disability for low back pain.The self-completed questionnaire contains ten topics concerning intensity of pain, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel.Each topic category is followed by 6 statements describing different potential scenarios in the patient's life relating to the topic. The patient then checks the statement which most closely resembles their situation. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible

    2. Lumbar range of motion [Change from Baseline disability at 3 months]

      Mobility. It will be measured using an electronic inclinometer.The TiltMeter© -advanced level and inclinometer app is an inclinometer app of iPhone®. The investigation has demonstrated that the app possesses good to excellent reliability (ICC ≥ 0.77) and concurrent validity with a gravity-based inclinometer (r ≥ 0.86) for measuring standing isolated lumbar flexion and extension range of movement

    3. Kinesiophobia [Change from Baseline disability at 3 months]

      Kinesiophobia was measured by an 11-item version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). The 11 items of the scale each have 4 response options; all anchored with the answers "strongly disagree", which scores 1 point, and "strongly agree", which scores 4 points. The total sum score is calculated and can range between 11 and 44 points. A high score indicates strong fear of movement/(re)injury, i.e. high kinesiophobia. TSK-11 has been psychometrically evaluated and has shown good construct validity and reliability among older people (i.e. internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, 0.74-0.87) and test-retest reliability (ICC r = 0.747)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 70 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Legal age

    • Non-specific Low-Back pain

    • Pain more 3 months

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • subjects with lumbar herniation.

    • Spine canal stenosis

    • Subjects with neurological disease.

    • Lumbar surgery

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Grupo Fisioterapia y Dolor Alcala de Henares Madrid Spain 28871

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Alcala

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Tomas Gallego Izquierdo, PhD, Alcala University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Prof. Dr. Daniel Pecos Martín, PhD. Daniel Pecos Martín, University of Alcala
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04384185
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CEIM/HU/2020/12
    First Posted:
    May 12, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 28, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 28, 2021