Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Using Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Versus Steroid/Anesthetic

Sponsor
University of Utah (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05121961
Collaborator
Radiological Society of North America (Other)
50
2
2
28.2
25
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if platelet-rich plasma is superior to steroid/anesthetic for the treatment of sacroiliac joint pain.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Sacroiliac intra-articular injection
N/A

Detailed Description

All patients with sacroiliac joint pain diagnosed by a back pain specialist will undergo physical examination maneuvers and a test lidocaine injection of the joint. Patients who meet eligibility requirements will be randomized in a single-blind randomized controlled manner with a 50% chance of receiving platelet-rich plasma versus steroid/anesthetic injection of the sacroiliac joint(s).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Single-blind randomized controlled trialSingle-blind randomized controlled trial
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
Patients will be blinded to which injectate they received.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Using Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Regenerative Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Comparison With Steroid/Anesthetic Injection With Advanced MR Analysis
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 22, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Platelet-rich Plasma

Patients will receive an intra-articular injection 3 mL of autologous platelet-rich plasma in the sacroiliac joint.

Procedure: Sacroiliac intra-articular injection
CT guided injection of platelet-rich plasma versus steroid/anesthetic into the sacroiliac joint

Active Comparator: Steroid/Anesthetic

Patients will receive an intra-articular injection 40 mg Depo-medrol mixed with 2 mL 0.25% bupivicaine in the sacroiliac joint.

Procedure: Sacroiliac intra-articular injection
CT guided injection of platelet-rich plasma versus steroid/anesthetic into the sacroiliac joint

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Numeric Rating Scale [Change between baseline and 3-months post-intervention]

    Validated pain scale rating pain on a scale of 0 through 10. 0 for no pain, and 10 for the highest pain the patient can imagine.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire [Change between baseline and 3-months post-intervention]

    Validated questionnaire used to evaluate function in patients with low back pain. The final score/index ranges from 0-100. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed-bound.

  2. Short-Form 12 Survey [Change between baseline and 3-months post-intervention]

    Validated survey used to evaluate function in patients with low back pain. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.

  3. Functional testing [Change between baseline and 3-months post-intervention]

    2 validated tests for low back pain "get up and go," "5 time sit to stand." Shorter times indicate better physical function, and longer times indicate poorer physical function.

  4. Opiate/pain medication usage questionnaire [Change between baseline and 3-months post-intervention]

    Questionnaire on type, dose, and frequency of pain medications being used by the patient. All opiates will be converted to the morphine milligram equivalent scale with lower values indicating lower opiate content and higher values indicating higher opiate content

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult (>18 y/o) males and females referred for therapeutic injection to the investigators spine interventional service by a physiatrist or pain anesthesiologist with a clinical diagnosis of SIJ pain confirmed by history

  • 50% or greater reduction in pain by a diagnostic anesthetic block using no more than 1.5 cc 2% lidocaine performed under imaging guidance by a pain interventionalist (PM&R, Pain Anesthesia, or Neuroradiology Spine Intervention).

  • Baseline pain must be >/=4 by numeric rating scale (NRS), at least 6 weeks in chronicity, and must not be multi-factorial (related to radiculopathy or axial pain localizing elsewhere) by physical examination or confounding medical history (infection, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy, or osseous metastatic disease).

Exclusion Criteria:
  • SIJ steroid treatment within the prior 6 months.

  • Patients with a history of infection currently on antibiotic therapy

  • Usage of systemic immunosuppressants

  • Pregnancy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah United States 84132
2 Veterans Administration Salt Lake City Health Care System Salt Lake City Utah United States 84148

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Utah
  • Radiological Society of North America

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Miriam Peckham, MD, University of Utah

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Miriam Peckham, Assistant Professor, University of Utah
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05121961
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RSCH1923
First Posted:
Nov 16, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Nov 16, 2021
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 16, 2021