Efficacy of a Supervised Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Program vs Nonsupervised in Non-specific Low Back Pain
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study compares the efficacy of a supervised rehabilitation program vs a non supervised rehabilitation program on pain, disability, quality of life and kinesiophobia in patients with non-specific low back pain.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Low back pain is one of the most common problems of population, being a priority for health systems. It has got a high prevalence and recurrence, affecting in a social and economic way, and, it is one of principal causes of laboral absenteism. A randomized clinical trial will be conducted comparing a supervised physical therapy rehabilitation program vs a non supervised rehabilitation program.
Objective: to compare the efficacy of a supervised rehabilitation program vs a non supervised rehabilitation program in patients with non-specific low back pain.
Methods: Sixt-four subjects with chronic non-specific low back pain will be assigned to supervised rehabilitation program or non supervised rehabilitation program during 4 weeks (5 sessions/week). Outcomes measures will be the following: disability, pain intensity, fear of movement, quality of life, McQuade Test, and lumbar mobility flexion.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Supervised Rehabilitation program It will be consist in a supervised exercise program by physical therapist, including the following structures: diaphragm, tranverse abdominis muscle, pelvic, gluteus, CORE and spinal mobility |
Other: Supervised exercise program
It will consist in a supervised exercise program, including the following exercises:
Diaphragmatic breathing.
Transverse abdomLateral leg raise for gluteus mediuminis muscle activation.
Pelvic swing.
Gluteus bridge.
Spinal mobility.
Spinal extensor muscles strengthening
Frontal plank
Side plank.
Lateral leg raise for gluteus medium
|
Active Comparator: Nonsupervised rehabilitation program It will consist in an exercise program for home, nonsupervised, including the following structures: diaphragm, tranverse abdominis muscle, pelvic, gluteus, CORE and spinal mobility. The patients will perform an exercise program at home. |
Other: Non supervised exercise program
It will consist in a non supervised exercise program, including the following exercises:
Diaphragmatic breathing.
Transverse abdomLateral leg raise for gluteus mediuminis muscle activation.
Pelvic swing.
Gluteus bridge.
Spinal mobility.
Spinal extensor muscles strengthening
Frontal plank
Side plank.
Lateral leg raise for gluteus medium
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change from baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) [at baseline,immediate post-treatment and at 6 months]
This is a self-reported questionnaire consisting in 24 items reflecting limitations in different activities of daily living attributed to low back pain including walking, vending over, sitting, lying down, dressing, sleeping, self-care and daily activities
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change from baseline in disability. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. [At baseline, immediate post-treatment and at 6 months]
It has 10 items associated to activities of daily living, each item has a puntuation fron 0 to 5 points
- Change from baseline in pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale). [At baseline, immediate post-treatment and at 6 months]
A 10-point Numerical Pain Scale (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) assesses the intensity of pain
- Change from baseline in Fear of Movement. Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia. [At baseline, immediate post-treatment and at 6 months]
It is a 17-item questionnaire that measures the fear of movement and (re)injury
- Change from baseline on Quality of Life. [At baseline, immediate post-treatment and at 6 months]
SF-36 Health questionnaire scores range from 0 to 100% and indicate the self-perceived health-related quality of life.
- Change from Mcquade Test [at baseline, immediate post-treatment and at 6 months]
It measures the isometric endurance of trunk flexion muscles
- Change from baseline in lumbar mobility flexion [at baseline, immediate post-treatment and at 6 months]
It is determined by measuring the finger-to-floor distance.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Chronic non-specific low back pain persisting ≥ 3 months.
-
Age between 18 and 65 years.
-
A score ≥ 4 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.
-
Not currently receiving physical therapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Presence of lumbar stenosis.
-
Presence of clinical signs of radiculopathy.
-
Diagnosis of spondylolisthesis.
-
Diagnosis of fibromyalgia.
-
Treatment with corticosteroid or pharmachological medication within the paset 2 weeks.
-
A history of spinal surgery.
-
Central or peripheral nervous system disease.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Universidad de Almería | Almería | Andalucía | Spain | 04120 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Universidad de Almeria
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó JM. [The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): an instrument for measuring clinical results]. Med Clin (Barc). 1995 May 27;104(20):771-6. Spanish.
- Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):482-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60610-7. Epub 2011 Oct 6. Review.
- Delitto A, George SZ, Van Dillen L, Whitman JM, Sowa G, Shekelle P, Denninger TR, Godges JJ; Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;42(4):A1-57. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.42.4.A1. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
- Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. Review.
- GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6. Erratum in: Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):e1.
- Hu H, Zheng Y, Wang X, Chen B, Dong Y, Zhang J, Liu X, Gong D. Correlations between lumbar neuromuscular function and pain, lumbar disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(36):e7991. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007991.
- Jubany J, Danneels L, Angulo-Barroso R. The influence of fatigue and chronic low back pain on muscle recruitment patterns following an unexpected external perturbation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 19;18(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1523-3.
- Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Benyamin RM, Hirsch JA. Epidemiology of low back pain in adults. Neuromodulation. 2014 Oct;17 Suppl 2:3-10. doi: 10.1111/ner.12018. Review.
- Marshall PWM, Schabrun S, Knox MF. Physical activity and the mediating effect of fear, depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing on pain related disability in people with chronic low back pain. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180788. eCollection 2017.
- Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3115-24. Review. Erratum in: Spine 2001 Apr 1;26(7):847.
- Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):141-4.
- Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):145-50.
- Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3130-9. Review.
- UAL-476